Connect with us

movies

Blake Lively Settlement Details Revealed, More Legal Headaches For Baldoni

Published

on

Doubtful at this point that anyone not living in either the Blake Lively or Justin Baldoni households will ever really know what went down between the It Ends With Us stars during and after the strained production of the Sony distributed flick. Yet, after days of supposed leaks and whispers, we now know a little bit more of how their bitter and trial bound battle ended this week in an 11th hour settlement, and what’s coming next.

“Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Stipulating Parties acknowledge and agree that Blake Lively does not release, and retains all claims, rights, and remedies in connection with her pending Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, Treble Damages and PunitiveDamages under California Civil Code Section 47.1 in the Wayfarer Action,” reveals a notice of settlement just filed in federal court in New York.

“The Stipulating Parties agree that the 47.1 Motion is not withdrawn and remains pending before this Court,” it adds. “The Stipulating Parties further agree that they hereby irrevocably waive any appeal from the Court’s determination of the 47.1 Motion.”

With damages that could be tripled in the millions if the next stage goes Lively’s way, the Golden State’s 2023-introduced Protecting Survivors from Weaponized Defamation Lawsuits Act (AKA Civil Code Section 47.1) now sits at the base of this week’s settlement as a ticking time bomb for Baldoni, his Wayfarer Studios brass and his Crisis PR team.

Either Team Baldoni blinked, as Deadline said when the settlement was revealed earlier this week, someone didn’t keep their eye on the ball for the defendants, or there is a very long game being played here. Regardless, there are still some unknowns. Still, after days of speculation, there are a few things we now know are true. For instance, it’s true, as you may have heard,  Lively hasn’t snagged any cash from the Wayfarer Studios defendants in this settlement. It’s also true that could change, big time.

“It pulls back in Mr. Baldoni, Mr. Heath, Mr. Sarowitz, Jennifer Abel, Melisa Nathan, all of the Wayfarer parties we have on this issue, and they will have to face whatever punishment Judge Liman finds is appropriate under this new law,” notes Lively attorney Sigrid McCowley to Deadline this morning. “They have waived their right to appeal. In other words, this will be the final judgment by this court, and it will not be able to hold things up with years of appeals.”

“This settlement is a resounding victory for Blake Lively,” bluntly adds the actress’ other lawyers Esra A. Hudson and Michael Gottlieb.

Representatives for Baldoni and the other Wayfarer Studios defendants did not respond to request for comment on today’s settlement filing and what the consequences could be. It should be noted that the notice of settlement, which still needs to be approved by the judge, was signed by Baldoni lawyer Ellyn Garofalo too.

While the nearly 18 months-and-counting core case between the Another Simple Favor star and the Jane the Virgin actor is now in the rearview, there still remains motions in court from Lively over Baldoni’s dismissed $400 million countersuit. Judge Lewis Liman tossed Baldoni and gang’s countersuit in June last year, but he never offered a ruling on the contention of Lively’s lawyers that California’s Protecting Survivors from Weaponized Defamation Lawsuits Act applied to the matter. Now, with that inflection point in play, a quick return to court is assured under the requirements of the settlement – – which now could be the whole ballgame for Team Baldoni.

“By agreeing to this settlement, and waiving their right to appeal, Justin Baldoni and every individual defendant now face personal liability for abusing the legal system to silence and intimidate Ms. Lively,” Manatt, Phelps & Phillips’ Hudson and Willkie Farr & Gallagher attorney Gottlieb stated to Deadline. “And by admitting that Ms. Lively’s concerns “deserved to be heard,” the defendants have ended once and for all the fiction that Ms. Lively “fabricated” claims of sexual harassment and retaliation. From day one Blake Lively’s mission was clear: expose and hold accountable those who weaponize smear campaigns and retaliatory lawsuits to intimidate and silence survivors. That mission continues.”

Under the mechanisms of the court, the matter could be before Judge Lewis Liman within weeks. It should be noted the May 18 trial date has not been vacated and still sits there on the court’s calendar.

Even though attempts at some kind of settlement had seemed to fail and fail again over the past six months, it is now clear a parallel mediation was taking place over the past weekend to reach a deal. While the formal filing of the settlement occurred this AM, a term-sheet was inked by the parties for Monday laying out the basic and binding tenets, I hear.

In that context, there’s also the fact Lively’s sexual harassment allegation and many of her other claims were tossed out last month. Still, as recently as April 3, the actress was asking supporters to not “be distracted by the digital soap opera” as the May 18 starting trial approached. Suddenly, as lawyers sparred in the federal court docket over experts and more pre-trial business, there was an armistice proclaimed earlier this week.

A temporary armistice it appears.

“Section 47.1 imposes severe and mandatory penalties against any party who files unsuccessful retaliatory defamation actions against sexual harassment and retaliation complainants,” states a letter to Judge Liman from Lively’s lawyers that was also filed Thursday morning. “Under Section 47.1, any ‘communication made by an individual, without malice, regarding an incident of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination [including retaliation] is privileged’ so long as the speaker ‘has, or at any time had, a reasonable basis to file a complaint of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination, whether the complaint is, or was, filed or not.’”

On May 4, nearly a year and a half after Lively filed her initial sexual harassment and retaliation complaint in late 2024 against Baldoni and his inner circle with the California Civil Rights Department, and just weeks before the whole shebang was set to finally go to trial in NYC, lawyers for the principal parties dropped the bombshell news that they had reached a deal.

In the spirit of such a peace, the attorneys at the opening of this week put out a very carefully worded and framed joint statement of a settlement.

“We acknowledge the process presented challenges and recognize concerns raised by Ms. Lively deserved to be heard,” said the release from Bryan Freedman, Ellyn Garofalo, Michael Gottlieb and Esra Hudson. Leaning on the harassment issues and the alleged online smear campaign against Lively they added: “We remain firmly committed to workplaces free of improprieties and unproductive environments. It is our sincere hope that this brings closure and allows all involved to move forward constructively and in peace, including a respectful environment online.”

A few hours later, without hubby Ryan Reynolds, Lively swanned on to the red carpet at this year’s Met Gala in full A-lister force.

Blake Lively attends the 2026 Met Gala celebrating

Blake Lively attends the 2026 Met Gala celebrating “Costume Art”

Dimitrios Kambouris/Getty Images for The Met Museum/Vogue)

The next day, as weak sauce claims that the multi-million dollar damages-seeking Lively received no cash in the settlement swirled around, Deadpool star Reynolds posted a happy couple selfie on his IG, deadening any rumblings of a riff in the Reynolds-Lively house.

Baldoni’s lead attorney Freedman, who became an object of scorn and repeated attempts at sanctions for the Lively side, has expressed “I can’t talk about the terms of the settlement, but what I can tell you is that he is ecstatic, that both Jamie and Justin are ecstatic at the results of this and the settlement itself,” the litigator told Extra this week of Wayfarer Studios CEO Jamie Heath and Nashville resident Baldoni. “They are very pleased with where this ended up,” he added.

Perhaps, but with California’s Section 47.1 putting Baldoni, Heath, Wayfarer co-founder Steve Sarowitz, flack Melissa Nathan, her TAG company, and fellow publicist Jennifer Abel on the hook for some big bucks, the “ended” in Freedman’s words might be a tad premature.

In addition to the shuttered but still active countersuit, there’s the separate but clearly connected legal action between the IEWU director’s publicist Jennifer Abel and her former boss Stephane Jones of the Jonesworks PR firm still moving forward. Ironically, after the settlement was unveiled this week, the Abel vs Jones dust-up could actually see both Baldoni and Lively having to give testimony after all – just not in their own case as we all presumed.

>

Continue Reading

movies

CNN, MS NOW And Politico Warn That Trump Will Revive “A Complete Ban”

Published

on

CNN, MS NOW and Politico are warning that the Trump administration will reimpose a “complete ban” on their access to the White House without a judge issuing a preliminary injunction.

Last week, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted a temporary restraining order, forcing the White House to restore access to the White House to the outlets as he more fully considers the legal arguments. The TRO lasts for 14 days.

In a filing in federal court on Monday, attorneys for the three news outlets argued that the Trump White House actions since then “leave little doubt that it will immediately reinstitute a complete ban of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico if allowed the opportunity.”

The outlets’ legal team, led by Theodore Boutrous Jr., pointed to the White House’s restriction on CNN from access to State Dinner arrivals on Thursday evening. The network then was barred from serving as TV pooler on Air Force One on Trump’s trip to Tennessee on Saturday, with no replacement stepping in, and leaving a dearth of TV images from the trip.

“Because the ban is an unlawful assault on the most fundamental First Amendment freedoms and will inflict irreparable harm on Plaintiffs and the public if not restrained, this Court should preliminarily enjoin its enforcement pending the resolution of this case,” the news outlets’ attorneys wrote.

Kelly cited a lack of due process by the White House when it pulled dozens of credentials of reporters from the three outlets. While the Trump DOJ has cited standards of “professionalism and decorum” and national security concerns, the media outlets’ legal team called that reasoning that “pretextual” and “post hoc,” as well as vague.

In the latest brief, CNN, MS NOW and Politico also again cited violations of the First Amendment. They noted that Trump has explained the ban by blaming their coverage as “Purposely … negative,” among other things.

“His statements also make clear he implemented the ban to coerce more favorable coverage from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, and to deter other journalists and news organizations from newsgathering and reporting that the President might view as negative,” the news outlets’ legal team wrote. “And his administration has continued to retaliate against Plaintiffs even after the temporary restraining order, only underscoring that Defendants’ motive is to punish and chill journalism they dislike.”

The outlets are asking the judge to prohibit the Trump team from pulling hard pass credentials, or to ensure the reporters of the White House access they had before Sept. 18. In contrast to a TRO, a preliminary injunction would sideline Trump’s ban until a trial is held, or if an appeals court rules otherwise.

Trump initially banned the three outlets on Sept. 18. When the judge granted a TRO last early Thursday, it meant that the White House had to restore hard passes, with reporters not gaining reentry until around noon that day.

The issue of whether the White House can also restrict CNN from the pool is a slightly different, but related issue. It’s also one at the center of another case, involving the Associated Press after it was banned from the pool and other White House events. That case is currently on appeal.

That said, in the latest brief, the three outlets cited the White House’s continued prohibitions on CNN as an example of White House retaliation over protected speech.

For much of last week, there was no TV network pool, meaning that there was little video coverage of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the White House. The four other networks in the pool — CBS News, ABC News, Fox News and NBC News — initially suspended their participation in protest of the exclusion of CNN. The networks resumed the TV pool coverage this week, but it will be put to the test again on Thursday, when CNN is assigned to that duty.

“Every day, critically important news is breaking at the White House, and the ban will substantially interfere with Plaintiffs’ ability to cover it,” the outlets brief stated. “The ban also inflicts an injury on all news media organizations—which now risk a similar fate if they engage in fact-based, independent reporting the President deems insufficiently favorable.”

The DOJ’s brief in response is due by Friday.

>

Continue Reading

movies

Tokyo Film Festival to Honor Mohammad Rasoulof and Mipo O

Published

on

The Tokyo International Film Festival will honor filmmakers Mohammad Rasoulof and Mipo O with its Kurosawa Akira Award at the event’s 39th edition next month.

Named for the Japanese master, the award recognizes directors whose work has made an impact on cinema and who are expected to help shape its future. It was revived in 2022 after a 14-year hiatus with support from Capcom. Last year’s recipients were Chloé Zhao and Lee Sang-il.

This year’s honorees were selected by a committee comprising filmmakers Yoji Yamada and Lee Sang-il, cinematographer Akiko Ashizawa and TIFF programming director Shozo Ichiyama.

Rasoulof, one of Iran’s leading dissident directors now living in exile in Europe, won Berlin’s Golden Bear for There Is No Evil (2020), while The Seed of the Sacred Fig (2024) received a special prize at Cannes before earning an international feature Oscar nomination as Germany’s submission.

The committee singled out the two films for “their humanist perspective, which portrays even those who perpetrate oppression as ordinary citizens.” It also praised Rasoulof’s “unwavering commitment to creative expression despite relentless pressure.”

“Receiving the Kurosawa Award is a great honor for me. His films are profound explorations of the human condition and the moral choices we make in moments of crisis. Kurosawa was a dynamic and inquisitive visual storyteller whose unique perspective on humanity, nature, and the world has made his work an enduring source of inspiration in cinema,” Rasoulof said.

O, a Japanese-born filmmaker of Korean descent, made her feature debut with The Sakais’ Happiness in 2006. Her credits include The Light Shines Only There (2014), Japan’s Oscar submission that year, and Being Good (2015), an ensemble drama exploring child abuse, bullying and the possibility of breaking those cycles through human connection.

After a nine-year break from feature filmmaking, she returned with Living in Two Worlds (2024), a family drama starring Ryo Yoshizawa as the hearing son of deaf parents, whose desire for independence complicates his relationship with his mother. Her latest, How Dare You? (2025), takes a more comic approach to childhood, following three elementary school students whose budding environmental activism — mixed with a classroom crush — leads to unintended consequences.

The selection committee praised her “multifaceted perspective on individuals living on the margins of society” and her avoidance of “a simple lens of good vs. evil,” while highlighting her work with child performers.

“To receive such an extraordinary honor on the 20th anniversary of my directorial debut fills me with immense gratitude and deep humility,” O said. “Winning the Shindo Kaneto Award in 2010 provided me with the vital support to keep making films. Though my progress has been slow, reaching the Kurosawa Akira Award is a stroke of fortune that makes me truly savor what a happy cinematic journey I have had. This recognition is by no means mine alone. My heartfelt thanks go to all the cast and crew members I have met along the way, the audience who stepped into the theaters, and the selection committee—led by director Yamada Yoji—who discovered my films.”

Tokyo will also screen 4K restorations of Kurosawa’s Sanshiro Sugata (1943) and Ikiru (1952), alongside Charles Chaplin’s The Circus (1928) and Abbas Kiarostami’s Where Is the Friend’s House? (1987).

Separately, the festival named Alice in Borderland actor Hayato Isomura president of its Ethical Film Award jury. Launched in 2023 with Sumitomo Corporation, the prize recognizes films addressing social issues including the environment, poverty and discrimination. Three members of TIFF’s Student PR team will join Isomura on the jury.

The nominees are Brazil’s Amadeo and the Hypothetical New World, the German-Ukrainian feature I Rarely Wake Up Dreaming and Australia’s Time and Tide. The award ceremony and a talk with Isomura are scheduled for Nov. 2.

“Today, we absorb vast amounts of information in seconds through a small screen. I often feel we fall into the trap of believing we understand something instantly, constantly searching for quick answers. Yet, when it comes to deepening our awareness and understanding of social issues, the process of reaching those answers is what truly matters,” Isomura said. “Cinema possesses the unique power to pause our hurried pace, allowing us to experience that very process through the lives and emotions of others. I am committed to taking the thoughts, hopes, and wishes woven into these films by each filmmaker deeply to heart, and to reflecting on them together with everyone.”

The 39th Tokyo International Film Festival runs Oct. 26-Nov. 4, with the TIFFCOM market taking place Oct. 28-30.

>

Continue Reading

movies

Dennis Haskins Dies: ‘Saved By The Bell’s Mr. Belding Was 75

Published

on

Dennis Haskins, best known for playing Mr. Belding in Saved by the Bell, has died. He was 75.

His agent Jay Schachter confirmed the news to Deadline, saying in a statement, “It’s a tragic loss. Everyone loved Mr. Belding and those of us who got to know Dennis, loved him even more. He was a great person, and he loved, I mean absolutely LOVED his fans.”

“He always had time for them, no matter what. He was my client and dear friend for over 20 years, and I will miss him terribly. I’m heartbroken,” he continued.

Haskins cause of death was not disclosed.

Haskins first played Principal Richard Belding in the Disney Channel series Good Morning, Miss Bliss, opposite Hayley Mills in 1989. After one season, the show was retooled as Saved by the Bell on NBC, where he reprised his role through its four-season run. Haskins returned as Mr. Belding for Saved by the Bell: The New Class in 1993 and played the role for seven more seasons, until the show’s finale in 2000.

Other acting credits for Haskins included Hangin’ with Mr. Cooper, Malibu, CA, The Practice, The West Wing, The Rerun Show, The Stoneman, 7th Heaven, Going Down, Red Water, Tangy Guacamole, An Ordinary Killer, JAG, Dead End Road, It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia, Men of a Certain Age, The Bold and the Beautiful, Victorious, Mad Men, Emerald Acres, How I Met Your Mother, Destroy the Alpha Gammas, New Girl, Hot In Cleveland, This Isn’t Working, Bill Nye Saves the World, Abstruse, Enigma, A Bennett Song Holiday, among many others.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.