Congress has held more than a dozen hearings about college sports since 2020. The NCAA and the former Power 5 conferences have combined to spend more than $15 million on lobbyists. Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti said last month he’s been to Washington, D.C., 21 times in his three-plus years on the job.

They came oh-so-close to getting an actual bill out of the Senate this week: the Protect College Sports Act. Senate Majority Leader John Thune tried his darndest to get his colleagues to hurry up and vote on it before beginning their five-week summer recess, but a predictable round of grandstanding and pork-barreling was too much to overcome. The ill-fated SCORE Act stalled out in a similar fashion in the House earlier this year.

More than six years since this never-ending legislative push began, Congress still hasn’t “saved” college sports. It’s time for university administrators, conference commissioners and NCAA president Charlie Baker to finally start formulating a Plan B.

If there is such a thing.

PCSA was the brainchild of Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) — a 171-page Frankensteinian whopper that aimed to cure everything from name, image and likeness and the transfer portal to eligibility limits and conference realignment (the latest version sought to limit conferences to 19 members). They even tried to ward off the next Lane Kiffin by declaring coaches couldn’t change jobs during the season. All of which was deemed essential to “save” an extremely popular multibillion-dollar enterprise from itself.

That’s because College Sports Inc. managed to convince politicians of all stripes that their schools will all go bankrupt if something isn’t done to rein in their escalating costs. As if some external party is forcing athletic directors to give football coaches guaranteed $90 million contracts, then give them blank checks to build a $50 million roster.

“Without this Bill, millions of young Athletes will be hurt, programs will be canceled, Women’s and Olympic Sports will go away, the fans will be robbed, and Universities will go broke,” President Donald Trump said this week while urging the Senate to pass it.

It all came to a head a few weeks ago when the Big Ten and SEC initially held out their support. The conferences finally signed off late last week when Cruz and Cantwell agreed to a revised “hard cap” that would allow schools to directly pay their athletes around $48 million, a considerable jump from the current $21.3 million “soft cap” no one follows.

Once that issue was resolved, Cruz confidently predicted the bill would fly through from there, with co-sponsor Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) telling reporters it could get as many as 80 votes.

But nothing is ever that easy in politics. At the 11th hour, the AFL-CIO and the Congressional Black Caucus came out in opposition. Sen. Ashley Moody (R-Fla.) filed an amendment to make it easier for home-state schools Florida State and Miami to change conferences. And then the final blow: three conservative senators, most notably old friend Tommy Tuberville, claimed the bill would threaten “state laws that ban biological men in women’s sports.” (The sponsors tried to assure them it would not.)

Yes, a bill whose authors purported to be protecting women’s sports got derailed by a different set of people claiming to be protecting women’s sports.

(Note to alarmists: The number of women’s college athletes has increased by 50,000 in the last five years, according to the NCAA’s 2024-25 participation data, and the NCAA is planning to add a women’s flag football championship in 2028.)

The PCSA is not dead yet. Cruz and Schmitt issued a statement Saturday claiming they’ve “locked in a guaranteed vote” for when they return in mid-September. But Cruz has been making these sorts of rosy proclamations for at least three years. Congressional experts say the odds of a vote decrease considerably the closer things get to the midterms. And even if it does pass, the House then gets its hands on it.  Representatives will have their own pet causes that will muck up that process.

In the meantime, the NCAA keeps getting sued into oblivion. Last winter, it kept losing injunction requests from geezer pro basketball players seeking waivers to return to college. It responded to that crisis by expediting a completely new eligibility process that eliminates waivers and redshirts entirely, instead giving a uniform five seasons of competition beginning no later than age 19. It passed in June to take effect in August.

So, of course, athletes who just completed their fourth seasons and had moved on with their lives began seeking injunctions to get their own fifth season of eligibility, and so far they’re all winning. Despite the NCAA’s pending appeal in a Colorado federal case, programs like Indiana, Texas and Virginia are already suiting up former players in training camps.

While each court case has its own unique circumstances, the judges’ decisions contain a recurring theme: They frown on any policy that restricts athletes’ ability to earn NIL compensation. And yet, College Sports Inc. presses on in its quest to get Congress to let them restrict the market for NIL compensation.

It’s time for Plan B.  College Sports Inc. currently has no idea what that looks like, but it’s got to start with leaders finally acknowledging that we’re never going back to the old days. These are professional sports now that need to be governed accordingly. Schools need to give their athletes legitimate service contracts rather than continue pretending they’re for “NIL.” And if they truly want things like salary caps and portal restrictions, they need to stop negotiating them with legislative aides and start negotiating with — brace yourself — the athletes themselves.

That, or keep acting like Charlie Brown with the football and spend another six years wooing politicians who claim they want to “save” college sports but mostly just want to see their names in a news release.

Lobbyists and lawyers will appreciate six more years of paychecks.

NEW YORK — New York Yankees starting pitcher Will Warren’s phone buzzed. It was late at night on Aug. 2, and he was in his seat on the team’s charter flight from Chicago to New York City.

The text message was from his wife. When he opened it, he saw a screenshot of a report — later debunked — that claimed he was part of a trade the San Diego Padres had rejected from the Yankees leading up to the deadline, which was the next night.

The supposed deal? It was Warren heading to San Diego for lefty reliever Adrian Morejon. The report quickly went viral.

Lending it possible legitimacy: The Yankees seemed to need a late-inning arm such as Morejon (2.89 ERA, 54 games), who as an impending free agent might have been someone San Diego would trade.

But Warren was glad the Padres had apparently said no.

“Phew,” Warren texted back to his wife. “Close call.”

Warren did not want to leave the Yankees, who drafted him in 2021 and helped him develop into a league-average (and still improving) starting pitcher. In 22 starts this season, he has a 4.18 ERA and an 8-6 record.

But something tugged at Warren at the time.

“Definitely,” he told The Athletic on Sunday, “when you read it, I was like, no way. They didn’t think I was good enough? That’s how I took it at first.”

Less than 12 hours later, however, The Athletic reported, citing a team source, that the trade proposal had never happened. The source spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing deliberations.

Then general manager Brian Cashman said the purported Warren-for-Morejon proposal “wasn’t true” during a post-deadline conference call with reporters last Monday night.

“There was a lot of noise on whatever that was,” Cashman said.

Warren remembered the reactions of some of his teammates, who were glad he stayed. He said he walked up to fellow starter Cam Schlittler and jokingly said, “Whoa, I was almost gone there.”

Warren said the whole ordeal didn’t bother him.

“Since my first season,” he said, “I think I’ve been tossed in these trade rumors like every single season. At this point, it’s like, I can’t do anything about it. If it happens, it happens.”

Warren said he did not reach out to any team officials after the dust settled.

“I wasn’t worried about it,” he said.

He added that, prior to this year’s deadline, he had doubted he would be traded.

“It was more like,” he said, “What are we going to do? Who are we getting? Who’s going away?”

The 27-year-old had been through something similar before — and with the Padres.

During the 2023 Winter Meetings, there were rumors the Padres wanted Warren as part of a trade package for star outfielder Juan Soto. It actually got to the point, Warren said, that his agent told him he was “probably” going to be in the deal.

But, instead, Warren was left out of the blockbuster trade. The Yankees ended up landing Soto and center fielder Trent Grisham for pitchers Michael King, Jhony Brito, Randy Vásquez, Drew Thorpe and catcher Kyle Higashioka.

Warren wants to stay with the Yankees as long as he can.

“This is the only thing I know,” he said. “It’s really, really special because, like, (Austin) Wells, Cam. Clarke (Schmidt). George (Lombard Jr.). Ben (Rice). Spencer (Jones). We all came up with the Yankees. Even if we didn’t play multiple years with each other, we were in the farm system together. So we’re close. And the team we have is super tight-knit. We jell together. I think we all have extra belief in one another.”

So, naturally …

“I was super pumped when I wasn’t leaving,” Warren said.

Nobbs says “too many draws” held Newcastle back last season but they are not hiding their ambitions this time around after a busy transfer window.

Under boss Tanya Oxtoby, who previously managed Northern Ireland and worked with Emma Hayes at Chelsea, Nobbs believes they are improving.

“I know we said it last season but I’ve always said things don’t happen overnight. We had a lot of changes,” added Nobbs.

“But [promotion] is our goal and you have to say that out loud. A lot of stuff we did last season, we don’t want to go too far away from.”

Nobbs is also embracing her responsibilities off the pitch and says her team-mates joke that she is considered a “legend” in women’s football.

“I try to still be myself but obviously give as much experience as I can off the pitch. I’ve played a lot of games now so you do want to listen to that,” said Nobbs.

“The girls straight away made jokes about me being a legend so they kind of made it a nice feeling rather than a pressure thing.

“It just allowed me to step into that type of role. There’s a balance of not being too over the top because I’ve still got to perform.”

Newcastle’s season kicks off at home to Wolves on 6 September (14:00 BST).