Mikaela Mayer says she feels “unbeatable” and that her blockbuster unification fight against Chantelle Cameron for the world super welterweight titles won’t be close.

British WBO title holder Cameron (22-1, 8 KOs) faces American Mayer (22-2, 5 KOs) at the bp pulse LIVE arena on Saturday – live on Sky Sports – with every bout on the MVPW-06 main card pitting a UK fighter against a US opponent.

WBA and WBC champion Mayer has no shortage of respect for Cameron – who has won her last four fights since a rematch defeat to Katie Taylor in 2023 – but has backed her own ability to unify the titles in front of what is set to be a hostile Birmingham crowd.

“I feel better than ever,” Mayer told Sky Sports. “I just know I just feel unbeatable right now. I feel in a great position and I can’t wait to get out to the UK and do my thing.

“[Cameron] is good at what she does. She’s an aggressive fighter. She lets her hands go.

“She fights at a fast pace and so do I. So that’s going to make for a very exciting fight for the fans.

“But I just don’t think it’s going to be as close and as much of a war as everyone thinks.

“There’s probably a handful of people who think I’m stupid for coming to the UK and going onto Chantelle’s turf, but I’m just confident in myself right now.

“I’m fighting better than I’ve ever fought, smarter than I’ve ever been. And I just believe in myself.

“I feel like no matter where I go, I’m still going to kick butt. So it could be here. It could be there. I’m taking the win.”

Mayer pointed to her “versatility” as a defining factor come Saturday, insisting nothing can prepare Cameron for the new and improved version of the 36-year-old that awaits.

“I’m really hard to train for because I’ve developed so much these last 10 months of being in the gym,” Mayer told Sky Sports.

“I know I haven’t fought since last October but the things I’m doing now, it’s really impossible for Chantelle to have trained for me at this point.

“I’m going to do everything I can to make it a very obvious win, maybe a stoppage, we’ll see, but I know I’m coming out with my hand raised.

“I’ve worked on making sure that my inside game and when I do press forward that my defence is tighter and I’m the one landing my shots. I’ll definitely be using a little bit of everything I’ve got, but knowing mine and Chantelle’s styles there will definitely be moments where it will be a dog fight.”

Mayer vs Cameron – fighter records

‘A win would be one of the best moments of my career’

The 35-year-old Cameron won the WBO super welterweight title – a belt Mayer had vacated just months after beating Mary Spencer for it – with a dominant victory over Michaela Kotaskova in April.

The significance of the chance to become unified world champion by reclaiming the WBO crown is not lost on Mayer, with the American describing the prospect of victory as a career-defining moment.

“[A win would be] definitely up there with one of the best [moments].

“I’ve had a pretty awesome career. Even though I’ve gone through some ups and downs, I think that’s what makes my career even more special and what makes these big fights that are ahead of me extra special.

“I’ve had to go through trials and tribulations – I’ve had to adjust, I’ve had to make changes in my team and keep continuing to get better – and I’ve done that.

“Going in there and having a dominating performance against someone like Chantelle Cameron, who is very highly respected – the only person to beat Katie Taylor – that’s going to definitely be one of the best moments of my career thus far.”

The upcoming bout may not be the last between the two, with Mayer revealing that a rematch clause has been included in the contract of both fighters:

“Well, Chantelle and I do have a rematch clause on both of our ends, which is unique, but if it’s the type of fight that everyone expects, then why not do a rematch?

“Why not give it to the world again? I have no problem giving a rematch when it’s, when it’s justified.

“Do I want to kick her butt so bad that she doesn’t even want to activate that rematch clause? Of course. But if she does, we can go again.”

Watch MVPW-06 in Birmingham, headlined by Mikaela Mayer vs Chantelle Cameron and with Caroline Dubois also in action, live on August 29 on Sky Sports. Get Sky Sports or stream boxing with no contract.

European Leagues president Claudius Schafer believes Gianni Infantino has “no future at FIFA” but says reforming football’s global governing body is more important than simply replacing its leader.

In an exclusive interview with The Athletic, Schafer said the current crisis at FIFA has been building for years because of Infantino’s “increasingly centralised and personalised” approach to leadership and his total failure to consult with key stakeholders on decisions that impact clubs, fans, leagues and players around the world.

It was this refusal to consult that forced European Leagues, which represents the interests of 53 men’s and women’s professional leagues in 34 countries, including the so-called ‘big five’, to lodge a formal complaint with the European Commission against FIFA for alleged breaches of European competition law.

That was almost two years ago and Schafer, a lawyer-turned-football-administrator who also runs the Swiss Football League, is very confident that recent events will only bolster European Leagues’ case, making it almost certain that the Brussels-based commission will open an investigation into FIFA’s decision-making and governance in future.

In the meantime, Schafer is adamant: Infantino must go.

“We are deeply concerned about his leadership,” he said. “We question his suitability to continue as president.

“Here in Switzerland, we’ve had a close view of FIFA and it seems that the influence of the president has grown from year to year. Major decisions are taken without meaningful consultation with stakeholders who will be affected – that’s why we’ve lodged our complaint with the European Commission over the international match calendar.

“Now we have this situation with (FIFA Forward Enterprise) but we also had the case of the (FIFA) Peace Prize last year, which was done without any conversation with the FIFA Council.

“FIFA is an association under Swiss law and in this association you have rules. The president and the board members have to perform their duties with care. This is a legal matter. If you take such a decision (as the peace prize), without even informing the council, that, in my view, is a breach of law.

“And then, during the World Cup we all know about the red card issue (with U.S. striker Folarin Balogun). It was a real scandal. I can’t ever recall a political intervention of this kind relating to a sporting matter. Such acts call the integrity of the game into question.

“That’s why there is no future at FIFA for Infantino. There can’t be.”

Infantino faced an enormous backlash over his plans to privatise FIFA competitions, including the World Cup (Mandel NGAN / AFP via Getty Images)

Infantino was forced to reveal his secret FFE project a month ago but only after it was leaked to the British media. The plan, which involved setting up a subsidiary to run FIFA’s competitions and then selling a stake in that company to private investors, caused a global storm that has split FIFA’s confederations and put Infantino’s 10-year hold on power in serious doubt.

The last month has seen Infantino withdraw the sell-off idea and apologise for working on the plan for so long without sharing the details with senior staff at FIFA, council members or the member associations. The 56-year-old Swiss-Italian, however, has made it clear that he has no intention to quit and will stand for a fourth four-year term next March at FIFA’s congress in Rabat.

He has also spent the last few weeks travelling the globe in an attempt to shore up his support ahead of an electoral showdown with his main critics – the Asian, European and North and Central American confederations – in the Moroccan capital.

Schafer said his members are “fully in line” with the rebels and is confident they will put up a candidate who will beat Infantino. But he is more concerned about what happens next.

“The role and responsibilities of the FIFA president need to be redefined,” he said.

“We we were promised some reforms at FIFA after the arrests at the Baur au Lac in 2015 but then Gianni didn’t follow through. Now, for us, getting these reforms is the most important task and they can only happen with another president.”

The reference to the Baur au Lac relates to the arrests that took place at the luxury hotel in Zurich on the eve of the 2015 FIFA Congress, where former FIFA boss Sepp Blatter was elected for a fifth term. The crisis sparked by those arrests forced him to resign six months later, paving the way for Infantino’s election as the organisation’s saviour.

When asked if Schafer was in favour of reducing the power of the presidency by rotating it between the presidents of FIFA’s six confederations – an idea which is gathering support – he said he was happy to let the current debate play out but added that there is a strong consensus “we never (a president) as powerful as this again”.

He said he is more interested in how FIFA itself will respond to the current crisis, particularly the 37-strong council that Infantino appears to have ignored for several years.

“I’m waiting for some action (from the council),” he said. “Where are they? Is there a meeting planned?”

Schafer believes FIFA’s refusal to deal with its very obvious problems are even more baffling when you consider the fact that the European Commission has been mulling over whether to open an investigation into the governing body since October 2024.

The catalyst for that unprecedented complaint from the leagues was FIFA’s decision to shoehorn an expanded the Club World Cup into an already congested international match calendar, over which it exerts complete control. For European Leagues, this was a clear case of FIFA acting as the game’s regulator but also as a competition organiser. And by favouring its competition over everyone else’s, it was abusing a dominant market position.

Premier League chief executive Richard Masters was asked about this last week when he spoke to a group of reporters ahead of the new season.

“Leagues don’t have a meaningful seat at the table at all,” said Masters. “We’re not consulted on the big decisions.

“We think that’s wholly wrong and that’s why we’ve regrettably had to put in a complaint at the European Commission.”

Some might wonder why the commission has not already opened an investigation, given the seemingly ample amount of evidence that FIFA does not consult before making big decisions, but Masters took a more diplomatic stance.

“The European Commission moves at its own pace,” he said. “The European Leagues team is in pretty regular dialogue with the people there and at some point a decision will be made.”

Schafer believes that decision will be positive for the leagues.

“We’ve had constructive meetings with key people in Brussels who dealing with the complaint along with the Commissioner for Sport (Malta’s Glenn Micallef),” he said.

“We’ve exposed FIFA’s conflict of interest of being a regulator but also a commercial operator, and now everyone can see it. We have also had a series of decisions from the European Court of Justice that support our position.

“We wouldn’t have done this if we didn’t think we had a very strong case. I’m sure the commission will have followed recent events and see that FIFA has a conflicted position.

“It takes time because they have other issues to deal with, not just football, but there is now some urgency with this case.

“We will know more about the timeline when they open the investigation but it will put FIFA under a lot of pressure to reform its governance model. FIFA should be doing this proactively now because, if it delays and the complaints succeeds, it will be obliged to reform and could also face a fine.

“The commission can issue very high fines and that is money that belongs to FIFA’s member associations.”

While Schafer was reluctant to spell out exactly what a “meaningful voice” would entail, it is clear that the leagues want a much bigger say over matters that directly impact the domestic game and, ideally, would have a veto in such decisions.

“We expect to be part of the decision-making process,” said Schafer.

“We want to be at the table. What that looks like in the end is to be decided. We have to find agreements on those matters affecting domestic leagues.

“FIFA is still the global football regulator but, because of their double role, they must admit they need to include stakeholders in the decisions.”

Asked if he was worried that Infantino might be able to exploit the desire of the big clubs to play in the Club World Cup (perhaps even a bigger and more frequent Club World Cup) to put pressure on the leagues to back down, Schafer said: “I think this is worrying and it’s certainly something he has done in the past.

“But in this situation it’s not just an issue for the big clubs – it’s more about the functioning of the whole game. There are 1,300 clubs in our leagues. Domestic football is the basis of football.

“We are not against the Club World Cup. We are not against big clubs looking for ways to play international games. But it has to be in a fair and balanced way and FIFA has to take a more general view and play a more responsible role. It cannot pick sides.

“Let’s go back to FIFA’s statutes and look at its objectives. Yes, it should try to raise money for the associations so they can fund projects. But, first of all, you need the game as a whole to work together. You need to balance the different layers of the game.

“Who is at the bottom of the pyramid? The grassroots game, then it’s professional club football, then international football. We have lost sense of that pyramid.”

Schafer also worries about the increasing strain all these new international tournaments are placing on the best players.

“Rest is really, really important and I’m happy to work on this with (global players’ union) FIFPro,” he said. “These new and enlarged competitions which require more dates are becoming impossible. And if you enlarge the Club World Cup and World Cup again, I’m wondering where you are taking the dates from?

“Sometimes, they’ll say, ‘the leagues should play fewer games, the Premier League should go to 18 teams.’ But I’ll say, ‘you know the Premier League has been that size for decades, why is it fair for you to come up with new competitions but we have to cut ours?’”

The Athletic has contacted the European Commission and FIFA for comment.

It was McGregor who opened the scoring on the night, a deflected shot and a 4-0 lead on aggregate.

LASK had started well but that goal looked to all the world like a kick to their solar plexus. They had chances in Glasgow and they had chances in the opening minutes in Linz – and they were 4-0 down!

How many punches can one team take before they lose their fight? Many, as it turned out.

Celtic were obliging, of course. Painfully so. We trumpeted their classy goals and their adventurous play a week ago and wrongly assumed that they had gumption to go with it. Big mistake. When Benjamin Nygren’s ridiculously loose pass led directly to LASK’s equaliser on the night, the first signs of a wobble were visible.

Thirty-two minutes had been played and Celtic didn’t look wholly comfortable at 4-1 on aggregate. Mad, but true. When they conceded again three minutes into the second half, there were a few jelly legs on show. Auston Trusty was culpable this time. Brushed off the ball. Swatted and 4-2 now.

Trusty was poor, not the only one, but a point of real weakness that LASK went for.

Ten minutes after the hosts scored their second, they scored their third. Too many parts of the Celtic team were in full fright mode now. The slow death was picking up pace.

Camilo Duran, the hero of the first leg, was reduced to a non-event. Kasper Hogh worked hard but with no impact. Passes went astray. Celtic were directionless. Everything fell apart. Rabbits in headlights don’t tend to look as lost as Celtic did when the pressure really hit.

If McGregor was trying to put out fires in his own team he was failing. He could not cut through the tension.

Martin O’Neill looked on like a man 10 years older than his true age. This was a shocking night for him. One of his worst in football, he said later. He took responsibility, but he can’t be alone in that.

He emptied his bench in a desperate attempt to stem the flow, but his substitutions, five in 12 befuddled minutes, had zero impact.

Celtic did not have a shot on target in the second half of normal time nor in extra-time. They only existed as a man hanging off a cliff edge exists. There was only one way this was going to end.

LASK’s fourth goal might have come in the 90th minute but it was deserved.

By that point they’d had 33 shots on Celtic’s goal (they finished on 40) to go with the 20 from last week. It was a rout.

Cameron Carter-Vickers was hobbling about on one leg. Hogh much the same. Forward came the waves and Celtic tried to hold them back with a back four of Anthony Ralston, Dane Murray, Trusty and Liam Scales.

The fifth goal was a mercy, and another Celtic player doing the wrong thing at the wrong time in the wrong place. For Nygren and Trusty read Luke McCowan. Hapless and helpless – and out of the Champions League.