Connect with us

movies

‘Digger’: Tom Cruise Movie Bombs at Box Office, Will Lose $150M

Published

on

Tom Cruise will not be jumping on any couches this weekend.

This as the Top Gun: Maverick and Mission: Impossible blockbuster star posts his lowest opening in 19 years, that being the reported $160M net priced Digger, which didn’t find an audience with an $8M domestic debut, a $20M global overall start and a C+ CinemaScore.

Myriad sources tell us that the film stands to lose around $150M and that’s if it’s lucky to get to a global box office of $50M. Post pandemic pricey fall disasters such as last year’s Dwayne Johnson starring The Smashing Machine and the 2022 Margot Robbie, Christian Bale and John David Washington absurdist period title Amsterdam had similar single digit domestic openings, and finaled lower with respective global grosses of $21.1M and $31.2M, and off of respective smaller budgets of $50M and $80M.

The timing of Digger‘s bombing is Shakespearan, coming at the most stinging moment when Skydance co-CEO (né Paramount CEO) David Ellison refused to honor Warner Bros Motion Picture Chiefs Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy‘s contracts and bring them into the fold. This after Warner’s milestone 2025 global gross of $4.3B, the best since 2019, and 11 Oscar wins. The new ParaBros is inheriting several Burbank lot lucrative IP assets shepherded by De Luca and Abyd such as Oceans Eleven, Gremlins, Gladys, Minecraft 2 and more going forward, 38 features overall, dated into 2029. In 2027, the Paramount Warners Bros slate will overdeliver the state AGs demands of 30 films annually with 36 titles.

How did Warners pick up a shovel and break ground on a filibustery-dialogue driven satire about the MAGA era which follows an oil tycoon whose latest ice caps project literally misfires, causing a global environmental disaster? (Those who’ve seen Digger know there’s a meta twist).

Iñárritu first developed what would become Digger at Netflix (the project had a different title) where he made the 2 hour 39 minute stream of consciousness art movie Bardo. At the time Leonardo DiCaprio was eyeing, however, after the streamer made the very-similar $75M Adam McKay directed environmental satire, Don’t Look Up, Iñárritu took the project to his Revenant producer Mary Parent at Legendary. There Digger was developed with Tom Cruise in mind.

Emmanuel Lubezki, Pamela Abdy, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Tom Cruise, Mary Parent, Andy Sherman and Michael De Luca attend the 'Digger' premiere on Sept. 22, 2026 in London, England.

Emmanuel Lubezki, Pamela Abdy, Alejandro González Iñárritu, Tom Cruise, Mary Parent, Andy Sherman and Michael De Luca attend the ‘Digger’ premiere on Sept. 22, 2026 in London, England.

Joe Maher/Getty Images

Cut to 2024. Warner Bros Discovery CEO David Zaslav is hot-for-teacher to land Cruise post Top Gun Maverick, and dispatches De Luca and Abdy to make a non-exclusive originals and franchise deal with the global star. The first project under the pact? Digger. Pamela Abdy had worked with Iñárritu on his $17M priced Oscar winning Birdman and $135M costing Leonardo DiCaprio western The Revenant while she was Production President at New Regency from 2013-2016. De Luca worked with Cruise when he was President and COO of New Line on the much thriftier priced Magnolia, also from Paul Thomas Anderson, which landed the star his third Oscar nomination (in Supporting Actor) at the time.

Cruise and Jason Robards Jr. in ‘Magnolia’

De Luca and Abdy, we hear, ran Digger through their analytical comps system. The combo of Cruise and Iñárritu justified a $125M production greenligiht. Legendary’s development costs were bought out by Warners, hence the reason why the production company isn’t co-financing ala other Warner projects like Dune and the Godzilla Kong movies. The cost with an extended schedule rose to around a net $160M shot at Leavesden in the UK with tax credits. Many sources have argued that the cost was substantially higher before the pic’s near $100M global theatrical marketing spend.

At the LA Westwood premiere, Cruise exclaimed to De Luca and Abdy, “You didn’t even take a breath when we brought you this film. I don’t even think you turned the page on it. You’re just like — you’re in.”

Which raises the question, exactly which studio executive says ‘No’ to Cruise?

With De Luca and Abdy painted by some as spendthrift in their loss of motion picture boss jobs at the new Skydance, let that executive who has said ‘No’ to Cruise on his productions, cast the first stone.

Skydance was heavily involved in the co-financing of lengthy Cruise shoots Top Gun: Maverick (net $177M) and the last two Mission: Impossible movies, Dead Reckoning and Final Reckoning, which carried an exorbitant combined cost between $591M and $691M, again, those budgets driven up partly due to Covid stops, but also Cruise’s fastidiousness.

“The problem is that there’s no one in Cruise’s camp to tell him ‘No’, and what might not work” says one high level source who was involved with the Mission movies, “It use to be his producing partner Paula Wagner.”

“Everyone knows he likes to direct on the set,” adds another, “I don’t know how that worked out with Alejandro because he doesn’t take direction from anyone.”

De Luca and Abdy did tell Cruise ‘No’, and that’s when they passed on the actor’s project, Deeper, with Edge of Tomorrow director Doug Liman, a supernatural underwater thriller that carried a $270M budget ask and no script at the time. The project remains in deep development at Universal. De Luca and Abdy also passed on making Michael Mann’s Heat 2, the sequel to a lucrative title in the Warner library as the budget for that movie climbed to $160M, which was cheap enough for $2.7 trillion conglomerate Amazon to make.

The first weekend of October, a hot frame where Warners launched the first Joker to a final gross of $1.07B WW and A Star Is Born to $440M WW, was chosen. Marketing began to tease the movie as the role that we’ve never seen Cruise in: an old, crusty, balding Texas waving a shovel heroically in an apartment. Toe-dip screenings with illuminati critics showed great promise. We hear there were two test screenings. The first with a half hour longer edit didn’t go so well, however, a second test with a half hour shorter edit (approaching the pic’s current 2 hour 9 minute running time) went much better. Insurance covered a reshoot involving Cruise’s makeup following the first test screening. Cruise began pre-production on the movie while doing press for Final Reckoning last year.

While Cruise worked it in regards to opening the movie including a stop at April’s CinemaCon, UK world premiere with the Royals, Q&As and even an appearance on Jennifer Hudson, his availability to the press wasn’t 100%. Read, trades were barred from red carpet appearances despite Cruise constant availably to them on the last two Mission: Impossibles and several red carpets for Top Gun: Maverick.

In July, LA-based press were invited to the Warners Burbank lot for the first trailer drop. Mobile phones were pulled, and questions not asked by the media as they watched Cruise onstage with a Gen Z podcaster who gushed over the star’s achievements and the promises of Digger. Later on, Cruise met and took a professional photo with each reporter in the room in addition to a massive group photo outside the Steve J. Ross theater on the Burbank lot.

Walking away, anecdotally, those in the room had their suspicions about Cruise in a Doctor Strangelove-like movie.

“When I see Tom Cruise, I want to see him as the Tom Cruise I know, not with all this makeup,” exclaimed one O.G. entertainment journalist.

Digger initially came on NRG tracking three weeks ago with an opening range of $17M-$23M. Those close to the movie say they were shocked by the polarizing reviews which stand at 51% Rotten. Bad word set in, not just here, but around the world, a 180 to the vibrant critical reaction and audience reception on One Battle After Another (94% certified fresh, and A CinemaScore).

Positive online buzz fell on Digger in RelishMix metrics from an 8.1 out of 10 on Sept. 15, to a 6.4 before opening. Said the social analytics corp in their weekly report: “Chatter has been mixed-negative for Digger. There’s skepticism with viewers who love the idea of Cruise, but side-eye the execution: ‘Impressive that after a nearly three-minute long trailer, I still don’t really know what this movie’s about.’ The sharpest criticism isn’t about hating the movie, it’s about distrust, suspicion that the ‘aging gracefully’ narrative is a PR construct. Comments needle at the film’s tonal identity, wondering if it’s satire or self-parody, ‘For me this looked funny at first viewing. Second time it just looks cynical and a bad Kubrick’s Dr. Strangelove rip-off. Hope my first take is right.’ Plus, ‘Why does this look like Tropic Thunder cosplay’ along with, ‘I understand even less about this movie after the full trailer than I did after the teaser.’ And, there are grumbles about the promo montage in the ‘Tom Cruise Retrospective’ trailer feeling like a premature Oscars reel.”

Iñárritu said he made the movie as a love letter to the younger generation, despite it starring a bunch of right wing-like crusty old dudes. Ironically, the 18-34 demo showed up at 60% majority, though clearly not enough of them.

Those close to Cruise have argued that even with Digger bombing, every time he has a new theatrical release it raises the whole value and churn of his library again; his box office worth standing at $14B+ across 53 titles. A similar excuse was given by Paramount insiders when Mission: Impossible-Final Reckoning didn’t hit an enormous box office number: The movie won’t profit in its first go-round, rather its nth cycle.

Breaking down the $148M estimated loss, this is realized per sources based on $127M in total revenues, meaning theatrical rentals, airline monies, domestic home streaming, PVOD, international TV and global costs of $275M, and that’s not just worldwide P&A near $100M, but also global home and TV costs. This is also figuring that Warners unleashes Digger on POVD soon and does a decent number relative to the box office cause people are curious.

Yes, at the end of the day, Digger is Birdman all over again, and should have been positioned as an awards arthouse play. Such originality comes at substantially less than $50M production costs. But again, Digger stars Cruise at full freight.

What would De Luca and Abdy’s fates had been at the new Skydance had the merger closed after Dune: Part Three?

Those in Ellison’s ears have whispered about the duo’s audacious bets, when the box office reality is that these titles (six-time Oscar winner and Paul Thomas Anderson’s highest grossing movie One Battle After Another, and 4x Oscar winner and $372M grossing Sinners, and the bomb The Bride) were a small part of a very commercial run for the two that included the near billion dollar-grossing A Minecraft Movie, the highest grossing Final Destination, Conjuring and Beetlejuce movies of all-time, the launch of another auteur in Zach Cregger’s Weapons, half of Twisters, upcoming holiday family title The Cat in the Hat and the hopeful billion dollar grossing title Dune: Part Three and much more to come.

Exclaimed one rival distribution exec who has never worked with De Luca and Abdy, “When Mike and Pam hit it out of the park, they hit it out the park.”

Warner Bros didn’t return request for comment.

>

Continue Reading

movies

John Leguizamo on Odyssey, Non-Traditional Casting, Spider-Man

Published

on

John Leguizamo, the veteran stage and screen actor and leading activist for Latino representation in Hollywood, who is currently garnering career-best notices and Oscar buzz for his portrayal of Eumaeus in Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey, is our guest on this episode of The Hollywood Reporter’s Awards Chatter podcast, which was recorded in front of an audience of students at Chapman University.


Over the course of 42 years in the business, Leguizamo has worked with everyone. He has been directed by Brian De Palma, Spike Lee, Baz Luhrmann and Jon Favreau multiple times, as well as by Mike Nichols, George A. Romero, Ridley Scott, Todd Haynes, M. Night Shyamalan, Ava DuVernay and Christopher Nolan. And he has shared the screen with the likes of Sean Penn, Harrison Ford, Al Pacino, Leonardo DiCaprio, Wesley Snipes, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Robert De Niro, Keanu Reeves, Nicole Kidman, Kevin Hart, Tina Fey, Amy Poehler and Matt Damon.

In the movies, he has starred in blockbuster studio franchises (Ice Age and John Wick), revered indies (Poison and Chef) and cult classics (Super Mario Bros. and To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar). On TV, he has been on hit network shows (ER) and acclaimed limited series (Waco and When They See Us). And on the stage, he has written and starred in six acclaimed one-man shows. Between them all, he has accumulated an Emmy Award and a special Tony Award, as well as Golden Globe and Critics Choice award nominations.

But Leguizamo has never received an Oscar nomination — something that might well change as a result of his latest turn as the blind loyal servant of Odysseus in The Odyssey, which has been described by The Hollywood Reporter as “a delicate, moving, heartbreaking performance… that emerges as the heartbeat of the film” and by the Wall Street Journal as “the performance of his career.”

Over the course of this episode, the youthful 66-year-old reflected on his journey from Bogotá to Jackson Heights to Hollywood, and how his discovery of comedy and acting saved; how he managed to make early inroads into the business, despite the reluctance of people to cast Latinos as anything other than stereotypes; and why he hated working on ER, loved being part of the Ice Age series and Encanto, and was invited to play the villain Vulture in Spider-Man: Homecoming — before being uninvited.

He also went deep on The Odyssey: why it meant so much to him that Nolan decided to employ non-traditional casting for the film; how he prepared to play a blind and elderly man; what it was like acting in the first film shot entirely with IMAX cameras; how he processed seeing the film — and his performance — for the first time; plus more.

Here are his thoughts on a few assorted matters…

On the trans character that he played in To Wong Foo, Thanks for Everything! Julie Newmar…

“I shouldn’t be playing it today. Yeah, no, it’s not fair. There’s plenty of great LGBTQIA actors out there that could play these roles and should be playing these roles. But that was back then, that was the ’90s.”

On who can play which roles in 2026…

“In a fair world, which it never is, everybody should be able to play anything. But the thing is that nobody gets to play anything except white cisgender males. They were never casting disabled actors ever. And now directors that I know, friends of mine, make it a mandatory thing to cast one disabled actor, to create a role for them. How great is that for them? They wouldn’t cast gay actors, even in gay roles they wouldn’t, that’s the way it was. In Latin roles, a lot of white actors were taking Latin roles in brownface for the longest time, since Touch of Evil with Charlton Heston in brownface with the black mustache. It was crazy. So I think, in this moment of correction, and perhaps it’s an overcorrection, it’s important that we cast the people who are written as the role and give them the opportunities. I really believe that. And then maybe eventually, when things are fair, then everybody can play everything all over again.”

On Nolan’s decision to employ nontraditional casting for The Odyssey…

“Now that ancient story that’s so powerful to Western literature belongs to everyone, and how beautiful is that? How generous is that? How open and inviting is that, to have Lupita Nyong’o play twins, Clytemnestra and Helen of Troy, and Travis Scott be the bard, and Corey Hawkins be Polybus, one of the evil suitors?”

On being uninvited from 2017’s Spider-Man: Homecoming…

“They offered me Spider-Man, the Vulture, and then the head of the studio called me, ‘Oh, John, this is really terrible.’ We had already negotiated. We had accepted terms. I hadn’t signed a contract, but we had accepted terms. It was pretty far along negotiations. And she said, ‘We’d like the role back. Michael Keaton wants it back.’ And I was like, ‘What the fuck is this?” I’ve never heard of such a crazy thing.’ I could have sued, but my reps are all cowards. It could [also] backfire. I mean, I’m not a litigious person anyway. That’s not who I am. I’d rather move on and create my own stuff.”

>

Continue Reading

movies

Trump Says MAGA Inc. Will Now Pay For TV Ads Rather Than Taxpayers

Published

on

Donald Trump said that his super PAC MAGA Inc. would now pay for advertisements that the White House has run at taxpayer expense, stirring an outcry among Democrats and some Republicans.

Trump posted on Truth Social on Monday, “The Radical Left is upset with the fact that I am taking Ads, which I consider to be a positive promotion for our Great U.S.A., and paying for them with U.S.A. money. This is a rather standard thing to do but, rather than doing that, although nothing will make them happy, I have decided to do the Patriotic Ads, among others, and pay for them myself, and with money I raised for MAGA, Inc.”

The White House has deemed the spots to public service announcements, comparing them to government-funded ads that promoted vaccines under President Joe Biden and the Affordable Care Act under President Barack Obama.

But the Trump spots feature himself and promote his presidency. One of the ads is almost identical to a spot that Trump posted on social media, promoting his presidential campaign. More than $10 million has been spent on the series of ads, per CNN, citing estimates from analysis firm AdImpact.

The ads prominently featured a line, “Paid for by the U.S. government,” airing during football games and during news programming, among other dayparts. The group Public Citizen filed an FCC complaint, arguing that broadcasters could be held liable for an illegal use of government funds. But FCC Chairman Brendan Carr said last week that he didn’t see anything “out of the ordinary” in the airing of the spots, calling them a “normal PSA.”

>

Continue Reading

movies

WBD’s JB Perrette Makes The Leap To Skydance, Taking Top Role In Ellison’s Executive Suite

Published

on

When Skydance confirmed the company’s executive leadership team Monday, most industry reaction centered on elevated roles for content execs like Casey Bloys, Channing Dungey and George Cheeks.

But another exec in a key new post is JB Perrette, a veteran of streaming since its earliest days and a close associate of Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav. He is not only making the leap to the new company from a top position at WBD (something of a surprise given that execs at the company being acquired generally head for the exits), but his turf is also expanding in some intriguing ways.

Skydance is due to close the deal Tuesday morning, and Perrette will join Co-CEOs David Ellison, Ynon Kreiz and others at a press conference later that afternoon on the Paramount lot.

Upon the close of the $110 billion deal, Perrette will be Co-Chair & Chief Business Officer, Skydance DTC and Co-Chair & Chief Business Officer, Skydance TV. He will have direct global oversight of global distribution, advertising sales, content sales, DTC strategy, marketing and business operations.

Perrette is poised to benefit handsomely from the merger. An SEC filing last March said he would receive $142 million in various deal-related proceeds, though some portion of that could be deferred given his post in the new company. One source cited the massive payday as a potential motivating factor. “He certainly didn’t need the money,” the person said. “He obviously felt compelled by the opportunity.”

At WBD, Perrette was head of global streaming and gaming, leading the global rollout of HBO Max across more than 130 global markets, including the UK, Germany and Italy after the end of a longtime output deal with Sky. The WBD streaming business (which includes some niche services along with mother ship HBO Max) also turned profitable on Perrette’s watch. One less-desirable line on the resume is presiding with Zaslav over the inauspicious rebrand of HBO Max to Max in 2023. (After confusion and a degree of backlash among viewers, suppliers and advertisers, it reverted to its original name in 2025.)

While any exec who is in a high position long enough will have missteps, many industry and company sources Deadline spoke with described Perrette as a solid operational executive. Bloys may be the rainmaker with HBO and HBO Max content, but Perrette oversaw product design, global distribution deals and a host of other aspects of the streamer’s growth. Plus, he comes with a pedigree.

At Discovery, Perrette was head of digital and helped launch Eurosport’s streaming service as well as Discovery+, but his 11-year run at NBCUniversal yielded an industry milestone. Overlapping with Zaslav during their time at NBCU, Perrette rose to president of digital and affiliate distribution. He helped usher in the streaming era as one of the key execs behind Hulu’s launch in 2007 as a joint venture with Fox, later serving for several years on the streamer’s board.

Company insiders describe a series of conversations between Perrette and Ellison over the past several weeks, a period when he gradually gained the confidence of the new Skydance boss and his co-CEO, Ynon Kreiz. “He is often the one asking the best questions in the room and has the most comprehensive view,” one former colleague said. Another person from the Paramount orbit said the execs had a “mind-meld” encompassing the future capabilities of streaming services in the AI age.

Perrette also has experience with the blocking and tackling of things like password sharing and other lucrative but detail-oriented operational tasks. Paramount board member and major Skydance investor Gerry Cardinale last week noted that efforts to merge the back ends and tech stacks of Paramount+, Pluto and BET+ have borne fruit. “We’ve already done a hell of a job,” he said. “Then we are going to do the same thing when we bring the HBO universe into this.”

A high-level streaming executive at another company noted that the move could save hundreds of millions of dollars in expenses at a time when Skydance will be eager to deliver on its promise of saving at least $6 billion in costs. “JB is good casting for that kind of thing because he’s willing to get into the weeds on it,” the person said.

While the fundamentals of streaming technology are familiar to Perrette, advertising and distribution may be a bit less so. “There was a lot of confusion when that popped up in the release because it doesn’t seem like he has a very extensive background in that,” one insider noted of the official announcement. As the former Paramount and WBD come together, there are some unanswered questions about the hierarchy of ad sales in particular, with both companies having recently gone through leadership changes. More details about the second level of top execs will be revealed in the coming days.

On second thought, noted one source, “what we took for granted all those years at the upfronts is up for grabs. Ellison is trying to turn it into a tech company. What will advertising even look like in that kind of environment?”

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.