Connect with us

Sports

Broncos QB Bo Nix undergoes scheduled cleanup procedure on right ankle: Source

Published

on

Denver Broncos quarterback Bo Nix had a cleanup procedure performed on his right ankle last week as part of a scheduled follow-up with surgeon Norman E. Waldrop, a league source confirmed to The Athletic on Tuesday.

Nix originally had surgery in late January after suffering an ankle fracture at the end of Denver’s overtime victory over the Buffalo Bills in the divisional round of the playoffs. The injury forced him to miss the Broncos’ 10-7 loss to the New England Patriots in the AFC Championship Game.

The latest procedure could affect Nix’s availability for OTAs, which begin for the Broncos in early June, and the minicamp to follow. Broncos coach Sean Payton acknowledged after the final day of the NFL Draft on Saturday that Nix had a scheduled follow-up with Waldrop, but he didn’t specifically answer a question as to whether the timeline for Nix to return to the field had changed.

“He had a recheck that was scheduled. He’s doing great,” Payton said of Nix on Saturday. “We’re excited about his progress. Nothing to report. These guys will be coming in here. He’s here. A number of these guys are coming in the building.”

Payton, general manager George Paton and co-owner Greg Penner all voiced confidence during the NFL’s league meetings in late March that Nix would participate in OTAs.

“He’s attacked his recovery in the same way that he attacks preparing for games,” Penner said of Nix at the time. “He’s done a terrific job. He’s ahead of schedule, no concerns at all for (the offseason program) and going forward from there. We’re really pleased with his progress and the support from (vice president of player health and performance) Beau Lowery and everyone.”

It now appears to be an open question as to whether — or how much — Nix will see the field during Denver’s on-field workouts in June. Even if Nix is limited during OTAs, though, the source indicated, he’s expected to be fully ready by the time the Broncos begin training camp in late July.

Nix suffered the injury while carrying the ball during the final drive of Denver’s 33-30 victory over the Bills. The Broncos’ euphoria after reaching the conference title game for the first time in a decade was quickly doused when Payton announced, about an hour after the game ended, that imaging done in the stadium showed Nix had suffered a broken ankle and would be out for the rest of the season. 

“I broke my ankle one step away from the Super Bowl,” Nix wrote in an essay published in “The Players’ Tribune” earlier this month. “It hurt. Bad. Not just physically. It hurt because I love playing the game with my teammates. It hurt because we’ve built something really special. It hurt because when you’re that close to something you’ve dreamed about your whole life, you don’t want it taken out of your hands.”

Nix threw for 3,931 yards, 25 touchdowns and 11 interceptions last season. His 24 victories since being drafted 12th overall by the Broncos in 2024 are tied with Russell Wilson for the most by a quarterback during his first two seasons in league history.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

NBA proposes new ‘3-2-1’ draft lottery system, sources say. Here’s how it works

Published

on

The NBA’s pursuit of an effective anti-tanking strategy took a significant step forward on Tuesday when league officials presented an updated draft lottery reform proposal — deemed the “3-2-1” system — to all 30 teams in a virtual general manager’s meeting.

The proposal, which was obtained by The Athletic and would go into effect for the 2027 draft if approved, aims to create an environment that heavily incentivizes teams at the bottom end of the standings to win their way up the ranks as a way of improving their lottery odds. The lottery would expand from 14 teams to 16 in this system, with lottery balls drawn for all 16 qualifying teams. Here’s what would determine how many balls each team gets, as well as other rules that are part of the pitch.

  • Three balls (8.1 percent chance of landing the No. 1 pick, seven teams in all): The teams that did not qualify for the playoffs or Play-In Tournament but avoided finishing with one of the three worst records.
  • Two balls (5.4 percent chance, seven teams): Teams that finished in the bottom three, and were thus subject to a “draft relegation” provision in which they are penalized by losing one lottery ball (going from three to two). In an attempt to create a floor for how far these teams might fall, the “draft relegated” teams would pick no lower than 12th, whereas all other lottery-eligible teams could fall as far as the 16th pick. The ninth and 10th Play-In seeds in each conference would also receive two lottery balls each.
  • One ball (2.7 percent chance, two teams): The losers of the Play-In games between the seventh and eighth seeds in each conference would receive just one lottery ball.

The proposal also includes several rules that, if approved, would further reduce a team’s ability to tank its way into better draft odds while also giving the league much greater leeway to punish would-be offenders.

  • No team would be able to win the top pick in consecutive years or be able to win three consecutive top-five picks.
  • Teams would not be able to protect picks in the 12 to 15 slots going forward.
  • The proposal includes a sunset provision, with the new system expiring following the 2029 draft and requiring an affirmative vote of the Board of Governors to either continue with the system or transition to a new one.
  • Under the proposal, the league would have expanded disciplinary authority to regulate tanking by having the option to reduce teams’ lottery odds and/or modify teams’ draft positions.

With an owner’s vote on draft lottery reform looming at a Board of Governors meeting on May 28, and commissioner Adam Silver vowing to make changes that restore competitive integrity to the game, this marks the first time the league’s stakeholders have elevated one specific proposal, as opposed to several, as they move closer to firming up the final version. The debate about this offering, which league sources say is a combination of the three that were proposed during the last general managers’ meeting on Feb. 21, is now expected to continue during the final stages of the process.

Per league sources, this latest proposal was well received by the majority of the league’s GMs. There was, the sources say, a belief from some GMs in the meeting that the bottom-three teams should be assured at least a top-10 pick, as opposed to top 12, and that this current structure in the proposal is too punitive. There was also a sense from some that the seventh and eighth seeds should be treated the same, receiving one ball each regardless of who wins that Play-In game. Those sorts of specifics will continue to be hashed out in the weeks ahead.

In the days leading up to this latest meeting, league officials and general managers alike had indicated that Option No. 1 from the previous GM’s meeting — an 18-team lottery system in which the bottom 10 teams would all have an 8 percent chance at the top pick — was widely seen as the heavy front-runner. But with the NBA’s executive vice president of strategy and analytics Evan Wasch leading the way, league sources say the decision was made to formulate a plan that took components from all three of the previous proposals. As has been the case throughout this process, changes could still be made to the proposal ahead of the Board of Governors meeting.

Silver and his staff have made it a priority for this process to be collaborative, as evidenced by the Tuesday meeting with general managers that was added to the schedule for the purpose of making this pitch. The league’s competition committee, which includes select general managers, coaches and players and typically heads these sorts of exercises, has also played an integral role in the process.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Connections: Sports Edition today: Hints and answers for April 29, 2026, puzzle No. 583

Published

on

Need help with today’s Connections: Sports Edition puzzle? You’ve come to the right place.

Welcome to Connections: Sports Edition Coach — a spot to gather clues and discuss (and share) scores.

A quick public service announcement before we continue: The bottom of this article includes the answers — and hints — for the four categories. So if you want to solve the board hint-free, we recommend you play before continuing.

You can access today’s game here.

Today’s difficulty

Game No. 583’s difficulty: 2.5 out of 5

Connections: Sports Edition hints for April 29, 2026

Scroll below for one answer in each of the four categories.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Yellow: FURLONG

Green: GRITTY

Blue: STYLES

Purple: PLACE

Connections: Sports Edition answers for April 29, 2026

Scroll below for the full answers to each of the four categories.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Yellow

Distances, in horse racing: FURLONG, LENGTH, MILE, NOSE

Green

Associated with Philadelphia sports: GRITTY, PHANATIC, TRUST THE PROCESS, TUSH PUSH

Blue

First-round picks in this year’s NFL Draft: BANKS, LEMON, PRICE, STYLES

Purple

First _____: BASE, DOWN, PLACE, TAKE

What is Connections: Sports Edition?

Connections: Sports Edition is The Athletic’s first-ever game, a daily puzzle designed for players to find connections between 16 words on the game board.

The game’s objective is to group words or objects into four groups of four based on commonalities within each group as quickly as possible. Find the groups without making four mistakes. Each puzzle has exactly one solution, so watch out for words or items that seem to belong to multiple categories!

Category examples:
Sports ____ : Fan, Car, Bar, Radio
U.S. Summer Olympians: Biles, Phelps, Ledecky, Lyles

Each category group is assigned a color, revealed as you solve, ranging from straightforward (yellow) to medium (green) to challenging (blue) to tricky (purple).

Who creates the puzzles for Connections: Sports Edition?

That’s me! My name is Mark Cooper, and I create Connections: Sports Edition and work as a managing editor for college sports here at The Athletic. I was previously The Athletic’s managing editor for breaking news.

The next puzzle will be available at midnight in your time zone. Thanks for playing — and share your scores in the comments!

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Artūrs Šilovs’ rise, Sidney Crosby’s scowl and a Penguins-Flyers series gone wild

Published

on

PITTSBURGH — When the Penguins traded for Artūrs Šilovs last summer, I reverted to old habits and called Jim Rutherford. After all, Rutherford oversaw the trade to Pittsburgh and was the president of hockey operations during Šilovs’ time in Vancouver. And the guy we used to call GMJR, you may have heard, doesn’t hesitate to voice his opinion.

Rutherford said he didn’t want to lose Šilovs, but that Vancouver had a surplus of goaltending and didn’t want to risk losing him on waivers. He also noted that, while Šilovs had some warts and wasn’t a finished product, he liked “playing in the big moments.”

Rutherford also said of the young goaltender, “He can get hot and go on runs.”

You don’t say.

There are many storylines in what has become more of a saga than it is a series. Penguins-Flyers games are never conventional, after all, and neither are these.

For that matter, neither is Šilovs.

Since replacing Stuart Skinner at the beginning of Game 4, Šilovs has stopped 46 of 50 shots, good for a .920 save percentage. He’s allowed just four goals in two games and only one in the third period. That Šilovs has stopped at least 90 percent of the shots he’s faced in each game is especially relevant when considering that, from the beginning of  March through the end of the regular season, his save percentage was over .900 only three times in 11 starts. He was not playing well at all, and the decision to begin the postseason with Skinner between the pipes was an obvious one.

Skinner was perfectly solid, even good, in the first two games. But they were both losses. In Game 3, Skinner played poorly, prompting Dan Muse to go with Šilovs. The 25-year-old from Latvia responded in a very big way.

Remember, it was Šilovs who put on a show at the World Championships a couple of years back. It was Šilovs who won the AHL championship last season. And it was Šilovs who led Rick Tocchet’s Canucks past the Predators and to a Game 7 against Edmonton two years ago.

It’s not a coincidence at this point. Šilovs has some serious rebound control issues; he doesn’t always track shots from the point well, and God help everyone who supports the black and gold if the NHL ever decides to use shootouts in playoff games.

All joking aside, Šilovs has been good. More importantly, he appears to possess the clutch gene. You either have it or you don’t. It’s not a learned skill.

Šilovs hasn’t just played well during the last two games, but as many veteran teammates have noted, there’s a calmness about him that they like.

The odds are still against Šilovs and the Penguins winning this series. A team has come back from down 3-0 four times in NHL history, so it’s not like a Penguins’ series victory is a slam dunk, or even a likelihood. But they do have a goaltender who doesn’t seem likely to flinch when the Flyers mount an inevitable charge in Game 6 on Wednesday.

Ten series observations

• Speaking of goaltenders, which version of Dan Vladar do we suspect will show up in Game 6?

He was fantastic in the first three games of this series. He allowed embarrassing goals in Games 4 and 5, however, and his glove hand appeared to be a problem. He was fighting the puck in Game 5, especially with that glove hand. He looked shaky. He looked a little rattled.

On the flip side, he still only allowed three goals. He was no disaster. But he didn’t look like the same guy.

Let’s see how he responds. He’s unquestionably the Flyers’ most valuable player. Playing at home when you’re a little off your game, however, can be more difficult.

• There has been plenty of talk about how nasty, or even dirty, this series has been. Almost all of that talk has come from the media or social media. I’m in the Penguins locker room every day and have been in the Flyers locker room a handful of times during this series. Other than the Penguins being annoyed at what they believe was a very intentional high stick from Garnet Hathaway to Sidney Crosby in Game 3, I haven’t heard a peep from either team about things getting nasty.

To them, it’s just playoff hockey.

• I was startled by how well the tandem of Kris Letang and Samuel Girard played in Game 5. We haven’t seen them locked in like that. They essentially played keep away during almost every shift in the third period, which was precisely what the situation required.

They’ll need to be that good again in Game 6. Erik Karlsson is still playing very well, but he’s cooled off since his outrageous hot streak that propelled the Penguins into the playoffs. Ilya Solovyov has played well, but his minutes are being severely limited.

Letang and Girard are going to receive huge minutes Wednesday.

• For better or worse, depending on your perspective, Trevor Zegras was very, very quiet in Game 5.

Whether it’s getting on the scoresheet or getting under the Penguins’ skin, I suspect he’ll be more active Wednesday.

• Let’s keep an eye on Evgeni Malkin. He was probably the Penguins’ best player in the first three games of this series, and in fact, he really had his legs in Game 4 and played high-level hockey. Malkin had zero jump in Game 5.

Perhaps the jump will return in Game 6.

• It’s Egor Chinakhov time. Or, at least, it had better be.

The Penguins are an explosive offensive team largely because of Chinakhov, whose shot and speed are simply rare. They’ve not been an explosive team in this series, and he’s been painfully quiet. That’s no coincidence. Chinakhov coming to life would be a godsend for the Penguins.

• I’ve been watching Rickard Rakell a lot in this series. He’s been outstanding. I had never appreciated the nuance in his game until this season. He’s doing the little things, and he’s doing them well.

• Tocchet is a really good coach. He’s been under fire all season for how he’s handled Matvei Michkov, perhaps Philadelphia’s most gifted forward. Michkov was a healthy scratch in Game 5.

It was the right call. Michkov was invisible during the first four games of this series.

• Bryan Rust has a goal in this series but has been more visible during altercations, including his wild brawl with Travis Konecny in Game 3 and his pulling of Porter Martone’s hair in Game 4.

Should the Penguins pull off this comeback, I would imagine Rust will have a big moment. They don’t call him Big Game Bryan Rust for nothing.

• The look on Crosby’s face following Game 5 said it all. I haven’t a clue how this series will end, but the look on his face told me that he believes. His game appeared to shift to a different place starting in Game 4. Were I the Flyers, this would concern me.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.