Sports
Newcastle United: Saudi Arabian owners’ desire for club ‘unchanged’ says boss Eddie Howe
Head coach Eddie Howe says the desire of Newcastle United‘s owners to get to the top remains “unchanged” after meeting with them this week.
Chairman Yasir Al-Rumayyan, the governor of Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), and minority owner Jamie Reuben are among those who have flown in for a two-day annual summit at Matfen Hall in Northumberland.
Although the PIF is to withdraw its multi-billion dollar backing of LIV Golf at the end of the season, senior figures at Newcastle were informed a couple of weeks ago that the pullout would not affect the club.
Newcastle are 14th place in the Premier League, but Howe stressed the “determination to succeed” came through from those above him in the meetings he attended on Thursday.
“The desire is unchanged,” he said. “It’s to try and get to the top of the Premier League, to try and consistently win as many trophies as possible.
“I don’t think that will change while the PIF are our owners, part owners or majority owners. They are very ambitious for the football club.”
Newcastle’s hierarchy have talked of achieving such goals by 2030, but Howe recognised that the infrastructure needed to elevate the club to such a position will take time.
Following a major capital investment, an announcement is expected regarding plans for a new state-of-the-art training ground to underline the owners’ commitment.
There have also been discussions this week regarding the future of St James’ Park as Newcastle weigh up whether to expand the stadium or build a new ground in a bid to turbocharge income streams in the long run and bridge a huge revenue gap on the league’s highest-earning clubs.
“They clearly care so much about the football club [given] the long-term planning that’s going on, on a number of levels,” Howe said of the PIF, who bought an initial 80% stake in 2021 before going on to increase their share.
“[There are] very exciting times ahead for the club, regardless of what happens short-term. The long-term vision is clearly there.”
This gathering of executives, which had been in the diary for several months, was viewed as an opportunity to discuss such infrastructure projects, recruitment plans, the team’s slide down the table and how the club go about addressing it.
Howe was among those to give a presentation on Thursday, as was always planned.
Rather than reacting emotionally, the view internally remains that Newcastle need to respond rationally with the help of cold, thorough analysis.
Howe had “challenging conversations” with those at the top, but the head coach sounded upbeat at his news conference on Friday before the visit of Brighton.
“I was pleased by the level of support given to me, but of course still understanding how football works and knowing we need to get results,” he said. “That will never change.”
>
Sports
Wrexham closing on signing of Sunderland goalkeeper Anthony Patterson
Wrexham target Anthony Patterson is expected to undergo a medical on Monday after a deal was struck with Sunderland over a potential club-record transfer.
The 26-year-old, who spent the second half of last season on loan at Millwall, was given permission to speak to the Welsh club following talks that had begun earlier in the summer.
A product of Sunderland’s academy, Patterson established himself as the club’s first choice ‘keeper in the second half of the 2021-22 campaign. He went on to play a key role in Sunderland’s 2025 promotion, including two vital saves in the play-off final victory over Sheffield United at Wembley Stadium.
However, the addition of Robin Roefs a year ago saw Paterson displaced as the Premier League club’s No 1. He came off the bench against Wrexham in the final friendly of the USA tour in Philadelphia, which was won 1-0 by Sunderland.
Providing there are no late hitches, Patterson is set to become Wrexham’s third signing of the summer after previous captures of Crystal Palace wing-back Danny Imray and Ben Whiteman, the Preston North End captain.
Millwall and Rangers have also been linked with a goalkeeper who made 16 appearances last season after moving on loan to The Den in the January window, including both play-off semi-final legs against Hull City.
Sources in the North East suggest the deal will be worth £8 million, eclipsing the previous club record £7.5 million fee paid for Nathan Broadhead a little under a year ago.
A needed defensive upgrade
No less than 17 teams in last season’s Championship boasted a better defensive record than the combined 65 goals conceded by Arthur Okonkwo and Danny Ward.
All manner of factors lay behind this less than stellar record, including early teething problems in defence and how control of midfield was ceded at times to the opposition, particularly during the absence of Matty James and Ben Sheaf between February and April.
But, amid this mitigation, there was also a sense that both ‘keepers — Okonkwo made 38 league starts in 2025-26 and Ward eight — did okay between the posts, but no more.
Both had their moments. Okonwko’s stoppage time saves in wins at Charlton Athletic and Millwall, in particular, were superb. Likewise, how Ward ensured Wrexham held on to a point at home to Sheffield Wednesday in August with a point blank save to deny Charlie McNeill in stoppage time.
But, as The Athletic wrote on June 1 in a piece titled ‘What do Wrexham need to compete for promotion next season’, “If Wrexham really are serious about making a concerted top two challenge, a goalkeeper capable of making important saves at key moments while also displaying consistently sound decision-making will be paramount.”
In Patterson, Wrexham must hope they have found that goalkeeper.
>
Sports
If Congress can’t save college sports, it’s time for Plan B. Except there is no Plan B
Congress has held more than a dozen hearings about college sports since 2020. The NCAA and the former Power 5 conferences have combined to spend more than $15 million on lobbyists. Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti said last month he’s been to Washington, D.C., 21 times in his three-plus years on the job.
They came oh-so-close to getting an actual bill out of the Senate this week: the Protect College Sports Act. Senate Majority Leader John Thune tried his darndest to get his colleagues to hurry up and vote on it before beginning their five-week summer recess, but a predictable round of grandstanding and pork-barreling was too much to overcome. The ill-fated SCORE Act stalled out in a similar fashion in the House earlier this year.
More than six years since this never-ending legislative push began, Congress still hasn’t “saved” college sports. It’s time for university administrators, conference commissioners and NCAA president Charlie Baker to finally start formulating a Plan B.
If there is such a thing.
PCSA was the brainchild of Sens. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) — a 171-page Frankensteinian whopper that aimed to cure everything from name, image and likeness and the transfer portal to eligibility limits and conference realignment (the latest version sought to limit conferences to 19 members). They even tried to ward off the next Lane Kiffin by declaring coaches couldn’t change jobs during the season. All of which was deemed essential to “save” an extremely popular multibillion-dollar enterprise from itself.
That’s because College Sports Inc. managed to convince politicians of all stripes that their schools will all go bankrupt if something isn’t done to rein in their escalating costs. As if some external party is forcing athletic directors to give football coaches guaranteed $90 million contracts, then give them blank checks to build a $50 million roster.
“Without this Bill, millions of young Athletes will be hurt, programs will be canceled, Women’s and Olympic Sports will go away, the fans will be robbed, and Universities will go broke,” President Donald Trump said this week while urging the Senate to pass it.
It all came to a head a few weeks ago when the Big Ten and SEC initially held out their support. The conferences finally signed off late last week when Cruz and Cantwell agreed to a revised “hard cap” that would allow schools to directly pay their athletes around $48 million, a considerable jump from the current $21.3 million “soft cap” no one follows.
Once that issue was resolved, Cruz confidently predicted the bill would fly through from there, with co-sponsor Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) telling reporters it could get as many as 80 votes.
But nothing is ever that easy in politics. At the 11th hour, the AFL-CIO and the Congressional Black Caucus came out in opposition. Sen. Ashley Moody (R-Fla.) filed an amendment to make it easier for home-state schools Florida State and Miami to change conferences. And then the final blow: three conservative senators, most notably old friend Tommy Tuberville, claimed the bill would threaten “state laws that ban biological men in women’s sports.” (The sponsors tried to assure them it would not.)
Yes, a bill whose authors purported to be protecting women’s sports got derailed by a different set of people claiming to be protecting women’s sports.
(Note to alarmists: The number of women’s college athletes has increased by 50,000 in the last five years, according to the NCAA’s 2024-25 participation data, and the NCAA is planning to add a women’s flag football championship in 2028.)
The PCSA is not dead yet. Cruz and Schmitt issued a statement Saturday claiming they’ve “locked in a guaranteed vote” for when they return in mid-September. But Cruz has been making these sorts of rosy proclamations for at least three years. Congressional experts say the odds of a vote decrease considerably the closer things get to the midterms. And even if it does pass, the House then gets its hands on it. Representatives will have their own pet causes that will muck up that process.
In the meantime, the NCAA keeps getting sued into oblivion. Last winter, it kept losing injunction requests from geezer pro basketball players seeking waivers to return to college. It responded to that crisis by expediting a completely new eligibility process that eliminates waivers and redshirts entirely, instead giving a uniform five seasons of competition beginning no later than age 19. It passed in June to take effect in August.
So, of course, athletes who just completed their fourth seasons and had moved on with their lives began seeking injunctions to get their own fifth season of eligibility, and so far they’re all winning. Despite the NCAA’s pending appeal in a Colorado federal case, programs like Indiana, Texas and Virginia are already suiting up former players in training camps.
While each court case has its own unique circumstances, the judges’ decisions contain a recurring theme: They frown on any policy that restricts athletes’ ability to earn NIL compensation. And yet, College Sports Inc. presses on in its quest to get Congress to let them restrict the market for NIL compensation.
It’s time for Plan B. College Sports Inc. currently has no idea what that looks like, but it’s got to start with leaders finally acknowledging that we’re never going back to the old days. These are professional sports now that need to be governed accordingly. Schools need to give their athletes legitimate service contracts rather than continue pretending they’re for “NIL.” And if they truly want things like salary caps and portal restrictions, they need to stop negotiating them with legislative aides and start negotiating with — brace yourself — the athletes themselves.
That, or keep acting like Charlie Brown with the football and spend another six years wooing politicians who claim they want to “save” college sports but mostly just want to see their names in a news release.
Lobbyists and lawyers will appreciate six more years of paychecks.
>
Sports
Will Warren’s first reaction to Yankees-Padres trade drama before deadline? ‘No way’
NEW YORK — New York Yankees starting pitcher Will Warren’s phone buzzed. It was late at night on Aug. 2, and he was in his seat on the team’s charter flight from Chicago to New York City.
The text message was from his wife. When he opened it, he saw a screenshot of a report — later debunked — that claimed he was part of a trade the San Diego Padres had rejected from the Yankees leading up to the deadline, which was the next night.
The supposed deal? It was Warren heading to San Diego for lefty reliever Adrian Morejon. The report quickly went viral.
Lending it possible legitimacy: The Yankees seemed to need a late-inning arm such as Morejon (2.89 ERA, 54 games), who as an impending free agent might have been someone San Diego would trade.
But Warren was glad the Padres had apparently said no.
“Phew,” Warren texted back to his wife. “Close call.”
Warren did not want to leave the Yankees, who drafted him in 2021 and helped him develop into a league-average (and still improving) starting pitcher. In 22 starts this season, he has a 4.18 ERA and an 8-6 record.
But something tugged at Warren at the time.
“Definitely,” he told The Athletic on Sunday, “when you read it, I was like, no way. They didn’t think I was good enough? That’s how I took it at first.”
Less than 12 hours later, however, The Athletic reported, citing a team source, that the trade proposal had never happened. The source spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss ongoing deliberations.
Then general manager Brian Cashman said the purported Warren-for-Morejon proposal “wasn’t true” during a post-deadline conference call with reporters last Monday night.
“There was a lot of noise on whatever that was,” Cashman said.
Warren remembered the reactions of some of his teammates, who were glad he stayed. He said he walked up to fellow starter Cam Schlittler and jokingly said, “Whoa, I was almost gone there.”
Warren said the whole ordeal didn’t bother him.
“Since my first season,” he said, “I think I’ve been tossed in these trade rumors like every single season. At this point, it’s like, I can’t do anything about it. If it happens, it happens.”
Warren said he did not reach out to any team officials after the dust settled.
“I wasn’t worried about it,” he said.
He added that, prior to this year’s deadline, he had doubted he would be traded.
“It was more like,” he said, “What are we going to do? Who are we getting? Who’s going away?”
The 27-year-old had been through something similar before — and with the Padres.
During the 2023 Winter Meetings, there were rumors the Padres wanted Warren as part of a trade package for star outfielder Juan Soto. It actually got to the point, Warren said, that his agent told him he was “probably” going to be in the deal.
But, instead, Warren was left out of the blockbuster trade. The Yankees ended up landing Soto and center fielder Trent Grisham for pitchers Michael King, Jhony Brito, Randy Vásquez, Drew Thorpe and catcher Kyle Higashioka.
Warren wants to stay with the Yankees as long as he can.
“This is the only thing I know,” he said. “It’s really, really special because, like, (Austin) Wells, Cam. Clarke (Schmidt). George (Lombard Jr.). Ben (Rice). Spencer (Jones). We all came up with the Yankees. Even if we didn’t play multiple years with each other, we were in the farm system together. So we’re close. And the team we have is super tight-knit. We jell together. I think we all have extra belief in one another.”
So, naturally …
“I was super pumped when I wasn’t leaving,” Warren said.
>
-
movies3 months agoSearch For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Fashion9 years agoAccording to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Fashion9 years agoModel Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
-
Fashion9 years agoYour comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
-
Fashion9 years ago9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
-
Fashion9 years agoEmily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
-
Fashion9 years agoA photo diary of the nightlife scene from LA To Ibiza
