The 2026 NHL Entry Draft marks the first real rebuilding draft class this century for the Vancouver Canucks.

Among the picks Vancouver put to good use this weekend were the ones they received for franchise defenseman Quinn Hughes, hard-working fan favourite Kiefer Sherwood, long-tenured veteran defenseman Tyler Myers and middle-six sparkplug Conor Garland.

In all, the Canucks entered the 2026 draft with 10 total picks, and emerged from the weekend with nine new prospects and some additional capital in 2027.

There is still a ton of work to be done by the Canucks moving forward. Even beyond the development side of the equation, the goal for new Canucks brass is to build an almost entirely new young core that can lead the next great Canucks team out of the cellar and back to meaningful contention over the next five years or so.

The sheer amount of talent required to summit that particular mountain is enormous. This weekend, however, the team began the process of building up a base level of forward talent through the draft and demonstrated very clearly what Vancouver’s new decision-makers want this next generation of Canucks players to look like.

Let’s open the notebook and unpack what the Canucks did at the draft, what’s still needed to tie this offseason together and what comes next as development camp and the free-agent frenzy get underway next week.

Size, size everywhere

Clearly, new general manager Ryan Johnson and Canucks director of amateur scouting Todd Harvey have a type.

Vancouver was after one thing and apparently one thing only: athletic players, preferably with big bodies.

After the Canucks selected a 6-foot-2 centre with the third overall pick and added a heavy 6-1 power winger with the No. 24 selection on Day 1, the club doubled down on size by selecting massive 6-7 centre Brooks Rogowski with No. 33 on Saturday.

By the end of the draft, the Canucks had selected four forwards measuring 6-2 or taller: Malhotra, Rogowski, 6-4 winger Yaroslav Bryzgalov and 6-4 Slovakian winger Lucian Bernat. Then, for good measure, with their final pick Vancouver selected a 6-foot-5, 215-pound behemoth defensive defender in Samuel Eriksson. None of Vancouver’s nine draft picks across two days measured in at under 6 feet.

“You know what, we talked about this, and we had some direction from obviously (Johnson) and the staff,” Harvey told the media on Saturday after the draft had concluded. “We wanted to get bigger, we wanted to get faster, we wanted to get harder. Obviously we can say, ‘Well, we didn’t take any skill,’ but don’t underrate the skill on these guys. Like, these guys have skill. And I think they’re still developing, but definitely we won’t get pushed around.”

By and large, the Canucks weren’t reaching for size. In fact, their most off-the-board selection — 19-year-old USHL forward Connor Davis, the fifth-round selection — was the shortest player the Canucks selected.

Rogowski, for example, didn’t exactly light the OHL on fire offensively during his draft year, but he has some reasonably productive NHL comps in his scoring profile, including players like Lawson Crouse and Pavel Zacha at the higher end of his statistical comparables.

While some of the NHL amateur scouts we polled expressed some concern about his ability to leverage his size in the hard areas of the ice and his overall consistency, Rogowski was widely viewed as an early-to-mid second-round pick. And he definitely had his supporters in the industry, who note that he’s a plus skater and believe he’s very likely to break out offensively with Oshawa this upcoming season.

Likewise with Bryzgalov. While there are more concerns about his overall skating ability and the deception in his hands, he’s widely viewed as a high-hockey-IQ bruiser and a potential plus playmaker from down low. Bryzgalov is a re-entry prospect and his production doesn’t jump off of the page for a 19-year-old in the WHL, but it’s worth noting he’s relatively young for a draft-plus-one player. Some of the sharpest Western scouts I know thought the profile was interesting enough to warrant rolling the dice as early as Vancouver decided to.

Effectively, after landing a signature face-of-the-rebuild, two-way centre on Day 1, Vancouver largely found value from a variety of familiar fishing holes — the OHL, the Swedish junior ranks — in which the team has generally had success identifying talent, including in the late rounds.

This 2026 Canucks draft class might not be as chock-full of upside or value as it probably could’ve been, but it’s a strong class of talented, big-bodied athletes. Vancouver mostly found value where it belonged, and a variety of the players have the potential to provide some level of offensive value down the road if the Canucks can help their new prospects unlock their heavy skill game in the development process.

More than anything, incoming Canucks management has shown us clearly what they want the next generation to look and play like. Speed, size and character is clearly the order of the day for the Johnson-era Canucks at the draft table.

The leaper

Among the tree-like bets the Canucks placed throughout the 2026 draft, Norwegian forward Niklas Aaram-Olsen stands out.

Standing 6-1 and weighing in south of 190 pounds, Aaram-Olsen was one of the only welterweight forward types of Vancouver’s 2026 draft class. He is a skilled finisher who was solidly productive at the Swedish junior level and appeared in 16 SHL games, a good sign that his development track is accelerating quickly, even if he didn’t manage to record a point in the top Swedish professional league as a 17-year-old.

More than anything, though, Aaram-Olsen is a proper freak-level athlete.

At the NHL draft combine, Aaram-Olsen absolutely crushed the various jump-related athletic tests. These are typically the tests that NHL talent evaluators pay the most attention to, largely because they’re seen as correlated with explosive skating ability. In the standing long jump test, in particular, Aaram-Olsen recorded the best result in this draft class. The only players within two inches of Aaram-Olsen’s result were also two inches taller than the new Canucks winger.

“He’s a machine in the gym,” Harvey noted. “I mean, he’s a guy that’s pretty low-maintenance, a direct player when he’s on the ice. He’s direct and he skates quick. That kind of explosive skating, and he’s got a really good shot so he can beat goalies.”

Aaram-Olsen is likely to spend this upcoming season in the SHL, but is a Boston University commit and may join Caleb Malhotra at Agganis Arena for the 2026-27 season. In the event that Malhotra doesn’t sign an entry-level contract and turn pro before then, there’s even a chance two of Vancouver’s top picks may get the opportunity to play together at the NCAA level.

“We better call (BU coach) Jay (Pandolfo) and tell him they better play together,” Harvey joked. “That’d be great for our development.”

“When he gets excited, I get excited”

With their third-round pick on Saturday, the Canucks dipped into the pool of available goaltending talent to select Russian netminder Dmitri Ivchenko out of the Avangard Omsk pipeline.

Ivchenko stands 6-foot-3 and is viewed as a technically proficient goaltender. He’s certainly put up sparkling results at every level he’s played at and appears to have spent some time in the KHL as a 17-year-old — though he never saw any game action — which is generally a bullish signal that he’s thought of very highly by Omsk coaches and development folks.

One wrinkle to be aware of: because of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, which has directly led to Russia’s exclusion from IIHF competition, it’s very difficult for NHL scouts to enter the country to evaluate Russian-based prospects. Harvey told the media on Saturday that the Canucks were never able to get a live viewing of Ivchenko during the draft process.

This is an interesting dynamic. Vancouver’s process differs from that of some other NHL teams in that it strongly favours in-person viewings in the evaluation process. Goaltending, however, functions a bit differently due to the involvement of longtime Canucks goaltending coach, former director of goaltending and current goaltending scout Ian Clark.

“Ian Clark’s a big part of our process,” Harvey told the media on Saturday. “And he does such a great job. You know we all know how hard he works, and he’s on top of things. I think that he was he was excited, and when he gets excited I kind of get excited too.”

There’s a lot worth unpacking here, but first and foremost, this is a clear signal Clark is still deeply involved in Vancouver’s evaluation process at the very least. For years Clark had shaped Vancouver’s overall strategy as it pertained to goalie evaluation. After his withdrawal from the day-to-day coaching work during the 2024 offseason, however, Clark’s influence internally had dwindled precipitously. And with it, to be honest, so did the quality of Vancouver’s decision-making in the blue paint.

From the team’s decision to only sign Kevin Lankinen to a one-year deal, to the Artūrs Šilovs trade, to the long-term Lankinen extension, to the risky Demko extension, the Canucks have been on a very difficult cold streak in making transactional decisions in net.

If selecting Ivchenko is a signal that Clark may be getting more involved once again in Vancouver’s goaltending evaluation process, that would be a very good thing indeed.

Johnson’s first trade

Even as the NHL trade market has popped off with fans being treated to a veritable buffet of trade news since just about the moment the Stanley Cup was awarded to the Carolina Hurricanes, it has been relatively quiet for the Canucks.

In fact, since the offseason kicked into full gear following the Stanley Cup Final, 28 of the NHL’s 32 teams had executed a trade before Johnson got in on the act on Saturday, executing a minor trade with the Toronto Maple Leafs during the sixth round of the draft.

The deal itself, in which Vancouver swapped out No. 161 (an early sixth-rounder) in exchange for Toronto’s 2027 fifth-round pick, was a straightforward value add. From Vancouver’s perspective, Johnson and company got a head start on accumulating additional draft capital for next season and fixed a slight win out of Vancouver’s trio of sixth-round draft picks.

The deal was tidy work for the Canucks, but obviously, it was a swap more likely to be remembered as a career milestone for Johnson as opposed to an especially consequential trade in the context of Vancouver’s rebuild.

For what it’s worth, the lack of trade activity out of Vancouver over the past 10 days doesn’t appear to be the result of a lack of effort.

Multiple league sources have suggested to The Athletic this weekend that Vancouver is eager to sell a variety of their veteran players. The club is open to discussing just about every established veteran on the roster, and one source even characterized the club as “desperate” to move off of struggling, highly-compensated centre Elias Pettersson. We know, too, that Jake DeBrusk has been in play, and there are various teams doing their homework — including the Ottawa Senators — on the possibility of adding the net-front specialist to their lineup.

On Friday, Vancouver explored various scenarios to move around the draft board. I’d wondered if perhaps Vancouver had been among those teams attempting to move up and acquire the Philadelphia Flyers’ pick for the purpose of selecting Ryan Lin, but have been told that it was the Calgary Flames, Anaheim Ducks and of course the Sharks that had bid up for that particular trade return.

In any event, now that the seal is broken and Johnson is in the book as having executed an NHL trade, hopefully the dam will begin to break here.

The situation he has inherited, after all, is a dire one. Emergency measures to shed inefficient commitments attached to depreciating assets and clear the decks for the purpose of accumulating future value over the next 24 months will be required to turn this particular franchise around.

In that context, Johnson’s first career trade felt like something of a microcosm of the dynamic that we saw unfold for the Canucks throughout the weekend. The deal with Toronto was solid work, competent. It was a win in normal circumstances, much like Vancouver’s unsexy but valuable haul of high-character, highly athletic, high-floor prospects at the draft.

The question, even if it doesn’t rise to the level of a concern or a criticism just yet, is whether the good work that the Canucks are pulling off is sufficient given the circumstances — or whether more aggression on the trade market, and a greater level of risk tolerance at the draft table, may be required to catch up to the pack in a reasonable enough time frame to pull this rebuilding project off.

Need help with today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle? You’ve come to the right place.

Welcome to Connections: Sports Edition Coach — a spot to gather clues and discuss (and share) scores.

A quick public service announcement before we continue: The bottom of this article includes the answers — and hints — for the four categories. So if you want to solve the board hint-free, we recommend you play before continuing.

You can access today’s game here. And when you’re done, try out our limited-edition Connections: Soccer Edition — special for this summer’s World Cup — for an extra challenge.

Today’s difficulty

Game No. 643’s difficulty: 2.5 out of 5

Connections: Sports Edition hints for June 28, 2026

Scroll below for one answer in each of the four categories.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Yellow: FLAIR

Green: PF

Blue: GUSTO

Purple: TD

Connections: Sports Edition answers for June 28, 2026

Scroll below for the full answers to each of the four categories.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Yellow

Style: FLAIR, PANACHE, PIZZAZZ, SWAGGER

Green

Basketball stats, abbreviated: FG, FT, PF, TO

Blue

Members of France’s World Cup squad: BARCOLA, GUSTO, MBAPPÉ, OLISE

Purple

NBA arenas: BARCLAYS, KIA, MODA, TD

What is Connections: Sports Edition?

Connections: Sports Edition is The Athletic’s first-ever game, a daily puzzle designed for players to find connections between 16 words on the game board.

The game’s objective is to group words or objects into four groups of four based on commonalities within each group as quickly as possible. Find the groups without making four mistakes. Each puzzle has exactly one solution, so watch out for words or items that seem to belong to multiple categories!

Category examples:
Sports ____ : Fan, Car, Bar, Radio
U.S. Summer Olympians: Biles, Phelps, Ledecky, Lyles

Each category group is assigned a color, revealed as you solve, ranging from straightforward (yellow) to medium (green) to challenging (blue) to tricky (purple).

Who creates the puzzles for Connections: Sports Edition?

That’s me! My name is Mark Cooper, and I create Connections: Sports Edition and work as a managing editor for college sports here at The Athletic. I was previously The Athletic’s managing editor for breaking news.

The next puzzle will be available at midnight in your time zone. Thanks for playing — and share your scores in the comments!

After 72 World Cup group stage matches the bracket is set and the remaining 32 teams are all five rounds away from the game’s biggest prize.

It’s knockout football from here with all three host nations still standing and stars including Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappe, Erling Haaland and Harry Kane firing in goals.

So, who is the best team left? Who is going to be in the final? Who are the best fans? The best player? Where will the shocks come? And who is going to win it?

We asked our writers, and this is what they said.

---

The best team to watch at this World Cup is…

Oliver Kay: In terms of quality, it’s France. Their first half in their opening game, against Senegal, was poor. But since then, they’ve been excellent. For fun, it’s probably Senegal or Japan.

James Horncastle: If you forget the first half against Senegal at MetLife, France have looked as good on the pitch as they look on paper. This has not always been the case with Didier Deschamps. It is a welcome development.

Jack Pitt-Brooke: Quite to my surprise, the USA. Not many teams actually bring dynamic, intense vertical football into the international game, but Mauricio Pochettino has managed it. Combine that with the atmosphere as hosts and their games are all must-see from here on.

Jay Harris: Japan have been mesmerising. They finished second and were unbeaten in a challenging group which contained the Netherlands, Sweden and Tunisia. Key players Wataru Endo and Kaoru Mitoma missed out on the tournament through injury but they still play with such effortless fluency. Daizen Maeda’s goal against Sweden was pure poetry.

Laura Williamson: In terms of the ball on the grass, it’s got to be France but my answer is actually the United States or Canada. I’m fascinated by people falling in love with these teams and the game in general — and long may it continue.

Felipe Cardenas: France. This team is simply too good to ignore. Even against Norway, a game that meant very little to them, France put on a show. Ousmane Dembele scored a hat-trick and proved to everyone that, together with superstar Kylian Mbappe, no attack is better equipped to win the tournament.

Matt Slater: This is a tough one, as no team has been absolutely brilliant for the entire game, three times. France have been the best I have seen in person but I have also enjoyed the Dutch on TV — thrills and spills.

Phil Hay: Japan/Colombia. Japan because they have no superstars, prima donnas or passengers. That might sound underwhelming but it makes them a proper team. Colombia because they’re flamboyant and ambitious in their play — and the emotion of it all drives players such as Luis Diaz and James Rodriguez to tears. Diaz has performed like a man possessed.

Jordan Campbell: I have enjoyed Morocco the most. They are not perfect but they are full of invention and creativity. When they get their combination play and counter-attacking right, they look capable of going all the way. Whether they can sustain it for full games without giving too many chances away is the big question.

Lukas Weese: Argentina. With Messi on the pitch, still playing so well despite being 39, Argentina remains a threat.

Patrick Iversen: Japan. This may be familiarity bias because I’ve seen two of their games live, but I just love the way they play football.

Greg O’Keeffe: France. It’s like watching Paris Saint-Germain on cheat mode.

Austin Green: Most aesthetically pleasing? Japan. Flatout best? France.

---

The best player is…

Kay: Lionel Messi.

Horncastle: Improbably, still Messi. Others will go for Mbappe, and I did enjoy being present for a stadium-wide cheer in Philadelphia when he tracked back and regained possession for his team. Shout out to Vinicius Junior, who has also stepped up.

Pitt-Brooke: No point trying to be clever here: it’s obviously Messi.

Harris: There is a small part of me which wants to build a convincing argument for somebody else just to be different, but the only possible answer is Messi. We should not forget about Lamine Yamal, though. He will play a more prominent role for Spain during the rest of the World Cup now that he is fully fit.

Williamson: Mbappe. He hasn’t missed a penalty at this World Cup, has he?

Cardenas: Messi. Is the Argentine as fast and dynamic as Yamal and Mbappe? He isn’t. But the 39-year-old is playing like he doesn’t want his international career to ever end. Bravo.

Slater: I was in the mixed zone in Doha when Messi said the 2022 World Cup would be his last … what a fibber. He is still the best, though.

Hay: Mbappe. That will be proven by the end of the tournament, I think. But my favourite player is Australia goalkeeper Patrick Beach, as explained here.

Campbell: Messi. It’s almost funny at this point to keep saying, aged 39, that he is still the best. But he is. Until someone else displays the same mesmerising vision, passing range and clinical touch in front of goal, only a bias against age would see him rank below.

Weese: Mbappe. Not only is he scoring goals but he’s making his team-mates look special too.

Iversen: Mbappe. It’s best not to overthink these things.

O’Keeffe: Mbappe is putting his problems at Real Madrid behind him. An unstoppable force of nature.

Green: Right now? Messi. After the final? Probably Mbappe.

---

The coach doing the best job is…

Kay: It has to be Bubista, who has led Cape Verde to the knockout stage, conceding only two goals in what looked like a horrible group. They have some talented players, but their biggest strengths are their unity, their organisation and their defiance. That reflects on the coach.

Horncastle: Can’t argue with Bubista. Cape Verde are unbeaten in 12 games. Maybe we should have seen this coming when they swept Serbia aside 3-0 at the end of May. Can’t believe we’re not doing the worst … I’ll save that entry for another day.

Pitt-Brooke: I thought South Africa were an absolute shambles in the opening game against Mexico, so hats off to Hugo Broos for dragging them through to the knockout stage. I could even see them finding their way through to the last-16 as well now.

Harris: Emerse Fae deserves credit for guiding Ivory Coast to the knockout stage for the first time in their history. It’s a remarkable achievement which the golden generation of Didier Drogba, Yaya Toure and Kolo Toure failed to achieve. They have the youngest squad at the tournament with an average age of 25.4 and will cause Norway problems in the next round.

Williamson: Bubista. Cape Verde’s achievement is absolutely remarkable. But an honourable mention to Ghana’s Carlos Queiroz, too. I don’t agree with much he says, but he certainly had the upper hand against Thomas Tuchel and England.

Cardenas: Ronald Koeman. The Dutch are flying. Ten goals in their first three matches caught my attention. Their football has been silky and the manager appears to be getting everything right. His tactics aren’t always the most expansive, but I’ll give him credit for getting his selections right.

Slater: A draw between Cape Verde’s Bubista and Iran’s Amir Ghalenoei. For both to get through their groups undefeated is — for very different reasons — a remarkable achievement. Bubista’s is the classic underdog story, while Ghalenoei is dealing with a unique set of disadvantages.

Hay: Pound for pound, it’s Cape Verde’s Bubista. His team didn’t bluff their way to draws against Spain, Uruguay or Saudi Arabia. They’re drilled and confident. In terms of bigger nations, Ronald Koeman has the Netherlands ticking along nicely.

Campbell: Bubista. To go unbeaten in a group containing Spain, Uruguay and Saudi Arabia is incredible.

Weese: Lionel Scaloni. He is getting a cohesive performance out of his players through the group stage.

Iversen: Koeman. The Netherlands has looked dominant since a shaky opener against Japan.

O’Keeffe: It’s Ghalenoei, given what he and his players have had to contend with, or Bubista. For the sake of positivity, Bubista nicks it.

Green: Bubista has made history with Cape Verde, and it is no fluke.

---

The best round 32 tie is…

Kay: Netherlands vs Morocco looks like fun. Argentina vs Cape Verde is a hugely appealing game too, but I will be very pleasantly surprised if it’s a close contest.

Horncastle: It’s Netherlands-Morocco for the talent on display and the cultural ties too

Pitt-Brooke: I think Japan might be the worst possible opponent for Brazil to face at this stage. They’re so clever, so fit and so sharp; I just wonder if they might be able to pick Brazil off.

Harris: Japan against Brazil has all the ingredients of an instant classic. Morocco’s clash against the Netherlands will be fascinating too. Several members of Morocco’s squad, including Noussair Mazraoui and Sofyan Amrabat, were born in the Netherlands, which adds an extra pinch of spice. Amrabat even made a few appearances for them at youth-team level.

Williamson: Ivory Coast vs Norway. You suspect there might be a few goals in that one (I’ve probably cursed it now) but it would be incredible to see an African side progress, particularly after Norway’s ridiculous raft of changes in their 4-1 defeat by France.

Cardenas: Mexico vs Ecuador. This will be a primetime showdown in Mexico City’s temple, the Estadio Azteca. It’s the co-hosts, winners of three group stage matches in front of frenzied crowds, versus a World Cup dark horse that is used to playing at altitude. Ecuador are nearly unbeatable in the capital of Quito, which will give them confidence in the thin air of Mexico City. I cannot wait for this one.

Slater: Morocco vs Netherlands, FIFA’s sixth-ranked team versus its seventh, in the round of 32? Good grief. This is exactly the type of premature jeopardy that did for the old European Cup. Much more of this excitement and FIFA will bring back a second group stage.

Hay: The Netherlands versus Morocco. Not much else comes close.

Campbell: Netherlands vs Morocco. Ronald Koeman’s side may not be the most beautiful Dutch team ever but they made light work of their group. Morocco, on the other hand, are brilliantly inventive. I’m intrigued as to how those styles will match up.

Weese: Portugal and Croatia. Cristiano Ronaldo, 41, taking on Luka Modric, 40, will be compelling. 

Iversen: Argentina vs Cape Verde, purely for the “can Cape Verde really do it?” factor that might last five minutes. Here’s hoping it lasts at least 45?

O’Keeffe: Morocco against the Netherlands has the potential to be utterly absorbing.

Green: Netherlands vs Morocco, two sides that simply do not lose easily in major tournaments.

---

The biggest shock will come when…

Kay: One of the three hosts might come unstuck. They have all played really well so far, and all have winnable ties, but it is very easy to get over-excited and lose sight of what’s in front of you.

Horncastle: I don’t think it’ll be a shock because I’ve seen them deny Italy a place at the World Cup. But I have a suspicion Bosnia will pop the U.S. bubble.

Pitt-Brooke: Ecuador play Mexico in the last 32. Ecuador are a fantastic team, as they showed in the way they bullied Germany in New Jersey in their third game to make it through. They won’t have an issue with the altitude either. No one will want to play them.

Harris: The USMNT fail to reach the quarter-finals. A favourable draw has opened up for them and, despite losing to Turkey in their final group-stage game, expectations have skyrocketed. The pressure is going to build and I have a bad feeling they will crack against a team they are expected to beat.

Williamson: It’s oddly hard to predict shocks when there are still 32 teams left in it! But I can see Brazil stuttering against Japan, and I wonder about the Netherlands against Morocco too. (I’m being beaten by a six-year-old in The Athletic’s Pick ‘Em game, so take that with a pinch of salt!)

Cardenas: Ivory Coast eliminates Norway. Haaland will be the first big star at this World Cup to pack his bags and go home.

Slater: Is Ecuador beating Mexico in Mexico City a shock? Is South Africa beating Canada in L.A. a shock? OK, how about both happening and we lose two of the co-hosts this round?

Hay: Japan knock out Brazil (OK, this probably won’t happen, but I don’t think it’s out of the question).

Campbell: England go out in the last 16 or earlier to a team not ranked in the world’s top 10. Could the U.S. also do the unthinkable and make it to the semi-final? They’re in a very favourable corner of the draw.

Weese: Canada makes the quarter-finals of the World Cup. You heard it here first.

Iversen: The U.S. doesn’t make it to the round of 16.

O’Keeffe: England go out before the quarter-finals. Injuries are exposing potential deep flaws in Thomas Tuchel’s selection logic.

Green: An organised, clinical Japan defeat Brazil in the round of 32.

---

The best fans are…

Kay: Argentina’s. So loud, so passionate, with so much love for their team. The atmosphere they bring is something special.

Horncastle: The Scots. Not for drinking Boston out of beer, but for the remix of Miami by Will Smith. Bienvenido, Tartan Army.

Pitt-Brooke: Can I say Ecuador again? The noise when Gonzalo Plata stabbed the winner past Manuel Neuer was one of the loudest of the whole tournament. And their fans lit up New York City all week.

Harris: I saw a lot of Ecuador fans partying late into the night after their victory over Germany. Norway’s Viking row celebration deserves a special mention, too.

Cardenas: The Scots. The Tartan Army are the GOATs of World Cup fan supporters.

Slater: Ecuador’s yellow army is the best, brightest and loudest I have encountered at this tournament so far. The only mistake they made was putting their colours on the Rocky statue in Philadelphia. Rookie error.

Hay: The Dutch. That ‘Al Rechts, Al Links’ song is ace, and the swathes of orange always look good. Kudos to Japan for their litter-tidying routine too.

Campbell: Norway. Only a few overly optimistic Scotland fans remain on U.S. soil but the vibrancy and feel-good fun of the Tartan Army has been carried on by the Vikings in Boston. Their famous ‘Norwegian row’ has been shaking stadiums and taking over bars.

Weese: I’ll give some love to Ghana, Ivory Coast and Senegal supporters who I saw in Toronto. Their musical chants are incredible.

Iversen: Everyone who wasn’t stationed in Boston for the group stage feels a bit of FOMO about the Scottish fans. They deserved better from their team.

O’Keeffe: Scotland’s, who haven’t had anywhere near as much to cheer on the pitch as Norway’s, but who have won most neutral hearts.

Green: The rowing Norway supporters.

---

The all-star golden boot race will be won by…

Kay: Mbappe. But whoever wins it, it will be with the highest total since Gerd Muller’s 10 in 1970.

Horncastle: I think Mbappe has more talent around him than Messi. He doesn’t have to do as much himself.

Pitt-Brooke: I can’t repeat Messi again, so I will go for Kylian Mbappe, who seems to become a different player during these big tournaments.

Harris: I’m going with Mbappe. Messi might hold the all-time goalscoring record for now, but Mbappe will inevitably rip it away from him at some point.

Williamson: Mbappe.

Cardenas: Messi. The Argentina captain is leading the pack, and I don’t expect him to slow down. Messi, Mbappe and Kane will battle for this award, although Dembele is lurking, too.

Slater: Just to be slightly contrary, I am going for Kane, as England are not good enough to rest him, he takes penalties and if he does not score at least seven goals here, England will not make the last week of the tournament.

Hay: The aforementioned Mbappe.

Campbell: I don’t think Norway will go deep enough for Haaland to win it and I’m still unsure of whether Brazil will get to the end, despite Vinicius Jnr looking inspired. Messi is the main contender but France are so dangerous that I can’t see Mbappe not getting to double figures by the end of the tournament.

Weese: Messi. We haven’t reached the important games yet and there’s just a feeling he will get on the scoresheet more times.

Iversen: Messi, as long as FIFA doesn’t decide the remaining games will be 90 minutes of penalty shots.

O’Keeffe: Mbappe. At the moment, it’s hard to see who stops him once Messi and Haaland face tougher opponents.

Green: Mbappe, with 12 goals to give him a neat 20 over two World Cups.

---

The World Cup final will be between…

Kay: France and Argentina again. That will be the most common pick, I expect, but it looks like a pretty open field.

Horncastle: France and Argentina, a repeat of four years ago.

Pitt-Brooke: The issue is that France and Spain are in the same half of the draw, but I would go for Spain to win the Dallas semi. Argentina are the best team in the Atlanta half of the draw.

Harris: France and Argentina are on opposite sides of the draw and the prospect of them facing each other in successive finals is tantalising. It would be only the second time in history that has happened after West Germany and Argentina in 1986 and 1990.

Williamson: France and Argentina. But it will take some beating to beat what I was lucky enough to witness in Doha in December 2022.

Cardenas: France vs Brazil. My big bold take before the tournament started was that Brazil would stay in the tournament longer than Argentina, but fail to win it. France versus Brazil has a nice ring to it.

Slater: France and … Argentina. I want to be contrary again but there is a limit.

Hay: France and Argentina again.

Campbell: France and Argentina. A chance for Mbappe to exact revenge. A chance for Messi to make himself doubly immortal.

Weese: France and Argentina. Messi versus Mbappe 2.0 would be the perfect conclusion to this epic World Cup.

Iversen: France and England.

O’Keeffe: France and Argentina.

Green: France and Argentina.

---

And it will be won by…

Kay: I said France at the start, and I’ll stick with that. But it’s not going to be easy. They’ll face Sweden and then, potentially, Germany, Netherlands/Morocco and Spain just to get to the final. That could take a toll.

Horncastle: France. Mbappe scored a hat-trick in the final in Qatar and didn’t win. He’s playing as if he wants to set that right.

Pitt-Brooke: Messi does what Diego Maradona could not do and wins Argentina consecutive World Cups.

Harris: West Germany avenged their defeat to Argentina in 1986 four years later, and I’m tipping France to follow in their footsteps. Argentina have been impressive so far but I don’t think anybody can stop Mbappe and his supporting cast of Dembele, Desire Doue and Michael Olise.

Williamson: France. I’ve changed my mind again!

Cardenas: France. Too good. Too deep. And too much Mbappe.

Slater: France, for the same reason as above. Their attacking options are almost unfair.

Hay: France. They’re clearly the best side.

Campbell: I picked Argentina at the start, so will stick with it. France’s firepower can be too much for anyone on their day, but they still lack a bit of balance.

Weese: France to beat Argentina in penalties.

Iversen: France. England’s World Cup heartbreak is basically load-bearing infrastructure at this point.

O’Keeffe: France. Didier Deschamps’ bond with his players will only have been deepened by his bereavement, and it could galvanise the group behind him further. As a team, they’re unmatched.

Green: France. Revenge is a dish best served on a suspect grass playing surface.

---

Round of 32 fixtures

June 28

• South Africa vs Canada at SoFi Stadium (Los Angeles) — 12pm PT, 3pm ET, 8pm BST

June 29

• Brazil vs Japan at NRG Stadium (Houston) — 10am PT, 1pm ET, 6pm BST
• Germany vs Paraguay at Gillette Stadium (Boston) — 1:30pm PT, 4:30pm ET, 9:30pm BST
• Netherlands vs Morocco at Estadio BBVA (Monterrey) — 6pm PT, 9pm ET, 2am BST (June 30)

June 30

• Ivory Coast vs Norway at AT&T Stadium (Dallas) — 10am PT, 1pm ET, 6pm BST
• France vs Sweden at MetLife Stadium (New York/New Jersey) — 2pm PT, 5pm ET, 10pm BST
• Mexico vs Ecuador at Estadio Azteca (Mexico City) — 6pm PT, 9pm ET, 2am BST (July 1)

July 1

• England vs DR Congo at Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta) — 9am PT, 12pm ET, 5pm BST
• Belgium vs Senegal at Lumen Field (Seattle) — 1pm PT, 4pm ET, 9pm BST
• USA vs Bosnia and Herzegovina at Levi’s Stadium (San Francisco Bay Area) — 5pm PT, 8pm ET, 1am BST (July 2)

July 2

• Spain vs Austria at SoFi Stadium (Los Angeles) — 12pm PT, 3pm ET, 8pm BST
• Portugal vs Croatia at BMO Field (Toronto) — 4pm PT, 7pm ET, 12pm BST
• Switzerland vs Algeria at BC Place (Vancouver) — 8pm PT, 11pm ET, 4am BST (July 3)

July 3

• Australia v Egypt at AT&T Stadium (Dallas) — 11am PT, 2pm ET, 7pm BST
• Argentina v Cape Verde at Miami Stadium (Miami) — 3pm PT, 6pm ET, 11pm BST
• Colombia v Ghana at Arrowhead Stadium (Kansas City) — 6.30pm ET, 9.30pm ET, 2.30am BST