Tech
SpeakOn’s dictation device is a good idea marred by platform limitations
I constantly use dictation apps such as Wispr Flow, Willow, or Typeless to reply to messages and emails on both my Mac and my phone. But to do so, I have to use my phone’s mic or AirPods to dictate my messages, and they often don’t pick up what I am saying.
That’s why when Notta-owned SpeakOn pitched me to test a dedicated device for dictation, I was intrigued by its potential. Unfortunately, I had mixed experiences with the product because of its form factor and platform limitations.
Still, I think there is space for dictation devices like this in the future.
SpeakOn is a small pebble-like device that can stick on the back of your iPhone via MagSafe, just like Plaud’s AI meeting notetaker. The device is very light at 25 grams, so you won’t feel its weight, even if you put it in your pocket separately.

The device comes with a companion app on iOS, which is in the form of a keyboard, like other dictation apps. You can also use the app without connecting the device, if needed.
To get started, you press the button on the device to start dictating and release the button when you are done. The device has one mic and claims to capture audio within 2 feet of distance. The dictation works in any app as long as the software keyboard is active. The speech is automatically filtered as the app removes filler words and can format the text output as a list if needed.
One advantage is that the device does not use the iPhone’s mic and instead relies on its own mic. Other dictation apps need to keep the iPhone mic active based on the session time users have defined. The SpeakOn device can help you avoid that.
My gripe with the SpeakOn device is that, despite having dedicated mics, it doesn’t pick up the audio well — unless I bring the phone within roughly two feet of range. And even within that range, the mics often underperform because of the surrounding noise. I am hoping for better quality mics in the next version.
I also wish that double-tapping the record button could bring the SpeakOn keyboard to the fore if I were using a text keyboard. Or if I could start speaking without switching keyboards, but those are system-level limitations that are possibly hard to overcome.
The app changes AI editing and tone based on the app that you’re in, but you can also manually change that. I felt that at times, the edits were forced and unnecessary. For instance, when I said, “Does this app work automatically?”, the app converted that into, “Does this application operate automatically?” In another instance, the app turned the word “complex” into “tricky,” and turned “Sure, no worries” into “There is no need to be concerned”. I don’t want or need these kinds of edits. I eventually turned off its “attune” tone-changing feature to get better results.
I would have also used this device a lot more if it were compatible with Mac and I could dictate in any app.

Besides transcription, users can tap on the translate button to automatically translate speech into supported languages, including English, Japanese, Korean, Simplified Chinese, Traditional Chinese, Spanish, French, German, Italian, Portuguese, Russian, and Arabic.
SpeakOn says that the device could be used for 10 hours at a stretch and has a 20-day standby time. But in my experience, standby time was only a few days rather than 20 days. By default, the device never turns off. I would suggest tweaking that setting to make the device turn off after a few hours of inactivity to save the battery.
The device can fully charge from 0 to 100 percent within an hour. But you can always plug it in for a few minutes to get enough juice for many minutes of dictation.
The device is priced at $129 with a plan that lets you dictate 5,000 words per week. Other apps like Wispr Flow typically allow for 2,000 words per week on their free plan. There’s also a $12 per month plan for unlimited words.
SpeakOn has an early mover advantage in releasing a dictation device. But it needs to expand platform support and improve the software experience, because another company could easily source components and put them in a different form factor to eat up market share.
When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.
>
Tech
OpenAI Asks Judge to Dismiss Apple Trade-Secrets Lawsuit
OpenAI asks a federal judge to dismiss Apple’s trade-secrets lawsuit over former employees and alleged misuse of confidential hardware information.
The post OpenAI Asks Judge to Dismiss Apple Trade-Secrets Lawsuit appeared first on TechRepublic.
>
Tech
OpenAI’s ‘Doughnut-Shaped’ AI Speaker Could Launch in 2027
OpenAI’s next big bet could sit on your table and look suspiciously like a doughnut.
The AI company is reportedly developing a compact, battery-powered, displayless smart speaker expected to cost somewhere between $300 and $400. Bloomberg reports that the device could cost more than $300, while TechCrunch puts the expected price between $300 and $400.
Those details are still unconfirmed, and the device is reportedly targeting a 2027 release. But if the reports prove accurate, OpenAI’s hardware ambitions suggest something considerably larger than an attempt to build a better smart speaker:
The real prize may be removing the screen, keyboard, and even the smartphone from the conversation entirely.
OpenAI may be betting that AI needs its own hardware
For most users today, interacting with generative AI still begins with opening something. You launch ChatGPT on a phone. Open a browser tab. Tap an app. Type a prompt.
That creates friction, however small, between having a question and asking an AI to act on it. A dedicated OpenAI device could attack that friction directly.
The Verge reports that the device is expected to be roughly the size of a hockey puck, with a doughnut-like shape, battery power, cameras and other sensors, lights, and moving components. Mashable also describes the unusual smart-speaker form factor and the premium price expected.
The reported lack of a display may be especially significant. Without a screen competing for attention, conversation would presumably become the primary interface.
The Verge reports that the device could offer something resembling a more advanced version of ChatGPT Voice Mode, potentially powered by more capable AI models. Its moving components may even allow it to physically react during interactions, although exactly how that would work remains unclear.
A portable device matters because it could change the relationship between the user and the assistant. Instead of ChatGPT living inside a computer or phone, the AI could become something sitting nearby and ready for conversation throughout the day.
Generative AI systems such as ChatGPT are increasingly designed around conversations, reasoning, research, writing, planning, and multi-step tasks. Put those capabilities inside dedicated hardware and a smart speaker could stop being merely a voice-controlled appliance. It starts looking more like an always-available AI interface.
The $300 price could reveal OpenAI’s real target
The reported price is arguably more revealing than the doughnut shape.
At $300 to $400, OpenAI would be entering premium-device territory rather than chasing the inexpensive smart-speaker market. That would be a curious strategy if the goal were simply to compete for countertop space against Amazon Echo or Google Nest devices.
But OpenAI may not need millions of consumers to think they need another speaker. It needs them to believe that a dedicated AI device can do something their existing devices cannot.
Smartphones already have microphones, speakers, cameras, screens, processors, and increasingly capable AI assistants. Apple, Google, Samsung, and other device makers also control operating systems that can integrate AI deeply into products people already own.
OpenAI does not have that advantage.
Its own hardware could give the company more control over how users interact with ChatGPT, from the physical design and sensors to the conversational interface, rather than relying entirely on devices and operating systems controlled by other technology companies.
In that sense, the rumored speaker may be less an Alexa competitor than an attempt to reduce OpenAI’s dependence on the smartphone as the primary gateway to ChatGPT.
More must-read AI coverage
What an OpenAI device could mean for users
For consumers, the bigger question is not whether OpenAI can make an attractive AI speaker. It is whether owning one would meaningfully improve how they use AI every day.
A dedicated ChatGPT device could make common interactions faster and more natural. Instead of pulling out a phone to ask a question, summarize information, brainstorm an idea, manage a task, or get help while cooking or working, users could simply speak to an assistant that is always within reach.
The reported cameras and sensors also suggest that the device could eventually understand more about its surroundings than a conventional voice-only speaker, although OpenAI has not publicly confirmed what those components would do.
However, that potential convenience comes with trade-offs.
An always-available AI device equipped with microphones, cameras, and other sensors would inevitably raise questions about privacy, data collection, account security, and how much personal context users are comfortable sharing with an assistant sitting inside their homes.
OpenAI would need to give buyers clear answers about when those sensors are active, what information the device collects, what gets stored or transmitted, and what controls users have over their data.
Then there is the $300 to $400 question. At that price, consumers will have to decide whether a dedicated AI device offers enough value to justify buying another piece of hardware when ChatGPT already runs on phones, laptops, and tablets they own.
That makes OpenAI’s challenge unusually simple to describe and difficult to solve: The device cannot merely make ChatGPT more convenient. It has to make ChatGPT meaningfully better.
If it does, users could get an early glimpse of a computing model in which AI becomes less of an app and more of a persistent interface to information, services, and everyday tasks. If it does not, the device risks becoming another expensive gadget competing for an outlet and attention.
Jony Ive’s influence makes the form factor more important
The unusual design is another clue that OpenAI may not want consumers to think of this as an ordinary smart speaker.
TechCrunch reports that OpenAI is developing the device with LoveFrom, the design firm founded by former Apple design chief Jony Ive. That involvement raises expectations that the eventual product will emphasize a different kind of human-computer interface rather than simply placing ChatGPT inside familiar electronics.
A doughnut-shaped, screenless device with moving components certainly qualifies as unfamiliar. But industrial design alone will not determine whether the experiment works.
OpenAI has to answer a much harder question: What is substantially easier, faster, or more useful when ChatGPT has its own piece of hardware? Without a compelling answer, even beautifully designed AI hardware risks becoming an expensive microphone connected to capabilities consumers already have on their phones.
The battle for AI could become a battle for the interface
The larger significance of OpenAI hardware is that the AI industry is beginning to confront an old technology lesson: controlling the software is powerful, but controlling how people access it can be just as important.
Apple has the iPhone and its operating systems. Google has Android. Amazon put Alexa into millions of homes. Meta is pushing its AI deeper into smart glasses and other devices.
OpenAI became one of the defining companies of the generative AI boom without owning a major consumer hardware platform. That leaves the company in an unusual position. ChatGPT can be enormously popular while still depending on phones, computers, app stores, and operating systems controlled by other technology companies.
A successful OpenAI device could begin changing that equation by giving the company a direct hardware interface built around ChatGPT. Instead of asking users to find ChatGPT inside someone else’s ecosystem, OpenAI could begin building a hardware experience around ChatGPT itself.
That is what makes this rumored device worth watching.
The strange shape will attract attention. The reported $300-plus price will generate debate. But the experiment underneath both is much more consequential: whether consumers want artificial intelligence badly enough to buy hardware designed around AI first, rather than simply adding AI to devices they already own.
If OpenAI can make people want dedicated AI hardware, it could reshape how we think about the next generation of personal computing.
Related reading: The rumored device could also give OpenAI another way to reach its rapidly expanding audience, with the company now reporting more than 1 billion active users across its models.
>
Tech
Samsung’s August Update Patches 56 Security Vulnerabilities Across Galaxy Devices
Samsung is starting August with a security sweep that patches dozens of flaws across Galaxy phones and tablets.
The company has published details of its August 2026 Security Maintenance Release (SMR), which addresses 56 security vulnerabilities affecting eligible Galaxy smartphones and tablets running Android 14, Android 15, and Android 16.
The update includes 38 Android security fixes from Google’s August Security Bulletin and 18 Samsung-specific patches for One UI and Galaxy software. Of Google’s fixes, eight are rated critical, and 30 are classified as high priority.
Samsung also noted that nine Google-listed vulnerabilities are not part of this month’s release. One was already included in the July update, while the remaining eight do not affect Galaxy devices because they are tied to hardware or configurations Samsung does not use.
The rollout is expected to begin in the coming days, with Samsung’s latest flagship devices, including the Galaxy Z Fold 8, Galaxy Z Flip 8, and Galaxy S26 series, likely receiving the update first before it expands to older flagship models and supported Galaxy A-series phones.
One UI patches close Galaxy-specific security gaps
Beyond Android itself, Samsung is fixing 18 Samsung Vulnerabilities and Exposures (SVEs) affecting its own software.
Among the more notable fixes is a patch for an authorization bypass in SemClipboardService that could have allowed local apps to access clipboard contents without proper permission. Samsung also addressed vulnerabilities affecting Samsung Contacts, Dialer, Messages, Galaxy Themes, and AppLock.
Several of the fixes target media components and system libraries, including the VC1 and MPEG4 codecs, where memory-handling flaws could potentially be exploited by local attackers. The company also strengthened access controls for the Weaver hardware component, closing a vulnerability that could have allowed attackers with local access to render a device unusable.
Some Samsung-specific vulnerabilities remain undisclosed, as the company noted that certain SVE details cannot yet be publicly released.
Must-read security coverage
What Galaxy owners should know
Security updates rarely introduce new features, but they remain one of the most important software releases users receive.
This month’s package addresses multiple high-risk Android vulnerabilities alongside Galaxy-specific flaws affecting core apps and system services. While many of the Samsung-specific issues require local or physical access to a device, installing the update reduces the risk of privilege escalation, unauthorized data access, and attacks targeting multimedia components.
Because Samsung distributes updates in phases, availability will vary by model, carrier, and region. Some users may receive the patch days or even weeks after the rollout begins. Users can install the update through Settings > Software update > Download and install once it becomes available for their device.
Editor’s note: This article originally appeared on our sister publication, eSecurityPlanet.
>
-
movies3 months agoSearch For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Fashion9 years agoAccording to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Fashion9 years agoModel Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
-
Fashion9 years agoYour comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
-
Fashion9 years ago9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
-
Fashion9 years agoEmily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
-
Fashion9 years agoA photo diary of the nightlife scene from LA To Ibiza
