Sports
Can an NHL offer sheet include a no-trade clause? Summer minutiae for diehards
Red Light newsletter 🏒 | This is The Athletic’s hockey newsletter. Sign up here to receive Red Light directly in your inbox.
Good morning to everyone except anyone who was involved in making “The Love Guru.” If you’re still thinking about hockey these days, you’re a true diehard, and we salute you.
(Sergei Belski / USA Today Sports)
New Kid on the Block
Oilers land another top rookie
It’s the middle of August and the NHL offseason has ground to a halt, but that doesn’t mean the best teams aren’t still out there adding top young talent. In this case, that team is The Athletic, and the talent is our new beat writer covering the Edmonton Oilers.
That would be Janson Duench, who made his debut earlier this week. My first instinct was to figure out a way to make Janson skate a lap by himself. My second was to invite him to further introduce himself to Red Light readers by answering some questions about the Oilers.
You’re getting settled into a new beat in a new city, but what’s your early sense of the mood of the Oilers fan base right now? Specifically, is there as much “we have to win” panic as the rest of the league seems to want to project onto them?
💬 Duench: “There’s certainly an uneasy optimism about what the Oilers could be this season with a new coach and plenty of rest. Worries about goaltending remain, which is par for the course in Edmonton.
“I think many Oilers fans would tell you a certain degree of the noise surrounding the team is projected from Toronto Maple Leafs fans who want to see Connor McDavid in blue and white. Still, as much as fans ardently believe their captain is in Edmonton to stay, this spring’s first-round exit, combined with the rising age of the core, is enough to make anybody start to sweat. Each year that ticks by only makes the goal less attainable, regardless of McDavid’s contract situation.”
As you mention in your intro piece, so much of the focus this year will be on Mike Babcock, especially after his sideshow stint in Columbus. There are lots of people waiting for this to explode. But is it really as simple as saying that he’ll be fine as long as he wins?
💬 “Many long-suffering Oilers fans will be happy with a win-at-all-costs bench boss. For others, no amount of success can augment what they already believe about Babcock.
“But as is so often the case in sports, winning is king. I think the fact that McDavid, Leon Draisaitl and Zach Hyman were at the genesis of Babcock’s hiring makes this a very different scenario than Columbus. The top dogs are clearly on board with his vision and sold on his track record. The hiring of associate coach D.J. Smith is an important security blanket, perhaps one that was missing with the Blue Jackets.
“Wins will be crucial in October, and if Babcock gets the Oilers on track for another deep run, it’s not that difficult to imagine the storm around him settling down.”
Coaching aside, is this team actually any better than the one that made a first-round exit last year?
💬 “Even without any roster changes, it’s possible this team would have been significantly better next season by virtue of enjoying a long summer. No team has more playoff baggage since 2022 than the Oilers (81 games). That’s practically an entire regular season. Throw in the addition of Stanley Cup-winning goalie Frederik Andersen to help stabilize the crease, and full seasons of Jason Dickinson and Connor Murphy, and I’m confident declaring this team has improved.
“Many fans celebrated the departure of longtime stalwart Darnell Nurse and his $9.25 million cap hit, but it bears watching to see if the left side is actually better off. That said, the pieces are in place: Jake Walman is due for a bounce-back season and free-agent signing Ryan Shea is coming off a breakout year in Pittsburgh.”
Trivia time💡
Janson is just the latest top prospect to head to Edmonton, where the Oilers have a long history of finding franchise players and landing No. 1 draft picks. But can you name all of the Oilers in franchise history who have won the Calder Trophy as the NHL’s top rookie?
Answer at the bottom.
(Graphic via The Athletic)
Coast to Coast
💄 This summer marks the end of Da Beauty League, the Minnesota institution that featured players from the NHL and elsewhere staying in shape and raising money for charity. Joe Smith talked to the beauties who made it all happen.
⭐ Great work by Max Bultman and Peter Baugh in running down the Hall-of-Fame status of all of today’s active stars from “they could retire today and make it” to “check back in a few years.” Their list has 15 sure-thing HOFers.
👔 Have you had your say in Dom Luszczyszyn’s annual front-office confidence survey?
🤬 In the return of The Contrarian, I made the case for why Dylan Larkin isn’t a quitter, the puck-over-glass rule is great and the Habs are headed for salary-cap trouble.
👶 Scott Wheeler has released his preseason top 32 ranking for next year’s draft. Get ready to know the name Landon DuPont.
🏋️ I’ll be honest, I was just about to add all of these exercises into my next workout before Fluto Shinzawa talked me out of it.
🏆 Who wins an all-time roster battle of NHL stars based on how many Stanley Cup titles they won? Can Alex Ovechkin, Teemu Selanne and Ray Bourque of Team One Cup hold off Sidney Crosby, Patrick Kane and Martin Brodeur on Team Three Cups? Let’s find out.
🎙️ “The Athletic Hockey Show” tries to fix the Blackhawks and Senators this week, with special guests Mark Lazerus, Scott Powers, Julian McKenzie and me. Watch or listen here.
📰 Hockey Canada announced continued suspensions for four of the five members of its 2018 World Juniors hockey team who were acquitted of sexual assault charges last year. Alex Formenton is immediately reinstated for Hockey Canada-sanctioned events. Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote remain suspended. Full story here.
(Corinne Votaw / Imagn Images)
No Dumb Questions
We believe that in hockey, as in life, there are no dumb questions. So, if you have something you’ve always wondered about the sport, ask away by emailing us at redlight@theathletic.com.
Can offer sheets have no-trade clauses?
When an offer-sheet contract is signed, can it contain provisions other than salary? For example, no-movement clauses or limited no-trade clauses? Or is an offer sheet limited to just salary and term and the way that’s paid each year?
It may be important because if a matched offer-sheet contract has only money and term, then the matching team is in a much better position to trade that contract at some point. For example, I suspect Connor Bedard’s Blackhawks contract has all sorts of no-movement or no-trade provisions for its five-year term. It was a contract directly with the team. However, does Leo Carlsson’s contract have any such provisions? – Steven P.
It’s an interesting question, in part because there’s an important detail hiding here that I think a lot of fans aren’t clear on.
First things first: Steven is right that Leo Carlsson’s contract does not include any no-trade protection. In theory, the Ducks can trade him at any time, aside from the first year. (When a team matches an offer sheet, it can’t trade the player for one year. That’s to prevent them from matching one team’s offer and then immediately finding a better deal with a third team.)
That said, could Carlsson’s offer sheet have included no-trade protection? Yes. It’s allowed. It just wasn’t part of this particular contract, presumably because Carlsson’s side figured that briefly becoming the league’s highest-paid player was enough of an ask.
But here’s the twist that Steven and others often miss: Bedard’s new extension barely contains any no-trade protection either. He has a no-move clause in the fifth year of his five-year deal, but that’s it. The Hawks are completely free to trade him anywhere they want until 2030.
Why? Because no player can have any trade protection in his contract until he would otherwise qualify for UFA status. That typically happens after a player’s seventh season. So, in the case of Carlsson and Bedard, both of whom debuted in 2023, they’re not eligible for no-trade (or no-movement) clauses until 2030-31. Even if their teams were willing to give them protection before then, the league wouldn’t allow it.
That’s an important detail to keep in mind the next time you hear fans bemoaning all the no-trade clauses in the league these days — especially fans of teams who are often on those lists. “We can’t trade for anyone!” Well, that’s not completely true. Anyone in the league can be traded anywhere, as long as they haven’t reached the UFA threshold yet. And that includes young stars like Leo Carlsson and Connor Bedard.
(Ethan Miller / Getty Images)
💡Trivia Answer
If you came up empty on your list of Oilers who’ve won the Calder as NHL rookie of the year, congratulations: You got this week’s trivia question right.
Yes, despite having had stars such as Wayne Gretzky, Connor McDavid, Mark Messier, Jari Kurri, Leon Draisaitl, Grant Fuhr and Paul Coffey, not to mention four No. 1 draft picks in the 2010s, the Oilers have never had a player win the Calder.
Gretzky wasn’t eligible because of his WHA experience. McDavid missed time to injury as a rookie, which opened the door for 24-year-old Artemi Panarin to beat him out. And of the other players mentioned above, only Fuhr was even a finalist, finishing third in 1982.
Other near-misses include Jason Arnott (second to Martin Brodeur in 1994), Ryan Nugent-Hopkins (second to Gabriel Landeskog in 2012) and Stuart Skinner (second to Matty Beniers three years ago). But they’ve never had a winner.
📫 Love Red Light? Check out The Athletic’s other newsletters.
>
Sports
The Giants’ struggles are now a national story, but the biggest culprit remains the pitching
There are bad seasons, and then there are seasons that prompt articles from national writers. You can tiptoe through the bad seasons and hope that nobody else notices, but when the rest of the country starts to care, it’s a sign that an organization has screwed up majorly.
On that note, our own Brittany Ghiroli had an excellent look at the brutal start to the Buster Posey era, using the unflattering technique of “describing what’s happened so far.” All of the losses, and all of the surrounding nonsense, have conspired to produce the perfect description in the headline: “Buster Posey’s Giants legacy is on the line as adulation is shifting to anger”.
The Giants’ Buster Posey put his legacy on the line. Will it work?
Brittany Ghiroli and more
For my money, the legacy question isn’t important. Jeff Kent spent four years wearing Dodger blue and sneering at the Giants. If you would like more information on this dastardly turn of events and how it affected his legacy, you can learn about it at Jeff Kent Day at Oracle Park on Aug. 29. Eventually, the Giants might have to plow this whole front office under and hope it’s good for the soil, but there will still be standing ovations and pre-game ceremonies. For what it’s worth, I still think of Tom Haller as one of the most underrated Giants in franchise history, even though he also built the only 100-loss team in franchise history.
You shouldn’t be worried about how Posey will be perceived in 2036. You should, however, be very concerned with how the baseball got so bad in 2026. Now that you’ve read Ghiroli’s article through (required reading, test on Monday), let’s focus just on this season for now. Most of the team’s struggles, flaws, needs, wants and failures in the 2026 season are included in the article. Let’s rank the problems of 2026 and only 2026, as they appear.
Again, this is only looking at how the Giants got here this season. If you’re worried about next season, I can’t help you in this article. If you comment about how the Giants have already messed up next season, your penance is to watch this video explaining how you’ve made me feel.
Here we go: the best reasons to Monday-morning quarterback the Giants, even though it’s still early Sunday evening in this analogy, starting with a couple that you really shouldn’t care about at all.
5. Not signing a closer
Posey took significant heat on local radio earlier this season for saying he “didn’t regret” not signing a closer in the offseason.
The silliest of complaints, made only by casuals who parachute into the baseball offseason after the Super Bowl ends. Edwin Díaz was, by leaps and bounds, the best closer available this offseason. The Giants could have built their entire offseason around him and felt like they came out on top. Díaz has an 11.57 ERA and just blew a two-run lead for the Dodgers on Thursday night.
The Giants could have signed Robert Suarez for something like three years, $50 million, but let’s check on his status over the next two seasons, when the Giants might actually need a closer. It wouldn’t have helped them to have a great closer this year. It simply would have added a year to your lifespan.
Signing a big-money closer like Robert Suarez alone wouldn’t have fixed what has ailed the Giants’ bullpen (and pitching staff as a whole) this season. (Edward M. Pio Roda / Getty Images)
Note that this is distinct from “addressing the bullpen” or “screwing up the entire pitching staff.” We’re just talking about throwing money at the problem. It almost never works, and it wasn’t going to work this time.
4. The biggest contracts
This is the easiest problem on the surface to clock: The Giants will owe Rafael Devers, Willy Adames and Matt Chapman a combined $480 million-plus after this season, yet this season has been a complete disaster.
The Devers trade made sense at the time, giving the Giants the big-name slugger they kept missing in free agency. But in retrospect, the timing looks off.
There is no easy way out for Posey, who told local media after the Aug. 3 trade deadline — when he drew largely favorable reviews — he “was glad” to have Devers, Adames and Chapman still on the team.
So far this season, the three players are worth 6.2 WAR according to Baseball-Reference and 3.1 WAR according to FanGraphs, which is a substantial difference. But it’s also safe to assume the Giants have gotten at least some value out of their highest-paid players.
Compare that to the Brewers, who had a preseason payroll estimate of approximately $105.4 million and spent $44 million of it on Brandon Woodruff and Christian Yelich, both of whom aren’t helping them at all right now (Woodruff had season-ending shoulder surgery in July and Yelich is a below-replacement level DH). They would love to have their highest-paid players contributing a couple wins here and there.
No, the biggest problem isn’t that the Giants are paying Adames superstar money to be an average shortstop, and it’s not that Devers is getting paid 140 OPS+ money to have a 120 OPS+. The players around them have been a much bigger drag on the team. And if the argument is that their high salaries are preventing the Giants from giving the money to different, greener free agents on the other side of the fence, I have news about how most free-agent contracts work out.
More than any of that, though, is that this is a choice the Giants have made. If they want to pretend like they’re the kind of organization that gets only a couple chances at a big contract, then, yes, Devers, Adames and Chapman hurt the Giants in term of opportunity cost — they had a finite number of “spend big” tokens, and this is how they used them.
Except the tokens aren’t meted out by a tough-but-fair baseball god. Ownership distributes them, making the choice to invest in the Curran Theatre instead of Dylan Cease. Is it unfair to cherry-pick Cease instead of, say, Tatsuya Imai, who was almost as exciting a few months ago? Yes. Yes, it is. But the point stands: the three biggest contracts affect the Giants only if they’re committed to an internal salary cap, which they appear to be. Their payroll is about the same as it was a decade ago, even though inflation marches on.
The Giants’ highest-paid players aren’t living up to expectations. It’s not ideal. But it’s also something that teams can overcome, even when their entire payroll looks like a Dodgers’ rounding error, like it does with the Brewers.
3. Inattention at the margins
The Giants have spent most of the season with an open 40-man roster spot, and they’ve made hardly any waiver claims. This is the biggest departure from the Farhan Zaidi era, and it’s jarring.
At the same time, this is more of a long-term concern that hints at a lack of creativity (or an overwhelmed front office) that bears scrutiny. The difference between Christian Koss and Shay Whitcomb, recently claimed by the Giants on waivers, wasn’t going to be the difference in 2026.
This inattention has piled up, though, leaving the Giants with lopsided benches, unexpected spot starters, poor pinch-hitting options and all sort of other calamitous outcomes.
2. Hiring Tony Vitello
Again, this is about 2026 only. For what it’s worth — and it’s not much — Posey is hinting that Vitello is coming back.
“One of the challenges in this job is trying to understand when is the time to act and when is it time to not and just hold the course,” Posey says. “I look at the job that Tony and his staff are doing, I don’t have any reason not to believe that what they’re doing isn’t gonna get us to a place where we’re playing more consistent winning baseball.”
It might not be up to Posey if he’s not coming back, but let’s focus on the initial decision to hire a college coach without any major-league experience.
For the single-season sample of 2026, it’s been a disaster. The learning curve was always supposed to be too high, but it’s possible that massive difference was actually an understatement. There was simply too much to learn on the fly at the major-league level, and if you’re still high on Vitello as a person, personality or clubhouse binder, this season must have felt like watching a champion NASCAR driver in a boat race. “Where’s the clutch?”, he seems to ask every other inning or so. “Why’s the road sopping wet?”
That’s a charitable view of the hire, one that still gives Vitello the benefit of the doubt and assumes that it’s possible to learn through experience. Even then, the idea that it’s possible to squeeze immediate extra wins out of a college coach with no major-league experience seems dead. It might be a good long-term play, depending on the situation, but there will be an upfront cost, and it’s a doozy.
1. Incorrectly evaluating what makes an effective pitcher in 2026
Mad about the lack of attention paid to the bullpen this offseason? Don’t perseverate on the free agents the Giants didn’t sign. Focus more on the decisions the Giants made when evaluating their internal and external options. Think about their evaluation of Ryan Walker last offseason. They compared his 2024 season (one of the best bullpen efforts in franchise history) and 2025 (a disappointing follow-up) and believed in the 2024 version. They were wrong.
They were wrong a lot. Tyler Mahle is pitching well enough for the Braves that it wouldn’t hurt to say “Game 7 starter, Tyler Mahle” out loud once, just so it doesn’t surprise you into a heart attack if it actually happens. But with both Mahle and Adrian Houser, the Giants were gambling that they would get an entire season of that kind of pitching, while saving money for the owners and avoiding longer-term deals that have a way of tying the Giants’ hands. What they got was the kind of inconsistency that sends starting pitchers down to that tier of free agency in the first place.
The Giants bet that Adrian Houser and Tyler Mahle would be inexpensive but effective rotation stalwarts, but it was a miscalculation. (Ezra Shaw / Getty Images)
The bullpen is filled with mediocre strikeout rates and iffy walk rates, a brutal combination. It’s true that the strikeout rate for the league has dropped, while the walk rates have increased, but the Giants seem like one of the teams that’s been caught most off-guard by the shifting sands of pitcher evaluation.
This is the big one, the reason for the Giants’ horrible season. Everything else — the managerial weirdness, the contracts, the decision to spend anywhere but the bullpen — pales in comparison to the franchise’s ability to determine which pitchers are likelier to get outs than others.
Perhaps this is all on Posey. Maybe the dirty secret is that he’s quietly overruling all of the other people in the room and making baseball-player-brained decisions, like “Mahle was always a tough AB. I like the cut of his jib, too.”
Or, more likely, it took a village to whiff like this. If you think the roster is built by Posey flipping through the box scores by himself in the morning, you’re way off. They might have the wrong quants or not enough quants or maybe they’ve outsourced their data distillation to an AI chatbot named YORVIT that kept telling them that Erik Miller was going to throw strikes any day now.
In Ghiroli’s article, she directly asks Posey if he’s scared that he’s surrounded by yes-men, and he responded by saying that he didn’t think so, but didn’t exactly call the idea ridiculous.
Later in the article, Posey address the Pride Night debacle.
Posey feels burned by some in the media. He’s not on social media but is well aware of the online backlash. In person, he said, fans have been overwhelmingly supportive. Encouraging even.
“I haven’t had anybody berate me publicly,” he says. “It would be kind of interesting if they did.”
This is selection bias. People are more likely to say nice things to someone than mean things. They’re especially likely to feel more comfortable saying nice things to a franchise icon. This isn’t evidence; it’s an anecdote, and it should be one of the easiest cognitive biases to grasp. If you’re impressed by this one, you have no chance of spotting the yes-men among you.
Still, it’s hard to see this being a roster that’s been built through the singular vision of a rogue ex-player. There might be times when Posey’s voice is the only one that matters on a decision, but the bigger problem is that the decisions have been wrong, especially on the pitching side, almost certainly because of faulty logic, data, poor luck, or a combination thereof. There are just under 400 pitchers in the majors. The Giants have 12 of them, and not all of them should be among the 400. The rotation looked shaky, and the Giants took a risky way out. It was easy to find fault with the strategy then.
Again, if the Giants had prevented fewer runs in 2026, they would have seemed almost normal. Not completely normal. There still would have been plenty of second-guessing. But the kind of fire where the flames are noticeable from all over the country? That takes some serious screwing up. And, lo, the Giants have screwed up.
They’ve screwed up in a way that calls every season after this one into question, and the fatal flaw of this front office might eventually be “didn’t know how to prevent runs.” It’s enough to put an organization in the gutter for a long time. It’s also the main problem this season, and while there have been plenty of other problems, and they’ve been both distracting and infuriating for everyone involved, you’ll never believe how many problems will go away if they can find starters and relievers who can keep the other team from scoring.
The Giants are a, uh, quirky organization that’s paying for their quirkiness this season, and they lost an entire season because of some very bad ideas. When it comes to a 2026 postmortem, though, the tune hasn’t changed: The Giants needed to assemble a pitching staff that’s better than this. They have deeper problems, but solving that one might be the only one they need to address this offseason in order to have a much, much better season next year.
>
Sports
Scottie Scheffler: World number one leads first FedEx play-off event
St Jude Championship – round two leaderboard
-11 S Scheffler (US); -8 Im (Kor), V Hovland (Nor); -7 L Aberg (Swe); -6 Nico Echavarria (Col), T Fleetwood (Eng), J Spieth (US), B Harman (US)
Selected others: -3 M Fitzpatrick (Eng), J Thomas (US); -2 A Rai (Eng); E H Hall (Eng); +1 S Lowry (Ire); +3 J Rose (Eng); +4 R McIlroy (NI), J Smith (Eng); +5 A Fitzpatrick (Eng)
Scottie Scheffler equalled the course record with a nine-under-par 61 as he opened up a three-stroke lead at the end of the second round of the St Jude Championship in Memphis.
The world number one, who already led the FedEx Cup standings heading into the first of three play-off events, birdied the first five holes at TPC Southwind.
The American proceeded to knock in a further six birdies, with bogeys on the eighth and 12th holes the only blemishes on his scorecard as he recorded his fourth career round of 61 or better on the PGA Tour.
“Really just a dream start. Probably one of the best starts I’ve had on tour, to be honest with you. I couldn’t tell you a time where I’ve been lower early in the round,” said Scheffler.
“My swing has felt really good in the past couple weeks, especially playing at home. It was nice to get out there and get things rolling early in the round and was able to keep the momentum going and shoot myself a nice round.”
South Korea’s Im Sung-jae is tied for second with Norway’s Viktor Hovland at eight under overall, with Ludvig Aberg a shot further back.
Reigning FedEx Cup champion Tommy Fleetwood is the highest placed British player and in a quartet that also includes Jordan Spieth at six under.
Matt Fitzpatrick and fellow Englishman Aaron Rai, who collected his first major at the US PGA Championship in May, are at three under and two under respectively, with Northern Ireland’s Rory McIlroy at four over.
With there being no 36-hole cut at any FedEx play-off event, six-time major winner McIlroy will hope to fare better over the weekend.
One player who will be absent though is Scotland’s Robert MacIntyre, who withdrew prior to the start of play on Friday with a knee injury.
MacIntyre, who had limped to a 12-over 82 during the first round on Thursday, currently sits at 31st on the FedEx Cup points list.
The top 50 will head into next week’s BMW Championship.
>
Sports
Nationals to move All-Star shortstop CJ Abrams to second base in surprising decision
NEW YORK — The Washington Nationals will move All-Star shortstop CJ Abrams to second base in the coming days, a dramatic decision that could help the team defensively in the short term but raises questions about morale and fit down the stretch.
When asked about the move Friday, Abrams said he didn’t have many thoughts on the decision or the team’s communication of it, but still views himself as a shortstop long term. Manager Blake Butera has stood by Abrams’ play at shortstop throughout the season and said Abrams received the decision well and was a “total pro.” Abrams, though, didn’t come across as overjoyed when speaking with reporters Friday.
“We’ll see how it goes,” Abrams said.
Abrams will still play shortstop about once a week, with Nasim Nuñez — arguably the best fielder in the organization — shifting from second base to shortstop.
Abrams, 25 and an All-Star starter this season, has been one of the best offensive players in MLB and showed flashes of improvement in the field this year, but ranks last in MLB among all position players in outs above average despite working with a new set of coaches.
Team officials began kicking around the idea of moving Abrams to second base early this season and broached the idea with Adams last week, wanting to give him time to sit with the idea and voice his opinion.
Butera said he, president of baseball operations Paul Toboni and general manager Ani Kilambi came to the decision together.
“I play shortstop today, so I’ll be ready to go,” Abrams said. “That’s where I’ve been. Can take charge of the infield when I can, and play my game.”
“Think it’s the right thing to do for the group, and also acknowledge the fact that whenever somebody is moving from shortstop, that can be a big thing,” Butera said.
The timing of the decision was arguably the biggest surprise. The Nationals could have held out on a position change until this offseason, or even through part of 2027, if they wanted to give Abrams more runway. They have a strong crop of shortstops in the farm system as well but let the deadline pass without trading him. Ultimately, Butera said, the decision was made to help the club win more games in 2026 and 2027.
“There is no perfect time to do this,” Butera said. “I think you can make an argument like, ‘Why didn’t we do it coming out of spring training?’ It’s like, well, then we’re not giving him a chance to show if he can do it or not. Then why not do it now or next year? We think now is probably the best time because, one, we wanted CJ to be able to play shortstop, and especially with new coaches here and have some run to do that. But then also I think doing it now allows him a chance to, like, get some real feedback before the offseason to know what this looks like and what he’s going to have to really hone in on during the offseason to make 2027 better.”
>
-
movies3 months agoSearch For Canadian TV Actor Stewart McLean Now Homicide Investigation
-
Fashion9 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2017
-
Fashion9 years agoAccording to Dior Couture, this taboo fashion accessory is back
-
Fashion9 years agoModel Jocelyn Chew’s Instagram is the best vacation you’ve ever had
-
Fashion9 years agoYour comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
-
Fashion9 years agoEmily Ratajkowski channels back-to-school style
-
Fashion9 years ago9 Celebrities who have spoken out about being photoshopped
-
Fashion9 years agoA photo diary of the nightlife scene from LA To Ibiza
