Connect with us

movies

Obsession Ending Explained: Inde Navarrette Breaks Down Shocking Twist

Published

on

[This story contains spoilers from Obsession.]

It’s a tale as old as time: Be careful what you wish for.

In Curry Barker’s supernatural horror film Obsession, Inde Navarrette’s Nikki becomes the target of a dangerous wish when her shy friend Bear (Michael Johnston), desperate to escape the friendzone, wishes that she would love him more than anyone else in the world. To his surprise, it works — but not in the fairytale way he imagined. Instead, Nikki’s love spirals into something violent, possessive and terrifying.

As Nikki transforms from an ordinary young woman into an unhinged force willing to do anything to keep Bear to herself, Navarrette delivers a seamless and chilling performance that has quickly positioned her as one of horror’s most exciting new talents.

A major part of Obsession’s impact also comes from Barker’s fresh voice as a writer-director. Following its buzzy premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival, Focus Features acquired the $750,000 indie for $15 million, with critics and audiences praising its bold take on supernatural horror. But at the center of it all is Navarrette, whose fearless turn grounds the film’s shocking premise in something both heartbreaking and haunting.

“I think the horror world will be very happy,” Navarrette tells The Hollywood Reporter of Barker’s future in the genre. “It’s gonna be a lot better with Curry part of it, because he’s a new and specific voice.”

Read on to find out how Navarrette pulled off that bonkers performance, whether Nikki and Bear ever could have worked if he’d just told the truth, how she unpacked that devastating plea for death and what she believes really happens to Nikki after the film’s shocking twist.

I don’t know how much you’ve seen online, but everywhere I look, people are calling this one of the great horror performances. What has it been like stepping into horror in such a major way and already getting that kind of response from audiences, especially horror fans?

It feels very surreal. I try not to look at a lot of comments, only because I really want to take in every moment. I mean, I’m doing a press junket for the first time. I’m doing a bunch of things for the first time. So, I really want to be present, but it feels really insane. I mean, it’s nuts. It feels really, really good.

Your chemistry with Michael is so central to making this story work. Did that connection feel immediate when you first read together?

Yes, I felt like I understood Nikki more reading opposite Michael because the responses I was saying, the lines written down, became real and made sense. There’s a different meaning to them. It was like a person-to-person conversation versus two actors reiterating what was on a page, and our chemistry was so immediate and specific. We have brother-sister chemistry, which is great, because then you look at them on screen and you go they should not be together, it feels gross and wrong on so many different levels. But one specific one being that Michael and I have chemistry that is not romantic, so I think that really adds to their relationship.

Inde Navarrette and Michael Johnston in Obsession.

Focus Features/Courtesy Everett Collection

Early on, Nikki and Bear’s relationship feels complicated and even confusing. One could argue she’s sending mixed signals, but when Bear downplays his feelings and says they’re just friends, Nikki looks like she’s genuinely disappointed. If Bear had been honest from the start, do you think Nikki might’ve been open to something more?

I completely think so. Something Curry and I talked about in the beginning was that since the whole film is from Bear’s perspective, we never leave that. We played with this idea of: Bear doesn’t know how Nikki feels. Bear only knows that he really likes her. So we played with the performance aspect of Nikki, of having it be super ambiguous. Does she actually like him? Does she not? Because that’s exactly how Bear feels. But I think, as the person who played Nikki, she definitely would have been open to the conversation if he had just said something, but he didn’t.

Nikki’s an extremely free-spirited person, because she talks about quitting, she talks about leaving, she talks about wanting to become a writer. I think Nikki loves, and she loves to love. It was a little disappointing that he also thought they were friends, because I think she felt a vibe.

Your physicality in this film is so unpredictable — sometimes terrifying, sometimes darkly funny — and certain moments even reminded me of classic possession performances like The Exorcist. Did you look to any iconic horror performances for inspiration, or was Nikki’s movement something you wanted to build from scratch?

Nikki’s movement was something that Curry and I built from scratch, not because we didn’t want to take any inspiration. It was just as soon as we got attached to the project, we just really spearheaded. It was a fast track. We filmed it in 26 days, and it was an indie-budget film, so we didn’t have a lot of things at our disposal. But that created this organic movement for me. I mean, I’m not a movement person. I’ve never really done that before. I used to dance, but Curry would be on the opposite side of me, mimicking something with his body, and then I would do it in a way, and be like, “No, no, like this.” And so we would mirror each other. Technically, the choreographer would be Curry Barker. (Laughs.)

Your voice work and facial expressions are unsettling at times, especially in scenes like the party sequence. Were those screams and vocal shifts really all you, and how did you craft Nikki’s voice once she begins to change?

Yeah, everything in the movie, whether it’s facials or vocals, are me. We didn’t use any AI, or CGI. Everything was extremely practical. I do know that certain things were pitched up for an effect, to be in symphony with the sound design. But Curry and I had a lot of fun making voices. It was terrifying, especially during that really long monologue. That was an audition scene for me. I just remember being like, “I’m going to have so much fun with this, because who cares?” You either have to send it or not go in at all. I remember doing the audition, and like my goal was to make everybody as uncomfortable as humanly possible, and [thinking], “How does that come out, and what do you do?” So that voice came out of an urge for me trying to make everybody extremely uncomfortable.

Focus Features/Courtesy Everett Collection

The moment where Nikki appears asleep, but Bear hears her tell him to kill her. How did you interpret that scene — was that really Nikki herself breaking through?

Yes, that really was Nikki breaking through. If you look closely during that scene, my body is convulsing. There were so many times when there was a physical nature to Nikki that my body also added. It was almost like my brain and body were completely disconnected, like the two Nikkis, where I would get really visceral shakes. Especially in that scene, you can see my body trembling, because you feel the physical anxiety. She’s begging to be killed, because she knows that a person that should protect her and love her, her friend that she has been kind to, and listens to. At the bar scene, she goes back to him, like, “No, you were saying something.” She really, really cares about Bear. And how gut-wrenching that is to watch him do everything that he’s doing. That scene in the film really shows how much it affects the quote-unquote real Nikki, how much damage she’s taking and how traumatizing this experience is for her. She just wants to end it all, because she doesn’t have another option.

When she becomes so much more violent as the film goes on, do you think that that’s because she has some deep resentment for Bear for making that wish?

I never thought about that, but I love it when things like that come up, because I mean, we never distinctly tell the audience how to feel. We allow them to feel what they’re feeling. And it’s great hearing the feedback, because it’s like, yeah, that makes sense. It makes complete sense, but also at the same time, Nikki’s always at a 10 from the second act on, so whenever you feel jealousy, what is a 10 version of jealousy look like? I mean, there’s crimes of passion, there’s murders that come out of passion and Nikki is just extremely passionate. (Laughs.) I think it was the dichotomy of both, but I don’t think the violence stemmed from resentment, because Nikki is so in love with Bear. She’s obsessed with him, so it’s just the heightened versions, and what does that heighten look like?

The film’s third act is already intense, but I know the TIFF cut was even more graphic before some material was removed to avoid an NC-17 rating. How different was that earlier version, and what can you share about what audiences didn’t end up seeing?

Honestly, it’s not that different. It’s just whenever I kill Sarah, we reduced the amount of head smashes because it was too long. I really loved the response at TIFF, because people really liked how long it is and how aggressive Nikki is. It shows how obsessed she is, what she’s willing to do for Bear and how far she’s willing to take it. It’s just really intense. Also, what was cut was the aftermath. Curry wanted to play with the idea of what does a human body do after that sort of smashes, like there’s gurgles come out, so there was gurgles, there was like human sounds that might have been too gruesome for an R rating, so they kind of downsized it. TIFF definitely got a really gruesome, gruesome version, but it sounded like they liked it. Yeah, they definitely got a sneak peek. (Laughs.)

What was your reaction to the ending and Bear’s decision to sacrifice himself to undo the wish? How did you process that for Nikki, and was there ever talk about her dying, too?

Whenever I first got the script, I tried not to read any scenes Bear had alone, because I really wanted to see this fully from Nikki’s perspective. So, the first time that I ever saw that scene was at TIFF, and I just started crying, because I was like, “Holy shit, he goes from this innocent boy to making a wish out of desperation, not knowing if it will work, and then it does work, and then he gets what he wants, but then he realizes how damaging it is to her, and that he doesn’t want it anymore, so he does make that decision. But what I thought was cool is Michael asked Curry if he could try and throw up the pills after he ingests all of them, because he’s too coward at the end of the day, he doesn’t want to die, he thinks of himself. So, the moment where he actually goes to throw all of them up, and then you hear Nikki making the wish that he would be more in love with her, that’s the reason why he dies, because he actually doesn’t have time to throw them all up, because then a wish overtakes him.

In terms of what potentially could have been my death scene in the ending, the original ending was that I was going to choose that I didn’t want to live that way anymore, after all of the trauma and pain. Last second, they were like, “Let’s just try this one thing,” and from other people’s perspective, which is high praise for me, and I really, really appreciate it, they did one take, they felt like it was magical and electric, and they knew that that was the ending. At the end of all of this, it was such a release to get all of what I felt like Nikki was experiencing out of my body. I’m really glad that she didn’t die. I’m really glad that she’s considered a horror final girl, that I think is the sickest title ever.

Do you have a horror icon or Scream Queen you look up to?

Oh my God. Well, I’ve never said this before publicly, but I’m a really big fan of Jennifer’s Body. Megan Fox’s performance in that film, I think, was groundbreaking, was so stark different than anything she had ever done before. I love her performance. She really twists it. Now that I’m thinking about it, the roles are kind of very similar to a certain extent. So, I would say Jennifer’s Body is a Scream Queen that I’ve definitely loved throughout time. A more modern day version of that is I am just in awe of Mia Goth. I think she is so wonderful in the horror genre, because she is so incredibly grounded and human, which adds just another layer to horror that I love.

Once Nikki returns to herself, she’s still left with extreme trauma and consequences, given that the possessed version of her murdered two people. Where do you imagine she goes from there?

I think she starts a grieving process. There’s jokes about her going to jail, because obviously, where else is she gonna go? (Laughs.) She’s kind of done it all, and nobody believes that the wish is real. But I think in her personal journey, she just starts grieving. I mean, we all go through traumatic events, and so I think, similar to Nikki’s, you just start the grieving process.

Because Nikki’s future is left so open-ended, it feels like there’s more story to tell. Could you see yourself revisiting this world for a sequel?

I absolutely would, but I really love the idea that it’s kind of left there. It’s like a memory, whenever you look back to yourself at like 24, 23, 22 those are all chunks, and they begin and end at a certain point. I think that’s kind of like this story. It begins and it ends, and then it’s new Nikki, if you will. (Laughs.)

***

Obsession is now playing in theatersCheck out all of The Hollywood Reporter‘s coverage here.

>

Continue Reading

movies

Rose Leslie Joins Russell Crowe In ‘The Last Druid’, Filming In June

Published

on

EXCLUSIVE: Rose Leslie (Game Of Thrones), Andreas Pietschmann (Nuremberg), and Daniel Zovatto (Don’t Breathe) are joining Oscar winner Russell Crowe in action-drama The Last Druid, which will begin production on June 8 in Barcelona and the Canary Islands, Spain.

A quarter century after Crowe waged war on the Roman Empire in Gladiator, the actor is once again set to stir the warrior within. The movie will tell the story of a Roman Emperor who discovers a secluded Druid stronghold in the mountains of Caledonia. A peaceful Celtic elder (Crowe) must take up arms to protect his family and people from annihilation.

William Eubank (Paranormal Activity: Next of Kin) is directing from a script by Eubank, Phil Gawthorne (Modern Life is Rubbish) and Carlyle Eubank (Muzzle).

Pic is being produced by Adrián Guerra (Buried), Brian Kavanaugh-Jones (Longlegs), Fred Berger (La La Land) and Ben Pugh (The Courier), and executive-produced by Núria Valls, Xavier Parache, AJ Bourscheid, Brandon Millan, Sam Wasson, George Hsieh and Stuart Ford.

As we previously revealed, Stuart Ford’s AGC has pre-sold the film in multiple international markets, including to Amazon for a handful of territories. The company will continue dealmaking on the film at this week’s Cannes market.

Crew includes director of photography Agustin Claramunt (Land of Bad), production designer Laia Colet (Bird Box: Barcelona), costume designer Alberto Valcárcel (The Embassy), special effects supervisor Pau Costa (Den of Thieves: Pantera) and line producer Rubén Gómez.

Range Media Partners and CAA Media Finance arranged financing for the picture with Nostromo Pictures and are representing the U.S. rights. AGC international is handling sales in the rest of the world.

>

Continue Reading

movies

‘Sheep in the Box’ Review: Hirokazu Kore-eda’s Drippy Human-AI Drama

Published

on

Hirokazu Kore-eda brings his customary warmth and generosity of spirit to the seemingly cold presence of GenAI in our lives in Sheep in the Box (Hako no naka no hitsuji), in which grieving parents hope to ease their pain by embracing a humanoid built in their dead son’s image. The Japanese director has no shortage of ideas — chief among them the potential for advanced robotics to bring closure to the bereaved. But too few of those ideas yield satisfying conclusions, resulting in a drama that becomes treacly and insubstantial, reaching for a profundity that remains elusive.

Family dynamics have frequently been at the heart of Kore-eda’s films, invariably distinguished by his exceptional direction of children. Something of a motif in his work is the resilience and resourcefulness of kids, which continues here with a robot that outgrows the need for his adoptive parents, just as flesh-and-blood children do when it’s time to seek independence. But these and other thematic threads lack both definition and emotional heft, making the movie feel flimsy, especially considering its two-hours-plus run time.

Sheep in the Box

The Bottom Line

Beautifully made but thematically woolly.

Venue: Cannes Film Festival (Competition)
Cast: Haruka Ayase, Daigo, Rimu Kuwaki
Director-screenwriter: Hirokazu Kore-eda

2 hours 6 minutes

Despite occasional detours into fantasy like 1998’s sublime After Life, Kore-eda is fundamentally a naturalistic filmmaker with a marked humanist vein that has often tagged him as an Ozu descendant. Which makes the prospect of him tackling a near-future sci-fi scenario sound of interest. The droll futuristic touches of the opening scenes — a delivery drone that could pass for a mini-UFO carrying parcels high above a city coastline; a robot crossing guard trailed by a string of children — hold the promise of low-key humor.

That drone touches down at the address of architect Otone Komoto (Haruka Ayase), who designed her family’s modernist home, an arrangement of overlapping boxes stacked around a garden courtyard. It was built by her carpentry and construction tradesman husband Kensuke (Japanese TV comic Daigo). When the camera pans to a framed photo of their 7-year-old boy Kakeru (Rimu Kuwaki), composer Yuta Bandoh’s melancholy score provides an unsubtle hint that the boy is no longer with them.

One of the parcels delivered contains a heart-shaped package that opens to release a hologram of a luna moth, the logo of a company called REbirth that specializes in generative AI humanoid replicas of deceased loved ones. It turns out the Komotos were first approached by a rep two years earlier at their son’s funeral and are eligible for a free promotional trial. 

Otone is somewhat curious, given how acutely she still feels Kakeru’s absence, but Kensuke is more skeptical. They make an appointment at the REbirth offices and listen to the sales pitch but remain uncertain until a young boy around their son’s age when he died approaches them in the cafeteria. Astonished by how lifelike the robot child is, they sign up for the program, submitting photos, videos and other info on Kakeru to be fed into his design.

When the new model Kakeru is delivered, Otone is overjoyed, even if the boy’s communication skills are basic, at first limited to “Mama, I’m home.” But “papa” is tougher to convince, dismissing the new arrival with cracks about Tamagotchis and Roombas before heading out to play baseball for the day. 

Most directors would look for conflict in the inevitable incompatibilities between grieving parents with human feelings and a humanoid with no emotions and no needs beyond his overnight charging station. But Kore-eda dawdles over all that without ever finding much dramatic nuance, making for a dullish midsection.

Things come briefly to life when Otone’s judgy mother shows up uninvited, faints at the sight of her dead grandson and then scoffs at the folly of replacing the boy with a machine, reminding Otone that she’s still young enough to have another child. But even that fails to generate tangible drama, as do ongoing tensions about the circumstances of the real Kakeru’s death.

More intriguing is the appearance of a youth in black, followed by a handful of other children with whom Kakeru finds kinship as they spend time each day in an abandoned warehouse making mysterious plans. 

While Kore-eda’s take on the existential threat of AI is refreshingly free of violence, rebellion and gloom, it’s also a bit predictable in its conclusion that the humanoids’ accelerated learning capabilities will soon make their human families superfluous. And the writer-director tips his hand by having Kakeru collect the offcuts from Otone’s architectural models and start building his own model in secret.

The film’s most original idea is the instinctual connection of robots to aspects of nature like the networks of trees nourished and protected by a “mother tree” that functions like a central computer hub. Sure, there are dystopian shadings in the inference that robots will form their own communities, leaving people behind. But Kore-eda is more interested in a smiley-happy outcome of mutual accord, which is pushed into sentimental overdrive by increasingly cloying slatherings of Bandoh’s score.

Shot by Ryuto Kondo, who also served as cinematographer on Kore-eda’s wonderful Palme d’Or-winning Shoplifters and the more recent Monster, the film looks sharp, with lots of striking aerial shots and gorgeous natural light in the many outdoors scenes. It’s also well-acted, notably by Ayase, the lead in Kore-eda’s Our Little Sister, whose gentle disposition and unforced sweetness are an ideal match for the director’s sensibility.

But Sheep in the Box (the title comes from The Little Prince, another motif) is unquestionably a minor entry in the Kore-eda canon. If you want to see a stimulating meditation on humanoid-human interaction that’s genuinely moving, seek out Kogonada’s criminally under-appreciated After Yang, from 2021.

>

Continue Reading

movies

Box Office Thriller: ‘Michael’ Returns to No. 1, ‘Obsession’ a Win

Published

on

In a moonwalk for the box office history books, Antoine Fuqua’s record-smashing Michael Jackson biopic is returning to No. 1 in its fourth weekend with as much as $27 million domestically, only days after dancing past the $600 million mark globally. And last weekend, it became the top-grossing music biopic of all time ahead of Bohemian Rhapsody in North America, not adjusted for inflation.

Michael, from Lionsgate and producer Graham King, is benefiting from the failure of the video game adaptation Mortal Kombat II to turn into a crowd pleaser beyond its core fanbase.

Last weekend, almost all Imax screens went to New Line’s Mortal Kombat, but the martial arts sequel has underwhelmed and ceded much of its Imax footprint to Michael and a 20th anniversary celebration of Tom Cruise’s Top Gun franchise that includes screenings of both the first film and the more recent Top Gun: Maverick (the double billing is expected to earn an estimated $2.6 million).

David Frankel’s The Devil Wears Prada 2 also continues to dominate even as it cedes first place to Michael domestically. And on Friday, the 20th Century and Disney sequel sashayed past the $500 million mark globally to become the top-grossing female-fueled pic since Barbie, not adjusted.

Prada 2 is expected to gross another $20 million or so domestically in its third outing for a North American tally of around $178 million through Sunday (while it has access to a number of premium large-format screens, it was never remastered to play in Imax). But Disney’s film empire will soon be the ruler of all premium-large format auditoriums when Memorial Day tentpole Star Wars: The Mandalorian and Grogu opens around the world this week.

Another title performing nicely in the lull before Grogu: emerging director Curry Barker‘s supernatural horror film Obsession, which is headed for a third-place finish this weekend with $15 million after costing a mere $1 million to produce. That’s well ahead of a $10 million to $12 million debut. Obsession has won over both critics and audiences in equal measure, boasting a coveted 94 percent score among both categories on Rotten Tomatoes as of midday Saturday.

Barker, 26, has spent the past few years amassing an avid fan base on YouTube with his sketch comedy channel, That’s a Bad Idea. He next made the $800 found-footage serial killer feature Milk & Serial, which went viral. Almost overnight, everyone in town was trying to win him over; he ultimately signed UTA.

Obsession, which Focus Features acquired out of TIFF for around $15 million, stars Michael Johnston as a young man who has long been in love with a friend Nikki (played by Inde Navarrette), and hopes that she will one day feel the same. But disastrous consequences ensue when he buys a One Wish Willow, which promises its users it will grant one wish upon splitting it in half, and wishes for his friend to love him. Cooper Tomlinson, Megan Lawless and Andy Richter also star.

Mortal Kombat II could tumble as much as 67 percent for a domestic gross of $12 million to $13 million after opening to a tepid $38 million last weekend.

Amazon MGM’s family-friendly film The Sheep Detectives, likewise a critical and audience favorite, is expected to round out the top five with $10 million in its sophomore outing. The comedy-mystery follows a flock of talking sheep who are determined to solve the suspicious death of their beloved shepherd, played by Hugh Jackman, who read them detective novels on a regular basis despite having no idea they could understand him. Phil Lord and Christopher Miller, directors of the 2026 box office hit Project Hail Mary, are among the film’s executive producers.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.