Connect with us

Sports

Inside Newcastle Q&A: When will the new kit be launched? Who is being sold? Is Samu a striker target?

Published

on

During the Premier League season, The Athletic’s Newcastle United subscribers can ask our writers covering the club for their views and insight into what’s happening at St James’ Park.

We have pulled together some of the questions and our answers from Monday’s edition of our Inside Newcastle live Q&A, which included queries about front-of-shirt sponsor deals, who will leave this summer and whether the owners have any direct day-to-day involvement at St James’ Park.

Want to ask us anything else Newcastle-related? Chris Waugh will be back soon for another session.


Any idea on when this hideous barcode-design strip will be released? Has there been fan consultation during the design process? Will it be timed for release with a new front-of-shirt sponsor? — Joseph M

Waugh: Newcastle released their kit for 2025-26 ahead of the final game of last season. Whether they will do likewise this year I am unsure because they would need to do so this week, given West Ham is their last home game, while at Fulham they will wear an alternative strip, due to the west Londoners playing in white.

As to whether there was fan consultation over the controversial design, I am unsure, but usually it is a process which involves Adidas as kit manufacturers and Newcastle, rather than supporter input.

My suspicion is it will take a little longer to confirm the kit for 2026-27 because of the front-of-shirt sponsorship with Sela expiring. Sela’s three-year deal ran into this season, so the Adidas-manufactured kit could be released in its entirety at the back end of the previous campaign, but there is greater uncertainty about who will adorn the shirt moving forwards.

Newcastle will be looking for a new front-of-shirt sponsor once the Sela deal ends (Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

As of earlier this month, Newcastle had not struck a front-of-shirt sponsorship deal for next season. Nor were they even close to doing so at that stage.

More than half of Premier League front-of-shirt deals are due for renewal and, with betting-advertising regulations changing, the industry feedback is that sponsorship levels on offer have been depressed somewhat. Newcastle do not want to undersell themselves, and so will not merely take a huge cut on the £25m ($34.1m) a year the Sela partnership provides.

Whether a rolling deal for Sela to extend may be agreed, or Newcastle could even go into 2026-27 without a front-of-shirt sponsor, as Chelsea have done previously, is unclear. But David Hopkinson, the CEO, is keen to maximise commercial revenue, so he will not want to see a massive decrease in the valuation of Newcastle’s kit deal if at all possible.


Have you heard anything concrete on potential outgoings? Or are things still in a state of flux? — Davey T

Waugh:  The exact blueprint for Newcastle’s summer window does feel like it is in a state of flux, partly because they could theoretically still get to Europe which would affect business to a degree — although it seems highly unlikely they will — and also due to the uncertainty over the futures of certain players.

Anthony Gordon is destined to depart, seemingly with the blessing of just about all parties involved, as long as Newcastle can recoup close to their valuation, which is believed to be the best part of £80million. Bayern Munich are among the clubs interested and, while Gordon is expected to go, it is not categorical he does because it depends upon a deal being struck.

Anthony Gordon will leave if Newcastle’s valuation is met (Steve Bardens/Getty Images)

Kieran Trippier is already leaving, Fabian Schar and the other out-of-contract players are expected to follow, while Aaron Ramsdale’s loan move from Southampton is almost certainly not going to be made permanent.

Joe Willock is entering the final year of his deal and Newcastle will listen to offers, with midfield replacements already being closely monitored (and had they been able to sign Patrick Zabi from Reims in January, he would have been the successor, though he is now heading to Paris FC).

Sandro Tonali has been heavily linked with a move and there is a decent possibility of the Italian leaving, but only if a club can meet the significant overall cost required, which very few can. Tino Livramento, too, may depart, though the full-back’s injury problems may deter his suitors.

The futures of Nick Woltemade and Yoane Wissa are yet to be resolved, too, and it is not beyond the realms of possibility that one or even both leave. Beyond that, as far as senior first teamers go, Newcastle hope and expect to keep hold of the rest of their squad, including Bruno Guimaraes.


Can you provide any info on if PIF officials are engaged on a regular basis with NUFC, apart from a yearly visit? — Eliot O

Waugh: The accusations of borderline ‘absenteeism’ levelled at PIF (Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund, Newcastle’s 85 per cent owners) will only continue while they do not have a visible presence on the ground on Tyneside.

Yet Hopkinson speaks to ownership on an almost daily, if not a daily, basis, while Ross Wilson, the sporting director, is also in regular contact with PIF officials. Much of their communication tends to be over the phone or via video calls — with PIF involvement in many key online conference meetings, especially those which require significant financial commitment.

The most prominent point of contact for many senior staff is Jacobo Solis, PIF’s head of Europe direct investments. The Spaniard, who is a former lawyer and investment banker, has been heavily involved since the takeover of October 2021, and was formerly appointed to Newcastle’s board in January 2025.

It is Solis who is often involved in internal transfer discussions and who acts as a direct point of contact between the majority owners and the club’s hierarchy.

Jamie Reuben, the minority owner, is also regularly in communication with senior figures and is sometimes involved in transfer negotiations, having led club-to-club talks with Nottingham Forest for the Anthony Elanga deal last summer, for example.

But PIF have installed Hopkinson, Wilson and the executive team to run Newcastle on a day-to-day basis, with the CEO having secured greater operational decision-making powers recently so that fewer calls have to be sent to ownership for ratification (though big-money and big-ticket infrastructure items still do).

PIF are not physically present as owners at every match or every day at St James’ Park, yet nor are they anywhere near as hands-off as some suspect.


Do you think the club could rekindle interest in Samu Aghehowa to resolve our striker issue? — Andrew T

Waugh: Samu was definitely considered last summer, but Newcastle did not want to meet the €100m (£86.5m, $117.9m) release clause in his Porto contract. Had the Portuguese side been willing to negotiate at a lower price, Newcastle may have pursued the 22-year-old more aggressively, but Porto were adamant he would only leave if that figure was met.

Porto striker Samu Aghehowa was considered by Newcastle last summer (Alex Grimm/Getty Images)

Samu has 13 goals in 19 starts in the Portuguese league this season, so has remained prolific, and he does have admirers inside Newcastle, even if there are some misgivings about the rawness of certain aspects of his game and whether he can prove as effective in the Premier League.

But Samu suffered an ACL tear in February and is unlikely to return before the autumn, so it seems unlikely Newcastle would make a big-money move for an injured player this summer.


Do you think it’s likely some of the academy players will get a look-in over the next two games? We’ve got nothing to lose by giving Leo Shahar and Sean Neave a go — James S

Waugh: Some fans were questioning why Shahar did not deputise at right-back against Nottingham Forest, rather than switching Lewis Hall across, while Neave did not even make it on to the bench.

The reality is that Howe just does not deem Neave, the 18-year-old striker, or Shahar, the 19-year-old full-back, to be ready to start Premier League matches yet. The head coach does not have that trust in Alex Murphy, the defender, either, it seems, with the Irishman being named on the bench 23 times in the league this season, only coming on once.

Murphy did make his full debut in the Champions League, though that came in the second leg against Qarabag, when Newcastle were already 6-1 ahead, and he has not featured since.

Leo Shahar has found first-team chances hard to come by at Newcastle (Stu Forster/Getty Images)

When Howe spoke after Forest about planning for the “future”, he seemed to be referencing the first-team squad members who he already knows will be here next season, as well as those he is still undecided on — with Woltemade’s runout at No 10 possibly fitting into that latter bracket.

Neave and Shahar have trained regularly with Newcastle’s first team for almost 18 months now, and the former in particular has shown he is a class above at under-21 level.

Both need first-team football to develop further and, should neither force their way into Howe’s thinking during pre-season, they would benefit greatly from loans in 2026-27. In the unlikely event Newcastle now qualify for the UEFA Conference League, one or both may be kept around and granted minutes in Europe’s third-tier competition. But if Newcastle are not in Europe, the chances of them heading out increases.


Could you clarify what Andy Howe’s responsibilities are in this new executive position? There’s a lot of criticism fired his way from fans who think he’s a nepotistic hire, but I don’t think it’s clear what he actually does — James S

Waugh: The message from inside the club is that the tweaked title is a greater reflection of his current role following a summer in which he was tasked with overseeing incoming transfer business once Paul Mitchell departed as sporting director. Previously the assistant head of recruitment, Andy Howe was asked to step up by the board to lead the window when Mitchell left on May 30.

Hierarchically, the 31-year-old was previously below Steve Nickson, the head of recruitment, who leads the club’s scouting operation. Rather than slotting back into that rank, to represent the responsibility placed upon him during an extremely challenging summer, Wilson sought a new title for Howe, the nephew of Eddie, which is senior football executive (and he reports in to the sporting director).

In practice, insiders insist that Andy Howe’s day-to-day role and general influence is largely unchanged and that he remains a critical recruitment voice who is trusted by Eddie Howe, the head coach. The title change is to tidy up a club structure which, on the recruitment side at least, has seemed opaque, given Andy Howe’s level of influence relative to his previous positions (at least in name).

Andy Howe has been integral to Newcastle’s post-takeover recruitment operation and an influential voice during transfer discussions, as shown during video calls on the 2023 Amazon Prime documentary, We Are Newcastle United.

He identifies players, whittles down target lists, scouts and speaks to agents (and clubs) regarding deals. He pushed for the signings of Bruno Guimaraes and Sandro Tonali, two of Newcastle’s most expensive overseas imports, as well as Anthony Gordon, Tino Livramento, Elanga and Jacob Ramsey.

“He’s played a huge part in recruiting some key players,” Eddie Howe said of Andy Howe during a press conference in March 2024.

The nepotism allegations have followed the pair from Bournemouth, where they previously worked together, to Tyneside, when Andy joined Eddie soon after the latter’s appointment in November 2021. Those accusations are easy to level, given their familial connection, but the fact Andy Howe is still at the club and has a senior executive title suggests his work and input has been valued by at least some within the hierarchy.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Jelena Ostapenko accuses Anna Kalinskaya of ‘all kinds of simulations’ after skipped handshake

Published

on

Jelena Ostapenko has said she was ready for “all kinds of simulations” from Anna Kalinskaya during their tense Italian Open meeting Monday.

The pair did not shake hands at the end after Ostapenko won 6-1, 6-2 to move into the quarterfinals. After missing a forehand drive volley into the net to end the match, Kalinskaya did not wait there for Ostapenko, as is convention.

The Russian instead went straight to shake the umpire’s hand, and then went to her chair. Their last meeting, at February’s Dubai Tennis Championships, did end with a handshake, but a decidedly frosty one.

“I was ready for all kinds of simulations with the physio calls and all these things,” Ostapenko, 29, said in an interview with the WTA Tour following a tetchy match in which Kalinskaya, 27, took an off-court medical timeout at the end of the first set. “She’s a tricky player that is trying to get you out of the rhythm when she starts losing. But the most important (thing) is that I’m really proud of myself, the way I was able to manage all that, losing three games and playing a really good match.

A representative for Kalinskaya did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

During the interview, Ostapenko also said that the non-handshake was her opponent’s choice.

“I feel like there are so many great players and we are respecting each other,” she said. “I know that I can be emotional on the court, but at the end of the day, I respect the other players.”

Of her 0-4 head-to-head record against Kalinskaya going into the match, Ostapenko added: “I honestly didn’t really care much. I know I’m a better player.”

Ostapenko, a former French Open champion, has had plenty of run-ins with her opponents. No-look handshakes have become something of a signature, with the first high-profile example coming at the 2017 U.S. Open, a few months after that Roland Garros title. Having lost to Russia’s Daria Kasatkina, Ostapenko actively looked away from her opponent, prompting former world No 33 Mary Carillo to joke on Tennis Channel: “Notice the frost on the fingers.”

A couple of years ago, Ostapenko lost to Belarusian player Victoria Azarenka three times in the space of seven weeks. Those defeats were met with two no-look handshakes, Ostapenko holding out her racket rather than her hand on the other occasion. In a May 2024 interview, Ostapenko said of her non-handshakes with Azarenka: “There is a reason behind it.” When asked whether they related to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, in which Belarus is a strategic ally, Ostapenko said that “there are a few reasons for that.”

Most recently, Ostapenko was involved in an ugly incident last year when, after losing to Taylor Townsend at the U.S. Open, she angrily confronted the American about not apologizing for a fortunate net cord and repeated the phrase “you have no education” three times. Ostapenko apologized for the “no education” comments three days after the incident in a statement on social media that did not name or acknowledge Townsend.

She will face Aryna Sabalenka’s conqueror, Sorana Cîrstea, in the last eight on Tuesday.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Donovan Mitchell’s offensive explosion put the Pistons’ weaknesses on display

Published

on

CLEVELAND — As Donovan Mitchell sized Cade Cunningham up with just over five minutes remaining in the fourth quarter, fans at Rocket Arena could sense what was brewing. Mitchell was in the midst of a historic second-half scoring showcase, and Cunningham looked intent on putting an end to it.

Mitchell went to his left before crossing over to his right, stepping back to throw Cunningham off balance and creating more than enough separation to get a clean look off from beyond the arc. Cleveland Cavaliers fans began cheering before the ball even went through the net.

Once it did, Mitchell had words for his bench as he pounded his chest and seemingly expressed that Cunningham couldn’t guard him.

It was fitting considering the Detroit Pistons had no answers for Mitchell in Monday’s 112-103 Game 4 loss that evened this Eastern Conference second-round series at 2-2. Mitchell torched the Pistons’ hopes for a commanding series lead while tying a postseason record with 39 second-half points.

In the process, Mitchell highlighted Detroit’s weaknesses. When the game becomes a shootout, the Pistons become vulnerable. When an opposing superstar is cooking, which can happen in the playoffs, their firepower becomes an issue.

Their offensive flow grinds to a halt. So when Detroit can’t get stops, it can’t get wins.

That presents a troubling quandary, considering who’s waiting in the next round. The New York Knicks are putting up historic offensive numbers. But the Pistons’ biggest problem is the one in front of them: the Cavaliers, who have two players who can catch fire on offense.

It was James Harden in Game 3, Mitchell in Game 4. Despite having one of the best defenses in the league, Detroit couldn’t cool them off. In Game 3, Cunningham nearly matched Harden bucket for bucket. But in Game 4, the Pistons’ offense stood no chance.

“We’ve got to have more ball movement, more making them chase us,” Detroit coach J.B. Bickerstaff said. “Understanding where we create our advantages. Less stagnant, less one-on-one opportunities. Just trying to move them, put the guys in the matchups that we like. Then be aggressive, and the play doesn’t always have to be for me. Now I’m attacking, the help comes and now I can find a spray. We’ll get to more of that.”

The Pistons unraveled to start the third quarter. They committed five turnovers and missed eight consecutive shots. On top of that, they couldn’t contain Mitchell, who exploded for 21 of his 43 total points in the third. His flurry of floaters, midrange jumpers and triples landed like haymakers. As a result, Cleveland scored the first 22 points of the quarter — the longest playoff run in franchise history.

Game 4 continued a trend that’s emerged in this series. In third quarters, the Cavaliers are averaging 29.8 points on 59.2 percent shooting, including 14-of-32 from 3-point range.

“They came out and played with more force and tenacity than we did to start the quarter,” Bickerstaff said. “We just didn’t match it.”

The Pistons’ offensive challenges were as apparent as their lack of defensive resistance. Detroit lacked movement, turned the ball over six times in the third and looked stagnant overall. And Cunningham couldn’t save the day this time, unable to conjure up his typical third-quarter rhythm. He went scoreless on two shots with three turnovers during the game-deciding 12 minutes.

This marked the first time in Cunningham’s career that he was held below 20 points in a playoff game, snapping a streak of 16 straight. The two-time All-Star registered 19 points on 7-of-16 shooting. His shot attempts were also a postseason career low.

The Cavaliers’ scheme to limit Cunningham worked. Monday was the first time someone other than Cunningham led the Pistons in scoring during these playoffs.

“I’ve seen all these things before. I’ve struggled against these things and I’ve succeeded against these things before,” he said. “So really it’s just about clearing my mind and being better as the point guard. I pride myself on making sure my team has the best point guard on the floor. I didn’t do a great job of that tonight.

“But I’m excited about the challenge coming forward, getting us organized and making sure everybody is comfortable in their spots and knowing what to do.”

Cleveland picked up Cunningham full court, pressuring him as he got Detroit into its offense. The Cavaliers have taken to blitzing the Pistons’ point guard in pick-and-roll actions, forcing him to give the ball up. And when he does get downhill, they clog his path with multiple bodies.

Cleveland is essentially daring someone else to beat them.

Caris LeVert was game. The Pistons wing and former Cavalier had his best game since coming to Detroit, scoring a season-high 24 points. The Pistons outscored Cleveland by 15 points when LeVert was on the court. By comparison, Ausar Thompson was minus-27, and Cunningham was minus-23.

LeVert’s 31 minutes were the most he’s played in a Detroit uniform, and his usage might be an adjustment moving forward for Bickerstaff. LeVert looked to be one of the few players who could make an impact on both ends.

What LeVert couldn’t solve, however, was the Pistons’ incessant fouling. They committed seven in the third and 27 in total. The Cavaliers shot 34 free-throw attempts, making 30. Detroit was 9-of-12 from the charity stripe. Mitchell scored 13 of his points from the line.

As is NBA tradition, the road team pointed to an unfavorable whistle as the reason for the free-throw disparity.

“It’s unacceptable, it is,” Bickerstaff said. “We didn’t do enough to help ourselves, and I’ll start there. But ever since we came to Cleveland, the whistle has changed. There’s no way one guy on their team shoots more free throws than our team.”

So Bickerstaff decided to play the same game as Cavaliers coach Kenny Atkinson, who said before Game 3 that the way the first two games were officiated gave the more physical Pistons an advantage. He stressed that he and his team had to adapt to the style of play the referees were allowing Detroit to dictate.

Atkinson said the Pistons’ physicality was “completely within how the game’s being called today” and put it on his Cavaliers to find ways to adjust.

Then, in Games 3 and 4 combined, the Pistons were called for 52 fouls and the Cavaliers 32.

Bickerstaff pointed to Detroit’s style of play as evidence of inconsistency. The Pistons aren’t a jump-shooting team, he said. They don’t settle. They drive the ball, attack the paint.

“So what was done out there tonight, it’s frustrating,” Bickerstaff said. “But we can’t allow that to be the reason why. Because we didn’t play well enough and play to the best of our capabilities. But you look at the foul count, you look at the disparity and that’s hard to overcome. And you wonder the reason why. It’s interesting (that) since Kenny made his comments publicly about us, the whistle’s changed in this series.”

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Noah Calouri targets England summer Test debut in July

Published

on

after scoring five tries against Sale on his full Saracens debut in October, earning an immediate call-up to Borthwick’s autumn squad and an England ‘A’ appearance in November.

However Caluori wasn’t involved in the Six Nations, instead featuring for the Under-20s, and he admits playing full international rugby at that point may have come too soon.

On 4 July, England face South Africa in Johannesburg before playing Fiji in an ‘away’ fixture at Everton’s Hill Dickinson Stadium in Liverpool a week later. They will then travel to the small Argentine city of Santiago del Estero to take on the Pumas on 18 July.

“Maybe the autumn or the Six Nations would have been a bit of a rush,” Caluori admitted.

“But I feel like I got handled well during the autumn and the Six Nations, putting me into England ‘A’ to experience that level as well as enjoying my time with the Under-20s, and going on a bit of a physical development plan was good.

“If I were to play [for England] earlier this year it would have been a rush, but now is a good time, especially experiencing this run-in with everything on the line for Saracens. It shows how [critical] every result is, and that’s similar to a Test match game.

“I’ve had some comms [with Steve Borthwick], we’ve had a chat, and I’m just focused on playing my best rugby from now until the end of the season.”

After scoring five tries in the home fixture against Sale, Caluori repeated the feat against them last month, and says he is coming to terms with being one of the most talked-about players in the league.

“I feel like the most pressure that will come on me is maybe internalised pressure,” he added.

“And I’ve dealt with that pretty well and then spoken to people to help me with it, so I can just focus on being the best teammate and the best person on the pitch I can be.

“But I feel like I’m handling everything pretty well. I’m trying to enjoy it.”

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.