Connect with us

movies

‘I See Buildings Fall Like Lightning’ Review: Clio Barnard Melodrama

Published

on

A textbook example of how good casting lifts all boats, I See Buildings Fall Like Lightning features five outstanding up-and-coming British and Irish millennial actors — Anthony Boyle, Joe Cole, Jay Lycurgo, Daryl McCormack and Lola Petticrew — at the helm of a strong ensemble alongside well-chosen supporting players and non-professionals. The core quintet play a gang of working-class friends who’ve known each other since high school but are now facing tough adult choices in economically depressed Birmingham, England. Their liquid, nervy, interlocking performances make this British director Clio Barnard’s best feature in a while, although it still doesn’t reach the high-water mark set by her haunting, innovative debut The Arbor.

Adapted by Enda Walsh (Die My Love, Small Things Like These) from a novel by Keiran Goddard, Buildings offers a hearty, quintessentially British-Irish café fry-up of gritty realism, class consciousness and masculine despair, all washed down with tannic, milky mugs of message-bearing melodrama in the tradition of Ken Loach. That sort of package usually plays well in Cannes, where this debuted in the Directors’ Fortnight strand, although the end result is ultimately a bit flat and underwhelming.

I See Buildings Fall Like Lightning

The Bottom Line

Beautifully acted but heavyhanded.

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Directors’ Fortnight)
Cast: Anthony Boyle, Joe Cole, Jay Lycurgo, Daryl McCormack, Lola Petticrew, Tracey Green, Lucie Shorthouse, Skyla-Rose Steward, Elsie Mae Vitello-Minshull, Jackie Donald, Emma Bassett, Debbie Milner, Millie Brady
Screenwriter: Enda Walsh, based on the novel by Keiran Goddard
Director: Clio Barnard

1 hour 49 minutes

The poetically present-tense title refers to the spectacle of high-rise buildings from the mid-20th century being blown to smithereens that the characters here remember observing years ago in their old neighborhood. Indeed, back in the 1990s and 2000s, municipalities across the country were happily demolishing Brutalist eyesores made to house the poor. Authorities often dispensed empty promises that projects would be replaced with better structures, ones less vulnerable to crime, damp and black mold, and not flawed by the kind of dangerous cost-cutting construction that led to London’s Grenfell Tower burning down in 2017, killing 72 people. Just to underscore the point, throughout Barnard and editor Maya Maffioli splice in archive footage of imploding tower blocks collapsing into clouds of dust in which, according to Oli (Lycurgo), he could see the face of the devil himself. But given how often Oli was high on drugs in those days, such Satanic visions probably just meant it was a Tuesday.

True to form, the film opens with Oli getting stratospherically high on booze, cocaine and maybe some heroin at his own birthday party in The Castle, a local pub everyone has been going to for years. (Some of the background artists and characters with only a few lines are locals and staff from an actual Birmingham pub.) The party has reunited Oli with his four oldest friends from school days: longstanding couple Patrick (Boyle, from stage’s Harry Potter and the Cursed Child), a food courier with a bachelor’s degree, and Shiv (Petticrew, arguably best known for an indelible turn TV’s Say Nothing), a carer for her children and aged mother, who now have two young daughters (Skyla-Rose Steward and Elsie Mae Vitello-Minshull); aspiring developer and permanently simmering pot of rage Conor (McCormack, Wake Up Dead Man); and working-class hero made good Rian (Cole, Peaky Blinders and Skins), who went off to work in finance down in London and now makes more in a month than all the others put together do in a year.

The woozy, choppily edited party sequence, featuring lots of handheld, cellphone-style footage and glassy slow-motion interludes, clearly illustrates the camaraderie and profound affection between the five main characters, who tease and tickle one another like sportive, overgrown puppies. But underneath the smiles, hugs and wisecracks, fissures and fraught moments can be glimpsed, such as a sozzled Conor almost getting into a pointless barroom fight or Rian giving Patrick and Shiv the kind of look you see in a cat just before it knocks a glass vase off the table.

Goddard’s novel is broken up into a series of first-person interior monologues from each of the principles and covers a considerable span of time, and it’s clear Walsh and Barnard have struggled to keep that polyphonic symphony going in the film. The transitions here are sometimes jarring and lack finesse, creating a choppy rhythm as we jump around from character to character. We’re able to gauge how much time has passed by how far along the construction has come on the apartment complex Conor is supervising, seen rising floor by floor in time-lapse, mirroring the demolition footage elsewhere.

It turns out that Rian is partially bankrolling the project, a set of flats which will house either “yuppies” (or, as one old boozer calls them, “yippees”) or a younger generation of clients in need of state-subsidized housing like the protagonists’ parents. Patrick clearly is hoping for the latter, and he says as much in several inebriated speeches full of progressive political rhetoric. But his idealized vision of a past paradise of social cohesion that late-stage capitalism destroyed doesn’t reckon with the snakes that were always there in this imaginary Eden, including a personal betrayal that’s close to home and only comes slithering out in a moment of drunken weakness.

Boyle puts extra meat on Patrick’s bare bones with a soulful performance that meshes precisely with Petticrew’s turn as the slight-in-stature but formidably strong-willed Shiv. The two actors both hail from Northern Ireland but nail the tricky nasal tones of the “Brummie” accent, as do the rest of the main cast, none of whom are from the Midlands. It’s obvious that there was space created in the production process for the cast to build a sense of fraternal solidarity through improvisation and spontaneity on set, an ease that comes through in the way they interact via dance and touch. But that physicality has to do a lot of heavy lifting to persuade us that it’s plausible that these five very different people would still be pals at this stage in their lives.

Although they’re meant to be all roughly the same age, Conor and Oli look like they’re from different generations, even though the actors are only five years apart. That partly stems from the way McCormack projects the gravitational pull of a man grappling with forces and feelings far beyond his control, which prevent him from seeking help when everything starts to go south. All sweet-natured Oli needs to worry about, apart from getting over some major addictions, is how to make sure he’s got enough money to pay for dog food for his adorable mutt, Lulu. Rian is similarly hamstrung by inarticulacy and masculine angst, but his storyline feels the least convincing, as if fashioned only to prove money can’t buy happiness, even if Cole convincingly suggests unspoken depths.  

Barnard has always coaxed layered, thoughtful performances from her cast and knows this kind of battered but unbowed community like the back of her hand. But the drama here feels too diagrammatic, foretelling a tragic fate from the first scene onward as everyone parties down like their lives depend on it. You just know that before the end credits roll one of them will have lost their raging battle with the dying of the light, and just as there will be hangovers in the morning, there will be a funeral wake in that very same pub.

>

Continue Reading

movies

‘Game Of Thrones: The Mad King’: What The Critics Are Saying

Published

on

It’s an epic story being told on an epic stage. The critics are having their say on George R. R. Martin’s Game of Thrones: The Mad King, the UK stage adaptation of the hit novels and series.

The sold-out show’s reviews embargo finally lifted after previews began a couple of weeks ago at the Royal Shakespeare Company’s home of Stratford Upon Avon. The ambitious production has drawn a number of strong notices. First look images courtesy of the RSC are below. This after multiple early shows were cancelled, much to fan ire.

Whatsonstage gave the star a glowing five-star review, calling it “a triumph; a soaring, surging spectacle and a latter-day history play, both serious and popular…It is a remarkable achievement, wonderfully directed by [Dominic] Cooke and superbly acted by every member of the 35-strong ensemble. The result is a brilliant exhibition of how theatre can create magic.”

The Guardian gave the show 4/5 stars, calling “an action-packed saga of dry ice and fire…this prequel to the TV series has one joust after another, spectacular stagecraft and plenty of modern resonance.”

Metro also gave the show 4/5 stars, writing: “As a stand-alone piece of theatre, The Mad King scrapes through. But as an extension of the Game of Thrones world, it scores well, shifting the narrative to the stage with suitably theatrical thrust.”

The Independent was also a fan, noting in its 4/5 star review, that the “stellar stage show has all the thrillingly staged battles, gory deaths and, yes, dragons that the most bloodthirsty fan could hope for… there’s also a surprising amount of heart – of the warm, still-beating kind – as it lingers on the faces of its fallen.”

The Daily Mail lauded the show but was one of many to acknowledge the challengingly long running time: “The first half of Cooke’s superbly staged, spectacular production has the feel of a dynamic Bayeux Tapestry: a stunning pageant of medieval stop-motion animation. But after the interval, the plot takes off. Sparks fly romantically and dramatically, which is just as well because, at three hours 45 minutes, it’s almost as long as Hamlet.”

The Telegraph had similar things to say in its largely positive review: “At almost four hours, it’s a long evening, sometimes too dense with detail, and it lacks the grit and gore (not to mention the nudity) of the TV series…Still, it capably serves newbies and devotees, and speaks in a timely fashion to our age of unruly leaders…It’s not up there, yet, with the Harry Potter or Stranger Things prequels but, on balance, the Game of Thrones franchise has yet another worthwhile and lucrative spin-off on its hands.”

The Times was one of the few dissenting voices, claiming that while the play “gives hardcore GoT fans a chance to go hunting for ‘Easter eggs’, it seldom comes close to matching the grim aura of the TV series…Duncan Macmillan’s script is sorely lacking in poetry. Events plod forward, one after the other, and although Michael Shaeffer is a thoroughly compelling presence as the cruel and chronically unstable monarch Aerys, other performances seem nuance-free. Too many lines are simply shouted. You expect better of the RSC.”

Game of Thrones creator Martin is said to have been heavily involved in the play, having a representative in rehearsals at all times, and he attended the opening night in Stratford on Saturday.

The Mad King is a stage prequel that, according to its official synopsis, is set in Harrenhal as a long winter begins to thaw. “At a lavish banquet on the eve of a jousting tournament,” the synopsis reads, “lovers meet and revelers speculate about who will contend. But in the shadows, amid growing unease at the bloodthirsty actions of the realm’s merciless Mad King, dissenters from his inner circle anxiously advance a treasonous plot. Far away, the drums of battle sound. Family bonds, ancient prophecies, and the sacred line of succession will be tested in a dangerous campaign for power. Who will survive? Who will rise?”

The play is inspired by the “Robert’s Rebellion” lore of Martin’s sprawling book series, in which the married Prince Rhaegar Targaryen, son of the Mad King Aerys, falls in love with, and runs off with, Lyanna Stark. This leads to a rebellion led by Robert Baratheon, who is engaged to Lyanna. Successfully deposing the Mad King, The Rebellion leads to the downfall of House Targaryen.

Credit: Johan Persson
Credit: Johan Persson
Credit: Johan Persson

>

Continue Reading

movies

‘Fauda’ Season 5 To Drop On Netflix Next Month; First-Look Images

Published

on

EXCLUSIVE: Israeli drama Fauda will return to Netflix on September 8, and we’ve got first-look images here.

Season 5 of the show, which comes from lead star Lior Raz and writer Avi Issacharoff, is set two years after the Hamas-led attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Haunted by the trauma of the events, Daron Kavillio (Raz) and the other fighters embark on a deadly race to stop a catastrophic attack on Israel, forcing them to confront the true cost of warn after war.

Melanie Laurent and Hakim Djaziri are joining the cast alongside Ram, with Yaakov Zada Daniel and Doron Ben-David returning. The show debuts on Netflix globally following its run on Israeli network Yes, which is the commissioning broadcaster.

Omri Givon is the director and writes alongside Omri Shenhar, Issacharoff, Raz, Sari Azoulay Turgeman, Yona Rozenkier and Nir Berger. Raz and Issacharoff scrapped their first scripts for Season 5 following the October 7 attack and reformulated with that shocking event at the center of the story.

Liat Benasuly is the producer, with Nitay Netzer the DoP, Rachel Ben Dahan the costume designer and Sari Azoulay Turgeman the editor.

Yes TV and L. Benasuly Productions are the co-producers with Yes Studios on international distribution. The eleven-episode season filmed across Israel and Hungary.

“This is a TV show, not reality. But we thought that there is still a story here to be told,” said Issacharoff, co-creator and exec producer. “We wanted to ask very tough questions to people all over the world, not only in Israel. Is the revenge worth it? Is continuing this very endless cycle of bloodshed worth it? Where is it taking you? I think these are the questions that are at the heart of this season.”

Fauda has often been lauded for portraying the incredibly complex Israeli-Palestinian conflict in a relatable way, while opening a window into the situation in the present-day Middle East. Netflix has acquired all seasons to date.

Below is a selection of pictures from the new season.

Melanie Laurent as Anne Aubert and Lior Raz as Doron Kavillio
Melanie Laurent as Anne Aubert and Lior Raz as Doron Kavillio
Hakim Djaziri as Saïd Al-Khatibi
Hakim Djaziri as Saïd Al-Khatibi
Lior Raz as Doron Kavillio
Lior Raz as Doron Kavillio
Hakim Djaziri as Saïd Al-Khatibi
Hakim Djaziri as Saïd Al-Khatibi

>

Continue Reading

movies

‘Power Book III: Raising Kanan’s Sascha Penn Breaks Down Series Finale

Published

on

SPOILER ALERT: The following reveals major plot points from the series finale of the Starz crime drama Power Book III: Raising Kanan.

Although it has come time to say goodbye to Power Book III: Raising Kanan, things are only beginning to shape up for the titular character, who is coming back with a vengeance in the upcoming follow-up series Power: Origins. Sascha Penn, the creator of both Raising Kanan and Origins, is taking a moment to take it all in.

It’s a difficult task to conclude a series and hit all the right notes, but Penn wrapped up Raising Kanan with a lot of love and care. And while many may not understand the reasons why we had to have our hearts broken with the loss of Lou (Malcolm Mays), Marvin (London Brown), and then Raq (Patina Miller), we should trust the process and watch how the rest of the story unfolds on Power: Origins.

Penn spoke to Deadline about the events of the finale, that epic post-credits scene, and what’s coming soon from his new prequel series that will finally bring together the powerful trio of Ghost (Spence Moore), Tommy (Charlie Mann), and Kanan Stark (Mekai Curtis).

Tony Danza, Mekai Curtis, Patina Miller, Sascha Penn
Tony Danza, Mekai Curtis, Patina Miller, Sascha Penn

DEADLINE: So many fans are sad because we said goodbye to our favorites. But, as Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson says in the final beats of the finale, this is not an ending, but a beginning for Kanan. What say you?

SASCHA PENN: The show was always called Raising Kanan, and it has always been that. We are a product of our families and our environment and our experiences. By the end of this series, you do have a good sense of how Kanan became Kanan. You may not love that journey, and you may be really upset about that journey, but it is a journey that I do believe explains how he became the character that we get to know in Power. We’ll know even better in Origins. I feel good about the story we told, and I do feel like it has a real ending.

DEADLINE: You surprised viewers with the young Tommy and Ghost, who are so young that Kanan won’t even mess with them. [Laughs] Why was it important to include them?

PENN: The one question I’ve been asked the most of any question over the past six years: when are we going to see Ghost and Tommy? In our timeline, they’re way too young to be super involved. But I always knew, even from the pitch, that at one point we would glimpse at them just enough for people to feel like, ‘Oh wow, there they are.’ And by the way, we put them into the show before we even knew Origins was happening.

DEADLINE: We need to discuss the post-credits scene. It’s Kanan’s birthday and the family, almost all of whom are now gone, are there for new mom Raquel. There’s an episode of Good Times on [Season 2, Episode 24 titled “The Lunch Money Ripoff.“]. Why did you pick that show?

PENN: In terms of going with Good Times, that show is on my Mount Rushmore of television series as a kid. I’ve watched every single episode of Good Times, and, like everybody else, I wish I was part of the Evans family. That family felt like this idealized family to me, right? So it was really important to include it. And this notion of this idealized family juxtaposed with this other family [on Raising Kanan]… I can’t unpack all of what it meant to me, but there was something about it that felt really appropriate.

DEADLINE: It fully makes sense, for anyone that knows that episode. Here’s a “bad” kid with an absent father bullying other kids in school, including the Evans family’s youngest Michael (Ralph Carter). He wasn’t a “bad” anything, more so a victim of his circumstances, like Kanan. What say you?

PENN: There was another episode which we considered. In the episode [Season 2, Episodes 9 & 10, The Gang, Parts 1 and 2], JJ (Jimmie Walker) was shot by a gang member [named Mad Dog].

DEADLINE: That would’ve worked out well as well, but I think you picked the right episode.

PENN: Yeah. I felt like we have this moment, we have Good Times, then we see Raq as a new mother, and what that responsibility feels like. Raq didn’t set out to raise this kid who ultimately wants to kill her. No, she’s like every other parent. She has this tiny baby that’s defenseless in her arms, and she’s like, ‘I’m gonna protect you. It’s you and me. I got you,’ which is heartbreaking in a completely different way. I think most parents really set out to do the right thing by their kids, but it’s hard. Life intervenes in all sorts of unexpected ways. But I felt like it was meaningful to have the last image of this series be a mother loving her son.

DEADLINE: What can you tease about Origins?

PENN: It takes place in like 2002, 2003. Tonally, it is different than Raising Kanan and Ghost; there’s a little more levity. It’s a little bit more like 48 Hours or Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. That’s sort of what we were aiming for. So it’s fun. Not to say that there isn’t dark stuff in it, and Kanan is there and it’s a pretty grim version of him. It’s super fast-paced. The actors that are playing Tommy and Ghost are amazing. They’ve done the right thing, which is that they give you enough of the original Tommy and Ghost while at the same time making the characters entirely their own. We just wrapped last week on 18 episodes. I think people are gonna love it.

This interview has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.