
From L to R Top: Elle Fanning, Jamie Bell, Callum Turner, and Lukas Gage.
Front L to R: Riley Keough and Tracy Letts.
Courtesy
Since her critically acclaimed role in 2024’s The Last Showgirl, Pamela Anderson‘s acting career has been moving in a new direction. With decades devoted to more mainstream roles befitting of a blonde bombshell, Anderson now embraces projects that both challenge and scare her.
Up next, she stars in the satirical dark comedy Rosebush Pruning, as part of a star-studded ensemble that also includes Callum Turner, Riley Keough, Elle Fanning, Jamie Bell, Elena Anaya and Lukas Gage. The film, directed by Karim Aïnouzhits and written by Efthimis Filippou, hits select theaters across the U.S. today.
Rosebush Pruning follows a rich American family that lives in hedonistic isolation in Spain, seeking love and validation through one another, their designer wardrobes, and pop music. When an outsider infiltrates the family, buried tensions surface and blood ties are severed.
While on a break from working on her garden at home, Anderson spoke to Deadline about the evolution of her career, proving herself in an industry that can often be unforgiving, and whether or not a return to Baywatch is in the stars.
“I love the film Rosebush Pruning because I read the script and I knew Karim and his work, of which I was a big fan, and of the other people that are involved. It was like the hot movie. Everybody wanted to be in it, and it was just so odd and provocative. It was also great that Karim got to work with Efthimis, who normally just works with Yorgos [Lanthimos]. That was an odd and interesting pairing too,” shared Anderson.

From L to R Top: Elle Fanning, Jamie Bell, Callum Turner, and Lukas Gage.
Front L to R: Riley Keough and Tracy Letts.
Courtesy
The film will keep viewers on the edge of their seats with shocking twists and turns. Anderson plays the deceased family matriarch who lost her life after a pack of wolves savagely gobbled her up, leaving nearly nothing behind to be buried. She is, however, immortalized in concrete, as a naked woman atop a pretty empty grave outside their home. The family routinely visits the site, a tradition that’s often the cause of emotional outbursts.
“There are shocking things that happen in the film to tell the story, but it’s not gratuitous. It’s just random. I think there is something to be said about this level of wealth and vapidness, the lack of empathy and awareness in this world,” the Canadian native said.
Adding, “I remember when I came to Los Angeles, and people just talked about money. I thought, add zeros, add zeros. Like, someone let me think it’s $100, but they were talking about millions. I tried to find my way to navigate it all because it was way out of my depth. I’m so happy that I have had the life that I’ve had, and that I come from where I’ve come from, so I can kind of appreciate things in a different way.”

Pamela Anderson in ‘The Last Showgirl’
Roadside Attractions
Anderson took a quick trip down memory lane during the conversation, reflecting on how she couldn’t have imagined back then how her life would turn out. From her early credits in fan-favorite projects like Baywatch, Home Improvement, Barbwire, to the E! reality series Pam: Girl on the Loose, and two stints on Dancing With the Stars, they are fun experiences she remembers fondly. But today, she’s moving on a totally different wavelength.
“I felt like I had dug a hole for myself when I was younger. It was great to be able to be in these popular TV shows and get all this attention. Then the way my personal life went and how it became tabloid fodder, I couldn’t see a serious film career for me or anyone offering me a dramatic role. But it was so nice that I got to play Roxie in Chicago on Broadway, and my son made this documentary on my life [Netflix’s Pamela, a Love Story], and it reintroduced me to people in a different way,” Anderson stated.
She added, “Then [director] Gia [Coppola] was persistent and got me to do The Last Showgirl, and I haven’t stopped since. It’s been great having indie film directors see me about really great projects. I’ve been really lucky.”
Of this latest evolution, she is resolute in that she will not take anything for granted. Up next, she has a lineup of finished movies soon to be released: Place to Be from director Kornél Mundruczó, which will premiere at the Venice Film Festival; Michael Cera’s feature directorial debut Love is Not the Answer; Somedays, starring opposite Billy Bob Thornton; the Sally Potter-directed Alma; and playing Guy Pierce’s love interest in Rania Attieh and Daniel Garcia’s Queen of the Falls.
“So now I figure, this is my second chance, or whatever you want to call it, and I’m not taking it for granted. I have nothing to lose, and I’m going to do everything to my utmost capability. I also want to see things through to the end. It’s very important when you do a movie, even if it’s a very small part, that you promote it. You have to because so many people are depending on you. I’m very proud of my work. And with this difficult time for theaters and the movie industry, we have to promote for each other, not just ourselves.”

Pamela Anderson as C.J. Parker, Alexandra Paul as Lt.Stephanie Holden, Gregory Alan-Williams as Police Sgt. Garner Ellerbee, David Hasselhoff as Lt. Mitch Buchannon, David Charvet as Matt Brody, Nicole Eggert as Summer Quinn, Jeremy Jackson as Hobie Buchannon
FremantleMedia
With this new phase of her career going strong, there’s a lingering question about the past. Anderson’s best known for her portrayal of C.J. Parker in the 90s series Baywatch, which is currently being rebooted by Fox starring Stephen Amell, Shay Mitchell and Brooks Nader. With stars from the original series like David Chokachi and Erika Eleniak returning to Venice, would Anderson consider appearing on the new show if she were approached?
“No one’s reached out to me. I don’t know much about it. I know that they were talking to my sons at some point about producing, but I don’t think they had a meeting of the minds. I’m not sure what happened there, but I wish them well. It was a great job, and I loved going to work every day on the beach. I would have been there anyway. [Laughs] At the time, it taught me a lot, and it gave me worldwide exposure. Everything I’ve done has led me to here, which is a blessing. But I have no plans of going back to Baywatch,” she said.
When asked if she wasn’t curious about what became of C.J., she added, “If my kids were involved, I probably would have listened to them. I think I’ve just got to keep on seeing what else is out there. I get that there’s a lot of really great TV out there right now, but I’ve already done that. Now is my time to really play with different characters. I don’t want to just fill my time until the end of the year. I have options, and some things I’m thinking about, including some theater again. I want to make really bold choices. I want to surprise people. I want to surprise myself. And so I’m trying to do things I haven’t done in the past.”
>
Speaking at the rescheduled White House Correspondents’ Association Dinner on Friday, Donald Trump delivered an hour-long speech blending shopworn rally material with a string of leaden one-liners.
He was making his first appearance as president at the dinner, which had to be rescheduled last Aprtil after a shooter attempted to rush the ballroom and was subdued by the Secret Service. While presidents for decades have long used the event’s keynote slot to zing reporters to varying degrees, Trump lapsed into rally mode, only deviating for some personal broadsides at members of the press, marbled with references to their appearance.
After one quip about an elderly U.S. senator’s sex life drew crickets, Trump asked, “Does anybody get that? I thought that was actually great. That was actually the only thing I thought was good in this whole frickin’ stupid speech. It was the only good one, and that went down with not exactly great laughter.”
Over the rest of the meandering speech (watch the whole thing below), Trump seemed to recognize that many of his would-be jokes were not landing. There were few laughs or reactions at all beyond squirming or fidgeting as he veered in stream-of-consciousness fashion from topic to topic.
“Tonight’s event is even crazier than the last time,” Trump said. “It’s so successful that I’ve been informed by CBS News’s David Ellison” (Ellison is CEO of CBS parent Paramount) that “next year, they’re going to call it the Trump White House Correspondents’ Dinner.” Changing the name, he added, “is the only way you’re going to get me back here.”
The hour-long speech tested the patience of all but the fiercest Trump loyalists in attendance. The audience only sporadically showed a notable reaction, with long periods of near-silence prevailing. Once Trump’s remarks concluded and mentalist Oz Pearlman took the stage, hundreds of guests streamed toward the exits.
Compared with April’s event at the Hilton, the ballroom at the Waldorf-Astoria is much smaller. Trump cabinet members mingled with reporters in an aisle near one of Paramount’s tables. Among those sitting at a table with Chief Legal Officer Makan Delrahim were cabinet members Pete Hegseth and Robert Kennedy Jr., as well as presidential advisor Stephen Miller as well as Katie Miller and Kennedy’s wife, actress Cheryl Hines.
Prior to Trump’s remarks, there were some awkward moments onstage as annual awards were given out, including to some journalists behind investigations of the president. As Wall Street Journal reporters accepted an honor for their Jeffrey Epstein story, Trump shook their hands and then threw his hands up in the air and smiled a bit. Wolf Blitzer, who was presenting the award, noted that he sued the WSJ over the story for $20 billion.
Once he took the lectern, Trump went after Josh Dawsey, one of the WSJ winners, and CNN host Kaitlyn Collins with highly personal digs, but the room fell nearly silent as the would-be laugh lines were delivered. Weijia Jiang, outgoing president of the White House Correspondents’ Association, was stone-faced as Trump went into the roast-like remarks.
Trump had been scheduled to deliver remarks at the April dinner, but it was interrupted and then ended after a gunman breached a security barricade. The incident took place just outside the Washington Hilton ballroom, but shots could be heard among dinner guests. That sent the Secret Service scrambling to remove Trump and Vice President JD Vance from the dais, as well as other guests seated in the ballroom
Trump urged the White House Correspondents’ Association to reschedule, but the new arrangements were for a new venue at the Waldorf, formerly a Trump hotel, and with a new set of security measures in place.
But just as in April, there has been attention on the WHCA and what would be said during the evening, not just by Trump but by other journalists. In addition to a flurry of lawsuits against media outlets and routine rants about the news media, Trump has threatened to pull network broadcast licenses and his Justice Department has subpoenaed reporters to try to obtain their sources. In the latter case, the DOJ this week withdrew subpoenas issued to New York Times reporters who wrote pieces on the lack of security features on the new Air Force One. That followed a court hearing in which a federal judge criticized government attorneys for the way that the subpoenas were issued.
The president skipped the WHCA dinners last year and during his first term, at times holding counter events. But he agreed to attend this year, putting him front and center at an event celebrating some of the journalists he has attacked. Among those receiving awards were reporters for The Wall Street Journal who reported on a bawdy letter with Trump’s signature sent to Jeffrey Epstein. Trump denied he sent the letter, and sued the publication, along with its publisher and Rupert Murdoch.
Dade Hayes contributed to this report.
>
As Guillermo Del Toro brings Pan’s Labyrinth back to theaters 20 years later, he’s sticking to tried-and-true restoration techniques.
During Friday’s Hall H panel for the movie’s milestone anniversary at San Diego Comic-Con, the 3x Oscar winner reinforced his stance on using “absolutely no goddamn AI” in the 3D re-release, which premieres Oct. 9 in theaters.
“I said, ‘Absolutely no goddamn AI,’” said Del Toro to applause. “It’s much more expensive. I don’t care. The thing is, what we’re protecting is the beauty and the redeeming power of art.”
Del Toro’s latest comments come after he has frequently denounced generative AI, saying last year that he’d “rather die” than use it in his filmmaking. “Fuck AI!” he has declared on more than one occasion.
At Friday’s panel, the Mexican auteur also recalled the crew of Pan’s Labyrinth not initially understanding his wild vision of a dark fantasy set during the Spanish Civil War of 1936-’39.

Doug Jones in ‘Pan’s Labyrinth’ (2006) (Picturehouse/Courtesy Everett Collection)
“We had a lot of adversity in the movie,” said Del Toro. “And a lot of the crew was very skeptical. They would see a faun come in in the middle of a civil war movie, and they would say, ‘This fucker is crazy.’ But I remember the first time I knew, we were shooting the Pale Man.”
Re-enacting the Pale Man’s now iconic moment of holding up his own eyes in his hands to see, Del Toro noted that was the moment the crew was on board with his vision. “I said, ‘Ah, see?’” he recalled.
On Oct. 9, Pan’s Labyrinth will be presented theatrically for the first time by Cineverse and Fathom in 4K, with versions available in both 3D and HDR by Barco.
>
Laughs and an appreciation of Rick Moranis were plentiful as Amazon MGM’s Spaceballs: The New One, a sequel to the 1987 Mel Brooks Star Wars parody, flew into San Diego Comic-Con’s cavernous Hall H Friday afternoon.
One of the panel’s biggest attractions was seeing Moranis, the comedian who appeared in seminal 1980s films such as Ghostbusters andHoney, I Shrunk the Kid, make his first ever appearance. The actor played villain Dark Helmet in the original 1987 movie but has been largely absent from movies and television for most of this century, so his return with the Spaceballs sequel is headline making.
After a “comb the audience” joke, a callback to a line in the original movie that revealed the comedian to be in the audience wearing an oversized Darth Vader-style helmer, Moranis hopped up the stage to a standing ovation and chants of “Rick! Rick! Rick!”
“You made our childhoods better,” said Kevin Smith, who ably moderated the panel.
Moranis sat between Josh Gad, one of the creative forces behind the sequel, and Daphne Zuniga, who played Princess Vespa in the original and returns for the sequel. Also on stage were director Josh Greenbaum, actors Keke Palmer and Lewis Pullman, and writers Dan Hernandez and Benji Samit.
Gad described the origins of the sequel, recounting how he had been working on a Honey I Shrunk the Kids sequel with Moranis that ultimately fell apart, but did end up watching Moranis movies with his daughter.
“We finished it and she goes, ‘Can we watch part 2?’” he said. “And I said, ‘There is no part 2.’ And she said, ‘Yeah, the weird little alien guy said there was going to be a part 2.’”
When he replied, “Oh sweetie, that is called a joke,” she countered, “Well, why isn’t there a part 2?”
That night, Gad said, he had a dream about the sequel and soon after was pitching Brooks and his producing partner. He threw in ideas refencing new Star Wars movies and characters such as The Force Awakens and Kylo Ren.
Imitating Brooks, Gad summed up his reaction: “Josh, it sounds like you’ve really got your finger on the pulse. I don’t know half of what you’re talking about, but I really like it.”
The comedic presence of Brooks, who appeared only by a recorded video early on in the panel where he thanked the nerds for keeping his movie alive close to 40 years, loomed large over Hall H. Amazon MGM bucked the Comic-Con trend by not having a trailer debut or showing any clips from the movie, but it did show videos of Brooks reuniting with Moranis, reuniting with original star Bill Pullman and Zuniga, and recording lines in a booth while praising — or not — the script.
Greenbaum recounted meeting the comedy legend early on in the movie’s development, and when it was approaching time to being principal photography, he asked if the man had any words of advice.
Brooks paused, and said yes. Greenbaum was thrilled. He leaned in.
“Don’t say ‘Cut!’ first. It’s ‘Action!,’ and then ‘Cut!’” Brooks told him.
The young director’s takeaway? “It was, don’t take this too seriously and go out there and have fun,” Greenbaum summed up.
The new movie, Gad said, takes a look at the state of movies and nostalgia.
“The industry it was parodying is a very different industry than this one 40 years later,” said Gad. “We all sort of talked thematically about this word ‘nostalgia.’ And we love movies that look back. We love sequels. We love continuing these stories we grew up with. We analyzed why that is and we thought Spaceballs was the perfect vehicle to catch us up with everything that’s happened in filmdom and in fan filmdom.
Interjected Smith, “When they made the first one, there was a trilogy to make fun of. Now there’s a never-ending fount.”
“We really wanted to dive into that,” Gad replied.
The panel also featured a funny bit where Lewis Pullman read out a letter purportedly written by his father, Bill Pullman, about how great it was to be part of a family, while ignoring his own father-son relationship. And it also showed, on multiple screens, the purported plans of a Spaceballs cinematic universe, sketched out in decade-spanning movie “phases,” a shot at how Marvel Studios has unveiled timeline of its various movie plans.
>
These ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
According to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
Model Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
Your comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
Emily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
A photo diary of the nightlife scene from LA To Ibiza
OpenAI CEO apologizes to Tumbler Ridge community