
Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images
“There is no question to anyone following the case in detail that Altman & Brockman did in fact enrich themselves by stealing a charity,” a big bucks court losing Elon Musk stamped his feet and proclaimed today of his now estranged OpenAI co-founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman. Tossing in a Trump caps, the world’s sometimes richest man added: “The only question is WHEN they did it!”
Just a couple of hours after a federal jury and judge rebutted Musk’s 2024 filed breach of charitable trust claim and unlawfully enriched claim against the OpenAI CEO and president (as well as Microsoft), the X owner went on his social media platform to decry the results.
Clearly P.O.’d by the nine-juror panel and Oakland-based Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers emphasizing the statute of limitations to blunt his desires to take back control of the home of ChatGPT, fire Altman and Brockman and more, Musk blamed everyone else and backed up his lawyers promises of an appeal.
“This illustrates why the ruling by the terrible activist Oakland judge, who simply used the jury as a fig leaf, creates such a terrible precedent,” Musk tweeted. “She just handed out a free license to loot charities if you can keep the looting quiet for a few years!”
Viewing the statue of limitations as some how unfair and staying on brand that the rules shouldn’t apply to him, Musk followed that up with: “Regarding the OpenAI case, the judge & jury never actually ruled on the merits of the case, just on a calendar technicality.”
“There is no question to anyone following the case in detail that Altman & Brockman did in fact enrich themselves by stealing a charity,” he went on in a second tweet, repeating his core accusation that Altman and gang were pirates on the data seas when the open a for-profit portion of OpenAI in 2019.
“The only question is WHEN they did it!”
Formed in 2015 by Musk (who put in $50 million, left in 2018), Altman and Brockman, OpenAI has been working for months on a widely anticipated $1 trillion IPO that could bust Wall Street records. Musk’s 2024 lawsuit and the three-week trial that it spawned had a real possibility of derailing that colossal stock offering. Now, the legal leather restraining straps are off — and Altman has the upper hand, and Elon knows it.
“I will be filing an appeal with the Ninth Circuit, because creating a precedent to loot charities is incredibly destructive to charitable giving in America,” the litigious billionaire wrote, hoping to get around a promised appeal refusal from Judge Gonzalez Rogers. “OpenAI was founded to benefit all of humanity.”

Jaap Arriens/NurPhoto via Getty Images
Perhaps, but as the founder of his own AI company, recent Trump China trip tagalong Musk knows it ain’t that straightforward anymore.
Musk also knows, or should know, that, as much as he hates Altman and the sums he stands to make, on an increasingly crowded landscape with Anthropic, Perplexity AI, Google‘s efforts, the legions of companies out of China and significant OpenAI ownership stakeholders MicroSoft, humanity has a lot of benefits and risks out there in its digital future.
>
Although the live-action remake of Moana hasn’t quite been able to catch a wave at the box office, Dwayne Johnson is proud of what they made.
The Golden Globe nominee said the Disney movie’s negative reviews, which currently sit at 32% on Rotten Tomatoes, are “just the way it goes” in the entertainment industry, and what “really mattered” was that “the culture really stood up” in the Polynesian-inspired tale.
“Our first two reviews came out. I’ll never forget it… They were amazing. I was like, wow,” he told People, noting the reviews then “went another way, as sometimes happens.”
“That’s just the way it goes because we’re in this business,” added Johnson.
A decade after he voiced the demigod Maui in Disney’s animated film Moana, Johnson reprised the role in the Thomas Kail-helmed live-action adaptation.

“The challenge was, okay, let’s remember, though, what’s going to be beyond this opening weekend. Let’s remember what’s happening right now and the noise that’s happening right now,” said Johnson. “If you love it, great. If you don’t, no problem.”
Following Moana‘s July 10 premiere, the movie has gone on to make $266M at the global box office. Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro addressed the low turnout in a letter to shareholders.
“Even when our franchise films don’t meet our box office expectations, as with The Mandalorian and Grogu and the live-action Moana, our investments in these core properties fuel other parts of our company,” said D’Amaro, noting that Moana is “expected to be a strong title on Disney+, building on the success of the original film, which is one of the most streamed movies of all time.”
>
While One Night Only is intended as a romantic-comedy, there are some obvious dystopian undertones that audiences can’t ignore.
Director Will Gluck recently addressed online comparisons between the Purge franchise and his new Universal rom-com, which is now in theaters, about two New Yorkers (Monica Barbaro and Callum Turner) who meet on the one night a year premarital sex is legal.
“I am very aware of the online discourse about this world and this movie being the ‘sex Purge,’ and rightfully so,” he told SlashFilm. “But I don’t want this movie to be about that. And I know I get some blowback going, ‘How could you make a movie about this not being about that?’ Because I love exploring characters and situations.
Gluck added, “Whenever us humans get put in situations, no matter how or why the situation happens, we still have to be humans and get through the day. And that’s what interests me. So we didn’t want it to overwhelm. We wanted to explain it. We didn’t want to take a side. We wanted to show both sides, but we wanted it to be about these two people going through this crazy night.”
With five movies and a TV series expanding on the universe since The Purge premiered in 2013, the Blumhouse franchise is set in an alternate reality where all crime, including murder, is legal one night a year for 12 hours.

In a similarly dystopian fascist universe, albeit with a much lighter mood, One Night Only follows recently dumped pizzeria owner Owen (Turner) and singer Allie (Barbaro) meet on the one night of the year premarital sex is legal under the United States’ “chastity mandate.”
>
HBO’s new documentary series Monsters of God abounds with colorful creatures – and those are just the humans.
The five-parter from Tiger King co-director Eric Goode features reptile dealers with a fondness for creepy crawlies and a loose connection to ethical and legal mores. There’s Tom Crutchfield, who loves women with the ardor of Pepé Le Pew but spends most of his time not in pursuit of the ladies but of exotic snakes, lizards, alligators, turtles and whatnot. His arch rival: Hank Molt (aptly named, given that snakes molt), a man who pioneered the shady trade of importing rare and often endangered reptiles to the United States (HBO calls it a “billion-dollar criminal enterprise.”).

Another key Monsters of God character: Anson Wong, a Malaysian “exporter” (to use a polite term) perhaps as cold-blooded as the creatures he rounds up and dispatches around the world. His nickname – “the Pablo Escobar of reptiles.”
The template for the series is supplied by the 2008 book The Lizard King: The True Crimes and Passions of the World’s Greatest Reptile Smugglers, written by Bryan Christy. The author, who appears in the series and serves as a consulting producer, took part in a panel discussion of Monsters of God Thursday night after HBO screened episode 1 at Vidiots in Los Angeles. He praised Goode and fellow producers for wrangling the reptilian importers, typically a wary group.

“I know what it took to run these people down, to get people to say ‘yes’ to you coming in their place,” Christy told the moderator, the actor Jason Segel. “And with a camera. I just had a pencil… It’s amazing what they brought together. And they’re celebrating the animals in a way that I hope gets people to care more about this sort of maligned species.”
Goode needed no persuading about the beauty of animals like New Caledonian geckos, African bush vipers, Caribbean rock iguanas, and similar Cyclura. He’s been an avid collector since childhood.

“I have a confession to make,” he said at the Q&A, alluding to his collecting urge. “I’ve been an addict for over 50 years and now I’m still not sober, sorry to say.”
The challenge of convincing reptile dealers to appear on camera became evident during the panel discussion, which included Crutchfield and Mike Van Nostrand, both Florida men who have served time behind bars for their activities (in 2022, Van Nostrand was convicted in a scheme to smuggle “illegally-harvested Florida turtles out of the United States and into China, Japan, and other places,” per the Department of Justice).
“I didn’t like the Tiger King,” Van Nostrand stated flatly. “Eric was a little tricky one.”
For his part, Crutchfield called Tiger King “one of the weirdest movies I’ve ever seen.”

Along with Tiger King, Goode also directed the 2024 HBO documentary series Chimp Crazy about people obsessed with raising chimpanzees as essentially human children. At the Q&A, he addressed contrasts between Tiger King, Chimp Crazy, and Monsters of God.
“Right now, a lot of people are thinking I’m trying to take down the reptile world,” Goode said of Monsters of God. “Yes, I didn’t like people keeping chimpanzees in Chimp Crazy. I wanted laws changed so you couldn’t do that. I didn’t want people having 200 tigers in their backyard [in Tiger King]. Reptiles are different. It’s nuanced. And as Mike [Van Nostrand] says, if people were breeding more reptiles that may take pressure off of the poachers. And so there’s a lot of gray in this story and it’s not painting anyone with one brush. Law enforcement made a lot of mistakes. We’ve made mistakes. The zoos made big mistakes and we’re all complicit.”

Zoos are complicit, the series makes clear, by paying dealers like Molt and Crutchfield to supply them with exotic reptiles knowing full well the wranglers were violating U.S. and international law. Federal officials with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service don’t seem to come off much better, to judge from episode 1. Nobody’s motives seem 100 percent pure in Monsters of God, self-assessments notwithstanding.
“What I really want people to get out of my complete performance from the very beginning to the end,” Crutchfield asserted at the Q&A, “is my great passion and my great love, and more importantly, my great respect for all of these monsters of God that you’re going to see.”
Van Nostrand chimed in sardonically, “Are you saying money had nothing to do with it?”
“So far,” Crutchfield replied.
Fresh episodes of Monsters of God will debut on HBO the next four Thursdays, and stream on HBO Max. Audiences may get hooked, mirroring the obsessional quality of true lizard people. Jason Segel, for one, pronounced himself a fan of the series.
“At times it feels like Goodfellas. It feels like Scarface sometimes,” Segel enthused at the Q&A. “I watched every episode over two days and was mesmerized. I can’t wait for all of you guys to see it.”
>
Search For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
These ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
According to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
Model Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
Your comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
Emily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
A photo diary of the nightlife scene from LA To Ibiza