TL;DR: The near-mint HP EliteBook 830 G8 pairs an 11th Gen Core i7, 32GB RAM, and enterprise-grade security for $389.99 (MSRP $549.99).

Consumer laptops often emphasize thin designs and flashy marketing, while business laptops are built to survive years of daily work. The near-mint HP EliteBook 830 G8 falls squarely into the second category, delivering enterprise-grade hardware for $389.99 (MSRP: $549.99).

Power through business anywhere with the HP EliteBook 830 G8

Powered by an 11th Gen Intel Core i7 processor, 32GB of DDR4 memory, and a 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD, the EliteBook is designed for professionals who regularly multitask across large spreadsheets, video meetings, development tools, browsers, and productivity applications.

Intel Iris Xe Graphics also provides enough performance for everyday creative work and multiple external displays. And it features Windows 11 Pro.

The laptop’s 13.3-inch Full HD touchscreen is housed in a lightweight 2.8-pound CNC-machined aluminum chassis, making it well suited for commuting and hybrid work. Connectivity includes Thunderbolt 4, HDMI 2.0, USB-A, Wi-Fi 6, and Bluetooth, reducing the need for adapters in most office environments.

Security is another area where business systems distinguish themselves. HP Wolf Security combines features such as HP Sure Start, HP Sure Sense, HP Sure Click, and TPM 2.0 to help protect both the system firmware and user data. These are capabilities commonly deployed across enterprise fleets rather than consumer notebooks.

This refurbished model carries a Grade A near-mint rating, meaning buyers should expect minimal to no cosmetic wear while paying substantially less than a comparable new business laptop.

For professionals, developers, remote workers, and students who prioritize reliability over trendy features, the EliteBook 830 G8 represents a practical investment. Rather than paying for the latest consumer design refresh, you’re buying hardware that many IT departments chose specifically because it was built to keep working day after day.

Get this near-mint HP EliteBook 830 G8 for just $389.99 (MSRP $549.99).

StackSocial prices subject to change.

Linux users no longer need to rely solely on a browser or unofficial desktop clients to access ChatGPT.

OpenAI has released its ChatGPT desktop app for Linux in preview, combining ChatGPT, Work, and Codex in one application. The launch closes a gap in OpenAI’s desktop lineup and puts its coding agent closer to the Linux environments where many developers already work.

Which Linux distributions are supported?

According to OpenAI’s announcement, the preview supports:

• Ubuntu 24.04 LTS and 26.04 LTS
• Debian 13
• Fedora 43 and 44
• x64 and ARM64 processors
• .deb and .rpm packages

OpenAI has not officially listed Arch Linux, openSUSE, NixOS, or other distributions as supported. Community packages and workarounds may emerge, but compatibility, updates, and technical support could differ from OpenAI’s validated configurations.

Why the Linux app matters to developers

The application brings three OpenAI experiences into one interface. Chat handles questions, research, and conversations, while Work is designed for longer tasks such as analyzing information and creating documents, spreadsheets, presentations, and reports.

Codex can work with local files, repositories, terminals, and development tools, subject to the permissions available in the environment. That integration may be the most important part of the Linux launch.  Developers can now use an AI coding agent alongside their projects instead of keeping it confined to a browser tab.

For IT teams, that access also requires scrutiny. An agent that can inspect files, change code, and run commands has more access than a conventional chatbot. Organizations evaluating the app should review its filesystem, network, and command-execution permissions before connecting it to sensitive repositories or production credentials.

The preview comes with caveats

Currently, the application is in preview with OpenAI yet to announce when the Linux app will reach general availability or when it might support more distributions.

Some early users have reported configuration-specific problems involving Wayland, input methods, display scaling, and synchronization between desktop and command-line Codex projects in OpenAI’s developer community. These are anecdotal reports, not confirmed product-wide defects, and some users have shared workarounds or different results.

IT teams should therefore treat the current build as evaluation software. Before a wider rollout, testing is a must against an organization’s standard Linux image, desktop environment, authentication controls, endpoint security software, and development workflows.

What Linux users should do next

Users can obtain the app through OpenAI’s official download channels and confirm if their operating system and processor are supported. Developers can begin with a noncritical repository to evaluate how Codex handles project context, terminal operations, and file changes. Organizations, on the other hand, should consider a limited pilot with restricted permissions, logging, and mandatory human review of generated code.

The Linux release removes a longstanding platform gap, but its value to technical teams will ultimately depend on compatibility and control — not merely the convenience of a native app.

Read more: As Linux users explore the new desktop app, brush up on ChatGPT’s features, costs, limitations, and tips with the complete ChatGPT cheat sheet.

Singer and actress Selena Gomez and her mother are being sued over their mental health startup, Wondermind. The plaintiffs in the lawsuit say they invested nearly $1.2 million in the startup, and are accusing Gomez of securities fraud and breach of contract.

They allege that the startup failed to deliver on its commitments without informing investors, and Gomez failed to market the startup after promising to do so. The news was first reported by Forbes.

Wondermind launched in 2021 and aimed to offer daily mental health resources to users. The lawsuit alleges that investors were unaware of the company’s troubles until a September 2025 story from The Cut uncovered them.

“Gomez purported to sign a contract obligating her to perform and then ignored it,” the complaint reads. “The partnerships did not exist. The initiatives never materialized. The app was never built. And for three years, while the Company quietly collapsed around them, not one of its founders, officers, or directors said a word to the investors whose money was funding the collapse.”

The investors allege that Gomez and Wondermind misrepresented the company’s finances and overstated the extent of Gomez’s involvement. The plaintiffs are seeking to recover their investments and legal fees.

Wondermind did not respond to our request for comment.