
Sandra Wollner
Courtesy of Robert Newald
The Cannes Film Festival‘s Un Certain Regard section prides itself on showcasing discoveries of non-traditional cinema. What a fit for rising Austrian writer-director Sandra Wollner, who is making her Cannes debut in this year’s program with her third feature, Everytime!
Her debut feature, The Impossible Picture, showed the everyday life of a Viennese family in the 1950s as documented on 8mm film by 13-year-old Johanna, until the camera suddenly turns on her. Her sophomore movie, The Trouble With Being Born, was a drama about a 10-year-old android and her “Daddy.”
Now, Wollner is back with Everytime, which sees a tragic death bring a mother, her daughter, and a teenage boy, who everyone blames for the tragedy, together. The cinematic exploration of grief, blame and forgiveness takes the unlikely trio on a trip to Tenerife for “a family holiday that never happened,” as the auteur puts it. And under the glowing sun of the Spanish island, time, as well as reality and fiction, suddenly seem to start blurring.
If audiences, just like the writer of these lines, end up wondering “what the hell is going on!?,” Wollner is happy to hear it. “One experiences that feeling only rarely, and I really want to embrace that,” she tells THR. “I think it’s nice if you walk out of the cinema and you can’t completely grasp what you have just seen.”
Everytime, which features cinematography by Gregory Oke and editing courtesy of Hannes Bruun,
stars Birgit Minichmayr (The Blood Countess, The White Ribbon, My Wonderful Wanda), Lotte Shirin Keiling, Tristan Lopez, and Carla Hüttermann. Produced by Lixi Frank and David Bohun at Panama Film with Viktoria Stolpe at The Barricades, Charades is handling international sales.
Wollner talked to THR about the inspirations for the film, which premieres on May 18, and the themes it dives into, her creative process, the role of musical and video game aesthetics in Everytime, and how her documentary film studies play into her filmmaking.
What inspired Everytime?
“Why does the sun go on shining?” One would think that after a tragedy like the one that happens in the film, the world ought to have the decency to stop. A night out, two kids bursting with life, a wrong step, and a teenage girl dies. And life just goes on after that. The sun just keeps on hanging in the sky, shining with simple, oblivious innocence, as if nothing has changed, as if nothing has happened. The indifference of the universe, which doesn’t care about our pain – that’s what interested me.
The three protagonists of the film are based on people and constellations I have met at certain points in my life. But they are more “afterimages” of these people – they grew into themselves and took on a life of their own. I just had to follow them.
They form a bit of an unlikely trio. There is nothing they can say that will change what happened, nothing they can do that will overcome this immense loss. They are in an in-between state where they are not honest with each other. Everyone tries to do “the right thing,” like a decent person. But no one talks about their actual state of mind. The boy cannot say that he just wants forgiveness, and the mother cannot say that she cannot give it to him – because, actually, deep down, she does blame him somehow. It’s like in all complex scenarios – there are a variety of things that are true at the same time. And sometimes it’s hard to bear.
We follow this unlikely trio, and a lot is going on, but not in terms of big visible “action.”
They go on quite a journey in this film. But at first, we follow them through the stillness of everyday life, where everything feels suspended except for their grief, and the different ways they confront it, evade it, or find themselves unable to face it at all. That quiet tension is what ultimately propels them into a strange journey: a family holiday that never actually took place.
When everything is said and done, they have to face the fact that there is nothing they could do that would change what happened. Nothing can change the simple reality of death. Except in this film, reality itself is not such a simple thing.

Sandra Wollner
Courtesy of Robert Newald
It’s definitely not a classic hero’s journey, but I feel philosophical, maybe even religious, overtones…
Personally, I don’t believe in an afterlife. I grew up in a more traditional Catholic environment in Austria, where the rites only structured the year; they held no spiritual meaning for me. I was lucky that I was loved, I was fed, and I didn’t feel the urge for an afterlife.
But I always envied those who did, because it’s quite a fantastic idea that you can come back, or that you can meet people again after you leave this world. I do believe that the people we love somehow inscribe themselves into our inner world, like spiritual beings, like ghosts of the mind. We do have an inner world that coexists with the reality out there. And we can never step out of that. These spheres are always overlapping.
Anyone who has experienced the loss of a family member knows that you can recall memories that feel so vivid that you can almost step into those images. Ever since my father died, who loved to fish, I have seen him standing on this particular river bend when I come by there – or even when I don’t. The idea of stepping into that image is, of course, something that cannot happen in real life, because our reality is not built like that. It doesn’t allow something to come alive just because you picture it very clearly. Not quite. But, you know, that’s what the movies are for.
I have seen one of your other features, and memory and images sound like a recurring theme in your work.
We are not only thrown into the world, we also judge it, categorize it – constantly. We build our fictions all the time, we project our human meanings into a complex, sometimes chaotic world. And I think this is the core of what I’m interested in – the strange overlap of this inner thought world and our outer reality.
The film is leading towards the strange manifestation of a memory. It is as if you could step into an old video image that is quite banal, because it has no meaning – but you feel that it has value. And at the same time, there is something uncanny and tragic to it.
Since you like to surprise audiences and keep us on our toes, I wonder about your writing process. Do you know early on exactly where you want to go?
For me, when it comes to writing, I really want to allow myself to be surprised. Of course, you do the usual work of “where is the plot going” and “where are the characters standing”? But sometimes I write and just follow the sound of a sentence to see where it leads me. You have the rhythm of a sentence, and it leads you somewhere, and something unexpected can happen. I like to push the boundaries and not [just think] what would typically happen next. Otherwise, you’re trapped in tropes of human psychology. You must allow yourself to follow a more fluid process, which is something that I feel very strongly about and love.
I honestly didn’t know exactly what I was thinking and feeling when I wrote this film, specifically the final chapter, so to speak. But I was surprised myself. And I thought there was something interesting about it. If you don’t know exactly where it’s leading, and the ambiguity is heightened, still try to follow that!

‘Everytime,’ courtesy of The Barricades/Panama Film/Gregory Oke
I have seen Birgit Minichmayr in various films, and I always like her. But I didn’t know the younger cast members, who are also wonderful. Young Lotte Shirin has such charisma. What kind of safeguarding was needed to protect the cast, especially her, from some of the heavier themes, such as drugs and death?
I’m quite experienced when it comes to protecting and working with kids. And our team was always looking out to create a safe space on set and beyond. But especially with Lotte, who is extremely mature, it wasn’t hard. Of course, we talked about drugs, for instance, and what happens when they are taken, in a manner that is suitable for a child. You also really always cast the parents with the kid, and Lotte has amazing parents who are actors themselves. We talked quite a lot in the beginning. They also saw my last film – which is about a sex robot played by a 10-year-old, after all – and we talked about my methods, rules and boundaries. We all worked together really well.
How and when did you find the film’s title, Everytime?
I feel that Everytime is the cosmos in which all my work takes place. I made two films before – and one is about how a memory becomes a memory. The cosmos in which all these films are set is a place where the weird overlap of memory and imagination happens. It’s a place where the inner world meets the outer world. It’s not like there are ground rules to this world. It’s just a feeling that the films share.
We see the kids playing a video game, which adds another layer of reality or fiction to the film. Can you talk about this choice of featuring these video game scenes and the music that comes with it, which somehow gave me the feeling that I was being pulled into the screen?
Perhaps some of what we see in the film is the gaze of someone, something else – an entity, and not a very empathetic entity at that. Maybe it’s the universe itself, or god or whatever we want to call this entity. It is simply watching, and in watching, it doesn’t discern between the meaningful and the banal. I feel this is the misery we live in. Life doesn’t stop when a tragedy like this happens. It just goes on. And this entity takes the tragedy as seriously as the video game – the game that the dead kid used to play and that her sister is playing now. Therefore, there is an overlap of the music that comes from this video game with what happens later – it evolves into something different within the film.
Inherently, video games create inner experiences, but they are also complete worlds and realities in themselves. Again, the inner and the outer world. In this particular game, your hopes and intentions as a player clash with an immense, almost boundless world and its survival mechanics. But you can also fly, or create anything you want, or dig into the earth until it’s all black around you. It’s as uncanny as it gets. This is why, in the film, after you experience the tragedy, you’re suddenly thrown into a video game full-screen.

‘Everytime,’ courtesy of The Barricades/Panama Film/Gregory Oke
I read that you studied documentary filmmaking. Do you feel your doc background feeds into your work?
I did study documentary filmmaking – and then stopped making documentaries because I felt the burden of the truth, as it were. I wanted to be true to my protagonists, but also really wanted to follow my vision. So I stopped, because I realized that my urge to create was bigger than my urge to stay close to the facts. I suppose my love of writing is stronger than just filming the world as I see it.
At the same time, in this film, there is a subtle shift in tonality, almost a shift in genre – but this shift could only really be felt if you, as a viewer, completely trusted the reality of what’s on screen. This meant that for most of the film’s runtime, we needed the plot, the characters and the film’s texture to feel as authentic as possible – however frail that concept of authenticity might be.
Nearly everything is scripted, although there are some scenes where I just gave the actors a general sense and a sentence for what to do. But when things are scripted and choreographed in the writing process, I then look at it as if I was just there to document them in the filming – which is hard, because you are definitely forgetting that you are “just documenting,” you have to actually create it. After that, in the editing, once we have created this new authenticity, I really love to watch the whole thing like a documentary, to see how it speaks to me. Then we treat the material like it’s found footage.
Congratulations on your first-ever Cannes invite. How does that feel?
I’m excited about going to Cannes. I haven’t been there, and it’s quite an honor. I still cannot really believe it. I heard the cinema is really big, and I hope that a lot of the crew will enjoy the [experience].
Is there any new project you are working on?
I’ve started to write a film that explores the question of how the first ghosts came into the world. It is set in prehistoric times and follows a band of children trying to survive the strange environment around them. Let’s see where it goes.
>
Italy’s Fandango Distribution has acquired Sine Plambech’s Rescue for all rights, including theatrical release, The Hollywood Reporter has learned.
Radio Télévision Suisse (RTS) has come on board as a broadcaster, joining pre-sale partners DR, VPRO, SVT and NRK, in deals negotiated by Vienna-based Autlook Filmsales, which handles worldwide sales on the film.
The agreements land as Plambech, serving as president of the documentary competition jury at the 22nd Zurich Film Festival, presents the European premiere of Rescue in the festival’s Now/Future section this week.
Rescue tells the story of Roro, a Yemeni mother of young children fighting to reunite her family after a Mediterranean rescue operation left her separated from her husband and held in captivity in Libya. Filmed with rare access aboard Doctors Without Borders’ Geo Barents, the documentary examines the fallout of Europe’s “externalization” of migration control to North African countries, tracing one woman’s fight for justice, dignity and the right to be seen amid a broken system.
The film is written by Plambech and Janus Metz, and produced by Elk Film’s Andreas Dalsgaard, Sofie Husum Johannesen, and Tereza Šimíková. Troels N’koya Jensen is the cinematographer, with editing by Per K. Kirkegaard and Marion Tuor and music by Uno Helmersson. Running 80 minutes, the film is in Arabic, English and French with English subtitles.
Rescue had its world premiere at TIFF and screens in Zurich’s Now/Future section, which this year features nine films exploring human rights, social conflict and sustainable development. Presented in collaboration with the EurAsia Heart Foundation and Dementia Research Switzerland, the section highlights figures committed to equality and social justice alongside perspectives on ecological, social and economic questions for the future.
Plambech is currently heading up the doc competition jury in Zurich. She is an award-winning director, anthropologist and senior researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS). Among other things, she directed Mission Trafficking (2010, in collaboration with Judith Lansade) and Becky’s Journey (2014), and provided the research foundation for From Thailand to Thy (2008) and From Thy to Thailand (2008), both directed by Janus Metz.
Her major breakthrough, Heartbound (2018), which built upon the two films from 2008, had its world premiere at TIFF, was selected for IDFA, and won the Golden Eye Award for best international documentary at the Zurich Film Festival that year.
>
If you pay any attention to the BBC, you will know Britain’s national broadcaster is on the horns of a funding crisis.
We know this because the BBC keeps telling us. Director-general Matt Brittin has told staff that the “cupboard is bare.” He has told Parliament that the BBC’s current funding model, the licence fee, is a “busted flush.” He told BBC viewers on Sunday that the corporation is in a “tight financial situation.”
And when the BBC is not telling us, it is showing us by cutting thousands of jobs, canceling shows, and threatening to close services. The drip-drip of cuts announcements is like a marketing campaign counting down to BBC doomsday.
Luckily for the BBC, there’s a potential solution: It’s called charter renewal. Every decade, the broadcaster sits down with the government and thrashes out its future, agreeing its funding for the years ahead, and making detailed decisions about its governance and operating guardrails.
And it just so happens that the BBC and the government are in the thick of charter renewal negotiations as you read this. Behind-closed-doors meetings between the BBC’s policy team and Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) officials are happening every week. Brittin is engaging regularly with Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary. There is lots of talking going on.
In public at least, the BBC and new Prime Minister Andy Burnham’s administration are singing from the same hymn sheet. The BBC wants to ensure that the 94% of Brits consuming the BBC are actually paying for it. Nandy told BBC News this month that she wants to put the corporation on a “sustainable footing.”
But here’s the rub: Neither the government nor the BBC have wholeheartedly set out their preferred way of achieving this ambition, leading to what Deadline hears is growing unease on both sides about a lack of vision for the BBC’s future.
We can rule out some things pretty confidently, including full ad or subscription funding. Never going to happen. What about a household levy? This would basically involve adding a tax to a utility or broadband bill. The BBC quite likes this idea, but ministers have explicitly ruled it out on the grounds that a new tax would be unpalatable (not to mention politically toxic) in a cost of living crisis.
This shrinking field of options increasingly points in the direction of tinkering with the £180 ($240) licence fee. There is an old joke in UK media that reviews of BBC funding nearly always result in the same conclusion: The licence fee is the least worst option.
But quite what this tinkering looks like, and whether it will achieve the shared aim of safeguarding the BBC, remains to be seen. The main idea under discussion is extending the licence fee to include non-live content on commercial streaming services.
What does that mean in practice? Well, at the moment, you can watch The Gentlemen on Netflix without being legally obliged to pay the licence fee. Ministers and the BBC are now discussing plans that could incriminate you for watching MobLand on Paramount+ without paying your cut to the BBC. Shows not made by Guy Ritchie would also be included.
Closing the streaming loophole may seem an elegant solution in theory, but it is complicated in reality. The BBC is struggling to enforce payment of the licence fee as it is, and the tools at its disposal, including pursuing convictions, are regressive, hitting lower-income households and women hardest. Netflix carrying pop-up ‘PAY YOUR LICENCE FEE’ notices (a genuine BBC suggestion) is not going to cut it.
To get around this, Nandy has floated the idea of charging consumers extra for their subscription streaming services. A BBC levy on your monthly Disney+ bill, if you like. She acknowledges, however, that this is unlikely to be popular with U.S. streamers, who are quick to make noises about pulling back their UK investment when they see barriers to growth.
Nandy has also spoken about allowing the BBC to top up its public funding with commercial revenue, including monetizing archive content or enabling the corporation to carry ads around its podcasts on platforms like Spotify or YouTube. But again, Nandy has been reluctant to fully embrace these proposals.
Ultimately, it will likely be the Treasury, rather than the DCMS, that calls the shots on funding questions, but time is running out to push through the thorny reforms under discussion.
It means that, with 15 months until the current BBC charter expires, the broadcaster has no clarity about its finances beyond next year. During the last round of charter negotiations, the BBC struck a funding deal with David Cameron’s government 18 months before its operating agreement ended. Nandy recently described that deal as “appalling,” but has declined to commit to an alternative.
Instead, we have a vacuum. Private talks and a paucity of public information. We may hear more from BBC boss Brittin at the Royal Television Society London Convention on Tuesday, but no minister will speak at the important industry gathering because of the Labour Party conference in Liverpool. And so the limbo lingers.
As one BBC watcher in Westminster puts it, both sides have been “as bad as each other” in their approach to the charter process. “As much as this government isn’t the best when it comes to making decisions about anything, it’s not clear to me what the BBC’s vision is for itself,” the lawmaker explains. “It’s a longstanding problem, and in the past the BBC usually stood to benefit, as the result would be status quo. The danger now is that the status quo just accelerates [the BBC’s] decline.”
Nandy has promised to publish the government’s position “soon.” For the BBC, which is gearing up to announce another gruelling round of cuts over the coming days, it can’t come soon enough.
>
In their conversations leading up to the making of Rose, star Sandra Hüller and director Markus Schleinzer worked hard at fine-tuning their eponymous 17th-century hero. Hüller was to play a woman disguising herself as a male soldier in the aftermath of the Thirty Years’ War, ingratiating herself in a small Protestant village. She considered preparation routines like strength training, before setting them aside as anachronistic; she agonized over keeping things as believable as possible. “She was wondering, ‘What should I do with my voice — should I lower it?’” Schleinzer recalls. “Then we started to laugh because then we found out that my voice, as a man, is higher than her voice as a woman. It would be a weird thing for her, to lower her voice to pretend to be a man, for a male director who has a much higher voice than hers.”
The anecdote offers some amusing insight into the dynamic between Schleinzer and Hüller, which remained deeply playful and collaborative over the years it took to get Rose made. Yet it also speaks to the ultimate mastery of Hüller’s portrayal here, which never goes for the easy or obvious choice. In a career full of decorated performances, this ranks among Hüller’s very best, a moving, wondrously strange embodiment of a survivor in constant, subtle hiding. Below, you can watch the exclusive trailer for the film for a first look.
Rose premiered at the Berlin Film Festival in February, where Hüller won the Silver Bear for best lead performance. The star then went on to receive a Tribute Medallion in Telluride earlier this month, where the movie made its North American premiere; now, it’s making the rounds in New York. “Rose is another extraordinary showcase for her gifts and a master class in the art of acting with rigor, honesty, physicality and zero showiness,” wrote THR chief film critic David Rooney of Hüller in his review.
Schleinzer first had the idea for Rose on his birthday, when a friend told him that 250 years ago to the day, a woman had been executed for being caught living her life as a man. The Austrian filmmaker and former casting director, who came up under the legendary Michael Haneke, became obsessed with the story and researched hundreds of other examples, from decades before and after. He saw them speaking to the current climate of fear felt by various marginalized communities. “Every life, every day is a political act — so we cannot hide,” says Schleinzer, who is queer. “We have to change things if we want to have a better life as a community.”
Already at work on the script, Schleinzer then met Hüller on the set of the 2023 German black comedy Sisi & I — as her co-star. “I was really bad in this movie because I was so keen to watch Sandra firsthand — I already had started writing Rose and started stalking her, watching all the things she was ever in, even the tiny television spots she had at the beginning of her career.” He later sent her the script, which was written in prose, more akin to a novel; she jumped at the challenge.

Sandra Hüller in Rose.
The Match Factory/Courtesy Everett Collection
When asked what surprised him about Hüller’s approach to the role, Schleinzer points to a viral red-carpet clip of the star describing her process in straightforward terms — “I really have to disappoint you, it’s not so much: I learned the lines” — in noting that what results from that is anything but simple.
“I was a casting director for 17 years and I always had the feeling that my main job was to get people out of being afraid, of having fear or discomfort — there is this type of actor who loves to talk, because talking means that they do not have to act, they can just talk, talk, talk, talk,” the director says. “Sandra is the complete opposite. She is someone who gets easily bored, so no take is the same: ‘Now I’ll become a little more boyish,’ ‘Now I’m the soldier.’ I had the big problem of choosing how to build up a character for the audience, then — but this was surprising, to see such life come alive in front of your eyes on the set every day.”
Shot on location near the East German border with original sets, scouted by Schleinzer through hours of hiking, the film boasts a handmade quality in Gerald Kerkletz’s black-and-white cinematography, the exacting makeup and costume work and the dry humor that allows the absurdity of certain situations to breathe — even as Rose hurtles toward profound tragedy. “My intention was to make something more about these days we are in than just a museum piece with some nostalgic images,” Schleinzer says.
Rose premiered this past weekend to more raves at the New York Film Festival, and will be released in North American theaters by Mubi on Dec. 11. The project started shooting less than two weeks after the end of Hüller’s campaign for Anatomy of a Fall, which netted her a best-actress Oscar nomination — and shot in small increments over many months from there. This could be the project that brings her back to the Oscars, although her greatest competition may be herself: She’s also terrific as the lead of Cannes-winner Fatherland, also a Mubi release, and plays key supporting roles in Project Hail Mary and Digger.
But within the scope of Hüller’s filmography — really, any actor’s — Rose feels special. “Sandra said I should not threaten people, but I have watched her career for the last 20 years and I’ve seen so many prizes taken away from her,” Schleinzer says with a grin. “If she’s not going to be nominated for this one, I’m going berserk.”
Check out the official poster below.

Rose poster.
Mubi
>
Search For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
These ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
According to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
Model Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
Emily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
Rurouni Kenshin: Hokkaido Arc Manga Takes 1-Issue Break – News
HIDIVE to Stream English Dubs for The World Is Dancing, The Forsaken Saintess and Her Foodie Roadtrip in Another World, The Dangers in My Heart: The Movie Anime – News