Connect with us

Entertainment

High Potential Delayed as Dancing With the Stars, Scrubs Lead ABC Fall Slate

Published

on

New seasons of “Dancing With the Stars” and the “Scrubs” revival will lead ABC’s fall slate as the network’s top-rated series, “High Potential,” holds until midseason.

While the Kaitlin Olson-led series recently found its new showrunners in Nora and Lilla Zuckerman, the delay for Season 3 isn’t creatively-driven, according to ABC SVP of content strategy and scheduling Ari Goldman. Instead, the move enables the network to utilize the post-“Dancing With the Stars” timeslot on Tuesday to provide a solid launching pad for sophomore series “RJ Decker.”

“We do want to keep using that launch pad of ‘Dancing with the Stars’ to get some new content off the ground,” Goldman told TheWrap, noting “High Potential” “didn’t necessarily need the lead-in support.” “With ‘High Potential’ and the really dominant success that it’s enjoyed, we have no real concern about the audience not making the journey over to midseason to follow the show.”

“High Potential” will debut midseason alongside “The Rookie” and its Jay Ellis-led spinoff “The Rookie: North,” as well as comedy “Shifting Gears,” drama “Will Trent,” and unscripted staples “The Bachelor” and “Bachelor in Paradise.”

Goldman isn’t concerned about not having ratings leader “High Potential” on the fall schedule, touting the “rarest of lead-ins in all television right now” with “Dancing With the Stars,” which he noted soared nearly 80% in the demo last season. The network is hoping to continue that growth into the 2026-27 season with buzzy recruits like “Summer House” star Ciara Miller and “The Traitors” star Maura Higgins.

“The team has innovated immensely in the social media space, both from a casting perspective and a lot of the social and marketing tactics involved with the show — I think you’re going to see the same type of approach this season with the amazing work that’s been done on TikTok and across social platforms,” Goldman said, also pointing to innovation in the podcast space. “The margin now between ‘Dancing with the Stars’ and the nearest entertainment titles just continues to grow and grow. We’re super excited to see that fresh, engaged audience on ABC and Disney+.”

“Dancing With the Stars” will provide a solid launch pad for “RJ Decker” as it returns after its midseason release, though the series has already passed “High Potential” and “Will Trent” in terms of its launch in the 10 p.m. hour, and will continue to be positioned for success during the summer hours.

Also returning swiftly after its midseason debut is “Scrubs,” whose short midseason run Goldman says has “held up remarkably well across its weeks.” “We’re excited to bring this one back really quickly in the fall and just capitalize on the momentum that we’ve seen on the season,” Goldman said.

“Scrubs” will kick off Wednesdays ahead of “Abbott Elementary,” “Celebrity Jeopardy!” and “Shark Tank.” Thursday’s lineup of “9-1-1,” “9-1-1: Nashville” and “Grey’s Anatomy” will remain untouched. With “Grey’s Anatomy” losing two series regulars, most networks are facing budget cuts that could very well impact episode count.

“We’re always taking a close look at and managing our budgets and our inventory,” Goldman said, while noting ABC has still grown its scripted slate. “Everything that we do here is in service of the creative execution of these shows, making sure that the schedule is introducing audiences to the right content in the right places. That does mean, for some of our series, there will be adjustments to episode counts. But nothing that is particularly, I’d say, austere.”

That said, shows on the Thursdays lineup are “in discussion about their full orders for the year,” with Goldman noting “each of the shows did have a pretty robust length across the season, and I think will be pretty close this coming year.”

One question mark that remains in regards to ABC’s 2026-27 TV season is Taylor Frankie Paul’s season of “The Bachelorette,” which Goldman noted he had no news to share about and pointed to Rob Mills’ comments about taking the process day-by-day.

“There’s certainly a demand, I’m sure out there … we’re not unaware of the social media and the conversation around the show,” Goldman said. “But again, what’s more important at this moment is that these are real people involved in this situation … so again, more to come over time.”

With ABC renewing all of its scripted slate for the upcoming season, Goldman noted it’s first time in ABC’s history, going back to the late 1940s, that the network has renewed every scripted series on the network.

“We have shows that are really resonating across platforms and on the linear schedule, so whether it’s the sort of juggernauts like ‘High Potential’ and ‘The Rookie’ that we’ve told the story about so many times, or the newer entrants to the lineup like ‘RJ Decker’ and ‘9-1-1: Nashville,’ I think we just had a lot to work with going into next year,” Goldman said. “When you think about the events that we have and the marketing opportunities we have to further introduce these shows to more and more people, I think that really got us across the finish line to renewing each of these titles.”

The strength of the renewed series meant the network didn’t have room for Rachel Bloom’s comedy pilot “Do You Want Kids?” Goldman pointed to the network’s existing comedy slate, noting “we really just did not have the real estate for the show this year.”

ABC embraces a year-round development cycle, different than NBC’s push to bring pilot season back, which the network is sticking to for the moment. “I think our schedule is just performing so well and is so packed with content that I think we have to just wait and see if that approach changes.”

While the 2025-26 TV season saw NBC take the ratings crown from CBS for the first time since the 2007-08 season due to Legendary February with the Super Bowl and the Olympics, Goldman is focused on the milestones on the entertainment side, noting ABC is “the only network to grow year over year in total viewers,” which he said is a “major testament to the strength of our scripted slate.”

That said, ABC will benefit from broadcasting the Super Bowl, the Grammys, the Oscars and the college football playoff championship next year.

See ABC’s full fall schedule below.

Monday:

  • 8:00 p.m. – ESPN’s “Monday Night Football”

Tuesday:

  • 8:00 p.m. – “Dancing with the Stars”
  • 10:00 p.m. – “R.J. Decker”

Wednesday:

  • 8:00 p.m. – “Scrubs”
  • 8:30 p.m. – “Abbott Elementary”
  • 9:00 p.m. – “Celebrity Jeopardy!”
  • 10:00 p.m. – “Shark Tank”

Thursday:

  • 8:00 p.m. – “9-1-1”
  • 9:00 p.m. – “9-1-1: Nashville”
  • 10:00 p.m. – “Grey’s Anatomy”

Friday:

  • 8:00 p.m. – “Celebrity Wheel of Fortune”
  • 9:00 p.m. – “20/20” (two hours)

Saturday:

  • 7:30 p.m. – College Football

Sunday:

  • 7:00 p.m. – “America’s Funniest Home Videos”
  • 8:00 p.m. – “The Wonderful World of Disney”

>

Continue Reading

Entertainment

AI Creators Want You to Know AI Filmmaking Is Still ‘F–king Hard’

Published

on























AI Creators Want You to Know AI Filmmaking Is Still ‘F–king Hard’







>

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Austin Abrams Talks Resident Evil’s Fan Backlash

Published

on

Zach Cregger’s “Resident Evil,” in a little more than two weeks, has already amassed nearly $200 million at the global box office.

Instead of a straight adaptation of the long-running video game series (or an extension of the already-existing film franchise), Cregger chose to tell a new story within the world of the games – a story that follows a hapless medical courier named Bryan (played by Austin Abrams), who is sent on a desperate mission to the heart of Raccoon City during a zombie outbreak. It is an all-gas, no-brakes rollercoaster ride that is carried along by Abrams’ performance – vulnerable, hilarious, inquisitive, the perfect audience surrogate. Even when things get weird, really weird, Abrams’ oddly emotional performance keeps us engaged.

Abrams said that Cregger first mentioned the project while the two were working on “Weapons,” which would go on to be a box office hit and an unlikely Oscar winner. But Cregger didn’t say anything specific about Abrams joining the project.

“It wasn’t until he was in post-production for ‘Weapons’ that he called and wanted me to read the script basically,” Abrams said. He hadn’t played the games (“Other than seeing it and being too afraid to play it”) but once he got the part it emboldened him to play horror/survival games that had a similar spirit.

Whereas “Weapons” was an ensemble piece, with Abrams portraying an unforgettable character (a junkie/thief who stumbles upon the mystery of a missing classroom of kids), with “Resident Evil” he would take center stage. The movie is him. And that left him a little nervous.

“You never know if you can do something until it’s done. It’s huge question marks. I feel personally like we’re going to be interested enough in watching this person,” Abrams said. “Not that everyone could feel that way. Or are they going to be like, I don’t really care about this guy that much. I don’t really want to watch this movie? It could happen. There’s a lot of feelings of the unknown came up.”

While shooting the movie, Abrams started to get the impression that it was going to be okay. “You catch the vibe of the people around you and they’re seeming to be into the character and that helps. You’re not getting like red lights. You keep going,” he added.

And while Abrams knew that he would be the audience stand-in, crafting a character through physicality rather than dialogue (“It feels good being in the body and using it as a tool,” he said) there were still some pretty radical changes to the final film, like when Cregger admitted that, after a test screening, he went through the movie and pulled out most of the jokes.

“There were some asides where I was like, ‘Are you going to keep that?’ Or ‘maybe check that out again.’ There was a bunch of stuff like that where we would take it to a place that was too far, really for our own enjoyment. And you never really know, until you get in the edit, how much you’re going want or not,” said Abrams. ”Especially for like this, where it’s a straight shot and there aren’t all these other characters that you’re interacting with. You want options. I don’t think it would be as enjoyable to watch if it was just straight through. If there wasn’t any laughs in it, I think it would be too unrelenting. Adding comedy, which is what I think Zach is so smart about too, really helps the enjoyment of it and relieves some of the pressure.”

One thing scarier than zombies or plague-infested monsters was the response of the die-hard Resident Evil fans to Cregger making a movie that eschewed the classic characters and established lore of the series. They were very upset about his approach.

Abrams was sympathetic. “I read a book that I love and then they’re going to do another one or make it into a different one. You don’t want someone to f–k it up. You have a personal connection with it. I get what that feeling is like. There’s that passion there,” Abrams said.

He said that he and Cregger “did the best job we could.” “We had a strong base of love and I think our best shot at making something that they would enjoy,” Abrams said. Cregger is a huge fan of the games and has played them all, including this year’s Resident Evil: Requiem. Their approach? “Make what you dig and then hope that other people dig it,” said Abrams.

Fan service was not something that they were interested in (Abrams said it doesn’t work in “a meaningful way”). “If you’re going to end up making something that feels fresh, I think that’s the best shot you have making something interesting,” he said. But still, he said, “I only send love to all those people.”

Before he started working with Cregger, Abrams was a fan of “Barbarian,” his debut feature. He remembers thinking, I love whoever’s made this movie, because they have guts and extreme talent and skill, and a comedic understanding that is really rare and that I relate to. Meeting him, Abrams found that they were perfectly in sync.

“We connect on many other levels, aspiring for the same thing and we have a similar level of what we deem to be the work that we want to make,” Abrams said. “I think that helps us to push each other. We both understand what it is we’re trying to make and have a similar sensibility.”

“He is a total dream to work with. I mean, truly a dream, and he is a beautiful, kind person. And he’s such a formidable actor. He’s so good at whatever he tries to do. I have yet to see him find his limit. That guy’s range is miraculous,” said Cregger. “When it was time to go and put this one together, it was like there wasn’t even a decision. There was not a moment of like, Well, who else could we? No, it’s Austin.”

There isn’t a role for Abrams in Cregger’s upcoming sci-fi freakout “The Flood” (which just cast Jennifer Lawrence in the lead role), but when we asked Abrams if he was the Kurt Russell to Cregger’s John Carpenter, he smiled wide and said, “Hey, you said it. I didn’t say it.”

When it came to – spoilers ahoy! – Abrams’ monstrous transformation towards the end of the film, he said that he actually found the motion-capture process enjoyable.

“I was shocked at like how minimal they needed to be able to capture everything,” said Abrams. “It’s all those other guys. You see them in a room, just imagining all this stuff.”

And given the open-endedness of the movie (and the fact that the video game series has been running for so long), we had to ask if Cregger had said anything to him about coming back for another installment. Another entry seems more and more likely, especially as its box office tally continues to grow.

“We’ve had the smallest of discussions. I also don’t want to go into it too much at all because I don’t know how things would play,” said Abrams.

Still, it’s very clear – if Cregger has an idea for how to bring Bryan back to snowy Raccoon City, Abrams would be there. In whatever shape – monstrous or otherwise – that would take.

“Resident Evil” is in theaters now.

>

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Cindy Holland Exits Paramount, Casey Bloys Could Lead Streaming

Published

on

Cindy Holland, the chair of Paramount‘s direct-to-consumer division overseeing the company’s streaming plans, announced in a memo to staff that she’s exiting the company, according to reports in Variety and Deadline. The move most likely paves the way for Casey Bloys, who leads HBO and HBO Max at Warner Bros. Discovery, to lead streaming, something Holland hinted at in her exit memo. Today, September 29, is her last day at Paramount.

Holland’s exit provides some clarity for Paramount’s streaming vision. While Holland’s memo didn’t mention Bloys by name, it hints that “David is optimizing for HBO stability as we move into this next chapter, and I fully support that.” Bloys became president of HBO programming in 2016 and his role has only expanded since then to encompass HBO Max and other aspects of Warner Bros. Discovery.

Holland joined Paramount in January 2025 and described in her memo that she was tasked with reviving Pluto TV as well as integrating Paramount+ and advising on the WBD merger, and she helped grow Paramount+ to 79.6 million subscribers. She also was a pivotal force in the early days of Netflix’s expansion into original streaming programming with shows like “House of Cards” and “Stranger Things,” and she ultimately spent 18 years at Netflix.

While Bloys coming aboard isn’t official, nor has the merger itself closed just yet, it could be solidified in a matter of days. And what happens to HBO and HBO Max, how it’s integrated into Paramount+ or whether it stands alone, are big questions that remain. Bloys, though, has as good a track record as anyone in town. Consider HBO’s continued dominance at the Emmys and how the brand has sustained over the years even as Paramount’s own premium cable brand Showtime has dwindled, ultimately becoming integrated into Paramount+.

Unanswered still is what will be the fate of Warner Bros. Pictures executives Mike DeLuca and Pam Abdy and what their role would be in a combined WarnerMount. Paramount still needs to deliver on an aggressive slate of 30 movies per year across the two studios, so there’s plenty of opportunity to go around.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.