Connect with us

Tech

Authors push back as publishers and agents seek share of Anthropic settlement

Published

on

Some authors hoping to receive their share of Anthropic’s $1.5 billion copyright settlement said they received surprising emails this week — emails informing them that someone else was making a claim on their payments.

Anthropic settled a copyright class action suit last year, after a judge ruled that training AI models on copyrighted material is legal under fair use doctrine, but pirating that material was not. The deal received final approval in July, allowing the payments to move forward.

Under the terms of the settlement, the authors of nearly 500,000 titles will be paid $3,000 for each pirated work. If the book is still in-print with a traditional publisher, the money will be split 50-50 between author and publisher. If the book was self-published, or if the publisher reverted the rights by allowing the book to go out-of-print, then the author should get the entire payment.

But writers have been posting on social media that publishers seem to be claiming more than their fair share of some payments. For example, mystery and thriller author April Henry asked, “WTF is HarperCollins playing at? They claimed one of my books on the Anthropic Settlement that reverted back at least 17 years ago AND on the same day I got a credit alert saying they had been added as my employer! (which they never were).”

At the popular blog Writers Beware, Victoria Strauss wrote that she’s been receiving author complaints that fall into two broad categories: one where publishers are seeking payment for works that they no longer have a legitimate claim on (because the rights have reverted), and another where publishers are seeking a full 100% payment when they’re only entitled to 50%.

In both cases, Strauss said she’s “reluctant to attribute to malice what can be plausibly explained by poor recordkeeping” — and she noted that some publishers have already said this is a mistake that they’ve asked Anthropic to fix.

Similarly, Authors Guild CEO Mary Rasenberger told The New York Times that she doesn’t see this as “a grab by the publishers” and that she doesn’t believe publishers are “specifically trying to screw any author over.” Instead, she argued that this is the predictable result of bad record-keeping and a confusing settlement process.

Strauss also acknowledged that any complaints she’s seen are just “a peek through a small crack in a massive wall.”

“But the unusually large number of reports I’ve received over the last two days, as well as the fact that authors are reporting the exact same errors over and over, suggest to me that these aren’t the kind of routine glitches you might expect from such a large operation, but something much more wide[s]pread and systemic,” she wrote.

And publishers aren’t the only ones seeking a cut of the payments. Strauss said she’s gotten complaints that a number of literary agencies are also making claims, which she said is surprising since “agents are not rightsholders in the books that they sell.”

Author Courtney Milan (the pen name of former law clerk and law professor Heidi Bond) was more blunt in a post on Bluesky, writing, “Apparently some agents are trying to claim percentages on the Anthropic settlement, and I do not REMOTELY think they should do this, what the fuck, stop that shit!”

Milan and the Authors Guild also shared more details about how authors can dispute their payment allocations. (One tricky issue: When the rights to a specific book reverted. In order for an author to make a 100% claim on a book, the rights reversion needs to have happened before August 10, 2022, which is the “download date” in the settlement.)

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

>

Continue Reading

Tech

Phil Schiller’s App Store exit reportedly driven by wariness over future plans

Published

on

Why is longtime Apple executive Phil Schiller stepping down from his role as the head of the App Store?

Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman reports that Schiller’s decision — he will remain involved in the company as an Apple Fellow working on unspecified projects — was driven in part by a desire to spend more time with his family and on philanthropy.

But apparently there was another factor in Schiller’s thinking: New CEO John Ternus and services chief Eddy Cue seek to improve App Store margins and bring in more recurring revenue.

Of course, Apple’s management of the App Store, as well as its share of App Store payments, has been an ongoing source of developer criticism and even been the subject of major lawsuits.

In Gurman’s telling, there wasn’t a big fight over Ternus and Cue’s strategy. But Schiller believed that trying to squeeze more profits from the business would only increase conflict with governments and developers, so he decided to step down and avoid getting involved.

>

Continue Reading

Tech

Travis Kalanick’s Atoms might be getting into the robotaxi business

Published

on

Earlier this summer, Travis Kalanick’s Atoms announced a $1.7 billion funding round led by Andreessen Horowitz. But even after raising that mega round, the Uber founder remained a bit cagey about what he was actually aiming to do.

Now a story in the Financial Times offers more details about Atoms’ goals. The startup is reportedly preparing for a hiring spree, as well as acquisitions, that could make it a major player in the autonomous vehicle industry.

In fact, the FT said Atoms has talked to Uber about how the ride-hailing company could use the startup’s robotaxi technology. (Uber has already partnered with a long list of autonomous vehicle companies.) The report also noted that Uber has invested $100 million in Atoms — a figure previously confirmed by TechCrunch.

While sources emphasized that robotaxis don’t represent the entirety of Atoms’ plans, this direction seems consistent with Kalanick’s description of the round as “unfinished business.”

It also fits with Atoms’ acquisition of Pronto, an autonomous mining startup led by Uber’s former self-driving chief Anthony Levandowski. (Levandowski was convicted of stealing trade secrets and sentenced to 18 months in prison, but was then pardoned by President Donald Trump.)

>

Continue Reading

Tech

TechCrunch Mobility: Tesla Cybercab hits the road — and a snag

Published

on

Welcome back to TechCrunch Mobility, your hub for the future of transportation and now, more than ever, the role AI is playing in it. To get this in your inbox, sign up here for free — just click TechCrunch Mobility!

Depending on which corner of social media you frequent, the Tesla Cybercab event was either proof that the company is a robotaxi leader delivering the future or an overhyped affair with little substance. Whatever your view, Wall Street wasn’t impressed by the Cybercab event in Austin, which was unusually quiet and lacked the festival-like atmosphere of past Tesla events. CEO Elon Musk didn’t even attend — a notable and puzzling absence, especially considering he has spent years arguing that Tesla’s future — and its value — hinges on robotics and AI.

As senior reporter Sean O’Kane wrote before the event, “The Cybercab is Tesla’s fork in the road. This is either the moment the company begins to transform urban transportation as we know it, or the moment that reveals that, despite its many efforts, Tesla really is just an automaker after all.”

The event did little to boost confidence, but I don’t put much stock in events or demos. The real test is whether Tesla can launch a robotaxi service safely and at scale. For now, there is no scale, at least compared with Waymo. (As of today, Tesla has registered 45 Cybercabs in Texas, according to the state’s automated vehicle tracker.)

Another wrinkle emerged early Friday morning. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration opened an investigation into Tesla just hours after the company put its first Cybercabs, which lack a steering wheel and pedals, on Austin streets. Federal vehicle safety regulations require manual controls like brake pedals, though the Department of Transportation recently proposed removing those requirements for vehicles that are designed to drive themselves.

Tesla chose to self-certify, the standard route taken by automakers for traditional human-driven vehicles. The NHTSA responded by tapping the brakes, although Tesla may choose to operate even as the investigation plays out. To be clear, there is precedent for the NHTSA’s action, and you can read all about it here.

Curious about the Cybercab? Tesla published several guides that reveal a few important details, including that this gilded robotaxi is not for kids. Here is a complete roundup of the Tesla Cybercab, as well as the company’s interest in selling the autonomous vehicles to fleet operators.

Deals!

money the station
Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

Allianz, the German insurance company, is holding talks with advisors to consider acquiring AA, the U.K.-based roadside assistance organization, for £5 billion ($6.77 billion), SkyNews reported

Alteon, a Bengaluru-based startup developing autonomous aircraft inspired by dynamic soaring, raised $2.5 million in a pre-seed round led by prominent solo investor Lachy Groom, with participation from Together Fund.

Delivery Hero’s board signed off on Uber’s $15 billion takeover offer and recommended shareholders approve the deal.

Easy Aerial, a startup that makes autonomous tethered drone systems for aerial surveillance, raised $20 million in a Series B funding round. Insight Partners, Entrée Capital, and other private U.S. investors participated in the round, the company said. 

Magna International is now investing another $35 million in Yuma Energy, a Bengaluru-based firm that operates a battery-swapping network for electric two- and three-wheelers. 

Newlight, a Bay Area startup developing a hydrogen injection system to make cargo ships more efficient, raised a $9 million seed round that included investment from lomarlabs, the venture arm of Lomar Shipping; BIRD Energy, a joint venture between the U.S. Department of Energy and the Israel Ministry of Energy; deep tech funds Undeterred Capital and CiRi Ventures; and Fusion VC, an accelerator for Israeli startups in the United States.

Notable reads and other tidbits

Image Credits:Bryce Durbin

Flock continues to face backlash over privacy concerns and misuse of its tracking technology. Florida and Texas have both said they will no longer use the surveillance giant’s license plate readers.

Ken Karklin, the CEO of the Larry Page-backed flying car company Pivotal, has left the company. Mike Ross, an aviation exec who is on the board, was named interim CEO. 

Meet Liux, the Spanish microcar startup that thinks it can compete with a tiny electric car built around sustainability. 

Autonomous vehicle technology startup May Mobility and NTT Mobility plan to deploy Toyota’s e-Palette vehicles on public streets in Japan this year. May Mobility’s self-driving system will be integrated into the vehicles.

Uber is laying off about 3,300 people, or about 10% of its global headcount, as part of a restructuring that will cut management and combine its engineering, science, and delivery divisions. 

Waymo went on the offensive ahead of Tesla’s Cybercab event, arguing that fully autonomous vehicles aren’t possible without using a mix of sensors and warning that pure end-to-end AI systems aren’t safe enough. Meanwhile, the Alphabet-owned company started to open its robotaxi service to the public in Denver, San Diego, and Tampa.

Zoox extended its commercial robotaxi service in Las Vegas to include rides to and from Harry Reid International Airport.

One more thing

Image Credits:Kirsten Korosec

I typically test drive electric vehicles, but that doesn’t mean I never drive vehicles with different powertrains. I recently spent a week with the 2027 Kia Telluride hybrid X-Line SX- Prestige trim outfitted in sparkly black jade paint. My fully loaded model was priced at $61,180.

This second-generation Kia Telluride comes with a turbocharged 2.5-liter inline-four hybrid engine that generates 329 horsepower and 339-pound of torque. Importantly, it delivers more horsepower and torque than its non-hybrid equivalent while improving fuel economy to 31 mpg (in the combined cycle).

Kia tweaked the design of the new Telluride, and it did give me Kia EV9 vibes, although it felt more like a cousin to that EV, not its twin. A few of my positive impressions: It’s roomier than its predecessor and it is quiet on the road. It’s not the fastest three-row SUV out there and some critics have worried that Kia’s move from a V6 to a 4-cylinder engine would sap its power. But I found it zippy enough, especially for a vehicle of its size. 

Finally, I included a pic of the interior because I tend to focus on the UX and user interface of infotainment centers. This layout is not my favorite on the market, but it gets a few things right. For instance, it places a row of controls below the touchscreen for easy access. There is one design choice that I will probably never get over, even though I am sure I would eventually get used to it — and that’s the location of the gear shifter, which is a stalk attached to the right side of the steering column. I found that I was always searching for it.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.