Sports
The Bounce: The NBA’s 3-2-1 lottery plan doesn’t add up
The Bounce Newsletter
| This is The Athletic’s daily NBA newsletter. Sign up here to receive The Bounce directly in your inbox.
On this date in 1970, Jerry West hit a famous 60-foot buzzer-beater in Game 3 of the NBA Finals. After Dave DeBusschere put the Knicks up by two, West was forced to heave it from beyond half court. It did not result in a win because the NBA didn’t have the 3-point shot yet, and the Lakers lost in overtime. The Knicks won the title in seven games.
Lotto confusion
NBA’s new proposal is overly complicated
“If it ain’t broke, don’t break it.” — Charles Oakley.
That’s one of my favorite quotes in history. And it’s how I feel about the NBA’s latest lottery and anti-tanking reform proposal that surfaced on Tuesday. When some of the league’s proposed ideas leaked a month ago, the one that made the most sense was flattening the odds for the teams with the 10 worst records (each getting an 8 percent chance at the No. 1 pick). Then teams 11-18 (the four losers of the Play-In Tournament included) would all receive 2.5 percent odds. We graded it a 9/10.
So what did the NBA apparently choose? Turning the entire process into one big tax law that is unnecessarily complicated. The league wants to introduce the “3-2-1” system — because everything needs a clever little name. Instead of just making the simple and effective fix, the NBA would dole out different odds throughout the bottom 16 teams, expanding the lottery from 14. And the bottom three teams wouldn’t get the best odds.
I made a little chart to explain some of it. But I can’t explain all of it on one chart, because there’s so much more to it. Teams would get an 8.1, 5.4 or 2.7 percent chance of winning the draft lottery. They would get one, two or three lottery balls based on their finish.

You got all that? It’s not over! There are also extra proposed rulesdesigned to reduce tanking. My assessment is in bold.
- No team could win the top pick in consecutive years or win three consecutive top-five picks. In the lottery era, a team has had consecutive years with a top pick twice, once by trade.
- Teams could not protect picks in slots 12 to 15. This would affect almost nothing.
- The proposal includes a sunset provision, in which the new system would expire following the 2029 draft and would require a vote by the Board of Governors to continue it. So it’s an experiment for now. Maybe this includes potential expansion tweaks?
- The league would have expanded disciplinary authority to regulate tanking by having the option to reduce teams’ lottery odds and/or modify teams’ draft positions. This could have huge ramifications.
All these rules remind me of Mad magazine #295, which was its “Back to the Future 2” edition. Mad made fun of how convoluted the time travel and patterns were in the movie and had John Madden explain what was happening.

This plan is not as good as the one we judged a month ago. It’s just overly and unnecessarily complicated simply so the league could name it the 3-2-1 system, which reminds me of “Family Matters” and a wrestler from the 1990s. The Board of Governors will vote on this May 28 for the 2026-27 season. Tweaks could still be made, so call your local representative ticket rep.
The last 24
🏀 Mock SZN. Sam Vecenie has his latest mock draft, based on a random lottery draw of his own. Jazz fans will love this.
🏀 Rock chalk. Speaking of drafts, the potential No. 1 pick in 2027 — and the top incoming freshman in college basketball — picked his school on Tuesday. Tyran Stokes is headed to Kansas.
🧑⚖️ What’s next? Damon Jones pleaded guilty to two felonies in federal court. He’s the first among 34 defendants in the NBAgambling and poker game ring cases to plead to a deal.
🔊 NBA Daily. Watch and listen to a recap of last night’s games. Including the 76ers’ shocker.
Stream the NBA on Fubo (try it for free!) and catch out-of-market games on League Pass.
Mythic quote
Did T-Mac actually say that in 2003 playoffs?
When the No. 8 seed Orlando Magic were up 3-1 on the No. 1 seed Detroit Pistons in the first round of the 2003 playoffs, Tracy McGrady allegedly said, “It feels good to get into the second round.” For over two decades, this quote has been accepted as fact and recycled about the first of many Doc Rivers teams collapsing with a 3-1 series lead.
Except … T-Mac didn’t actually say that?
When the quote came up Monday after this year’s eighth-seeded Magic went up 3-1 on the No. 1 seed Pistons, McGrady addressed it on the NBC postgame show.
“Somebody didn’t really do their homework. (They) can’t find a video of me saying that. It’s a myth.”
Wait, we’ve all been running with this T-Mac quote forever. And, to be fair, I can’t find an interview or clip of this presumed statement after Game 4 in 2003. In a Reddit post from three years ago, there’s a theory about this alleged quote. Then-Pistons guard Jon Barry was the first one to spread it around. This is from the Houston Chronicle in 2005:
Barry was with Detroit at the time and said McGrady’s words were quickly passed around the Pistons’ locker room.
“(Orlando) got up 3-1, and he said, ‘It feels good to get in the second round,’” Barry said. “And it was a seven-game series. They proceeded to lose by 20 in the last three games, and we moved on. He’s heard about it from me a few times.”
The Pistons thought he said it, and that gave them motivation to make T-Mac eat his seemingly fake words. McGrady was quoted in a newspaper clipping saying that to “… possibly get to the second round would be so great.” He’s been misquoted for 23 years?
However, going through the comments of that Reddit thread, it’s time to bust out the Columbo “Oh, just one more thing.” McGrady might have said it, via the East Lansing Journal! How many quotes did T-Mac have about this Game 4 victory? Why don’t we have video? I’m more confused than when I started this section.
About last night
Knicks avert crisis, while Spurs advance
Let’s review last night’s Game 5s …
Knicks 126, Hawks 97: Knicks lead 3-2
Read the takeaways from The Athletic. Here are mine.
- Paint dominance. The Knicks had 60 points in the paint and 20 second-chance points. The Hawks had just 42 paint points.
- KAT’s meow. Karl-Anthony Towns had another brilliant game: 16 points on 5-of-7 shooting, 14 rebounds, six assists, two steals and two blocks.
- Fast-break points. The Hawks had just four in this game. That’s 32 fast-break points in three losses, and 40 in two wins.
Who played huge in this game? Jalen Brunson. He had 17 of his 39 points in the fourth quarter to pull the Knicks away from the Hawks. He was 15-of-23 for the game.
Who came up short for the Hawks? CJ McCollum — just six points on 3-of-10 shooting with four turnovers. That is not answering the bell, as he did in Games 2 and 3.
How concerned should the Hawks be? Extremely. The Knicks dominated the last two games.
PPM: 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 for Atlanta | 🚨🚨🚨 for New York
76ers 113, Celtics 97: Celtics lead 3-2
Read the takeaways from The Athletic. Here are mine.
- Tyrese Maxey got going again. The Sixers bringing Joel Embiid back in Game 4 seemed to take away from Maxey’s offense. He had 25 points on 10-of-18 shooting in Game 5.
- Horrific Celtics shooting. They were just 11-of-39 from deep and 14-of-23 from the free-throw line. Very un-Celtics-like.
- Quentin Grimes was fantastic. His 18 points off the bench and defense on Jaylen Brown were huge.
Who played huge in this game? Embiid. He didn’t just get 33 points on 12-of-23 from the field and 9-of-10 from the line. He also had eight assists as the Sixers thrived off his presence.
Who came up short for the Celtics? Derrick White. It was really everybody for the Celtics’ role players, but White’s six points on 2-of-8 shooting was abysmal.
How concerned should the Celtics be? A little. They’re still the better team and have Game 7 at home, if needed. But they need to shoot really well to end this series.
PPM: 🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 for Philadelphia | 🚨🚨🚨 for Boston
Spurs 114, Blazers 95: Spurs win series 4-1 👽
Was this the expected outcome? Overall, yes. The Spurs were expected to win in about five games. Maybe six, once Victor Wembanyama had the concussion issue?
What’s next for the Spurs? They await the winner of Minnesota and Denver. The Wolves lead that series 3-2 (see below).
Who are the Blazers’ big free agents? Robert Williams III, Matisse Thybulle and Blake Wesley.
What’s the draft situation? Portland’s pick (15th) goes to Chicago. Its second-rounder (42nd) goes to San Antonio.
What’s the pressing need for Portland? Outside shooting. This team took a lot of 3s and didn’t make them. How much will Damian Lillard’s return fix that? Will the Blazers get involved in a Giannis trade or go after their own star? Who’s going to be their coach?
Overall grade for the Blazers’ season: B+
Since we’re here, let’s do a quick preview of tonight’s Game 5s. All times Eastern.
Magic at Pistons, 7 p.m. (Prime Video) | Magic lead 3-1
Something to look for: Will Jalen Duren help extend the Pistons’ season? He’s been non-existent in this series.
Raptors at Cavs, 7:30 p.m. (ESPN) | Series tied 2-2
Something to look for: Is this just one of those series in which the home team seems to dominate every game, and it just goes back-and-forth without any real tension until Game 7?
Rockets at Lakers, 10 p.m. (ESPN) | Lakers lead 3-1
Something to look for: Once again, no Kevin Durant in this one. Can the Rockets force turnovers like they did in Game 4 to extend their season?
>
Sports
Manchester United have had a quiet transfer window. Which might not be a bad thing
In a hectic, ever-changing transfer market, there can be value in standing still.
Manchester United have, by elite Premier League standards, had a quiet summer 2026 window.
Their two major signings have not been of the splashy, marquee sort. Andrey Santos joined from Chelsea for £48million ($64.1m), plus a potential £2m more in easily achievable bonuses, off the back of a quiet campaign for the west London club, but the 22-year-old Brazilian midfielder has been their standout player during pre-season, impressing with his understated, intelligent play in midfield.
The only other addition, Youri Tielemans, is higher profile, arriving from Aston Villa after United triggered his £35million release clause. The 29-year-old, 90-time Belgium international got his first taste of football for his new club on Saturday, coming off the bench in an entertaining 1-1 friendly draw with Paris Saint-Germain in the Swedish city of Gothenburg.
How does Tielemans fit at Man Utd?
Tifo Football
There will be clamour for further additions before the September 1 deadline, but the lack of wholesale turnover has allowed new permanent head coach Michael Carrick to preserve the stability he restored after taking interim charge in January following Ruben Amorim’s decidedly turbulent 14-month spell.
Carrick named an unchanged line-up in four of his 17 Premier League games last season — a feat Amorim managed just once.

That preference for continuity has carried on into this pre-season, a period when managers and head coaches often make plenty of changes.
Noussair Mazraoui replacing Leny Yoro was the only alteration from last weekend’s 2-1 win against Atletico Madrid across the country in Stockholm, as Carrick resisted the temptation to start Bruno Fernandes or Tielemans from the off in the PSG game, despite both being available for the first time following their post-World Cup holidays.
Upheaval and volatility have defined the 13-year post-Sir Alex Ferguson era at Old Trafford, with United lurching from one coach and philosophy to the next.
One way of assessing that instability is through squad churn, a metric that measures how much a team’s share of playing minutes changes from one season to the next. Zero would mean exactly the same players playing exactly the same share of minutes; 100 per cent reflects an entirely new team.
At United, churn has risen sharply over the past decade, a period in which they have faded from the title-race conversation.

Carrick’s side are, it must be said, still a way off returning to being talked about as championship contenders.
It is tempting to see the transfer market as a panacea for their shortcomings, to believe that a few lavish signings will supercharge a route back to glory.
No side embodied that thinking more than Saturday’s opponents, who once viewed Lionel Messi and Kylian Mbappe as their silver bullets. It was only after abandoning that obsession with superstars and pivoting to a more measured approach to squad-building, geared towards a clearly defined style of play, that PSG finally tasted the Champions League success they had craved for so long.
Closer to home, Liverpool have shown the pitfalls of an expensive facelift, splurging record sums on Florian Wirtz and Alexander Isak last summer only to free-fall from champions to a meek fifth-place finish.
Instead, having a consistent, longer-term core should help Carrick further develop this United side’s tactical identity, improve the players already at his disposal, and allow cohesion and team spirit to grow naturally.
That thinking has been consistent with his messaging throughout his short tenure. After last week’s defeat of Atletico, he specifically praised the team’s spirit and spoke of the squad building “different layers as we continue to push”.
This is an expensively-assembled group of players, talented enough to find internal solutions to different tactical challenges or fitness issues.
A good example is the shin injury that has kept United’s main centre-forward, Benjamin Sesko, out of pre-season action across the first four matches. Rather than source a direct, probably expensive, replacement in the market, Carrick fielded a fluid front four on Saturday, with Bryan Mbeumo deputising as the nominal forward.
That reshuffle opened the door for Amad, who shone on the right with a bustling performance, unsettling PSG with his sharp dribbling and laying on an assist for Mbeumo.
Those two rotated fluidly throughout, combined well and have developed a strong on-pitch connection. Establishing that sense of familiarity requires time spent playing and training together, something made more difficult by a constant carousel of new signings.
That is not to say United should be entirely passive for the final three weeks of this window.
Mason Mount went off injured in the first half yesterday, a substitution Carrick said was precautionary after a kick. But it was another reminder of the physical fragility of a player who has started just 25 league games since joining United for £55million three years ago, and the club should target a more reliable backup option.
Left-back could also do with reinforcements, with a thin pool of options available to cover for Luke Shaw, whose fitness record has been patchy during his 12-year career in Manchester.
Securing those additions, though, is secondary to the more pressing need to build and develop a strong starting XI, an area in which Carrick has made significant progress.
For that first-choice line-up, there is an argument United need to splurge on a more physical presence in midfield, someone in the mould of a Declan Rice or Elliot Anderson. But there is more than one way to build a successful side, and they do not need to conform to the Premier League’s current obsession with physicality and beef in the middle of the pitch.
Transfer fees have flown to gargantuan levels this summer, with £100million becoming close to the going rate for peak-age, ready-made talent.
In those conditions, United’s prudence makes financial sense. On the pitch, it might do too, giving Carrick and his players the space to breathe, develop and continue moving forward.
>
Sports
Connections: Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for Aug. 9, 2026, puzzle No. 685
Need help with today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle? You’ve come to the right place.
Welcome to Connections: Sports Edition Coach — a spot to gather clues and discuss (and share) scores.
A quick public service announcement before we continue: The bottom of this article includes the answers — and hints — for the four categories. So if you want to solve the board hint-free, we recommend you play before continuing.
You can access today’s game here. And when you’re done, try out our limited-edition Connections: Soccer Edition for an extra challenge.
Today’s difficulty
Game No. 685’s difficulty: 1.5 out of 5
Connections: Sports Edition hints for Aug. 9, 2026

Scroll below for one answer in each of the four categories.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Yellow: ICE SKATE
Green: TURF TOE
Blue: LANSDOWNE STREET
Purple: CITY GROUND
Connections: Sports Edition answers for Aug. 9, 2026
Scroll below for the full answers to each of the four categories.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Yellow
Equipment that comes in pairs: ICE SKATE, SHIN GUARD, SKI POLE, SOCCER CLEAT
Green
Injuries: HIP POINTER, SHIN SPLINTS, TENNIS ELBOW, TURF TOE
Blue
Fenway Park sights: CITGO SIGN, GREEN MONSTER, LANSDOWNE STREET, PESKY’S POLE
Purple
Premier League venues: CITY GROUND, OLD TRAFFORD, STADIUM OF LIGHT, STAMFORD BRIDGE
What is Connections: Sports Edition?
Connections: Sports Edition is The Athletic’s first-ever game, a daily puzzle designed for players to find connections between 16 words on the game board.
The game’s objective is to group words or objects into four groups of four based on commonalities within each group as quickly as possible. Find the groups without making four mistakes. Each puzzle has exactly one solution, so watch out for words or items that seem to belong to multiple categories!
Category examples:
Sports ____ : Fan, Car, Bar, Radio
U.S. Summer Olympians: Biles, Phelps, Ledecky, Lyles
Each category group is assigned a color, revealed as you solve, ranging from straightforward (yellow) to medium (green) to challenging (blue) to tricky (purple).
Who creates the puzzles for Connections: Sports Edition?
That’s me! My name is Mark Cooper, and I create Connections: Sports Edition and work as a managing editor for college sports here at The Athletic. I was previously The Athletic’s managing editor for breaking news.
The next puzzle will be available at midnight in your time zone. Thanks for playing — and share your scores in the comments!
>
Sports
Huddersfield Giants moving to Dewsbury: Super League side switching home from 2027 season onwards | Rugby League News
Betfred Super League side Huddersfield Giants have announced they are to leave the town and move to Dewsbury for the 2027 season onwards.
The Giants’ intention is to move into Dewsbury’s Flair Stadium, subject to RFL board approval, investing a projected £10m-plus in developing the ground.
The investment will deliver a transformational upgrade of the venue, including the construction of a new stand that will increase capacity from 5,000 to around 8,000 spectators, creating a viewing area on all four sides of the pitch.
The redevelopment will also feature refurbishment of the fan concourses, significant upgrades to existing and new hospitality suites, new bars and food areas, both male and female player dressing rooms, and press facilities elevating the stadium to Super League standards.
An agreement has been reached following extensive and amicable negotiations with Betfred Championship team, Dewsbury Rams, and a strong partnership between the two clubs has been forged. The Flair will continue to host the Rams in the newly-upgraded and dual-branded facility.
This comes following a period of uncertainty for the Giants after seeking a permanent location in the Huddersfield area.
Owner of the club, Ken Davy OBE, has explored several alternative sites, including The Shay Stadium in Halifax.
Speaking of the decision, Davy said: “It’s no secret that as a club, we have fought to find a home in Huddersfield. We had to move from Fartown, from Leeds Road, and now from the Accu Stadium. But the Huddersfield Giants will not retreat. We will not compromise or quietly shuffle into the shadows.
“While we remain the Huddersfield Giants, I am proud to announce that our stage for the 2027 season and beyond is Dewsbury.
“The Flair Stadium is the perfect location for us, it will have the right capacity and facilities for the Giants and its fans to thrive while we continue the search for our permanent home. Our one giant future starts now.
“My overriding aim is to create a purpose-built stadium within Huddersfield for the Giants to call home. My commitment on that has not wavered. However, that was not feasible for the 2027 season.”
Ralph Rimmer OBE, executive chairman of the Huddersfield Giants, added: “The Giants’ future is bright, and we are excited to lead the club into this new era.
“For fans, the matchday experience will be our focus. A smaller, more intimate ground means the crowd is closer to the action, letting the atmosphere grow and support the team out on the pitch.
“The Flair Stadium offers everything that supporters need from parking and accessibility to corporate hospitality and function rooms.
“We can’t wait to welcome you for the 2027 season and beyond to be a part of the Giant future we have in store.”
Jackson: Dewsbury not yet Super Lsague ready
Huddersfield Giants non-executive director Rebecca Jackson:
“[Dewsbury flair stadium] is not quite Super League ready yet, so we definitely need to bring it up to standard.
“We’ll be spending around £10m – a huge investment – to ensure that it can actually be the place where the Huddersfield Giants can play, and really have the atmosphere for both the fans and our partners – and that means building a new stand too, which is very exciting.
“This is just a medium-term plan. We are still looking to build our own stadium within Huddersfield, which has been something that we’ve worked on for a really long time.
“We’ve just unfortunately not been able to secure a site quite yet with the local authorities, but a lot of discussion has been happening.
“We’re hoping that this is going to be able to be a bit of a stop gap for us – a medium-term solution – to then be able to get back into Huddersfield long term.”
Sky Sports will show every game of the Super League live this season, including two matches each round exclusively live. The remaining five matches will be broadcast on Sky Sports+.
>
-
movies3 months agoSearch For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Fashion9 years agoAccording to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Fashion9 years agoModel Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
-
Fashion9 years agoYour comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
-
Fashion9 years ago9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
-
Fashion9 years agoEmily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
-
Fashion9 years agoA photo diary of the nightlife scene from LA To Ibiza



