Connect with us

Sports

Golden Knights come back in Game 2 vs. Avalanche to take 2-0 series lead: Takeaways

Published

on

DENVER — The Colorado Avalanche entered the Western Conference final with an aura of near invincibility after leading the NHL wire to wire, and cruising through the first two rounds in just nine games. Loaded with star talent and Stanley Cup experience, the Avalanche were the clear-cut favorite to win it all dating back to October.

And the Vegas Golden Knights have them on the ropes.

Jack Eichel tied Game 2 midway through the third period and Ivan Barbashev scored barely two minutes later as Vegas became the first team to mount a third-period comeback against Colorado all season, winning 3-1 and taking a commanding 2-0 series lead as the series shifts to the desert for Sunday’s Game 3.

Colorado had been a staggering 45-0-0 when leading after two periods, including a 4-0 mark in this postseason. But Vegas — loaded with star talent and championship experience itself — has quickly punctured that Colorado aura.

In Game 1, the Knights simply outplayed the Avalanche, cleaner with the puck and stout defensively, clogging shooting lanes and slowing Colorado down in the neutral zone. In Game 2, they stole one, withstanding wave after wave of Colorado attacks, killing off two penalties and keeping the game within reach until they finally solved Scott Wedgewood in the third period. The Avalanche seemed almost stunned after the quick goals, and never regained the momentum.

Eichel got Vegas on the board with a snipe of a wrist shot that beat Wedgewood high. It was a clever play by Eichel, who backed his defender off, then cut back and delayed, holding his release until the traffic entered Wedgewood’s sightline, then fired it past the goalie.

Barbashev followed it up with another wrist shot from distance that beat Wedgewood high. The Vegas forecheck forced a turnover in the Avalanche end, then Eichel found Barbashev for the shot. He fit the puck perfectly over Wedgewood’s outstretched blocker, and underneath the cross bar to put Vegas ahead.

Vegas’ PK still special

The Golden Knights’ penalty kill has been dominant throughout this postseason, and continued to be on Friday night. The unit does an exceptional job of taking away passing lanes, and pressuring puck carriers at just the right time. It’s a combination of the rangy, intuitive players Vegas has on its kill, and a great system run mostly by assistant coach John Stevens.

Colorado had zero shots on goal on its two power plays on Friday, and only two shot attempts.

Vegas killed both of Colorado’s power plays without allowing anything dangerous. Mitch Marner and Brett Howden threatened shorthanded, as they have throughout the postseason. The Golden Knights have now killed 37-of-43 power plays in these playoffs (86 percent), and 4-of-5 in this series (80 percent). —Jesse Granger

McNabb and Manson in and out

The Golden Knights briefly lost defenseman Brayden McNabb midway through the first period due to an apparent injury, but he returned to play the third period after sitting out the entire middle frame. The veteran laid a powerful hip check near his own blue line on his final shift in the first period, was hunched over following the whistle, and hobbled down the tunnel to the dressing room shortly after.

The Golden Knights blue line did a good job of picking up the slack before McNabb eventually returned. Specifically the big three of Shea Theodore, Rasmus Andersson and Noah Hanifin took on heavy minute workloads.

Avalanche defender Josh Manson left the game in the second period after crashing head-first into the boards while laying a hit on Vegas forward Ivan Barbashev, but like McNabb, returned for the third period. —Jesse Granger, Golden Knights writer

Ross is boss

Vegas was all over the Avalanche in the first period, as Colorado continued to look out of sorts defensively and tentative offensively without Cale Makar on the back end. Scott Wedgewood repeatedly had to bail out his teammates, including stopping Mitch Marner on a breakaway (and on the follow-up), and then on Pavel Dorofeyev late in the period after a ghastly turnover by Nazem Kadri.

But hockey being hockey, Colorado came out of the period with a 1-0 lead thanks to a heck of a shot by Colton. Brent Burns’ shot from the point ran into traffic in front, and a fortunate bounce put the puck right on Colton’s stick in the slot, and Colton beat Carter Hart. Colton’s roughing penalty in the second period of Game 1 was a critical miscue in that loss, but he was one of the Avalanche’s most dangerous players in that game, along with fourth-line sparkplug Logan O’Connor. That Colorado’s bottom-sixers are creating more chances than the star-studded top six isn’t ideal, but it illustrates the extraordinary depth Colorado has.

“There’s a ferociousness to the way that he’s playing right now,” Jared Bednar said of Colton. “He’s physical, he’s hard and I think the urgency in his game on both sides of the puck is there. He’s skating pretty well, so he’s making some plays and trying to be a difference-maker every shift. He’s got good consistency to his game right now.” —Jesse Granger, Golden Knights writer

Bednar shuffles the deck

Late in Game 1, Bednar broke up his top line of Gabriel Landeskog, Nathan MacKinnon and Martin Nečas, moving the returning Arttuti Lehkonen up and moving Nečas down. That seemed to spark Colorado, which made a desperate third-period push.

But Bednar returned to his usual top line to open Game 2, pitting MacKinnon’s trio against Jack Eichel’s. Bednar did suggest on Thursday that he wouldn’t wait as long to shake things up if need be. And sure enough, to open the second period, Lehkonen was back up top with MacKinnon and Landeskog, and Nečas was with Brock Nelson and Valeri Nichushkin — and creating a lot more than he was with MacKinnon.

Expect the line blender to keep whirring as the series goes on.

“I kind of liked the lines after I switched them more than the first group,” he said. “I think (MacKinnon’s) line was a little spread out at times during the night, so they were missing some detail in their game with the puck, so they weren’t as effective as I would have liked them (to be). And then I felt like there was some duplication there in roles too, like in O-zone play and off the forecheck. And when I changed it and went with Lehky and Landeskog, I liked that line together. And then (Brock) Nelson, Nečas, and Val (Nichshkin) was pretty good, too, and I was spotting (Nazem) Kadri up in there in the top six a little bit in the third period, too. And I liked all those combinations. … I would say (in Game 2), regardless of the lines I go with, I won’t wait as long to kind of mix it up and try something else, just because we got a little bit of a look at some things we liked in the third period.” —Mark Lazerus, NHL writer

Stone and Makar getting closer

Both Vegas captain Mark Stone and Makar showed signs of improvement leading into Game 2, but neither were healthy enough to suit up.

Stone was a full participant at Friday’s optional morning skate at Ball Arena, staying out on the ice for more than 40 minutes. He was the last man on the ice for the Golden Knights, skating laps around the rink with Vegas assistant coach Sean Farrell, but was ruled out by coach John Tortorella less than an hour later.

Makar also skated with his Avalanche teammates Friday morning, but was ruled out by Jared Bednar. Unsurprisingly, Colorado’s breakouts haven’t been as consistent or dynamic over the first two games without its elite defender. The Avalanche also haven’t been able to get shots through from the point, with the Golden Knights clogging shooting lanes with regularity. That’s obviously a specialty of Makar’s, and has been missed badly through the first two games of the series. —Mark Lazerus, NHL writer

This story will be updated.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Spain’s collectivism, England’s hero worship and how a nation’s societal norms can shape its football

Published

on

It was a passing comment from Liverpool’s new head coach during their pre-season tour to the United States, but one that spoke to a defining theme of football history: a nation’s cultural norms can shape the way it plays the game.

“People often ask why a lot of Basque managers especially have arrived at this level, and why a lot of Spanish teams are winning a lot of things,” Andoni Iraola said in July.

“I always say that a sense of collectiveness is very important.

“Spain has never had the best athletes. If you analyse, in swimming, track and field, they don’t normally win medals. But in collective sports, they are very good. In football, basketball, handball, hockey — we always put the team first.

“An example is someone like Rodri. He didn’t score or make an assist, but at the end, they won the World Cup, and he won best player of the tournament. ‘Team-first’ was always integrated in how we’re raised.”

Spain has shaped the way football has been played in the 21st century — from Pep Guardiola’s paradigm-shifting possession-based style at Barcelona, Bayern Munich and Manchester City to the dominance of the national team from 2008 to 2012, when they won two European Championship titles either side of their first World Cup.

Yes, star players shone in each of those sides, but Iraola’s point remains pertinent. Spain’s defining strength has long been the collective, with individuals thriving within a wider framework rather than carrying the burden alone.

Spain celebrate winning their first World Cup in 2010 (Ryan Pierse – FIFA/FIFA via Getty Images)

This summer served as a reminder of Spanish dominance as Luis de la Fuente’s side lifted the World Cup, two years on from winning another Euros, with an approach that was not dissimilar to that which brought success with their previous golden generation. Their women are current world champions, too.

Spain’s superpower was a coherent tactical system that no other national team — or their respective talismans — could find an answer to.

At club level, Paris Saint-Germain became back-to-back Champions League winners in May, thanks to Spanish coach Luis Enrique’s fluid attacking style, packed with rotations and a cohesive network of players.

It is no coincidence their European success has come for PSG after star forward Kylian Mbappe, a player who thrives off individual accolades as much as collective success, left for Real Madrid in summer 2024.

The club PSG beat in this year’s final were Arsenal, led by Mikel Arteta, who days earlier became just the second Spanish manager after Guardiola to win a Premier League title.

A strong defensive foundation was at the heart of Arteta’s success, but their victorious season saw them share the attacking load across 18 different goalscorers — their most since he was appointed in December 2019. Summer signing Viktor Gyokeres was their most prolific player with 14 goals in the top flight, the second-lowest leading-scorer total of any Premier League champions since 2000.

Mikel Arteta’s Premier League champions Arsenal spread the attacking load across the team (Michael Regan/Getty Images For Premier League)

The Europa League champions last season? That would be Arsenal’s fellow Premier League side Aston Villa, led by another meticulous Spanish manager in Unai Emery. Amazingly, all three are from the Basque province of Guipuzcoa, population 750,000, in northern Spain.

Each of those teams had a co-operative effort woven into their style by their head coach or manager.

Iraola’s perspective on the cultural importance of football will be music to the ears of Liverpool fans, who have consistently used the sport as a shield to fight against political, social or financial adversity throughout the club’s history — an approach that reflects the values of the Merseyside city as a whole.

“Things work in general when we aren’t just selfish, when we prioritise the situations of those who have less. That happens as well in football,” Iraola said.

“The ones who don’t play, the ones who come from the academy, the ones who earn less, it’s a reference if you want to compare it with society.”


Football can shape the culture within a city, region or country, but the relationship works in both directions.

As Iraola implies, society impacts football as much as the game impacts society.

Expanding on Iraola’s comments, there are methods to measure how different countries integrate individuals into groups. One method is to look at the sociological differences between ‘individualism’ and ‘collectivism’.

Individualist societies typically focus on independence within social groups, encouraging personal expression, and are more accepting of differences — and are typically found in Western countries, according to studies.

By contrast, collectivist societies focus more on social harmony and prioritise the group over individual goals, with decisions made based on what is best for the wider community. These have been found to typically be most prevalent among African and South Asian nations.

The research on this topic is extensive and widely debated, but a 2026 study has re-modelled a global individualism-collectivism scale to measure where each country falls.

Across a sample of 102 nations, Nordic ones (Sweden, Denmark, Norway, Iceland and Finland) come out as the most individualist. Spain’s index score still falls within the upper echelons of an individualist culture, but is lower than some of its fellow major footballing nations, including France, Germany, Great Britain (England, Scotland and Wales) and the Netherlands.

If cultural norms do shape footballing identities, that gap may help explain why the Spanish game has historically placed a greater premium on collective structures than some of its European neighbours.

How much these psychosocial factors directly correlate with on-pitch success remains unclear, but this would not be the first time cultural links are made between football and national identity.

In England, Scott Murray’s playful article in the first edition of magazine The Blizzard, titled How Roy Race Ruined English Football, highlighted how much the comic book Roy of the Rovers has created an unrealistic expectation of national identity that relies on the heroic acts of an individual rather than wider teamwork or tactical systems.

The comic was first published in the 1950s, but the emphasis on last-gasp winners and talismanic performances continued until the mid-1990s — with narratives that cascaded through English football culture in the decades in between.

How often have the hopes of the nation fallen on the shoulders of Kevin Keegan, Paul Gascoigne, David Beckham, Wayne Rooney or Harry Kane? Each generation has had a star individual who rose above the collective, with Jude Bellingham seemingly the next in line after his starring role at this year’s World Cup.

That individualist approach tallies with comments by former England captain Steven Gerrard’s last year. He told ex-England team-mate Rio Ferdinand’s podcast that the so-called ‘Golden generation’ of talented English players in the mid-2000s, which they were both part of, were “all egotistical losers”.

“It was down to the culture within England,” Gerrard said. “We weren’t friendly or connected. We weren’t a team. We never, at any stage, became a really good, strong team.”

Steven Gerrard said England’s ‘Golden generation’ at the start of this century were not a ‘friendly or connected’ unit (Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

The failures of England’s previous generations were multi-faceted, but how much did the national culture feed into the acceptance of their behaviour? Gareth Southgate’s recent success as England coach was made even more impressive by the way he curated a squad made up of rival players at club level who worked together in harmony for the national team.

With the help of team psychologist Dr Pippa Grange, England cultivated a team ethos in a manner that was incongruous to generations before them — and felt somewhat jarring, based on English societal norms.

In the Netherlands, David Winner’s excellent book Brilliant Orange: The Neurotic Genius of Dutch Football reflects the deeply-rooted societal influence towards the style that was synonymous with ‘Total Football’ from that country’s sides in the 1960s and 1970s.

Beyond historical and political analogies, Winner makes a fascinating link between architecture and football in the Netherlands — in which its flat landscape and crowded cities meant the optimisation of space and appreciation of geometry became an inherently Dutch trait.

The Best of the World Cup: The stars, tactics, and viral moments

It was that same appreciation of geometry that became the foundation of the Netherlands’ on-pitch success, pioneered by coach Rinus Michels and player Johan Cruyff.

While it is difficult to accurately measure its direct impact, football can often act as a mirror held up to reflect society.

The culture a manager grows up in can inevitably shape their ideas, and that becomes particularly intriguing when they take those principles to a new club or national team.

Going full circle back to Liverpool, Mohamed Salah’s summer exit means there is a gap in their squad for a new star of the show — but maybe they do not need a single individual leading the way to find new success. Team-first, as Iraola says.

If he brings the same values of his Basque and Spanish roots to Anfield, there is every reason to believe Liverpool’s new head coach will have similar success to his fellow countrymen.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Football’s most controversial transfers: ‘Judas’ chants, mocking billboards and a pig’s head

Published

on

As Cristian Romero pulls on the famous red shirt, he hums the words to North London Forever before making his way into the tunnel at the Emirates Stadium.

As the team walk out onto the pitch, Romero high-fives mascot Gunnersaurus, who points to the Argentinian’s brand new ‘Once a Gooner, always a Gooner’ tattoo on his right calf and gives a thumbs up.

Unlikely? FantasyLand? Well, if Arsenal pursue their surprise interest in the 28-year-old centre-back, perhaps not.

Not that Tottenham Hotspur appear willing to consider an approach from their neighbours and bitter rivals for their captain, let alone sanction a sale.

He may have been born in Cordoba, northern Argentina, but after five years at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, the notion of Romero being allowed to head the four miles south to the Emirates feels extremely problematic at best, sacrilegious at worst.

And yet, it wouldn’t even be the most controversial transfer in the history of the Arsenal-Spurs rivalry, let alone English football and certainly not globally. It would, though, add to the list of highly-disputed mooted moves that never happened.


“I was asking myself why he’d choose Arsenal when you know how much it’s going to affect your personal life,” ex-Spurs defender Stephen Clemence previously told The Athletic. “That’s what surprised me most about his decision. You turn your whole life upside down with a move like that.”

Sol Campbell was heading towards Tottenham-legend territory. Born a 30-minute drive from White Hart Lane in the Plaistow district of east London, academy graduate Campbell was still a teenager when he made his first-team debut for Spurs and would blossom into one of the Premier League’s best defenders, an England regular, their captain who lifted the League Cup in 1999 and a player who made more than 300 appearances for them.

Then, aged 26, he left on a free transfer to further his career ambitions. Disappointing, yes, but understandable. Inter of Italy and Spain’s Barcelona were possible destinations, but instead Campbell shocked English football and caused unimaginable consternation and fury… by joining Arsenal.

Spurs fans took this very, very well.

They hung an effigy of Campbell from a lamppost on Tottenham High Road, flooded their stadium with ‘Judas’ banners when he returned as an Arsenal player, threw drink bottles and missiles in his direction and endlessly chanted ‘scum’, among many worse words. His new Arsenal team-mates had booed Campbell in training to prepare him for the reception but, well, nothing could quite compare to the abuse he took.

Tottenham fans direct their anger at Sol Campbell in November 2001 (Tom Jenkins/Getty Images)

“In hindsight, I’m not sure if I would sign him again, bearing in mind the difficulties he faced,” Arsenal’s then manager Arsene Wenger later said.

It was the most controversial transfer in modern English football history, but one Campbell could justify via the two Premier League titles and three FA Cups he won in six seasons with Arsenal. “Spurs fans have not forgotten it, but it was the best thing I could have done for myself,” Campbell said.

Fellow defender William Gallas may have gone in the opposite direction to Tottenham (also on a free) a few years later, but nothing has compared to Campbell’s move since.

Imagine Bruno Guimaraes ditching this week’s Arsenal move to join Sunderland from Newcastle United instead, or Erling Haaland swapping Manchester City for neighbours United and you’d have something comparable.

The latter switch is not without precedent, though.

Carlos Tevez sort-of swapped Old Trafford for the Etihad Stadium in 2009; he had won two Premier League titles in two seasons having been loaned to United for two years from West Ham but, having elected not to join the club permanently that summer (despite United wanting to sign him), he instead went to City.

This was before their dominance era, so the old noisy neighbours wanted to make a big song and dance out of the deal and erected a huge ‘Welcome to Manchester’ billboard to reflect what would soon be a changing of the guard in the city.

Manchester City’s ‘Welcome to Manchester’ billboard after signing Carlos Tevez angered Sir Alex Ferguson (Dave Thompson/PA Images via Getty Images)

It was a marketing idea laced with genius, although United manager Sir Alex Ferguson didn’t quite see it that way, calling the stunt “stupid and arrogant”.

The Manchester rivalry is fairly hate-filled, so Wayne Rooney’s dalliance with City when he submitted a transfer request at United in 2010 was pretty controversial, ditto Cristiano Ronaldo’s flirtation with the Etihad in 2021 before he returned to Old Trafford after more than a decade with Real Madrid and Juventus. But it’s nothing compared with United’s rivalry with Liverpool.

Players swapping one of those clubs for the other is almost unheard of, to the extent that it has not happened since 1964, when Phil Chisnall moved to Anfield for £25,000 ($34,000) when the rivalry was devoid of the intensity that fills it now.

Even playing for both clubs in a career is rare, with only two men doing it in the Premier League era: Paul Ince (in 1997, two years after leaving United for Inter) and Michael Owen, with the latter seen by many Liverpool fans as a traitor for moving to Old Trafford in 2009, five years after leaving Anfield for Real Madrid.

Only one player has come close to leaving one for the other in modern times, although given United’s staunch opposition to the mooted deal, it perhaps never came that close at all.

Defender Gabriel Heinze wanted to leave in 2007, having lost his place in the team to Patrice Evra. Liverpool were his preferred destination and submitted a bid of £6.8million, which they believed met a minimum-fee release clause.

But United rejected it, and the dispute became bitter. Heinze believed the offer should legally have been accepted, so it went all the way to a Premier League tribunal, which ruled in United’s favour. Heinze never played for them again, eventually joining Real Madrid that same summer.

The Argentina international defender, now a coach at Arsenal, came to regret the saga. He said in 2011: “I was aware of the rivalry, I knew the risk of going from Manchester to Liverpool and what it means. I hope it doesn’t tarnish the way they (supporters) see me and they will remember the three years I had in the team.”

How many transfers do Liverpool actually need?

Jon Mackenzie

Given how unpopular United are with many other fanbases, moving there can destroy a legacy, like when Robin van Persie joined from Arsenal in 2012, or Alan Smith, who was Leeds United through and through before he broke Yorkshire hearts when signing for the team they despise like no other in 2004.

Steven Gerrard had his Liverpool legacy and connection in mind when he rebuffed Chelsea in 2005 after a long, protracted dalliance with the best team in England at the time, albeit he had just won the Champions League under Rafael Benitez.

“I’d have regretted it for the rest of my life,” Gerrard said recently of moving to Stamford Bridge.

“I went to see my dad and my brother, who are two Liverpool fans, and they completely took all the external out of it and just said, ‘If you go and win two or three Premier Leagues, or a European Cup, with Chelsea or Inter Milan, or Real Madrid, will it be good?’

“And I went, ‘Yeah, of course it will be good, because you’ve won’. They said, ‘But will it be good or better than if you win one more trophy with Liverpool?’ And I said, ‘No, I’d feel better to do it with Liverpool’. They said, ‘Well, just make it all go away’. And it all went away.”

Transfers just do not happen between certain clubs, like Glasgow’s big two Celtic and Rangers, for example, given their deep-seated rivalry which encompasses far more than football.

Rangers famously had an unwritten policy against signing Catholic players, which was smashed in 1989 when former Celtic striker Mo Johnston joined from French club Nantes. It was hugely controversial.

Johnston’s agent Bill McMurdo later said: “After the signing, Maurice and I had security with us 24 hours a day. I had people stay in my house for six months, and Maurice had a minder with him all the time.”

It takes an audacious player to sign for both Celtic and Rangers during their whole career, with Kenny Miller and Steven Pressley among a very small post-Second World War number to have done it.

It’s a similar story with Barcelona and Real Madrid in Spain. Only a handful have moved directly between the clubs in the past 50 years, such as Argentine striker Javier Saviola in 2007 (he joined Madrid on a free transfer after his Barca contract expired) and Spain midfielder (and now Paris Saint-Germain head coach) Luis Enrique, who went the other way in the same circumstances in 1996.

By far the most prominent and hate-filled such transfer was when Luis Figo made a then-world-record £37million move to Madrid in 2000. The Portuguese forward had won La Liga with Barca in 1998 and 1999, but that was not enough to stop him ditching the Camp Nou for the Bernabeu, leaving a trail of destruction in his wake.

Missiles rain down on Luis Figo at the Camp Nou in November 2002 (Firo Foto/Getty Images)

When he returned to Camp Nou in a Madrid shirt, glass whisky bottles were thrown onto the pitch by angry fans, and every time Figo took a corner, the game had to be halted due to the barrage of missiles hurled in his direction.

“When we warmed up and saw that atmosphere, I’d have been happy if the referee decided to call off the game,” then Madrid full-back Roberto Carlos said.

Why Real Madrid have quietly made the most sensible transfer of the summer

JJ Bull

It got worse two years later, when a pig’s head was thrown at Figo during a Barca-Madrid match.

Romero may or may not have it that bad at the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium as an Arsenal player if he makes this move, but it might be wise not to find out.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Wales must learn from Bosnia and Herzegovina loss in Euros bid – Ian Rush

Published

on

A number of Welsh players have secured moves during the summer going into the 2026-27 season.

Goalkeeper Karl Darlow left Leeds United to join Manchester United while Harry Wilson, arguably the star performer of the Bellamy era, moved from Fulham to Leeds.

Liverpool youngster Lewis Koumas, who scored his first international goal against Ghana in June, is also expected to secure another loan switch away from Anfield having had spells with Birmingham City and Hull City last season.

“I’ve seen Lewis quite a lot in pre-season, he looks very, very good,” said Rush, who scored 28 times in 73 appearances for his country.

“Harry Wilson, he came on in the second half, he was a major influence for Leeds in beating Liverpool.

“We’re looking forward, but we’ve got to keep it as a team, it’s up to them to do that, but I can see us doing alright.”

Wales start their Nations League campaign against Portugal in Lisbon on 24 September and face Denmark in Copenhagen three days later.

Bellamy’s side then host Norway and Denmark at Cardiff City Stadium in October.

The final two matches of the campaign take place in November with Wales travelling to Norway before hosting Portugal.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.