Tech
TechCrunch Mobility: How do you issue a ticket to a robotaxi?
Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility — your central hub for news and insights on the future of transportation. To get this in your inbox, sign up here for free — just click TechCrunch Mobility!
We’re going to do a bit of a deep dive today, which may make this newsletter look a little different than normal. There is a reason!
This newsletter is not region-specific, but sometimes there are policies at the state level that have widespread implications for tech companies and startups alike. Which brings me to California and the new autonomous vehicle testing and deployment rules issued this week by the state’s Department of Motor Vehicles.
There are two new sets of rules — collectively 100 pages long — that cover requirements for the testing and deployment of AVs. I spent the past few days speaking to engineers and policy folks working at AV companies and discovered that they have strong opinions and few want to speak publicly about it. But thanks to the public commentary period on these regulations, we have some insight into what the industry supported and what it did not.
The regulations include new, more robust requirements for data collection and sharing, training, and operations. Here are a few items that stuck out and what insiders told me.
How do you ticket a robotaxi? Under these new rules, law enforcement can cite AV companies for traffic violations committed by their vehicles. The rule, called “Notice of Autonomous Vehicle Noncompliance,” requires the manufacturer (meaning the robotaxi company) to report the violation to the DMV within 72 hours of receiving it from law enforcement.
I’ve heard a number of interpretations of this rule and how it will be implemented, but it appears there is not a monetary fine attached to these violations. Instead, these violations are another piece of data that the DMV can use to identify problems and take action if needed.
Techcrunch event
San Francisco, CA
|
October 13-15, 2026
Insiders told me that the data is actionable and more important than a monetary fine. My question: Why not both?
The good news for industry: The DMV will now allow heavy-duty vehicles equipped with autonomous vehicle tech to test and eventually deploy on public roads. Self-driving truck companies are happy with this outcome. Daniel Goff, VP of external affairs at Kodiak, told me the company is already working on the required documentation to apply for a permit.
The burden for the industry: The word that came up in every conversation I had with someone in the AV industry was “burdensome.” And it was always used in reaction to the new data collection and sharing regulations.
Goodbye, disengagement reports; hello, malfunctions: Others were happy to see annual disengagement reporting disappear. Disengagement reports, which detailed instances when human drivers had to take over control due to technology failures or safety concerns, have been controversial because companies use varying standards. This has made it impossible to compare the results or rate the proficiency of autonomous vehicle technology.
That entire section has been removed and replaced with a requirement to report “dynamic driving task performance relevant system failure.” This may seem like semantics — trading one jargony phrase for another. Insiders tell me that while it is not a perfect metric, it is clearer than its predecessor. That doesn’t mean it is beloved either.
There is a lot more in these documents, including a requirement to provide annual updates to first responder interaction plans, access to manual vehicle override systems, two-way communication links with 30-second response times, and updated training requirements to ensure safe and timely interactions with first responders.
My question for you, reader, is whether these rules go too far or if they are appropriate and provide the kind of reporting and data collection needed to keep these companies accountable? Sign up for the Mobility newsletter to vote in our polls!
A little bird

We had a lot of little birds talk to us about the new California AV rules, so nothing new to add here. But remember, you can always send us tips. Here’s how.
Got a tip for us? Email Kirsten Korosec at kirsten.korosec@techcrunch.com or my Signal at kkorosec.07, or email Sean O’Kane at sean.okane@techcrunch.com.
Deals!

BMW i Ventures launched a new $300 million fund with a timely thesis: AI will reshape how the automotive industry operates. The fund will invest in early-stage through Series B startups in North America and Europe that are working on agentic AI and physical AI as well as industrial software, advanced materials, and manufacturing and supply-chain technologies. This third fund brings the firm’s total capital under management to $1.1 billion.
Other deals that got my attention …
Sereact, a German robotics startup, raised $110 million in a Series B funding round led by VC Headline. Other investors include Bullhound Capital, Felix Capital, Daphni, Air Street Capital, Creandum, and Point Nine.
Spirit Airlines is preparing to shut down after failing to secure a $500 million lifeline from the government, the WSJ reports. The company is expected to cease operations around 3 a.m. ET Saturday.
Notable reads and other tidbits

China suspended issuing new licenses for autonomous vehicles after dozens of Baidu’s Apollo Go robotaxis suddenly stopped last month, Bloomberg reported.
Google‘s Gemini AI assistant is hitting the road in millions of vehicles.
Faraday Future paid around $7.5 million to a company controlled by its founder, Jia Yueting, in 2025, senior reporter Sean O’Kane discovered in a recent SEC filing.
Rivian reported earnings this week and one item that stood out to us — and to many others — was the downsizing of its DOE loan from $6.6 billion to $4.5 billion. That loan restructuring comes with changes to its Georgia factory. Instead of two 200,000-vehicle capacity structures on the Georgia site, Rivian will now build a 300,000-vehicle capacity factory and leave the adjacent “pad” untouched and ready for future development. Analysts didn’t necessarily view this as negative but did position this as rightsizing. Barclays, for instance, views the modification as Rivian adjusting to the current EV environment, according to a research note published Friday. Barclays also stated it didn’t believe Rivian currently plans to build the second plant at Georgia, “at least not until early/mid next decade.”
Tesla launched a Semi-Charging for Business program, which includes a new product called the Basecharger that is designed for depot and overnight use.
Uber has tapped Hertz to clean, charge, and fix its Lucid Motors robotaxis. This announcement left us with a cheeky question: How many companies does it take to launch a robotaxi service?
Uber customers in the United States can now book hotels directly through the app, one of several new features announced this week that pushes far beyond the company’s original ride-hailing purpose and even deeper into its users’ lives. At launch, Uber customers will have access to more than 700,000 hotels worldwide through a partnership with Expedia Group, the travel company that Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi led for 12 years.
Vay, a remote driving tech startup, says it has grown its fleet to 175 vehicles on the road and has surpassed 60,000 rides.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
>
Tech
Aurora CFO says 30,000 driverless trucks by 2030 isn’t as far-fetched as it sounds
Autonomous vehicle technology company Aurora told investors last week that it expects to have more than 30,000 self-driving trucks on the road generating $5 billion in annual revenue by the end of 2030 — an audacious plan considering it expects to end 2026 with just 200 driverless trucks and an $80 million revenue run rate.
CFO David Maday contends the seemingly outsized target isn’t as large or as out of reach as it might appear.
“While 30,000 kind of feels like a lot — and it does in the autonomy space for sure — in terms of trucks relative to the overall market, it’s kind of pretty small,” he told TechCrunch in a recent interview, adding that the four major truck manufacturers produce anywhere between 250,000 and 300,000 new trucks a year. “I don’t think it’s aspirational,” he added, “I think we can do it.”
Investors haven’t exactly embraced Aurora’s 2030 vision. Shares have continued to slide since the company’s annual analyst and investor day on September 23. On Monday, shares closed down 12.42%, to $5.29.
But investors have time to come around and, according to Maday, the big “unlock” for Aurora starts in 2027 and accelerates from there. The company expects to go from 200 driverless trucks at the end of 2026 to more than 1,000 a year later.
Today, Aurora operates what it calls a transportation-as-a-service business — a proof-of-concept model that it plans to limit to about 500 trucks. It owns and operates the self-driving trucks and charges its customers, including Detmar Logistics, Hirschbach, McLane, and Werner about a $2 per mile, a rate that includes a fuel surcharge.
That works out to roughly the same rates as other carriers’ typical pricing. The real shift — and the real savings, Maday says — will happen next year as when Aurora begins moving to a driver-as-a-service model. Instead of Aurora owning the trucks, customers will buy the self-driving trucks and pay Aurora a per-mile subscription fee for the self-driving technology, which the company expects to be about $0.85. Under this model, the customers will own and maintain the truck, while Aurora maintains the self-driving system and its accompanying hardware.
Moving the trucks off Aurora’s balance sheet is critical if the company wants to scale — and it’s likely what investors are paying attention to. The company said it expects to reach breakeven gross margins (meaning revenue would cover the direct costs of running the trucks) on a run-rate basis in the first half of 2027 with around 500 trucks on the road.
The next big leap comes at the end of 2027 with Aurora’s third-generation hardware— the sensors, computers, and other equipment that let its trucks drive themselves — which will be mass-produced autonomous vehicle hardware built by its partner, Aumovio (formerly known as Continental). Aumovio isn’t just engineering and manufacturing the hardware kit; the company is also financing it for Aurora — easing the financial burden on the self-driving truck company. Aumovio will also service and repair the kits for customers.
Aurora plans to expand its operations at the same time. By 2030, the company expects to grow beyond a few states in the South to the vast majority of the continental U.S., according to Maday.
“By 2028, I expect that our cost structures are going to be really outstanding, that’s why you see our gross margin starting to take off …” Maday said. “Once you get to that point, I think going into ride hailing is fine,” he said, confirming that Aurora still plans to eventually enter the robotaxi market.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
>
Tech
Source: Inference provider Modal Labs closing in on $750M round at $15.75B valuation
AI inference infrastructure provider Modal Labs is nearing a $750 million funding round led by Accel at a $15.75 billion valuation that includes the investment, according to a source with knowledge of the funding. The size of the round has not been previously reported, though Axios and Bloomberg have reported other details of the deal.
The new round would more than triple Modal’s valuation from the $4.65 billion it reached when it announced its $355 million previous fundraise just four months ago.
Modal Labs declined to comment.
The deal comes amid soaring demand for inference services, the process of running an AI model that’s already been trained to generate outputs, particularly from customers relying on open-source models. Other inference startups are also in talks to raise fresh capital at much higher valuations. Baseten is nearing an infusion of capital at a $26 billion valuation, doubling what it was worth in June, Bloomberg reported. Meanwhile, Fireworks and Fal, a startup providing inference for video and image generation, have also talked to investors about new rounds that would significantly increase their valuations, according to The Information.
Although revenue for these companies has been growing rapidly, their margins are thin, largely because the cost of acquiring or leasing compute remains very high. Fireworks announced in July that its annualized revenue had hit $1 billion, a fivefold increase from the year before. Multiple inference-focused startups are expected to reach the same revenue milestone by year’s end, according to our source.
Modal was founded in 2021 by CEO Erik Bernhardsson and CTO Akshat Bubna. Bernhardsson, who is Swedish, spent more than 15 years building data teams at companies including Spotify, where he helped build the music-streaming service’s recommendation system, and Better.com, the online mortgage lender, where he served as chief technology officer. Bubna studied math and computer science at MIT and was an early staff engineer at Scale AI, the data-labeling startup, before co-founding Modal.
The company, which is based in New York and estimated to have roughly 150 employees, lets developers train AI models and run other compute-heavy workloads without managing their own servers. Its web page lists customers that include the coding startup Cognition, the AI music generator Suno, the fintech company Ramp, and the publishing platform Substack.
As of May, Modal had surpassed $300 million in annualized revenue, it told Reuters at the time.
The fundraising talks come two months after Modal was pulled into one of the AI industry’s most closely watched security incidents. In late July, Modal disclosed that a customer’s data had been compromised as part of the same hacking campaign carried out by a rogue OpenAI agent against Hugging Face.
Modal Chief Technology Officer Akshat Bubna said the breach traced back to a flaw in a customer’s own code, not to Modal’s systems. “We’re aware a Modal customer published an unauthenticated endpoint that allowed anyone on the internet to use their sandboxes for code execution,” Bubna said in a statement to press outlets at the time. “This was used by the rogue agent. Modal’s platform was not compromised in any way,” he’d added.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
>
Tech
AMD will acquire Fei-Fei Li’s World Labs for $8.2 billion
World Labs, one of the leading developers of deep learning models intended to understand physical reality, has been acquired in a $8.2 billion deal, the two companies said today.
World Labs justified the deal in a statement saying that AI development required “close collaboration across model reseach, systems and compute.” AMD, in turn, says that understanding frontier workloads like those created at World Labs will shape its chip-making roadmap.
The acquisition will see World Labs founder Fei-Fei Li join AMD as executive vice president and chief scientist. The two companies formed an inference optimization and training partnership last year, and ties have remained close. Notably, Li was a guest at AMD’s CES presentation earlier this year.
Li, a Stanford computer science professor, is considered a pioneer of AI, particularly computer vision, for her role pioneering the ImageNet database and subsequent challenges. In 2024, Li founded World Labs to develop deep learning models with a more robust understanding of reality, arguing that true general intelligence required a grounding in physics and the ability to understand and reason about data beyond text.
In a post announcing the deal, Li described the partnership as the result of a desire to scale World Labs’ technical breakthroughs beyond the lab. “Now that we have tangible proof of the possibilities, we want to do everything we can to accelerate the future,” Li wrote in the post. “To do this requires scaling our efforts, widening our reach, and getting closer to the hardware.”
“World model” remains a loose term, encompassing everything from language models trained to understand visual inputs, to models capable of generating and sustaining a high-fidelity simulation of reality. World Labs’ first product, Marble, is pitched for creating entertainment experiences, but also for the ability to create simulated environments for robot training.
The acquisition is likely to help AMD compete with long-standing rival Nvidia in creating an ecosystem for AI-specific chips. While Nvidia already has a suite of open-weight world models like Cosmos, AMD has only offered text- and video-based models to the public.
World models are seen as vital in efforts to deploy generative AI models on robotic platforms, from autonomous vehicles to industrial robots and general-purpose humanoids. In particular, the dearth of useful data to train general purpose robots means that synthetic data from world models will be key to realizing the vision put forward by companies like Tesla and Figure.
The acqusition is expected to close before the end of the year, subject to regulatory approval.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
>
-
movies4 months agoSearch For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Fashion9 years agoAccording to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Fashion9 years agoModel Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
-
Fashion9 years agoEmily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
-
Fashion9 years ago9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
-
Anime4 months agoRurouni Kenshin: Hokkaido Arc Manga Takes 1-Issue Break – News
-
Anime3 months agoHIDIVE to Stream English Dubs for The World Is Dancing, The Forsaken Saintess and Her Foodie Roadtrip in Another World, The Dangers in My Heart: The Movie Anime – News
