Connect with us

Sports

Bills roundtable: New Highmark Stadium’s wow factor, obstructed views and small video boards

Published

on

Highmark Stadium went live Saturday night with the annual Blue and Red open practice, and there seem to be as many opinions about the new building as there were fans in the stands and cars in the parking lots.

I spent most of my time at the Buffalo Bills’ annual Blue and Red practice talking to fans on the concourses, and they were unanimously ecstatic about the $2.2 billion project that included $850 million in public funding.

One season-ticket holder, Mike Dolan from the Northtowns, said he woke up Saturday morning feeling “like a kid on Christmas” because he knew he would finally get to see the new stadium and find out where his seats are.

“I’m not going to lie. I had to hold back happy tears on the way in,” Rochester native Laren Hettler said. “I got a little too emotional at just the excitement. I’m sad that the old stadium is gone, but we have this. It’s just overwhelming.”

But as the night went on, unanimous praise began to splinter. Social media was awash with photos of complaints about this and that. Photos of seats with obstructed views were jarring.

A new era in Buffalo as Bills unveil their new stadium

Tim Graham and Madison Eades

One side-by-side showed the rendering the fan said they were sold and the actual seat that was obstructed. The public-address system was unintelligible. The scoreboards are too small. Then the rain started to fall, and fans who thought they would be protected by the canopy — which was advertised to cover around 65 percent of the seats — got drenched.

I didn’t witness any of these negative experiences firsthand, but there’s plenty of evidence that new Highmark Stadium’s reveal wasn’t an undisputed success. I asked fellow Bills beat writer Joe Buscaglia what his first impressions were as he and I discussed the Bills’ new home venue.

Buscaglia: I took some time ahead of the practice to give myself a little tour and get familiarized with the surroundings, both from a fan and media perspective. The first thing that stood out, just from walking in and around the stadium, was that some of the concourses and the way it was built reminded me a bit of MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. There are certainly Buffalo touches throughout, and things that make it unique compared to that building, though. Some of the touches are pretty cool, to be honest.

Graham: Wasn’t this supposed to look like Tottenham Hotspur Stadium? I sensed a Meadowlands vibe as well, particularly in the press box. Nobody wants to hear praise or complaints from the media about how we live on game day. Still, my overall take on the press box was that the view is similar to the Jets’ and Giants’ — better than most newer stadiums, but in general it felt like an average NFL press box. Much nicer than what we had at The Ralph, though.

Buscaglia: Yeah, I quite liked the spot up in the press box. It gave me an All-22 coaches film vibe, and I’m into that. Here’s a cool little feature up there. They put in mechanical windows near the top of some of the glass, so that way we can hear the natural roar of the stadium sound. Little touches like that make it a bit different.

Other than the media side, I made it a point to find my way up behind the main scoreboard to the opening on the lakeside of the stadium by the 300s. It has a view of downtown Buffalo off in the distance, and you can look down and see some of the area surrounding the stadium and the family circle area, with those massive bison visible from pretty far away. I haven’t seen anything quite like that at an NFL stadium before. It’s a viewpoint worth checking out if you make it to the stadium. I do wonder, though, what that opening is going to be like when the wind and snow start whipping around Orchard Park as it always does. What stood out most to you, Tim?

A view of the new Highmark Stadium’s Family Circle off in the distance, featuring the steel bison statues that greets fans. (Joe Buscaglia / The Athletic)

Graham: I loved the Western New York touches throughout the building, whether it was the public art in the M&T Bank Lounge or the neighborhood nods at the different concession stands. But based on some of the negative experiences and worries fans expressed about what they paid for through PSLs and face-value tickets, I’m starting to wonder if the Bills paid too much attention to the cute little details and not enough to the baseline experience. The big picture — quite literally the one scoreboard — was not a very big picture at all. I’ve also heard concerns about wind in the concourses, which construction workers have been whispering about for the past year. They say the wind howls through there. Much was made about the new Highmark Stadium being weatherproof, but the wind and rain already seem like issues. Maybe they won’t be on the field, which is what some of the technology was meant to address, but the fans endured Saturday night.

Buscaglia: How it responds to the different weather elements, all around, will be one of my biggest questions. But until we get there, I do have to compliment them for the level of efficiency in getting around the stadium. Everything inside the facilities has a pretty direct path to where you want to go, and that is a massive improvement over the last stadium. For instance, just from the media side, we walk in the door, and the elevator to where we need to get to is there and as easy as can be. At the old Highmark Stadium, each media person would need to go down a few levels on a staircase and play Frogger through a wave of exiting fans before traversing down more stairs to get down to the main tunnel for post-game stuff. By the NFL’s scope, it was kind of unheard of — so much so that I took a video of the entire thing in the stadium finale last year to fondly remember its ridiculousness. It was a great workout if you did it quickly enough. So, to me, the streamlining was really noticeable.

Graham: I heard some complaints from fans about the lack of escalators to take them to the upper levels, but I’m going to chalk that up — for now — to familiarizing themselves with a roughly 1.6 million-square-foot venue. The Ralph was so spartan that you knew your exact gate from street level and walked straight to your seat, or at least its vicinity, before you began wading through hordes of revelers of various consciousness, standing in endless lines for the restroom or concessions. I’m sure that within a few weeks, the new Highmark Stadium citizenry will have mastered routines like the backs of their double-fisted, beer-holding hands.

Buscaglia: Yeah, everyone will have their own special route to their seats before long, just like everyone has their own route to get down to the stadium that resides right near some neighborhoods. I do want to give them credit for bringing in some really local food and dessert options. It’s really difficult when you have a stadium that cost over $2 billion, and that is unlike anything we’ve ever seen in Buffalo and its surrounding areas, to push forward the local charm that existed within their last place. Bringing in local vendors really helps that piece of the puzzle, even if the stadium has more of a corporate feel than many are used to.

All in all, I think it was a good debut for the new home of the Bills. Now we’ll see how gameday operations go on Saturday, when the Bills take on the Carolina Panthers in the first preseason game in the history of new Highmark Stadium.

See you there, TG.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Twenty-one potential playoff teams. Plus: The day the Angels were dealt

Published

on

The Windup Newsletter ⚾ | This is The Athletic’s MLB newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Windup directly in your inbox.

It’s mid-August, and most of this past weekend’s games still had playoff implications?? Plus: Past and present players celebrated different milestones, and bad umpiring was on display. Also, Ken Rosenthal got the skinny on the Mike Trout … uh … what’s the opposite of “invitational?”

I’m Levi Weaver — welcome to The Windup!


Weekend Recap: Many teams remain in playoff race

I truly believe this has been the most entertaining regular season in recent memory. Not because every team is good (I’m familiar with the AL West), but it’s Aug. 10 … and 21 teams are either in or within 3.5 games of a playoff spot.

That’s 70 percent of the league’s teams — and thus fans — who still have something resembling hope. (I’m sure there’s a league-sponsored commercial coming soon to celebrate that parity.)

Anyway, here’s a quick ranking of every series this weekend featuring those 21 teams. Sorry, Reds-Nats and Mets-Pirates. (And here are the MLB standings, for reference.)

  • Braves-Yankees: New York snapped Atlanta’s eight-game winning streak in 10 innings on Friday, then won again Saturday. Atlanta salvaged a win on Sunday, also in 10 innings. All three were one-run games.
  • Guardians-White Sox: Cleveland won Friday when White Sox manager Will Venable made a first-inning blunder, but Chicago battled back to win the next two in a huge series, taking a 3.5-game lead in the division.
  • Astros-Padres: A collision between two red-hot teams went San Diego’s way; it won two of three to climb to within a game of a wild-card spot.
  • Orioles-Rangers: After losing the first two games, Pete Alonso’s two-homer Sunday helped Baltimore avoid a sweep, and kept Texas a half-game behind Houston.
  • Blue Jays-Phillies: Toronto won two before Philadelphia’s thrilling 12-inning win on Sunday. Toronto’s not dead, at 3.5 games out in the AL. Philadelphia, in a rough stretch, is now tied for the second and third NL wild-card spots, because …
  • Diamondbacks-Dodgers: Arizona (63-56) won two of three to pull even with Philadelphia. Meanwhile, L.A.’s malaise continues. The Dodgers are 1-7 in August.
  • Rays-Mariners: Tampa Bay swept Seattle. The Mariners are now four games out in the division and 3.5 games out in the wild-card race, tied with Toronto.
  • Twins-Brewers: Minnesota took the first game, but lost ground in the playoff chase (1.5 games out) when Milwaukee won the next two. Check out these two catches by Brewers OF Luis Lara.
  • Athletics-Red Sox: Boston extended its winning streak to nine games on Friday with a 13-1 trouncing, but the A’s took the last two.
  • Cubs-Royals: Chicago did what it’s supposed to do: win two of three on the road against a bad team.
  • Angels-Marlins: The Marlins (60-59) refuse to die. They took two of three at home and are three games out in the NL.
  • Tigers-Giants: Speaking of refusing to die, Detroit (58-60) hasn’t wilted after the deadline. It’s 4-2 since then (winning two of three this weekend) and is just one game out in the AL.
  • Rockies-Cardinals: I thought the Cards (59-59) were toast, but they took two of three at home against Colorado and are 3.5 back in the NL.

More playoff race: Stephen Nesbitt and Chad Jennings pored over the schedules to see which playoff contenders have the toughest and easiest paths to the postseason.


Middle Relief: A trade deadline day like no other

Today, Ken Rosenthal tells us the story of how a team golf outing, orchestrated by Mike Trout, became a game of Angels trade deadline “Survivor.” Here’s an excerpt: 

It was Aug. 3, the day of baseball’s trade deadline, an off day on the East Coast before a series in Baltimore. About a dozen Angels were gathered near the first tee, ready to begin a long-awaited round of golf at the course that Tiger Woods designed for superstar Trout.

Little did the players realize, some of them would be former Angels very soon.

“It seemed like every four or five holes someone was getting the call,” said Trout, who watched his team bonding event turn into one big breakup.

Trout, 35, was eager to host his teammates near his hometown of Millville, N.J., at his private, invitation-only club, Trout National — The Reserve. But he planned the outing in the spring, without realizing the date’s significance on the baseball calendar. Nor could he know back then that the Angels, a team that rarely acts as sellers at the deadline, would tear it down.

Suffice it to say, no team ever experienced a deadline day like this.

Three players were traded while taking in the rolling hills of Trout National — reliever Brent Suter, outfielder Jo Adell and reliever Ryan Zeferjahn. A fourth, reliever Kirby Yates, learned he was dealt after the round was over while in a car heading back to Trout’s home.

“It was pretty wild watching everybody go,” said Yates, a 12-year veteran. “None of us have ever seen that many guys get traded at once.

“After somebody went, we just kept saying, ‘All right, who’s next?’”

A fifth Angel traded that day, right-hander José Soriano, wasn’t part of the group, which the previous night boarded a bus upon landing in Baltimore for the two-hour drive to Trout’s home in New Jersey.

Soriano, 27, doesn’t golf. He was asleep in his hotel room when he was awakened by a phone call the next morning informing him he was heading to the Blue Jays.

Everyone else — the dozen or so players who stayed overnight at Trout’s home, plus coaches and staffers who arrived on a bus from Baltimore the following morning — was at Trout National.

“I’m bummed I wasn’t invited,” Angels interim general manager John Mozeliak joked. “I was a little tied up that morning.”

Mozeliak, preoccupied with trade negotiations, did not know nearly half his team was golfing. Trout came to realize, as he organized the outing, that it might be an unusual day. The group, he said, had an idea that trades were coming.

Suter got the first call, right before the players teed off.

“Everyone was putting on a green,” Trout said. “We were all sitting there, all on the tee box.”

For the rest, click here.


Challenge: MLB’s Emil Jiménez problem

He doesn’t have the years under his belt to be a C.B. Bucknor or Angel Hernandez, but if umpire Emil Jiménez keeps this up, he’ll be a household name soon enough.

We introduced you to Jiménez in late June, noting that (among other things) he had perplexingly refused a timely challenge by Jasson Domínguez. Then in mid-July, Jiménez did it to Domínguez again.

And during Saturday night’s Tampa Bay-Seattle game, Jiménez was back at it. This challenge was ruled to have taken too long:

I pulled out my stopwatch. It’s about 2 seconds after the ball crosses the plate. But you can’t challenge a call that hasn’t been made, and Jiménez doesn’t start his punchout until the 1.5-second mark. By the time he finishes the motion, Julio Rodriguez is already tapping.

Mariners manager Dan Wilson was (predictably) livid and promptly ejected (you can see that video here). Then it got worse.

In the next half-inning, Jiménez flat-out ignored another challenge, this one by Jonathan Aranda of the Rays. This time, third-base umpire Doug Eddings had to walk in and override the situation, granting the challenge. As you can imagine, the Mariners and their fans were not thrilled.

Jiménez isn’t the only umpire who has done this, but it’s becoming a problem.

More umpiring: For the sake of space, I’ll just let Rob Friendman, known on X as “Pitching Ninja,” show you Dan Merzel’s “highlight” reel from Saturday. I don’t remember the last time I heard “He started it!” from anyone older than 6 years old.

On Sunday, Merzel kept it going, ejecting a still-upset Chris Sale before the game even began. Brendan Kuty has that story here.


Achievements: More big moments from the weekend

It was a big weekend for honoring past players and celebrating current ones. Here’s a rundown of who achieved what:

Honors:

Milestones:


Handshakes and High Fives

The A’s and GM David Forst have parted ways.

Reds reliever Tejay Antone is one of just three pitchers to return to the big leagues after a third Tommy John surgery. He has become one of manager Terry Francona’s most trusted arms.

One major shift in Pete Crow-Armstrong’s game? His performance against left-handed pitchers.

Astros’ setup man Bryan Abreu has flipped a switch. He credits … socks?

The Twins promoted Kaelen Culpepper, and the 23-year-old infielder homered in his MLB debut.

Hunter Greene’s season is over in Cincinnati. He’ll undergo elbow surgery next week on a partially torn ligament.

Most-clicked in our last Windup: Luis Arraez jumping over a tag before realizing it was all over.

📫 Love The Windup? Check out The Athletic’s other newsletters.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Fantasy football players to avoid in 2026 drafts

Published

on

If you have read much of the fantasy football content at The Athletic (and of course you have, for you are a connoisseur), then you know that during the season I write a weekly column here — “Drops.”

It’s a weekly look at the players who are dead weight, dragging fantasy managers into the murky depths of Davey Jones’ Locker. That column will return in 2026 —the “why” escapes me as well if it makes you feel any better, but apparently there’s a market for snark meets marginally competent fantasy football analysis.

In any event, this year I have decided to get a head start on being wrong (it’s never too early to swing wildly at pitches like Mark Reynolds in 2009) by highlighting some draft-day drops. These aren’t players who should be let go — these guys should never be rostered in the first place, at least not at cost.

So, as you prepare for the biggest day on the fantasy calendar, keep these players in mind. Because if you draft these season-sinkers in 2026, you’ll wind up On Stranger Tides — and Dead Men Tell No Tales.

Those last two Pirates of the Caribbean movies had writing almost as bad as, well, this.

Almost.

QB: Josh Allen, Buffalo (ADP: 27)

To be clear, Allen is one of the best quarterbacks in the NFL and a valuable fantasy asset. He was the highest-scoring fantasy quarterback in 2025 and has finished in that spot three times over the past five seasons.

But taking the first quarterback on draft day is almost always a terrible idea — and taking Allen at his ADP, over two full rounds ahead of the No. 2 quarterback (Baltimore’s Lamar Jackson) is just lunacy.

For Allen to return value in 2026, he doesn’t just have to finish as the top signal-caller in fantasy points again — he has to obliterate the competition ala Jackson in 2019 or Kansas City’s Patrick Mahomes the year before. That’s not likely from a quarterback whose last 4,000-yard season came in 2023. Allen’s last 30-touchdown season throwing the ball was 2022. If his gaudy rushing numbers drop, look out.

Let someone else break the seal at quarterback. The value on draft day lies toward the back of fantasy QB1 territory with players like Jacksonville’s Trevor Lawrence and Dak Prescott of the Cowboys.

RB1: Christian McCaffrey, San Francisco (ADP: 6)

This writer has beaten this drum so much this summer that Peter Criss sent me a cease-and-desist letter. But Criss also chose “The Catman” for his KISS persona, so he can pound sand.

I shall not be deterred!

McCaffrey was fantasy’s highest-scoring running back last year by a wide margin — the third time in his career the 30-year-old has surpassed 2,000 total yards in a season. But he isn’t going to sniff those numbers this season.

McCaffrey’s 413 regular-season touches were the most of his career, and the most touches a running back has amassed in at least a decade. He’s well past the age where running backs start to decline. Backs who top 2,000 total yards in a season usually experience a substantial decline in production the next year.

The first two times that McCaffrey topped 2,000 yards, his legs fell off the following years. Thirteen missed games in 2020. Thirteen missed games in 2024.

He’s fantasy football’s biggest bust in 2026 — full stop.

RB2: Bucky Irving, Tampa Bay (ADP: 50)

Two years ago, Irving was quite the find for the Buccaneers and fantasy managers — the fourth-round rookie who topped 1,500 total yards, averaged over 5 yards per carry and finished the year as a top-15 running back in PPR points.

The problem is that it isn’t 2024 anymore. And 2025 happened.

During that 2024 campaign, Irving was sixth in the league in yards per carry (5.4) and fourth in the league in yards after contact per attempt (2.7) — ahead of Jonathan Taylor in both categories. Last year, Irving missed seven games with a shoulder injury that required offseason surgery and was dead last among qualifying backs in yards per carry (3.4) and 43rd in YAC/A (1.6). Irving also had exactly as many carries inside the 5-yard line in 2025 as I did.

Now, the Buccaneers have added Kenneth Gainwell as a replacement for Rachaad White. Youngster Sean Tucker lurks as a goal-line vulture after seven scores on the ground last year.

Gainwell will out-point Irving in 2026. Watch.

WR1: Rashee Rice, Kansas City (ADP: 26)

Seriously, folks, what are we doing here?

Rice has shown flashes of elite fantasy upside in the past. Over the past two years, the 26-year-old averaged 6.4 catches, 71.6 receiving yards and .67 touchdowns per game — numbers that would land Rice a 109/1,217/11 stat line and fifth-place fantasy finish in PPR points. He’s far and away the best wideout on Kansas City’s roster.

But in what universe can we reasonably expect Rice to play a full season?

Between a combination of injuries and a six-game personal conduct suspension, Rice has played all of 12 games over that two-year span. He has missed time in all three professional seasons — an average of almost eight DNPs a year. This offseason, Rice has already spent a month in jail for a probation violation and had a cleanup procedure on his surgically-repaired knee.

Rice is wildly talented. Injury prone. And flatly refuses to get out of his own way.

Oh, and Mahomes is coming off an ACL tear.  It feels like that’s worth mentioning.

WR2: Tee Higgins, Cincinnati (ADP: 37)

This is rather becoming an annual thing with Higgins.

To be clear, Higgins is a very good wide receiver — one of the best “Robin” receivers in the league. The 27-year-old has hauled in 21 touchdown passes over the past two years, ranking as the WR14 in PPR points in 2025 and WR17 two years ago.

But, at cost, there’s no upside with Higgins. His ceiling is where he’s being drafted on average. Higgins has missed time in all six of his professional seasons and has never caught 75 passes in a season, posted 1,100 receiving yards in a season or been targeted more than 110 times in a season.

Barring an injury to Ja’Marr Chase, there isn’t going to be some massive spike in Higgins’ production. When the Batmobile rolls out of the Batcave, Chase is most assuredly driving.

Overpaying for a low-ceiling sidekick isn’t winning any championships.

WR3: Mike Evans, San Francisco (ADP: 58)

There was time not that long ago when I was actually in on Evans in his first season with the 49ers. Sadly, that day has passed.

The optimistic view with Evans is to write off last year’s down season to injury. But you name the stat — yards per reception, receptions per game, receiving yards per game, PPR yards per game — and Evans was already headed toward the worst season of his career before the injury.

There’s also the matter of Evans’ age. He’ll be 33 years old when the 2026 season begins. Per ESPN’s Mike Clay, only two age-33 wide receivers (Julian Edelman and Larry Fitzgerald) have cracked the top-25 fantasy receivers in the past 10 years, and that duo averaged 104.5 receptions in those seasons.

The last time Evans had even 80 catches in a season was back in 2018.

TE: Harold Fannin, Cleveland (ADP: 80)

Fannin was a thunderbolt for fantasy managers last year — the late-round pick or waiver-wire add who came from nowhere to lead the Browns in every receiving category as a rookie on the way to finishing sixth in PPR points among tight ends.

And yet, despite all that success in his first NFL season, fantasy managers should want no part of Fannin at ADP this year. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nol. Sifir. Null.

It’s not Fannin. It’s the vortex of suck in Cleveland from which no hope, joy or fantasy upside can ever hope to escape.

The Browns just spent two picks in the top-40 overall in the 2026 draft on wide receivers in KC Concepcion and Denzel Boston. There’s a new coaching staff and offense. And for reasons that can be best explained with the highly technical term “Because Cleveland,” the Browns will probably be rolling out Deshaun Watson under center against the Jaguars in Week 1.

Fannin won’t get 107 targets again, and even if he does, a depressing percentage of them will either be over his head or at his feet.

Fannin isn’t a top-10 fantasy TE option in 2026.

Gary Davenport is a two-time Fantasy Sports Writers Association Football Writer of the Year. Follow Gary on X at @IDPGodfather.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

How to watch the women’s National Bank Open presented by Rogers: Streaming options for the Quarterfinal

Published

on

There are two women’s matches at the National Bank Open presented by Rogers today, highlighted by No. 17-ranked Diana Shnaider against No. 8 Iga Swiatek.

National Bank Open presented by Rogers key details

  • Tournament: The National Bank Open presented by Rogers
  • Round: Quarterfinals
  • Date: August 10
  • Streaming: Fubo (Stream now)
  • Venue: Sobeys Stadium
  • Location: Toronto, Ontario
  • Court Surface: Hard
  • Watching in person? Get tickets on StubHub.

National Bank Open presented by Rogers schedule today

  • Diana Shnaider vs. Iga Swiatek, 7 p.m. ET (Quarterfinal)
  • Ekaterina Alexandrova vs. Elina Svitolina, 8:10 p.m. ET (Quarterfinal)

National Bank Open presented by Rogers odds

  • Talia Gibson: +100
  • Linda Noskova: +100
  • Elisabetta Cocciaretto: +100
  • Peyton Stearns: +100
  • Ariana Arseneault: +100
  • Moyuka Uchijima: +100
  • Clara Tauson: +100
  • Oleksandra Oliynykova: +100
  • Diane Parry: +100
  • Jessica Bouzas Maneiro: +100
  • Zeynep Sonmez: +100
  • Amanda Anisimova: +100
  • Marta Kostyuk: +100
  • Xinyu Wang: +100
  • Xiyu Wang: +100
  • Ann Li: +100
  • Alycia Parks: +100
  • Panna Udvardy: +100
  • Eva Lys: +100
  • McCartney Kessler: +100
  • Janice Tjen: +100
  • Lois Boisson: +100
  • Polina Kudermetova: +100
  • Alina Korneeva: +100
  • Alexandra Eala: +100

This watch guide was created using technology provided by Data Skrive.

Betting/odds, ticketing and streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.

Photo: Clive Brunskill, Carl De Souza, Filipe Amorim, Valery Hache / Getty Images

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition

Spot the pattern. Connect the terms

Find the hidden link between sports terms

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.