Tech

Six search engines worth trying now that Google isn’t really Google anymore

Published

1 day ago

May 21, 2026

Google is about to look really different, and if you’re not a fan of the AI Overviews feature, then you’re not going to like what’s coming.

At the Google I/O 2026 keynote this week, the company announced that it is overhauling Search to embrace a conversational, AI-driven approach, even inviting users to enlist AI agents to automatically notify them if, for example, their favorite band were to go on tour.

“This is the biggest upgrade to our iconic search box since its debut over 25 years ago,” said Elizabeth Reid, leader of the Search organization at Google.

Now, when you search on Google, you’re given the option from the start to use AI mode. Even if you opt not to use AI mode, you might get a search result with an AI Overview, which will now include a chat box for you to ask follow-up questions. Once you open the chat box, Google begins to look more like ChatGPT than the search engine that’s ingrained itself into our lives for decades.

This announcement didn’t elicit the reaction that Google would’ve hoped for. Instead, many users see this as yet another example of a tech company squeezing AI agents and chatbots into everything it can, making it impossible to navigate the internet without encountering a chatbot. Especially after the rocky rollout of Google’s AI Overviews — remember when Google told people to stare into the sun? — users are not eager for another adjustment.

On Google’s video announcing the Search updates, one commenter wrote, “this is the best advertisement for letting people know it’s time to get a different search engine.”

They make a good point. The new Google Search, which Reid describes as “AI search through and through,” is sure to alienate users. Generative AI aside, some users have also grown weary of Google for its sheer dominance — a U.S. District Court ruled in 2024 that Google had acted illegally to maintain a monopoly in online search.

If you’re curious about alternative search engines, you’re in the right place. Here are some places to start (or, embrace chaos and see where Open Web Engine takes you).

Kagi

Before we were annoyed by Google’s AI Overview, we were annoyed by ads. Ads are non-negotiable for Google — that’s how Google Search makes money. But if a search engine were to operate without ads, could it still make money?

That’s what Kagi is trying to accomplish. For $5 per month — or $10 for unlimited searches — you can access an ad-free search engine without AI overviews.

Kagi isn’t just ad-free Google. The search engine also lets users customize their search experience by letting them filter certain websites and refine search results with “lenses.” If you’re in school, for example, you can use Kagi’s academic lens to find journal articles about a topic, rather than blog posts.

If you find Google’s AI Overviews useful from time to time, then you can use Kagi’s AI-powered “Quick Answer” feature to summarize an answer to your search and include links to its sources. But if you don’t want these AI summaries, guess what? You don’t have to generate them.

DuckDuckGo

Maybe you don’t want to pay to search stuff online. That’s understandable. DuckDuckGo offers a free search engine that makes money by selling ads, but unlike Google, it doesn’t collect user data in the form of search, browsing, and purchase history. Instead DuckDuckGo chooses what ads to serve based on the topic of your search — so if you search for concert tickets, you might see an ad for SeatGeek.

Like many alternative search engines, DuckDuckGo has an interface that’s reminiscent of Google — and like Google, it can display an AI-generated answer to a question in your search results. But if that bothers you, DuckDuckGo allows you to completely opt out of AI features in the settings menu.

Startpage

While DuckDuckGo has its own separate search index from Google, Startpage is a proxy for Google.

This means that Startpage acts as a middleman between you and the tech giant. When you search for something on Startpage, the company strips personal data like your IP address from your query, sends it to Google via the cloud, and returns the information to you. So, it’s Google without Google knowing who you are. The downside is, well, it’s still Google. At least Startpage lets you turn off AI features.

&udm=14

What if you took Startpage and made it simpler? The search engine &udm=14 is named for the string of characters it appends to all of your searches on Google.

If you add &udm=14 to your Google searches, you’ll get the same Google results, only without an AI overview. But doing that yourself after every search is pretty annoying. That’s why &udm=14 does it for you automatically.

The developer even put the code on GitHub so you can run your own version of &udm=14 if that’s your thing.

If you’re concerned about privacy, then you’d probably opt for Startpage over &udm=14, but both will basically get you AI-free Google.

Brave

Brave offers both a browser and a search engine. Since the browser is built atop Chromium, which is the same open-source base as Google Chrome, you can use Chrome extensions within the Brave browser. So, if you don’t want to use Google Chrome, but you can’t function without your LastPass plug-in, Brave could be for you.

In terms of search, Brave allows users to apply certain third-party “Goggles” (not Googles!) to their searches, which curate the results. These include “News from the Right,” “News from the Left,” “Tech Blogs,” and some other more niche options, like “Hacker News/1k short,” which prioritizes common domains referenced on Y-Combinator’s Hacker News forum, but without the 1,000 most popular domains, so it omits more mainstream sites. Then, there’s “No Pinterest,” which is pretty self-explanatory (and funny).

And yes, Brave does let you toggle AI features on and off. There’s no reason you can’t do this, Google.

Ecosia

Like Brave, Ecosia also offers both a browser and a search engine, and it’s also built atop Chromium, meaning that your Chrome plug-ins should work on Ecosia too. As its name suggests, Ecosia’s main draw is that it’s supposed to be more eco-friendly than other search platforms.

Ecosia makes money from ads, but it donates about 80% of its income to tree-planting initiatives around the world. Tree-planting can sometimes be a red flag for greenwashing, but Ecosia works with communities involved in local reforestation efforts, publishes monthly financial reports for transparency, and blogs about the actual impact of its efforts.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Tech

You can no longer Google the word ‘disregard’

Published

3 hours ago

May 22, 2026

qasimgillani

Earlier this week, Google rolled out a completely new Search experience, foregrounding AI summaries and kicking the traditional “ten blue links” far down the page. But the sheer scale of Google Search means there are lots of edge cases that the company doesn’t seem to have considered.

For instance, this is what you’ll now get if you type the word “disregard” into Google Search.

Google has been catching some flack on social media for this, and it’s easy to see why. As you’ll notice, the Merriam-Webster link is still in there, but you have to scroll past a huge block of empty space. For most users, that single reply is the only thing you’ll see. And crucially, the AI response serves no conceivable value to a user searching the word “disregard.” It’s just a broken tool.

For context, here is the same search in Bing, which has been less aggressive about its AI summaries. It’s not perfect, but there is some useful information to be found here.

I have been a professional tech journalist for nearly fifteen years, and before today, I cannot think of a single time when a Bing search result was more valuable than the Google equivalent. There really is a first time for everything!

Tech

Apple says Epic lawsuit shouldn’t reshape App Store rules for all developers

Published

3 hours ago

May 22, 2026

qasimgillani

In Apple’s seemingly never-ending lawsuit with Fortnite maker Epic Games over App Store commissions, the iPhone maker is once again fighting a court’s ruling. Its latest tactic? Saying that Epic Games’ beef with Apple over its fee structure shouldn’t lead to an injunction that applies to all developers that publish on the U.S. App Store, including other tech giants like Microsoft and Spotify, which weren’t a part of this particular litigation.

“…Epic never brought a class action and never attempted to show that enjoining Apple’s conduct against all other developers—like Microsoft or Spotify, who have nothing to do with Epic—was somehow necessary to provide relief to Epic,” reads Apple’s new petition, which asks the U.S. Supreme Court to review the lower court ruling.

In the same document, Apple also argues against the Ninth Circuit’s civil contempt order over Apple’s compliance with the injunction. The court had ruled that Apple must give developers the right to include links in their apps — links that could direct users to alternative payment options outside of Apple’s own system — if they chose to do so. Apple did permit this as required, but charged fees on those outside purchases, leading to the contempt order.

The Ninth Circuit said that charging fees of 27% on external payments defeated the purpose of allowing them — which, well, it did. But Apple is pushing back on specific legal grounds. Its new argument focuses on whether a federal court can hold a party in civil contempt for violating the “spirit” of an injunction when the injunction itself was written in a way that left room for interpretation and said nothing about commissions. (That is, it didn’t specifically prohibit fees on external purchases, so technically, Apple believes it did nothing wrong.)

Apple has seemingly infinite money to fund its legal battles. The company has been fighting Epic’s original 2020 lawsuit for over five years now with no end in sight.

Epic Games criticized Apple’s latest move as “one last Hail Mary to delay a conclusion to this case and avoid opening up the gates to payment competition for the benefit of consumers.”

Earlier this month, the Supreme Court rejected Apple’s request to pause additional proceedings until the court could determine whether the sanctions were justified.

This week, Epic Games announced that Fortnite was back in the App Store globally (save for Australia), because it believes the court is on its side and will not allow Apple’s fee structure to stand as-is.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

Tech

Kash Patel’s clothing brand website shut down after reports it was hacked

Published

3 hours ago

May 22, 2026

qasimgillani

The merchandise website of FBI director Kash Patel was taken offline on Friday after reports that it had been hijacked by hackers trying to infect visitors with malware, as first reported by Straight Arrow News.

As of this writing, the website of Based Apparel is offline. On Thursday, an X user who goes by Debbie posted that the brand’s website apparently had malware on it, in particular an infostealer, a type of malicious software designed to infect victims and steal their credentials and passwords. A security researcher later analyzed the malware.

Brand Apparel could not be reached for comment. TechCrunch emailed a Gmail address previously associated with Patel, but we have not received an answer.

This was not a good week for security for MAGA-associated business ventures.

On Friday, President Trump’s cellphone provider and maker of Trump Mobile confirmed that the company left customers’ personal information exposed online, including names, email addresses, mailing addresses, cell numbers, and order identifiers. The confirmation came days after a researcher alerted two YouTubers who had purchased Trump Mobile’s phone, that their personal data was exposed on the internet.