Connect with us

Entertainment

Jesse Watters Blasted as a ‘Bootlicker’ After Defense of Trump’s Stock Trades

Published

on

Jesse Watters faced pushback online after he issued a passionate defense of Donald Trump’s questionable stock trades, finding himself labeled a “bootlicker” for his response.

During Tuesday’s episode of Fox News’ “The Five,” the conservative broadcaster addressed Trump’s investment portfolio, which made headlines after it was revealed that it made more than 3,600 trades during the first months of the president’s second term. However, Watters defended Trump’s investments at-length, noting there was “nothing suspicious” about the money moves.

“I want to talk about the allegation that Trump’s trading stocks illegally,” Watters said. “So, you can see what he bought and when he bought it. It’s all right here. There’s nothing wrong with what he did.”

He continued: “So, they say he bought oil. OK? He bought oil after the ceasefire when oil had gone down. Now, if there was something nefarious, he would’ve bought oil before the war. And then sold it at its high and dumped it, he didn’t do that. Everybody got into oil then. And then they say, ‘Oh he bought gold, T-bills and cash.’ That’s what everybody did during the war. It’s a hedge, it’s a safe haven.”

Per Watters, Trump “actually lost money,” adding, “it’s nothing suspicious at all.”

“So, if you want to compare that to Nancy Pelosi, who came into office with no money and then all of a sudden earned $300 million. Well, how did she do that? Because Pauly P [husband Paul Pelosi] is her investment manager,” Watters sounded off. “Trump is not an investment manager. Pauly P founded an investment firm in San Francisco, which has made an absolute fortune in perfectly timed trades involving the tech sector, making call options.”

As Watters concluded his defense, he stated that Trump’s investments were what “anybody who has a diversified portfolio does with their money.”

It didn’t take long for the internet to lay into Watters for this explanation.

“I’ve been waiting to use this meme — thanks,” one critic wrote on X, posting an image of Watters’ face that was labeled “bootlicker.” The image also shared the definition of bootlicker, which read: “A person who shows excessive flattery or obedience toward someone in power in order to gain advantage.”

Another responded with, “Big difference is that Trump is using social media to manipulate markets in his favor. Watters knows this but he’s a f–king hack.” A third commented, “No shame with these people. The mental gymnastics you must perform to be a Trumper should earn a gold medal in the Olympics. The fact we have to live amongst these people is disgusting.”

A fourth chimed in with, “True cult-like behavior. Always a ‘rules for thee not for me’ attitude.”

Yet, Watters wasn’t alone in his defense of Trump, as Vice President JD Vance also downplayed the president’s investments. During a press briefing, Vance was asked how the administration can argue that they’re cleaning up corruption “when the president seems to be talking up stocks that he owns, selling them and enriching himself,” prompting a strong response from the vice president.

“Come on, man, have a little bit of objectivity in the way that you ask these questions,” Vance hit back. “Because, there are a lot of things in that speech masquerading as a question that didn’t actually get asked, okay? Number one. The president doesn’t sit at the Oval Office on his computer, on his Robinhood account, buying and selling stocks. That’s absurd. He has independent wealth advisors that manage his money. He is a wealthy person. He has had success in business. He’s not making the stock trades himself.”

Watch Vance’s full response above.

Like Watters, Vance also faced flak online for his defense of Trump, with one critic noting: “So it’s not corruption if he instructs someone else to facilitate the trades for him? This is exactly what corruption looks like.”

>

Continue Reading

movies

One Night Only Writer, Producer Talk Movie’s No Premarital Sex Rules

Published

on

Ever since the official trailer dropped for the Callum TurnerMonica Barbaro rom-com One Night Only, quickly racking up millions of views on its way to its nearly 40 million total, internet commentators have had a lot of questions about the film’s central premise in which premarital sex is illegal apart from one 12-hour period a year.

How is this law enforced? Are people breaking the law? How did this legislation pass? What counts as “sex” under this new mandate? Are marriage (and divorce) rates skyrocketing? What about affairs?

Rest assured: Some of those questions are answered in the movie, and explanations are starting to trickle out online for those unconcerned about spoilers. Beyond that, One Night Only writer, Travis Braun, who saw his screenplay top the 2024 Black List, has answers, but they’re not all in the Will Gluck-directed Universal movie now in theaters.

“I set out to write a movie about the circus that is modern dating, and I thought how fun if we could set that all in one night, and I have answers to those questions, and some of them are in the movie,” Braun told The Hollywood Reporter at the One Night Only premiere earlier this week in New York.

Braun said he definitely thought about the specific rules of the film’s alternate reality, framed as three years on from the no-sex act being passed, but didn’t want to get too deep into the politics of the world of the movie.

“There’s a big mythology that I’ve built out and then as you develop a movie you start to pare down and you go: What does an audience really care about, and what are they showing up to see? For me the answer is always a love story, romance,” he told THR. “I hope they can come in and we’ll show them how this world functions, and then they can just enjoy the movie and have fun. The whole focus of this was love story and romance first, and the world-building obviously has to make sense and has to be there, but ultimately we weren’t interested in getting into the politics of it. We wanted to tell a story about these two incredible people trying to find love on this crazy night.”

Producer Jacqueline Monetta, who brought Braun’s script to Gluck, said they didn’t want moviegoers to have all of the answers.

“I had a million questions. I was like, ‘What does this mean? What does this world look like? How do people communicate? What’s different?’ And that’s I think what’s so smart about it,” she said of One Night Only‘s “big idea, high-concept” premise. “We don’t answer every question in the movie, purposefully, because we want those questions to be had on the car ride home. We want people to keep talking about it and really think about what would this mean for our world, what does it mean for our world now. But I think Will and I were really specific on what questions we wanted to answer.”

In a recent Reddit AMA, Gluck also detailed how he and his team approached the world building of the movie while not wanting it to be all about the mandate and offered prospective moviegoers hints for where to find the answers to their questions.

“We spent a lot of time talking about the rules of the world, and if you’ve seen the movie, or when you see the movie, you’ll see that the rules of the world and the world building are all in the background,” he said. “It’s on TVs, signage, in thrown-away lines, because we didn’t want to give the world short shrift, but we didn’t want the movie to be about that. It’s another way I want people to see this. If they see it more than once, they’ll pick up so many more rules of the world in the background. A lot of the questions that I’ve been getting after people have seen the movie are actually answered in the movie, which is by design because I want people maybe not to know them. So, yes, it was a tricky tightrope to have them there, but not for the movie to be about it.”

Turner meanwhile echoes Braun’s advice for curious prospective moviegoers: “Go see the film!”

“You’ll realize pretty quickly what the realm is that you’re working within and it’s a comedy,” Turner says of what inquisitive filmgoers will find. “There are no great political undertones, I don’t think. This is just a place where you can escape for an hour and a half, two hours and enjoy and laugh your head off.”

One Night Only is now in theaters.

Callum Turner and Monica Barbaro at the One Night Only premiere on Monday.

Roy Rochlin/Getty Images for Universal Pictures

>

Continue Reading

movies

Dwayne Johnson Reacts To Live-Action ‘Moana’ Negative Reviews

Published

on

Although the live-action remake of Moana hasn’t quite been able to catch a wave at the box office, Dwayne Johnson is proud of what they made.

The Golden Globe nominee said the Disney movie’s negative reviews, which currently sit at 32% on Rotten Tomatoes, are “just the way it goes” in the entertainment industry, and what “really mattered” was that “the culture really stood up” in the Polynesian-inspired tale.

“Our first two reviews came out. I’ll never forget it… They were amazing. I was like, wow,” he told People, noting the reviews then “went another way, as sometimes happens.”

“That’s just the way it goes because we’re in this business,” added Johnson.

A decade after he voiced the demigod Maui in Disney’s animated film Moana, Johnson reprised the role in the Thomas Kail-helmed live-action adaptation.

'Moana' live-action trailer
Catherina Laga’aia in ‘Moana’

“The challenge was, okay, let’s remember, though, what’s going to be beyond this opening weekend. Let’s remember what’s happening right now and the noise that’s happening right now,” said Johnson. “If you love it, great. If you don’t, no problem.”

Following Moana‘s July 10 premiere, the movie has gone on to make $266M at the global box office. Disney CEO Josh D’Amaro addressed the low turnout in a letter to shareholders.

“Even when our franchise films don’t meet our box office expectations, as with The Mandalorian and Grogu and the live-action Moana, our investments in these core properties fuel other parts of our company,” said D’Amaro, noting that Moana is “expected to be a strong title on Disney+, building on the success of the original film, which is one of the most streamed movies of all time.”

>

Continue Reading

Entertainment

Hunter Biden Calls Trump the ‘Singular Existential Threat’ to Planet Earth

Published

on

Hunter Biden doesn’t have plans of running for office himself, but he still has some strong opinions when it comes to the presidency. In fact, President Joe Biden’s son just called President Donald Trump “the singular existential threat” to planet Earth.

During his wide-ranging interview with BBC Newsnight’s Paddy O’Connell on Friday, the 56-year-old artist opened up about receiving a pardon from his father during his last weeks in office back in December 2024 — and how Trump’s behavior may have impacted the decision.

“I am the most privileged person, as it relates to that, that there could possibly be. I was one of one, and I am eternally grateful for it,” Hunter shared. “I am eternally grateful for it because I think that Donald Trump has proven to be exactly who my dad thought he was going to be, as it relates to the revenge and retribution that he would seek on his political enemies.”

“Was it good for our Constitution? Was it good for the American people? Was it good for my dad’s legacy? No, on all counts,” he further admitted.

President Biden pardoned his son just weeks ahead of his sentencing on tax evasion and federal gun charges. At the time, Trump called the act “an abuse and miscarriage of justice.” A year and half later, Hunter remains equally unimpressed by his father’s successor (who was also, notably, his predecessor).

“I’m not going to stop talking about Donald Trump,” he concluded. “Donald Trump is the singular existential threat to this globe. Donald Trump is, literally, a greater threat than we have faced in any of our lifetimes.”

Elsewhere in his interview, Hunter fought tears while sharing a painful update on his father’s prostate cancer metastasizing to his bones: “My dad is, to this day, remains the center of our family. Not just because of who he is as the the public person, but completely because of who he is to each one of us. It’s really, really hard and it’s really sad to watch.”

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.