Connect with us

Sports

A $500,000 Tom Brady card deal gone wrong: How to avoid the pitfalls of private sales

Published

on

In sports cards, as in many things in life, big money can mean big problems.

In June, accusations of a nearly half-million-dollar sports card deal gone bad became public.

The salient issue for collectors is how to avoid being scammed when dealing with a private transaction outside of a reputable auction house, where both buyer and seller have protection. That goes for six-figure transactions, but every day there are many private deals done via social media platforms for far less money where the seller doesn’t want to pay fees to a third-party marketplace and payment is conditioned on proof of receipt of the item.

The Athletic spoke to one of the biggest collectors in the hobby and also one of the country’s top criminal defense lawyers, New York-based Jeffrey Lichtman, on how to navigate these issues so that you’re less likely to get scammed.

First let’s describe the nightmare scenario of an alleged $478,000 loss, according to the parties involved. The card in question was the one-of-a-kind 2012 Panini Prizm Tom Brady Black Finite, one of the hobby’s most coveted cards. The buyer, Steve Pocklington, in an appearance on a four-hour episode of Sports Cards Live, said he paid the seller, who was supposedly based in Mexico and may or may not actually exist, after a third-party broker vouched for the transaction. The broker also appeared on the show and said he had done hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of transactions with Pocklington before the Brady card deal, but when Pocklington sent the seller the massive sum for the card, the broker forwarded a FedEx box that had no Brady card in it. The broker claimed he had held the card, but the box was packed by the seller and he just added a label.

The broker added that the deal happened over a year ago now and that FedEx denied the insurance claim on the package. Pocklington said he’s still working with law enforcement to try to recover his money, but the broker said he’s never been contacted by law enforcement.

How could this alleged transaction have been managed better to mitigate this monumental risk? How do buyers protect themselves when not using an auction house or public marketplace as an intermediary? Lichtman says, the best way is using an auction house as a broker.

“Let’s say you are buying a million-dollar card or even a $100,000 card privately. The seller wants to avoid 20 percent fees from the auction house. But with a transaction of this size, they can contact an auction house and negotiate away the fee. What people don’t realize is that in a lot of big-dollar sales, the auction house gives back most and sometimes all of that buyer’s fee to the seller. Lichtman says sellers can negotiate that away because the auction house gets the publicity of selling the card.

Tom Brady 2012 Panini Prizm Black

The Tom Brady card that Steve Pocklington thought he was buying for almost $500,000. (Photo courtesy of Panini)

Auction house as a broker

Lichtman says the auction house will probably agree to serve as the broker in the transaction — in other words, receiving the payment before forwarding that to the seller and sending the buyer the card — for a nominal fee of something like five percent. Think of how much better off the Brady Black Prizm buyer would have been if the parties arranged to have an auction house serve as an intermediary. The broker on Sports Cards Live said his fee for the transaction was $5,000 (1 percent), money he claimed to have never received.

What if the transaction isn’t big enough or unique enough to interest an auction house to serve as an intermediary? Lichtman advises finding an escrow agent, typically used in real-estate transactions where their fee for a $500,000 house could be as high as $2,000. An escrow agent is a neutral third party who holds money or property in trust until all transaction terms are met.

If neither of those work, Lichtman says to just pack a bag and fly to the card. “If I’m paying six figures for a card in a private transaction, I’m flying to the card or just telling the person we can complete the transaction at The National (card show).”

That brings a whole other set of problems. Lichtman warns that carrying that much cash on a flight is very dangerous. Not just because of the threat of having it stolen, but also the probability of having it seized by the government as evidence of drug dealing. (One of Lichtman’s most famous clients was Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman.)

“I’ve had cases where I represented people where they flew on a plane on a one-way ticket with $150,000 in cash and they (had all of it) seized,” Lichtman says.

He advises doing the deal at a bank and only after filling out all the proper forms so that the transaction doesn’t trigger a loss or suspension of banking privileges. He says he always tells the buyer, who may not want a record of the transaction, that he’s documenting the purchase or the sale when he’s the person selling the card.

A three-percent tax for peace of mind

With more “normal” transactions of hundreds or thousands of dollars, private sellers sometimes balk at paying the fee for business transactions, which protects the buyer against the card not being received. A common method for completing these private transactions is PayPal, which charges the seller a fee that’s typically three percent, but that protects the buyer in the event the item is not received for any reason. Litchtman advises that the buyer should just offer to pay the fee and view it as the cost of peace of mind. If you don’t get the card, even due to no fault of the seller, you are financially protected. Cards can get lost and have been stolen by people in the delivery process who have their eye out for packages likely to contain a card.

Lichtman says he had an issue with a relatively low-cost Cooper Flagg transaction where tracking wasn’t provided and the cards were never received. The seller balked at refunding the money, assuming the cards were delivered. Lichtman says he went to the post office and asked about it and it turned out the package was being held for insufficient postage, which he paid for the seller. So insist on tracking for your purchase, too.

Much of the hobby operates on the vouch system. But what’s the value of having a third party vouch for a seller when the buyer and broker in the Brady Black Prizm transaction had a relationship involving previous high-value deals? For $100 a vouch may be sufficient. For $500,000, it seems to be worthless.

Litchtman says the measure for using these various methods to protect yourself should be what the impact on your life would be if you lost the money. If it would be significant, protect yourself.

The Athletic maintains full editorial independence in all our coverage. When you click or make purchases through our links, we may earn a commission.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Jurrien Timber leaves Arsenal training camp with groin issue

Published

on

Jurrien Timber has travelled back to London from Arsenal‘s training camp in Spain in a move related to the groin injury that caused him to miss the end of last season.

The Netherlands international missed two months towards the end of last season because of an ankle injury, but returned in time for the Champions League final loss to Paris St-Germain.

However, a groin issue then caused him to miss the World Cup.

It is now understood that the right-back has returned to London from the Gunners’ training camp in Spain but sources insist the visit is part of his rehabilitation schedule and not because of a setback in his recovery.

Timber is expected to return to Spain to rejoin the squad.

Timber, the Gunners’ first-choice right-back, played 30 Premier League games as they won the title last season.

He joined Arsenal from Ajax in July 2023 for an initial fee of £34m, but missed most of his first season after tearing his anterior cruciate knee ligament.

Arsenal face Manchester City in the Community Shield on 16 August (15:00 BST), before beginning their Premier League title defence against promoted Coventry City on 21 August (20:00 BST).

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Welsh Rugby Union outline timeframe for plan to cut a region

Published

on

The WRU state that they will “bring together the leadership of all the professional teams, and other stakeholders” after Wales’ Nations Championship matches in November.

They intend to thrash out the finances of their proposals and assess the interests of the quartet in taking up the new licences.

“This will allow an orderly implementation and avoid prolonged uncertainty for clubs, players, supporters, investors and sponsors,” said Marianne Okland, chair of Welsh rugby’s Professional Rugby Board, whose members met on Monday.

“Assuming that Cardiff Rugby and Dragons RFC want to sign up to the proposed licensing terms, there is now certainty that they will be offered the capital and east licences respectively.

“We understand that there will be ongoing uncertainty until a final decision on the west licence is made.

“That is why we are committed to progressing in a collaborative way, whilst not underestimating the considerable challenges ahead, and providing stability for all at the earliest opportunity.”

In April, the governing body confirmed that the cut to three teams would not happen until 2028 after a deal with Ospreys owners Y11 Sport & Media to buy WRU-owned Cardiff fell through.

Scarlets and Ospreys joined their eastern rivals in signing a Professional Rugby Agreement (PRA) this summer and are now poised to battle for survival.

That is unless they can be convinced or agree to merge – which was close to happening in 2019.

“We have already begun to put the support structures in place to develop the related player pathways, to create the best environments for our senior players, to provide the right financial support and to develop the facilities around them,” said WRU vice chair John Manders.

“We are making important progress which will safeguard the future of our game, concentrate resources and give our teams the best chance of achieving success at all levels.”

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Gianni Infantino: Why Fifa president is pushing World Cup sell off plan

Published

on

Fifa would receive a huge influx of cash in one go if the plan is approved, and the proportion earmarked for national federations would be made available from 1 January 2027, according to a letter sent to each country by Infantino.

He added: “The decision whether or not to proceed with this proposal belongs entirely to you.

“In exchange, all that is required is your trust – everything else remains the same.”

The appeal is clear – vote to help make us richer and we’ll make you richer too.

But each World Cup makes significantly more money than the last – it will probably be worth far more in four years, and four years after that, than it is now.

If Fifa sells stakes now, then the private investors will share in the rewards of that growth in the coming years, rather than Fifa and football doing so alone.

And ultimately, Fifa is a non-profit organisation under Swiss law, meaning its ultimate goal is – theoretically, at least – the long-term wellbeing of football rather than making a profit.

The big winners from the plan, then, would arguably be some of the smaller football nations, the private investors, and Infantino.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.