IndieWire readers know the drill by now: in the dog days of August, when the full flush of movie-going summer has passed and the fall festival is still on the horizon, we dedicate a full week to a disconcertingly large pocket of film history that’s mostly untethered to news cycles or trending stories. The good, nerdy stuff.

We launched with ’90s Week in 2022, went back in time with ’80s Week in 2023, naturally did the obvious thing in 2024 by jumping forward to focus on the aughts, and then finally picked up with ‘70s Week last year.

In 2026, we’re zagging a bit. (’60s Week? We’ll think about it!) This year: Sequels Week.

So much for the “not timely” bent we’ve kept up these past few years, because goodness knows, sequels (and prequels and legacy-quels, oh my!) remain a fixture of Hollywood movie-making and beyond. But while going back to the ol’ well for yet another story doesn’t always guarantee quality, there’s no better way to foster conversation about the movies we love and what makes them so good. If that can be duplicated, replicated, and even improved upon, all the better, and all the more worth celebrating and examining.

Next year: “Sequels Week 2, The Search for More Money.” (We’re kidding. Or are we?)

Below, you’ll get a preview of all the goodies Sequels Weeks has to offer, which will update with links to our stories as they go live over the course of the week. In the spirit of the sequel, why not read each piece twice?

Monday, August 10

The 100 Greatest Sequels of All Time, by IndieWire Staff and Contributors

A Taxonomy of Movie Sequel Terms, by Kate Erbland

Do Sequels Really Drive the Box Office?, by Brian Welk

Tuesday, August 11

On “The Color of Money,” by Jim Hemphill

The History of Unofficial Sequels, by Katie Rife

On “Everybody Wants Some!!,” by Vikram Murthi

Wednesday, August 12

The Best Straight-to-Video Sequels of All Time, by Jim Hemphill

On Legacy Sequels, by Vadim Rizov

On “Oslo, August 31st,” by Sophie Monks Kaufman

On Disney Video Sequels, by Wilson Chapman

Thursday, August 13

The 10 Best Anime Movie Sequels Ever Made, by Kambole Campbell

Why “Terrifer 2” Is the Defining Horror Sequel of the Century, by Sam Bodrojan

On Prequels, by Sarah Shachat

On Wenn Daramas’ “Ang Tanging Ina”, by Lé Beltar

Friday, August 14

On “The Godfather II,” by Chris O’Falt

On “Airplane II,” by Mike Ryan

10 Sequels We’d Like to See, by David Ehrlich

SPOILER ALERT: The following reveals major plot points from the series finale of the Starz crime drama Power Book III: Raising Kanan.

Although it has come time to say goodbye to Power Book III: Raising Kanan, things are only beginning to shape up for the titular character, who is coming back with a vengeance in the upcoming follow-up series Power: Origins. Sascha Penn, the creator of both Raising Kanan and Origins, is taking a moment to take it all in.

It’s a difficult task to conclude a series and hit all the right notes, but Penn wrapped up Raising Kanan with a lot of love and care. And while many may not understand the reasons why we had to have our hearts broken with the loss of Lou (Malcolm Mays), Marvin (London Brown), and then Raq (Patina Miller), we should trust the process and watch how the rest of the story unfolds on Power: Origins.

Penn spoke to Deadline about the events of the finale, that epic post-credits scene, and what’s coming soon from his new prequel series that will finally bring together the powerful trio of Ghost (Spence Moore), Tommy (Charlie Mann), and Kanan Stark (Mekai Curtis).

DEADLINE: So many fans are sad because we said goodbye to our favorites. But, as Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson says in the final beats of the finale, this is not an ending, but a beginning for Kanan. What say you?

SASCHA PENN: The show was always called Raising Kanan, and it has always been that. We are a product of our families and our environment and our experiences. By the end of this series, you do have a good sense of how Kanan became Kanan. You may not love that journey, and you may be really upset about that journey, but it is a journey that I do believe explains how he became the character that we get to know in Power. We’ll know even better in Origins. I feel good about the story we told, and I do feel like it has a real ending.

DEADLINE: You surprised viewers with the young Tommy and Ghost, who are so young that Kanan won’t even mess with them. [Laughs] Why was it important to include them?

PENN: The one question I’ve been asked the most of any question over the past six years: when are we going to see Ghost and Tommy? In our timeline, they’re way too young to be super involved. But I always knew, even from the pitch, that at one point we would glimpse at them just enough for people to feel like, ‘Oh wow, there they are.’ And by the way, we put them into the show before we even knew Origins was happening.

DEADLINE: We need to discuss the post-credits scene. It’s Kanan’s birthday and the family, almost all of whom are now gone, are there for new mom Raquel. There’s an episode of Good Times on [Season 2, Episode 24 titled “The Lunch Money Ripoff.“]. Why did you pick that show?

PENN: In terms of going with Good Times, that show is on my Mount Rushmore of television series as a kid. I’ve watched every single episode of Good Times, and, like everybody else, I wish I was part of the Evans family. That family felt like this idealized family to me, right? So it was really important to include it. And this notion of this idealized family juxtaposed with this other family [on Raising Kanan]… I can’t unpack all of what it meant to me, but there was something about it that felt really appropriate.

DEADLINE: It fully makes sense, for anyone that knows that episode. Here’s a “bad” kid with an absent father bullying other kids in school, including the Evans family’s youngest Michael (Ralph Carter). He wasn’t a “bad” anything, more so a victim of his circumstances, like Kanan. What say you?

PENN: There was another episode which we considered. In the episode [Season 2, Episodes 9 & 10, The Gang, Parts 1 and 2], JJ (Jimmie Walker) was shot by a gang member [named Mad Dog].

DEADLINE: That would’ve worked out well as well, but I think you picked the right episode.

PENN: Yeah. I felt like we have this moment, we have Good Times, then we see Raq as a new mother, and what that responsibility feels like. Raq didn’t set out to raise this kid who ultimately wants to kill her. No, she’s like every other parent. She has this tiny baby that’s defenseless in her arms, and she’s like, ‘I’m gonna protect you. It’s you and me. I got you,’ which is heartbreaking in a completely different way. I think most parents really set out to do the right thing by their kids, but it’s hard. Life intervenes in all sorts of unexpected ways. But I felt like it was meaningful to have the last image of this series be a mother loving her son.

DEADLINE: What can you tease about Origins?

PENN: It takes place in like 2002, 2003. Tonally, it is different than Raising Kanan and Ghost; there’s a little more levity. It’s a little bit more like 48 Hours or Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid. That’s sort of what we were aiming for. So it’s fun. Not to say that there isn’t dark stuff in it, and Kanan is there and it’s a pretty grim version of him. It’s super fast-paced. The actors that are playing Tommy and Ghost are amazing. They’ve done the right thing, which is that they give you enough of the original Tommy and Ghost while at the same time making the characters entirely their own. We just wrapped last week on 18 episodes. I think people are gonna love it.

This interview has been edited and condensed for length and clarity.

The latest round of quarterly earnings disclosures marked the most significant progress for the streaming industry to date, as all five Hollywood studios’ direct-to-consumer businesses reported profits and gains in revenue. 

Streaming’s shift from burgeoning growth initiative to key profitability engine is a meaningful inflection point as visibility into subscriber growth becomes increasingly limited, the linear TV business continues to be ravaged by cord-cutting and competition for consumers’ attention remains fierce as the major media companies contend with YouTube, social media, gaming, podcasts and more.

Netflix continues to lead the pack by a wide margin, but its executives have had to fend off Wall Street’s questions about its engagement growth in the wake of the collapse of its $83 billion bid for Warner Bros. Discovery’s streaming and studio assets. In its latest quarter, the streamer revealed it will shift from a biannual to annual publication of its engagement reports. 

Trailing in second place is Disney, which under new CEO Josh D’Amaro is going all-in on streaming with plans to transform Disney+ into the company’s “digital centerpiece.” Elements of that vision will start to be introduced in the spring. Disney+ and Hulu remain on track to launch as a unified standalone app by year end and the company is considering launching a free tier to help boost Disney+’s subscriber growth and engagement. It is the first of the legacy players to see streaming overtake linear in terms of revenue contribution.

But WBD and Paramount, the third and fourth largest players, respectively, could pull ahead of Disney if they successfully close their pending $110 billion merger. The deal, which is in limbo as a lawsuit with 12 state attorneys general heads to trial in March 2027, has received the necessary approvals from shareholders as well as regulators and governments representing 66 jurisdictions, including the U.S. Department of Justice, the European Commission and the U.K. Competition and Markets Authority. 

During their respective earnings calls, Paramount CEO David Ellison and Warner Bros. CEO David Zaslav expressed confidence that the deal would close as planned, though the former will be on the hook for over $1 billion in ticking fees during the delay. Paramount expects the deal will close five days after the outcome of a trial, or June 1, 2027, whichever is earliest. Under the terms of the merger, the March 4 outside date is subject to one automatic extension to June 4, 2027. If it doesn’t close at all due to regulatory matters, Paramount will pay WBD a $7 billion termination fee. 

While Peacock still trails behind its competitors, the service finally turned its first-ever quarterly profit six years after launching. But it still has plenty of work to do to become consistently profitable as NBCUniversal prepares to split from Comcast over the next 12 months. 

This analysis does not include Apple TV and Amazon’s Prime Video, which do not break out streaming subscriber, revenue or profitability metrics on a quarterly basis since they remain a small part of each respective tech giant’s business. 

Amazon Chief Financial Officer Brian Olsavsky previously said Prime Video has grown into a “large and profitable business in its own right,” but did not disclose specific figures. An NFL presentation to the FCC pegged the streaming service’s total subscriber base at roughly 180 million. While Amazon has not publicly confirmed that figure, it has disclosed that Prime Video’s ad-supported tier reaches more than 315 million monthly viewers globally.  

As for Apple TV, the tech giant’s Services Vice President Eddy Cue has confirmed that the streamer has “significantly more” than the 45 million subscribers previously estimated by analysts, but declined to disclose a specific figure. 

Check out the full breakdown of the numbers below.

Subscribers

Netflix, Disney and Warner Bros. Discovery have all opted to stop disclosing subscribers on a quarterly basis, making an up-to-date comparison by service difficult. 

As of their last available subscriber disclosures, Netflix reported a total of 325 million globally and Disney reported a total of 219.8 million across Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+. Meanwhile, WBD previously said it surpassed 140 million subscribers and forecasts it will surpass 150 million by year end. 

Meanwhile, Paramount+ added 2 million subscribers for a total of 81.6 million globally and experienced its lowest quarter of churn in the service’s history, driven by its original and sports programming, including “Dutton Ranch,” the FIFA World Cup and UFC. When combined with WBD, Paramount’s total count would sit at 226.6 million subscribers based on the latest disclosures. 

Looking ahead, Paramount+ subscriber growth in the third quarter is expected to be flat quarter-over-quarter. However, total paid subscribers will be modestly higher for the full year compared to 2025, including approximately 4 million strategic international hard bundle exits.

Peacock added 2 million paid subscribers for a total of 48 million, driven by the NBA playoffs, FIFA World Cup and “Love Island USA.” It did not provide guidance for the streaming service’s subscriber growth going forward. 

Revenue

Netflix’s total revenue grew 13% to $12.6 billion in its latest quarter. In the U.S., the company saw revenue growth of 10%, which reflected only a partial impact from its price increase across all of its plans in March. It also surpassed $4 billion in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region and $1.5 billion in Latin America and the Asia-Pacific region. 

It expects total revenue to grow 11.7% to $12.9 billion in the third quarter. As for the full year, the company narrowed its forecasted revenue range to $51 billion to $51.4 billion, but remains on track to double ad revenue to $3 billion.

Giving you a sense of Netflix’s lead, Disney+ and Hulu’s combined revenue grew 11% to $5.5 billion, or less than half of the streaming giant. Disney’s results were driven by a 15% increase in subscription revenues and 3% bump in ad revenue, subscriber growth, price hikes and reduced subscriber turnover driven by product and technology improvements. 

While streaming has overtaken Disney’s linear business in terms of revenue contribution, the company warned that domestic entertainment streaming revenue in the fourth quarter would be impacted by a softer than expected advertising environment.

Warner Bros. Discovery’s direct-to-consumer revenue climbed 10% to $3.08 billion, driven by HBO Max’s international expansion and growth in existing markets, an increase in ad-lite subscribers and content including “Euphoria,” “House of the Dragon,” “The Pitt” and “Hacks. “ Subscriber-related revenue grew 11% to $3 billion, while content revenue fell 18% to $84 million. 

Moving forward, year-over year growth in WBD’s subscriber-related revenue is expected to accelerate in the second half of the year and remain healthy into 2027, driven by its content lineup, continued engagement growth, robust global advertiser demand and ongoing product improvements. It also expects revenues to continue to grow at a “significantly faster” annual rate than operating expenses over the long-term. 

Paramount’s total streaming revenue rose 9% to $2.47 billion, with Paramount+ revenue growing 16% to $2.1 billion. For the full year, it continues to expect accelerating DTC revenue growth across subscriptions and advertising.

Peacock revenue grew 54% to $1.9 billion, driven by its subscriber growth, the FIFA World Cup, the NBA playoffs and “Love Island.” Distribution revenue grew over 50%, while ad revenue increased nearly 70%. Comcast did not provide a revenue outlook for Peacock.   

Profits

The starkest picture that highlights the gap between Netflix and everyone else comes with the profit chart.

The streaming giant’s profit climbed 9% to $3.4 billion in the latest quarter. For the third quarter, the company is forecasting a profit of $3.45 billion, up from $2.55 billion in the prior-year period. 

Disney+ and Hulu’s combined profit more than doubled to $712 million, fueled in part by subscriber growth, price hikes and reduced turnover from product and technology improvements. Its entertainment streaming operating margin was 13% for the quarter and executives continue to expect a double-digit operating margin in the long-term. The company does not break out profits and losses for its ESPN streaming service and no longer discloses the financials of ESPN+. 

WBD’s streaming profits soared 75% to $512 million. It continues to target a streaming adjusted operating profit margin of more than 20% over the long-term. 

Paramount’s streaming profits jumped 44% to $366 million, primarily fueled by growth at Paramount+. Total streaming profits are expected to grow year over year in 2026, but will be weighted more meaningfully to the first half of the year due to the timing of programming investments in the third and fourth quarters.

Peacock swung to profit of $189 million, compared to a loss of $101 million in the prior-year period. However, Comcast Co-CEO Mike Cavanagh warned its profitability would still vary from quarter to quarter, citing the timing of sports schedules and other content.

“Think of it on an annual basis rather than the lumpiness quarter by quarter,” Cavanagh told analysts. “It’s been improving steadily and we see that continuing to be the case.”