Connect with us

Entertainment

The Julia Set Review: Chase Infiniti Shines in Uneven Melodrama

Published

on

Director Niki Byrne’s frustratingly melodramatic “The Julia Set” is a film that hints at complexity and nuance but often settles for the lowest common denominator in its execution.

It has a lot to say but lacks the grace of easy digestion, unsure of how to move its story along without resorting to communicating its ideas in the most heavy-handed ways possible. It has a lot working for it, namely actors who are far too talented for the script they’ve been saddled with, but it all adds up to less than the sum of its parts. 

I’ll confess that I had my doubts about how one could make mathematics cinematic, and at the start of Byrne’s film, she assuages fears in part by demonstrating how the language of the world runs on these concepts we often restrict to our classroom. The drama of our daily lives can be refracted through the language of theorems, proofs and algorithms, and it’s a language Julia (Chase Infiniti) knows well. She’s a student at university who can solve differential equations better than her whole class, yet has grown accustomed to making herself small so as not to draw attention.

Even if you’ve appreciated Infiniti’s work prior, “The Julia Set” lets you fall in love with her talent all over again, particularly with her mastery of eye acting. Every time she stares, furrowing her brow at a worksheet placed before her or looking longingly at the TA, Pascal (Christopher Briney), who fires back reciprocal interest, you see that there’s a world of emotion waiting to be unleashed. 

The hypothetical becomes tangible when Julia and Pascal begin a relationship and train for a prestigious mathematics competition called The Putnam Exam, where students have six hours to complete 12 intense questions. They are to be trained by Professor Dr. Zatlan (a delightfully draconian Nina Hoss), who makes her favorites known and is punitive towards any mistakes. Both Pascal and Julia, in trying to prepare for the competition, also try to vie for Zatlan’s affections, with Pascal feeling particular pressure as he’s the son of a renowned mathematics giant. 

With the talent that Byrne has assembled to play the antagonistic adults (Hoss is only in the film for brief moments, but her scenes where she eviscerates her students leave a lasting mark), it’s curious that her script chooses to instead focus on the rapidly deteriorating relationship between Julia and Pascal. Pascal begins to grow jealous of Julia’s talent, and from that jealousy, begins to shame her, calling her a distraction from him pursuing his studies.

It would be tragic to see them feud if their dynamic was built up in any meaningful way, and if Birney could better communicate a sense of maliciousness that doesn’t feel cartoonish. It often feels as though the actor is trying to portray a facsimile of an emotion rather than embodying it, and as Pacal’s behavior becomes more monstrous, it becomes less believable. It is easy to condemn, but the obvious cruelty calls into question the affection Byrne wants us to have for Julia. It’s hard to imagine someone as smart as her giving herself so wholeheartedly to a sappy soyboy without properly testing the theorem. 

Therein lies the problem with “The Julia Set” in that, by admirably choosing to focus on the ways women are told to minimize themselves and their accomplishments in male-dominated fields, and by creating antagonists who are evil to the point of caricature, it absolves the audience. The film presents a simple equation when a more complex proof would be in order: we can simply critique Pascal’s chauvinism, which he inherited from his equally toxic father (a catty Jason Isaacs, making a meal out of narrative crumbs) rather than look inward.

It’s far too easy to point out the flaws in others, and Byrne’s urgent points would have benefited from an approach that more tactfully unsettles its viewers. When people are presented in such binaries, it removes any stakes, and interest quickly wanes. 

There’s also a cornucopia of half-baked ideas or unresolved points that also drag the film down. Gillian Anderson, as Pascal’s mother, is an interesting mirror of Julia. She too is caught in a union with a man who finds his only source of strength in keeping her silenced, yet while there’s a parallel, it’s never expanded upon in a meaningful way. Chloe Bailey delights as Julia’s best friend and the only one who is willing to tell the prodigy the truth, but she’s often reduced either to comic relief or to a mouthpiece to vaguely touch on issues of race that Byrne either doesn’t fully understand or lacks the patience to tackle with nuance. 

There are glimmers of craft worth praising, though they’re too few and far between. Take a moment when Byrne trusts her visuals to do the work: when Julia goes to use the restroom before the competition, she walks past a long line of men waiting to use the bathroom and enters the women’s one without any delay. So much is communicated in just that wordless moment, and had “The Julia Set” had more of those scenes, it might have added up to something truly sensational.

As it stands, it provides all the enjoyment of running through multiplication tables: fun at the start, trite by the end. 

>

Continue Reading

movies

FCC Chairman Accuses James Talarico Of Running A “Hoax” With Kimmel

Published

on

As Jimmy Kimmel‘s interview with James Talarico nears 7 million views on YouTube, FCC Chairman Brendan Carr weighed in on Saturday evening, accusing the candidate of orchestrating a “hoax” to drive up “clicks and donations.”

Earlier this week, Kimmel told viewers that he would be sitting down with an interview with Talarico for his late night show, but that it would be posted to YouTube and not broadcast because of the FCC’s crackdown on its equal time rule.

In a post on X, Carr wrote of the Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Texas, “He’s just running the same hoax he did a few months ago on Colbert for the purpose of getting clicks and donations—he’s banking on people not understanding the statute or operating as partisan lemmings.”

He also posted a meme of Talarico riding on a bicycle on Kimmel’s back before Kimmel puts a stick in the spokes and it crashes to the ground.

A Talarico campaign spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The Kimmel interview had drawn 6.8 million views as of Saturday evening.

In February, Stephen Colbert posted an interview with Talarico to YouTube, telling viewers that he was warned by network executives about featuring the candidate on the broadcast. That interview generated 9.6 million views on YouTube, well over the average audience for his late-night broadcast.

In an interview this week, Talarico characterized the Kimmel incident as government censorship and a form of “cancel culture.” He also posted the interview to X, calling it “the interview Trump’s FCC doesn’t want you to see.”

For decades, daytime and late-night TV talk shows have operated on the assumption that they were exempt from the FCC’s equal time rule, which requires broadcasters who feature candidates to provide comparable time to their rivals, if it is requested. News coverage and news interviews have been exempt from the requirements, and it does not apply to cable or streaming.

But in January, the FCC under Carr, appointed by Donald Trump, issued guidance to broadcasters that TV talk shows may not be exempt, a move that critics saw as a regulatory effort to crack down on daytime and late-night hosts the president does not like. 

Until now, Carr had yet to weigh in on Kimmel’s latest salvo, which the late night host called an effort by the FCC to “make our editorial decisions for us, which of course we cannot accept.”

Carr, though, has denied that the FCC’s stricter enforcement of the equal time rule is an attempt to censor guests.

On X, Carr posted, “The Equal Time statute does not prohibit anyone from interviewing anyone on broadcast tv. It is about more speech, not less. Congress wanted to ensure that voters would decide elections, not media gatekeepers picking winners and losers by providing preferential airtime to some candidates and not others. Indeed, when the statute applies, it simply requires broadcast stations to offer comparable time and placement. And comparable does not necessarily mean an interview by the same person on the same program either.”

Carr’s comments were in response to a post from Universtiy of Texas Democrats, who noted the appearance of Sen. Ted Cruz (D-TX) on ESPN’s College GameDay.

The FCC chairman noted that the equal time rule would not apply to Cruz’s appearance because it was on a cable network and because the regulation covers legal qualified candidates, or contenders who are in the midst of an election campaign. Cruz is not up for reelection this year; Talarico’s Republican rival is Ken Paxton.

ABC is challenging the FCC’s enforcement of the rule when it comes to The View, pointing out that the agency affirmed its exemption from the regulation in a 2002 letter. The network also has sued the FCC on First Amendment grounds. It claims that the agency’s order that its eight owned stations submit to licenses renewals ealr is a form of regulatory retaliation due to the Trump administration’s dislike of its news coverage and other content including The View and Kimmel.

In his post, Carr again defended the FCC’s regulatory efforts as within the bounds of the agency’s authority.

He wrote, “In exchange for that free and exclusive right to use spectrum, broadcasters made a deal with the American people. They agreed to operate, not in their own narrow interests, but in the public interest. There are various rules and policies that they must follow. This sets them apart from newspapers and cable shows and podcasts. But some broadcasters want to break their deal with the American people. They want to keep their free access to billions of dollars worth of spectrum, of course. They are less eager these days to abide by their public interest obligations.”

ABC’s legal team has argued that the FCC is engaging in selective enforcement, as its January guidance did not target conservative talk radio, and said that offering equal time would be unworkable for shows like The View. Kimmel said this week that he would love to interview Paxton, but that there were about 10 candidates in total on the ballot that the network’s Texas stations may be obligated to provide time.

>

Continue Reading

movies

‘The Surgeon’ Review: Michelle Yeoh in Deliriously Fun Genre-Bender

Published

on

Roshan Sethi has a résumé that could make the most accomplished among us feel like underachievers. His three previous features include the thoroughly charming 2024 rom-com A Nice Indian Boy. Two months ago his novel, The Simp, a funny Hollywood satire, was published. He was the co-creator of the Fox series The Resident. And as if that’s not enough, for a couple of months a year he still works as a radiation oncologist at a Boston hospital.

He puts all those experiences to good use in The Surgeon, a genre-bending swirl that is part The Pitt (but gorier), part tense crime thriller, part action movie and part midnight movie, all infused with witty touches. It is wildly entertaining.

The Surgeon

The Bottom Line

Ready for cult-classic status.

Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Centrepiece)
Cast: Michelle Yeoh, Martin Freeman, Laurie Davidson, Yuri Kolokolnikov, Joseph Mydell
Director and writer: Roshan Sethi

1 hour 32 minutes

As clever as Sethi’s screenplay is, the film’s greatest asset is Michelle Yeoh as Eliza Lim, a recently retired surgeon who is kidnapped by criminals and forced at gunpoint to operate on one of their colleagues. No one else could have brought the same serene presence, quiet intelligence and flair for action, a combination that is ideally suited to the character. Sethi’s film is perfectly in sync with Yeoh’s strengths.

The film swiftly establishes Dr. Lim’s character in a few brief scenes that chart her single-minded dedication to her job and the boring, empty retirement she has reluctantly entered. The Surgeon isn’t a character study, but we instantly know who that character is.

Out of nowhere, it seems — but actually for reasons revealed much later — she is abducted and finds herself in an abandoned hospital, surrounded by men with guns. An operating room is ready for her, and the patient’s face is covered. The operating scenes are not for the squeamish, but it’s worth covering your eyes to get to the real action. Lim realizes the kidnappers have no reason to keep her alive after the surgery, so she has to outwit them using her mind, medical knowledge and a few hidden scalpels.

Sethi often holds the camera on Yeoh’s face, expressive even at its most passive. Lim speaks softly as she proves the thugs are no match for her. “You can stop pointing that gun at me,” she tells one of her minders after the surgery. “I’m an old woman, half your age, half your weight. There’s nothing I can do to you.” Part of the fun of watching is that we can guess that line is a ruse, but we don’t know what she’s planning.  

Yeoh, of course, started out in martial arts films, but that is not the kind of action displayed here. Lim knows just where on the body to attack her kidnappers and goes for their most vulnerable spots with swift jabs and great precision. As in the best action films, we never lose sight of how the hero’s personality drives it. “You’ll never shoot a gun again,” she calmly tells one of her captors after severing some cartilage in his wrists. “That’s not snot, that’s your brain fluid dripping out,” she says to another after ramming an instrument up his nose. One of the weirdest, wittiest touches is that whenever she attacks, we see the body beneath the skin, viewing the bones she’s breaking or tendons she’s cutting as if a medical textbook had come to life.

Sethi loads the film with noir tropes, including a ticking clock that counts down how much time the patient has to live after Lim threatens to kill him. What has she got to lose? But even at its most noirish, visually the film is filled with light and color. A major action scene takes place in the former hospital’s chapel, full of bright stained glass. And she lives in a spacious, light-filled house with a large garden, which we see before and after the kidnapping. The Surgeon is taut and suspenseful, but never claustrophobic. The editing smoothly keeps the momentum going and the genre touches blend easily.

Martin Freeman enters the film fairly late in a supporting role as the crime boss who masterminded the scheme. As always, he is expert at looking meek while sounding deadly. And Joseph Mydell adds a welcome, sweet touch as a man who brings warmth and emotion to Lim’s life.

With a nod to genre conventions, the final shot leaves room for a sequel. But wherever Sethi’s varied career takes him, he has already established himself as one of the most exciting filmmakers around.

>

Continue Reading

movies

‘The Surgeon’ Review: Michelle Yeoh in Deliriously Fun Genre-Bender

Published

on

Roshan Sethi has a résumé that could make the most accomplished among us feel like underachievers. His three previous features include the thoroughly charming 2024 rom-com A Nice Indian Boy. Two months ago his novel, The Simp, a funny Hollywood satire, was published. He was the co-creator of the Fox series The Resident. And as if that’s not enough, for a couple of months a year he still works as a radiation oncologist at a Boston hospital.

He puts all those experiences to good use in The Surgeon, a genre-bending swirl that is part The Pitt (but gorier), part tense crime thriller, part action movie and part midnight movie, all infused with witty touches. It is wildly entertaining.

The Surgeon

The Bottom Line

Ready for cult-classic status.

Venue: Toronto International Film Festival (Centrepiece)
Cast: Michelle Yeoh, Martin Freeman, Laurie Davidson, Yuri Kolokolnikov, Joseph Mydell
Director and writer: Roshan Sethi

1 hour 32 minutes

As clever as Sethi’s screenplay is, the film’s greatest asset is Michelle Yeoh as Eliza Lim, a recently retired surgeon who is kidnapped by criminals and forced at gunpoint to operate on one of their colleagues. No one else could have brought the same serene presence, quiet intelligence and flair for action, a combination that is ideally suited to the character. Sethi’s film is perfectly in sync with Yeoh’s strengths.

The film swiftly establishes Dr. Lim’s character in a few brief scenes that chart her single-minded dedication to her job and the boring, empty retirement she has reluctantly entered. The Surgeon isn’t a character study, but we instantly know who that character is.

Out of nowhere, it seems — but actually for reasons revealed much later — she is abducted and finds herself in an abandoned hospital, surrounded by men with guns. An operating room is ready for her, and the patient’s face is covered. The operating scenes are not for the squeamish, but it’s worth covering your eyes to get to the real action. Lim realizes the kidnappers have no reason to keep her alive after the surgery, so she has to outwit them using her mind, medical knowledge and a few hidden scalpels.

Sethi often holds the camera on Yeoh’s face, expressive even at its most passive. Lim speaks softly as she proves the thugs are no match for her. “You can stop pointing that gun at me,” she tells one of her minders after the surgery. “I’m an old woman, half your age, half your weight. There’s nothing I can do to you.” Part of the fun of watching is that we can guess that line is a ruse, but we don’t know what she’s planning.  

Yeoh, of course, started out in martial arts films, but that is not the kind of action displayed here. Lim knows just where on the body to attack her kidnappers and goes for their most vulnerable spots with swift jabs and great precision. As in the best action films, we never lose sight of how the hero’s personality drives it. “You’ll never shoot a gun again,” she calmly tells one of her captors after severing some cartilage in his wrists. “That’s not snot, that’s your brain fluid dripping out,” she says to another after ramming an instrument up his nose. One of the weirdest, wittiest touches is that whenever she attacks, we see the body beneath the skin, viewing the bones she’s breaking or tendons she’s cutting as if a medical textbook had come to life.

Sethi loads the film with noir tropes, including a ticking clock that counts down how much time the patient has to live after Lim threatens to kill him. What has she got to lose? But even at its most noirish, visually the film is filled with light and color. A major action scene takes place in the former hospital’s chapel, full of bright stained glass. And she lives in a spacious, light-filled house with a large garden, which we see before and after the kidnapping. The Surgeon is taut and suspenseful, but never claustrophobic. The editing smoothly keeps the momentum going and the genre touches blend easily.

Martin Freeman enters the film fairly late in a supporting role as the crime boss who masterminded the scheme. As always, he is expert at looking meek while sounding deadly. And Joseph Mydell adds a welcome, sweet touch as a man who brings warmth and emotion to Lim’s life.

With a nod to genre conventions, the final shot leaves room for a sequel. But wherever Sethi’s varied career takes him, he has already established himself as one of the most exciting filmmakers around.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.