Entertainment
Andy Serkis on ‘Animal Farm’ Animation Pipeline — Interview
“Animal Farm,” George Orwell’s allegory for how the structures of power corrupt revolutionary idealism, is generally understood to satirize the Soviet slide into authoritarianism across the first half of the 20th century. Only director Andy Serkis has come up with an interpretation broad enough (as a barn, perhaps) to include rap songs, fart jokes, and a dogged refusal to allow evil to triumph over good, or to sit with the harm that corruption does to the innocent, regardless of the end outcome.
The politics of Serkis’ “Animal Farm” may be as hollow-boned as a bird’s. The film, though, does stand as an interesting experiment — a movie that began its life as a motion-capture project, and ended up turning to animation. “Animal Farm” needed to throw off the shackles of photorealism, it turns out, in order to produce the look it desired.
Serkis described that look to IndieWire as “a cautionary tale that has a whole heap of innocence around it.” There’s arguably no one better placed to collaborate with VFX artists on a motion-capture performance than Serkis, who’s delivered innocence, cunning, cruelty, longing, and kindness in roles that run from Golum to Caesar to King Kong himself. But he realized that the violence done to the creatures in “Animal Farm” couldn’t be rendered as realistically as it would be through photoreal visual effects.
“The very early designs for the animal characters were much more unforgiving and brutal. When animals looked like they were starving, you could see their rib cages; the pigs were a lot more gluttonous and just looked meaner. There is a version of that film that could exist,” Serkis said. “But we wanted to reach out to a younger audience.”
The animated designs definitely create more of a safety margin for viewers of all ages to watch what happens when, after they’ve thrown off the rule of Farmer Jones (Serkis), the pig Napoleon (Seth Rogen) begins co-opting the radical equality preached by Snowball (Laverne Cox), bringing the entire farm with him. Serkis still emphasizes a lot of close-ups throughout, and an animated performance style that approximates the world of motion-capture — how naturalistic human acting choices are translated onto more creature-like faces.

“I wanted the audience to reach out to the characters and to really feel — when the camera’s pushing in on a character’s face — what they’re going through. And not to feel that the animators had to overperform it, as such. That was a really interesting part of the process,” Serkis said.
Serkis was very familiar with the animation process from his work directing video games and live-action films with robust VFX needs, like “Mowgli: Legend of the Jungle” and “Venom: The Last Dance.” There’s a lot of overlap between animation and the processes for character design, storyboarding, and previz for a live-action film, or the best uses of Unreal Engine in a game. Where Serkis really dove into new skills was in the worldbuilding that animation requires.
“You build every blade of grass, every piece of farm machinery, the entire world. What had the most amazing set designer, Amos Sussigan, who was from Anaventure, who was just a brilliant, wonderful collaborator. Then working with the layout team and the story team… creating a scratch track, recording the actors, you’re working at a completely different pace.”
Animation requires a director to hold a scene in their head, in various stages of completeness, for much longer than in live-action. In the latter, you shoot the pages you plan to film during a day, and the next, you’ve at least got a version of the scene. Perhaps a lot more needs to be built on top of it, and the edit will dictate the final timing, but you have a scene.

“Getting to the end of a scene on an animated movie can take years because it goes through so many different hands and skills,” Serkis said. “So it was wonderful getting to know all the different departments in the animation team and to work with actors who were animators and be able to direct them in an interesting way.”
Budgetary concerns, too, can kill a scene while it’s still in the animatic stage, or the previz phase, so the director is killing darlings long before the entire film exists on an editing timeline or reaches a mix stage. But for as long as animation takes to come together, though, it offers incredible freedom to voice actors, and Serkis wanted his cast to take full advantage of that.
“If someone gives me the freedom to find a performance, I’ll try lots of different things. Standing in front of the mic, not having to reset camera, change lenses, do setups, you know, just being able to go into another round? It’s a great way of working, and it’s a very creative way of working for an actor,” Serkis said.
“Animal Farm” is now in theaters from Angel Studios.
>
movies
CNN, MS NOW And Politico Warn That Trump Will Revive “A Complete Ban”
CNN, MS NOW and Politico are warning that the Trump administration will reimpose a “complete ban” on their access to the White House without a judge issuing a preliminary injunction.
Last week, U.S. District Judge Timothy Kelly granted a temporary restraining order, forcing the White House to restore access to the White House to the outlets as he more fully considers the legal arguments. The TRO lasts for 14 days.
In a filing in federal court on Monday, attorneys for the three news outlets argued that the Trump White House actions since then “leave little doubt that it will immediately reinstitute a complete ban of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico if allowed the opportunity.”
The outlets’ legal team, led by Theodore Boutrous Jr., pointed to the White House’s restriction on CNN from access to State Dinner arrivals on Thursday evening. The network then was barred from serving as TV pooler on Air Force One on Trump’s trip to Tennessee on Saturday, with no replacement stepping in, and leaving a dearth of TV images from the trip.
“Because the ban is an unlawful assault on the most fundamental First Amendment freedoms and will inflict irreparable harm on Plaintiffs and the public if not restrained, this Court should preliminarily enjoin its enforcement pending the resolution of this case,” the news outlets’ attorneys wrote.
Kelly cited a lack of due process by the White House when it pulled dozens of credentials of reporters from the three outlets. While the Trump DOJ has cited standards of “professionalism and decorum” and national security concerns, the media outlets’ legal team called that reasoning that “pretextual” and “post hoc,” as well as vague.
In the latest brief, CNN, MS NOW and Politico also again cited violations of the First Amendment. They noted that Trump has explained the ban by blaming their coverage as “Purposely … negative,” among other things.
“His statements also make clear he implemented the ban to coerce more favorable coverage from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, and to deter other journalists and news organizations from newsgathering and reporting that the President might view as negative,” the news outlets’ legal team wrote. “And his administration has continued to retaliate against Plaintiffs even after the temporary restraining order, only underscoring that Defendants’ motive is to punish and chill journalism they dislike.”
The outlets are asking the judge to prohibit the Trump team from pulling hard pass credentials, or to ensure the reporters of the White House access they had before Sept. 18. In contrast to a TRO, a preliminary injunction would sideline Trump’s ban until a trial is held, or if an appeals court rules otherwise.
Trump initially banned the three outlets on Sept. 18. When the judge granted a TRO last early Thursday, it meant that the White House had to restore hard passes, with reporters not gaining reentry until around noon that day.
The issue of whether the White House can also restrict CNN from the pool is a slightly different, but related issue. It’s also one at the center of another case, involving the Associated Press after it was banned from the pool and other White House events. That case is currently on appeal.
That said, in the latest brief, the three outlets cited the White House’s continued prohibitions on CNN as an example of White House retaliation over protected speech.
For much of last week, there was no TV network pool, meaning that there was little video coverage of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s visit to the White House. The four other networks in the pool — CBS News, ABC News, Fox News and NBC News — initially suspended their participation in protest of the exclusion of CNN. The networks resumed the TV pool coverage this week, but it will be put to the test again on Thursday, when CNN is assigned to that duty.
“Every day, critically important news is breaking at the White House, and the ban will substantially interfere with Plaintiffs’ ability to cover it,” the outlets brief stated. “The ban also inflicts an injury on all news media organizations—which now risk a similar fate if they engage in fact-based, independent reporting the President deems insufficiently favorable.”
The DOJ’s brief in response is due by Friday.
>
Entertainment
New York Times Executive Fatally Shot by In-Laws, Police Say
>
Entertainment
Dennis Haskins, ‘Saved by the Bell’ Star, Dies at 75
>
-
movies4 months agoSearch For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Fashion9 years agoAccording to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Fashion9 years agoModel Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
-
Fashion9 years agoEmily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
-
Fashion9 years ago9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
-
Anime4 months agoRurouni Kenshin: Hokkaido Arc Manga Takes 1-Issue Break – News
-
Anime3 months agoHIDIVE to Stream English Dubs for The World Is Dancing, The Forsaken Saintess and Her Foodie Roadtrip in Another World, The Dangers in My Heart: The Movie Anime – News


