
Paul Hollywood has judged every season of ‘Bake Off’
“Top Gun: Maverick” was not the first “legacy-quel” — a nostalgia play sequel years or decades after the original that effectively remakes the original for a younger audience — but it is the benchmark for which all legacy-quels hope to strive. With $1.5 billion worldwide, it’s possibly the only example of a legacy sequel that not only lives up to the original but surpasses it.
And it’s why we will keep getting movies like “The Devil Wears Prada 2” from now until these movies consistently stop doing well. The sequel to 2006’s “The Devil Wears Prada” made $233.6 million worldwide this weekend, making it the second-highest opening of the year (behind “The Super Mario Galaxy Movie”). It did incredibly well internationally and actually opened slightly below expectations domestic with $77 million in North America. And, not factoring in inflation, the sequel has already made 72 percent of what the original made in its lifetime of $326.5 million worldwide.
It wasn’t a given that “Prada 2” would be a runaway (runway?) hit, even if the star power of Anne Hathaway and Emily Blunt has grown exponentially since the original came out. Last year, Disney released a legacy-quel to another 20+ year old comedy, “Freakier Friday,” which did fine but topped out at $153.1 million, which “Prada 2” surpassed on its international gross alone. “Tron: Ares” from last year was a legacy-quel to a legacy-quel, and it bombed hard with $142 million against a $220 million budget.
Clearly the nostalgia was there, and the word of mouth helped the film live up to the hype. The film got an A- CinemaScore, respectable critic reviews, and theaters themselves helped activate their audiences. Theater chains like Alamo, Cinemark, and Cinergy had dress-up costume screenings; Regal had photo booths and cosmetics “Glam Stations”; and EVO Entertainment had a “Cerulean” colored cocktail and even a “Luxury Claw Machine” that let guests try to win a designer handbag.
Part of the other reason the legacy-quel is now so common and enduring has plenty to do with streaming. When a new sequel comes out, everyone goes back to watch the original first, duh. Month over month between March and April, streaming of the original “Devil Wears Prada” was up a whopping 428 percent, according to Nielsen. Executives love to see it, because it all factors into the calculations of what makes a movie profitable in the modern age.
Rival studios are also going to be looking at “The Devil Wears Prada 2” very closely. Coming up, we’ll be seeing legacy-quels like “Scary Movie” via Paramount, “Practical Magic 2” via Warner Bros., “Focker-in-Law” via Universal, and “Spaceballs: The New One” from Amazon MGM. “Prada 2” is probably the comp WB will be eyeing for “Practical Magic 2” as, like the original “Devil Wears Prada,” “Practical Magic” has grown with some cult appreciation years after it did modestly at the box office ($94 million in 1998) and after Nicole Kidman and Sandra Bullock’s star power has likewise rocketed.
When will studios and streamers cool it with 20-years-later sequels? Did we really need a new “Ghostbusters,” “Gladiator,” “Happy Gilmore,” or “Hocus Pocus” when the originals are still there? It’s easy: Hollywood will stop making them when you all stop going.
>
EXCLUSIVE: In an op-ed during the Edinburgh TV Festival this week, Sky’s content chief Cecile Frot-Coutaz extolled the virtues of UK public service broadcasting as the Comcast-owned company finalizes its takeover of ITV. “Our ambition is to keep investing in brilliant British storytelling for generations to come,” she intoned in Broadcast.
But away from the polished words, Sky has been accused of imperilling one of the UK’s biggest public service broadcasting success stories: The Great British Bake Off. In a battle at odds with Bake Off’s wholesome charm, Sky and Frot-Coutaz find themselves defending furious complaints from producers central to the success of Channel 4’s cooking series. Producers who dedicated much of their careers to Love Productions, the respected company wholly acquired by Sky in 2020.
To say this situation is unusual is an understatement. In the polite world of British television, it is vanishingly rare for producers to go on record with their grievances against powerful networks and their executives, let alone sue them. But such is the strength of feeling, former Love managing director Letty Kavanagh has launched twin lawsuits against Sky for wrongful dismissal and unpaid severance, as revealed by Deadline this month. Two others have complained to Sky citing similar concerns: Kieran Smith, Bake Off’s former executive producer, and a third unnamed individual, who remains employed by Love.

Paul Hollywood has judged every season of ‘Bake Off’
Deadline has reviewed Kavanagh’s legal filings and spoken to people familiar with the dispute to understand how relations curdled. After an 18-year career at Love, Kavanagh claims she was fired for complaining that Sky’s bid to poach Bake Off from Channel 4 in 2025 was improper, mismanaged, and damaged relations with a key customer. She believes her experience shows that Sky does not have the best interests of public service broadcasting in its DNA. In other words, it serves as an unhappy harbinger for ITV ahead of its £1.6 billion ($2.2B) sale.
Sky strongly rejects allegations of impropriety and mismanagement, and has said it will robustly defend its position during the legal proceedings. Sky insiders attribute the Bake Off battle to differences of opinion about the show’s future, which led to a breakdown in professional relations that has nothing to do with its proposed ITV takeover. Gibson Dunn, an external law firm, investigated and dismissed Love’s complaints. Sky can also point to the irrefutable outcome of the Bake Off disagreement: That the show stayed free-to-air on Channel 4 and remains in rude health.
Project Rise
Love Productions founders Richard McKerrow and Anna Beattie built a culture that valued creative independence, meaning relations with Sky were not always straightforward. There has long been a feeling in Osterley that Love bosses struggled to come to terms with surrendering their ownership to Sky in 2020. Low-level disquiet erupted into open hostilities in early 2025, when Frot-Coutaz launched Project Rise, the codename for Sky’s efforts to snaffle Bake Off from Channel 4.
Channel 4 has been home to Bake Off (known as The Great British Baking Show on Netflix) since acquiring the series from the BBC in 2016. Love executives wanted to maintain the status quo. Indeed, Kavanagh, with the blessing of Sky, had in 2024 negotiated terms for a new Channel 4 contract, including an output deal that would have enabled Love to create new shows for the network.

Cecile Frot-Coutaz
So when Sky said it wanted to explore switching Bake Off, it went down like a sunken soufflé at Love, where producers had serious misgivings about the show fading into irrelevance behind Sky’s paywall. These misgivings were compounded by Sky’s alleged approach to Project Rise.
In her employment tribunal lawsuit, Kavanagh claims that Frot-Coutaz “intermeddled” in Bake Off contract talks with Channel 4 between January 2025 and November 2025, “undermining goodwill” at Love’s most important customer. This is denied by Sky sources, who say it was appropriate for Frot-Coutaz to explore options for Bake Off and that relations with Channel 4 remain in fine fettle.
People close to Kavanagh allege that Frot-Coutaz signalled her intention to take Bake Off, then left Channel 4 in limbo for months, sparking alarm among the broadcaster’s most senior executives, who began preparing for life without their biggest franchise. Channel 4 declined to comment. Meanwhile, Sky had a plan for Bake Off that would involve ditching spin-off series, including the professionals and kids’ versions. Love’s leaders were aghast. “Sky was prepared to make hundreds of people unemployed at the drop of a hat,” recalls one person.
Then Frot-Coutaz suddenly abandoned Project Rise. Love was unclear on the reasons for her volte-face, but speculated that Sky had failed to convince Bake Off stars like Paul Hollywood to make the switch. People close to Kavanagh also allege that senior Sky content executives, including unscripted chief Philip Edgar-Jones, were uncertain that Bake Off was a good fit for the network. Sky does not recognize this characterization of Edgar-Jones’ position.
Sky negotiated Bake Off’s renewal directly with Channel 4 in October 2025, meaning Kavanagh was only told about the deal after it was done. In her lawsuit, she alleges that Sky’s renewal was “materially less advantageous” than the one she negotiated in 2024. Some estimate that it wiped millions of pounds off the value of the contract and potential side deals, such as the U.S. licensing agreement with Netflix. Channel 4 insiders are certainly not unhappy with the outcome.
Kavanagh was furious and repeatedly made her concerns clear to her superiors at Sky. Within days, she was fired and marched out of the building in November 2025. Nine months on, she has filed two UK lawsuits — one in an employment court and a second at the High Court — that chronicle at least four grievances.
Kavanagh’s Lawsuits
Kavanagh alleges that Sky’s pursuit of Bake Off was a conflict of interest because the broadcaster was privy to contractual arrangements with Channel 4. Sources close to the producer allege that “ethical walls” between Love and Sky’s content team were smashed down in 2024, when Frot-Coutaz’s Sky Studios empire was expanded to include unscripted commissioning. In her employment tribunal filing, Kavanagh alleges that Sky commercial chief Helen Northrop “agreed” that “this was an issue.”

Letty Kavanagh
Sky disputes the conflict of interest allegation, arguing that there is no legal basis for the claim because it wholly owned Love and Bake Off. Sky denies that Northrop ever concurred with Kavanagh’s concerns. Senior figures at the pay-TV giant are genuinely perplexed by Kavanagh’s claim, and they argue that taking Bake Off in-house would not have been without precedent. ITV poached The Voice from the BBC soon after ITV Studios acquired Talpa in 2015.
Kavanagh also alleges that Sky imposed changes on Love’s annual accounts to create a flattering financial picture by booking margin on incomplete projects early. Sky refutes the accusation, attributing the changes to updated accounting practices introduced in 2023 at Comcast’s request. Kavanagh further accuses Sky of sex discrimination over the termination of her contract and, in a separate High Court lawsuit, claims she is owed £755,752 ($1 million) in severance payments. Sky denies the accusations and maintains that it has no financial liability to Kavanagh.
Sky says Kavanagh’s concerns about Project Rise and accountancy practices were investigated when she and colleagues made whistleblowing complaints. Gibson Dunn, an external law firm, was engaged to review the allegations. Kavanagh and Kieran Smith were interviewed, and their complaints were not substantiated. They have since questioned the rigour of the investigation, claiming they were not provided with a terms of reference or given access to documents on which they relied.
Sky stands by the findings. It has since installed new management at Love and then subsequently agreed to sell the company to ITV Studios for £200 million as part of its ITV takeover.
A Sky spokesperson says: “As the sole owner of Love Productions, Sky has every incentive to protect and enhance the value of The Great British Bake Off. We have invested in the show and its long-term future for more than a decade and continue to do so today.
“As with any long-running programme, when an agreement approaches renewal, it is natural and appropriate to consider the options for its future. The Great British Bake Off continues to be enjoyed by millions of viewers, and Sky agreed a new deal which keeps it on Channel 4 and free-to-air.
“The allegations were subject to a comprehensive investigation by leading external counsel and were not substantiated. We deny the claims against Sky and will vigorously defend our position in the ongoing legal proceedings.”
Where Kavanagh believes she is raising the alarm about a “cutthroat” American culture that’s coming for ITV, Sky sees an effort to embarrass the company into a settlement. Meanwhile, Bake Off returns to Channel 4 for Season 17 next month, welcoming new judge Nigella Lawson to the tent. That this almost did not happen could be a bun fight that goes all the way to court.
>
Shailene Woodley shared insight into why her performance as Mary Jane Watson didn’t make it into the final cut of “The Amazing Spider-Man 2,” revealing she learned the news a year after filming her scenes with Andrew Garfield.
Woodley addressed being cut from the superhero movie for the “SAG-AFTRA Foundation Conversations” series, where she confirmed – 13 years after she was photographed onset as the comic book character – that she did shoot scenes with Garfield’s Peter Parker/Spider-Man. Yet, she indicated that they’re unlikely to see the light of day.
“That was a fun phone call,” she recalled. “I was cast as Mary Jane for ‘Spider-Man,’ which was my dream because … Spider-Man’s my favorite superhero. Mary Jane was my favorite character growing up. So, when I got it, I was like, ‘This is so exciting.’”
Per Woodley, she and Garfield filmed “three scenes” together, but that she was given the bad news a year later.
“And then like a year later, they were like, ‘So, you’re not in the movie anymore,’” she said. “And I was like, ‘What? What do you mean?’ And they were like, ‘We’ve introduced a lot of new characters in this last one, and we’re going to wait for whatever happens between [Emma Stone’s Gwen Stacy] and Andrew.”
Woodley then poked fun at herself for trying to stay spoiler-free for a movie that came out in 2014, adding, “I’m so paranoid. All of these years of what I’m allowed to say or not allowed to say, I’m like, ‘It’s been out for over 10 years, Shailene.’”
“Whatever. They were like, ‘Let’s wait for her to die and then we’ll introduce Mary Jane,’” she said “[It] made sense. But then they didn’t make that film.”
Though, Woodley acknowledged that this was what she was told, quipping, “But again, who knows what the truth is. I could have been terrible and they’re like, ‘We can’t do this.’”
Watch Woodley’s comments below.
While Garfield’s planned third “Spider-Man” movies was ultimately shelved, he has since returned to the character, appearing in 2021’s “Spider-Man: No Way Home” opposite Tom Holland and fellow Spider-Man/Peter Parker Tobey Maguire.
And he hasn’t ruled out another return, either. In August, Garfield shared that he’d be open to putting the suit back on if the script was “very, very odd.”
“I would need it to be very strange, and I would need it to be completely unconventional and almost — I wouldn’t say boring — but I would want it to be just completely unexpected, like a genre of Spider-Man that you’ve never seen before, that feels very left field,” he said.
>
Jamie Foxx admitted he struggled to make sense of his stroke while undergoing physical therapy, calling the whole ordeal “frustrating.”
During a recent appearance on the “Baby, This is Keke Palmer” podcast, the Oscar winner reflected on his health struggle and rehab stay after suffering from a stroke in April 2023.
“Like, I was talking to him,” Foxx recalled while gesturing upwards. “I said, ‘Bro, what are you talking about? It’s me, bro. Like I put the smiles on people’s faces. Why me?’”
Foxx shared that he remembered feeling frustrated that he was struggling while there were “all these bad people out here.”
“And he said, ‘Those bad people already belong to somebody else.’ He said, ‘This is your time.’ And I said, [ugh],” he noted. “You just couldn’t imagine, like when I finally came to my [senses], I said, ‘What happened?’ And they said, ‘You had a stroke.’ I said, ‘What are you talking about?’”
He added: “I couldn’t make sense of it. And the parts I do remember, like the rehab part, was frustrating ’cause … They said, ‘You got a second chance.’ I said, ‘F–k the second chance. What was wrong with my first chance? This doesn’t happen to anybody. How does it happen to me?’”
Per Foxx, his healthcare team struggled to do “wellness checks” on him, given he utilized comedy to cope at the time.
“So, I was just funny. I was always joking all the time,” he said. “So, when they come and say, ‘Who are you today, sir?’ And I was somebody different.”
Specifically, Foxx shared that he pulled out his Dave Chappelle impression to get through the recovery process.
Foxx’s daughter Corinne confirmed this to be true, sharing her dad also said his name was Denzel Washington when he was admitted to the hospital. Foxx then gave host Keke Palmer a taste of his Washington impression.
All jokes aside, Foxx shared that this humor was the only way he “could find myself” throughout the ordeal.
“Because here’s the truth of it: When this all transpired, I went back to meet the 60 nurses that kept me alive,” he noted. Per Foxx, his healthcare team told him that his recovery was “a miracle,” adding, “It makes you want to go get it.”
Watch Foxx’s comments above.
The “Ray” star previously opened up about his health crisis in his 2024 Netflix comedy special, titled “What Had Happened Was.”
“Before I could get the Aspirin, I went out,” he said in the special. “I don’t remember 20 days, what I was told … was that they [took] me in to operate on me and my sister knelt down outside the operating room and prayed the whole time.”
Prior to this tell-all special, Foxx had shared a video update on Instagram, where he told fans: “I went to hell and back … And my road to recovery had some potholes as well. But I’m coming back. And I’m able to work.”
>
Search For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
These ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
According to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
Model Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
Emily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
Your comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
Rurouni Kenshin: Hokkaido Arc Manga Takes 1-Issue Break – News