Connect with us

Sports

Leeds close to reaching agreement to sign Eintracht Frankfurt goalkeeper Michael Zetterer

Published

on

Leeds United are close to reaching an agreement in principle with Eintracht Frankfurt for their goalkeeper Michael Zetterer.

The Premier League side have been in the market for an understudy for James Trafford since securing a club-record deal for the England international.

The German goalkeeper, 31, would be United’s back-up stopper if the two clubs can find an agreement. Sources at Elland Road, speaking anonymously to protect relationships, expect Frankfurt would need to secure a new goalkeeper of their own before sanctioning the German’s departure.

Zetterer’s arrival would also then allow Leeds to wave through an exit for Lucas Perri, who, one year after arriving from Lyon as first-choice, would otherwise spend much of next term on United’s bench. Perri has attracted interest from European clubs.

Frankfurt only signed Zetterer themselves on August 20 last year. In his one season with the Bundesliga side, he made 22 league appearances and kept six clean sheets. He also started five games in the Champions League.

As it stands, Trafford is backed up by Alex Cairns in the goalkeeping department at Leeds. Karl Darlow, who has now joined Manchester United, and Illan Meslier, who has now joined Premier League champions Arsenal, each departed as free agents this summer.

Zetterer, who has also played in the Netherlands, is also a former Germany youth international, having represented the nation’s under-20 and under-21 sides. He has not, however, ever represented Germany’s senior national team.


How would Zetterer fit in at Leeds?

Analysis by The Athletic’s German football correspondent Seb Stafford-Bloor

Zetterer is a stable, highly experienced goalkeeper.

He was signed by Eintracht Frankfurt a year ago as a deputy to Kaua Santos, a precocious young Brazilian goalkeeper with enormous talent. A succession of difficult moments saw Santos lose confidence, however, and Zetterer ultimately ended the season as first choice and a safe pair of hands.

Zetterer has overcome a lot in his career. Serious hand and wrist injuries early in his career at Werder Bremen cost him almost two years of football, but he recovered in the years since. The German was successful in grinding his way through various loan spells abroad, and eventually made his way back to the Bundesliga, where he became Werder Bremen’s first choice, proving his physical and emotional resilience.

Technically, he’s the typical modern goalkeeper: he’s not the tallest or the most physically imposing, but he’s good with his feet, quick off his line, and equipped with a fine set of reflexes.

Zetterer is often held up as a strong personality — as a very good goalkeeper, but also someone clubs like having in their dressing room, and no doubt that too is part of Leeds’ thinking

>

Continue Reading

Sports

The controversial Manor Solomon chant and why West Ham have asked fans not to sing it

Published

on

It did not take long for Manor Solomon to have an impact on his West Ham United debut against Burnley last weekend.

Solomon, the Israel international who joined from London rivals Tottenham Hotspur for £5million earlier this month, scored in a 2-2 draw on Sunday, West Ham’s opening Championship game of the season.

But that was overshadowed when West Ham fans in the away enclosure sang, “Manor Solomon’s on my mind and he hates Palestine,” a controversial chant which references the Israel-Gaza conflict.

Some supporters also paraded the Israel flag. In October 2023, Premier League clubs were advised to prohibit Israel and Palestinian flags inside stadiums. And then in August 2025, clubs were reminded that material which could be considered “politically motivated”, which could include symbolism of countries in conflict, should not be permitted in stadiums.

Ahead of this Saturday’s home game against Charlton Athletic, West Ham published a statement discouraging supporters from singing the “offensive and divisive” chant, which contains an “anti-Palestine message”.

The Athletic answers the key questions about the chant, why it is controversial and what Solomon has said previously about it.


Is this chant new?

The chant initially surfaced during Solomon’s loan spell at Leeds United in the 2024-25 season. Supporters sang it during a 2-0 Boxing Day victory over Stoke City in December 2024. Leeds published a statement after the match condemning the chant.

“Discriminatory language or chanting is not acceptable and supporters could be breaking the law,” it read. “The club condemns this behaviour and has a zero-tolerance policy towards discrimination abuse of all kinds.

“Tough measures and sanctions are in place across all English football leagues to tackle illegal behaviours within football grounds, and this involves but is not limited to, discriminatory behaviour and tragedy chanting.”

But supporters continued to sing the chant about the 27-year-old winger, forcing Leeds to release another statement and threatening fans with stadium bans if caught singing it.

Manor Solomon wheels away and roars as he elebrates scoring on his West Ham debut in Sunday's 2-2 draw with Burnley

Manor Solomon celebrates scoring on his West Ham debut in Sunday’s 2-2 draw with Burnley (Matt McNulty/Getty Images)

Why is the chant controversial?

In short, because it refers to the Israel-Gaza conflict.

The present conflict began in October 2023 after Hamas killed around 1,200 people and captured 250 hostages in southern Israel. According to figures reported by The New York Times on August 19, more than 70,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza since. That figure has been reported by the territory’s health ministry, whose data does not distinguish between civilians and combatants, and includes thousands of children.

The chant has left many people feeling uncomfortable. “It’s a hateful, celebratory chant that is very shallow and talks about hating a nation,” Danielle Bett, the director of communications at British-Jewish organisation Yachad, which supports a political resolution to the conflict, tells The Athletic.

“This chant should be condemned and not endorsed. As an Israeli, I don’t want to be represented and characterised by hate.

“I don’t know Manor Solomon’s political beliefs and I’m not sure that I want to have every Israeli abroad, be it a footballer or anyone else, to have to be the spokesperson on the conflict.

“The focus needs to be on the issues Israelis and people in Palestine face, and how we talk about it in a meaningful way. The chant makes a very broad assumption and normalises the idea that Israelis and Palestinians hate one another. That is just not helpful.”

Manor Solomon is challenged by Stoke's Wouter Burger during a Championship match in December 2024

Leeds United fans sang the same chant during a match against Stoke City in December 2024 (Ben Roberts Photo/Getty Images)

Supporters group Israeli Hammers also issued a statement supporting  West Ham’s efforts to discourage supporters from singing the chant.

“As the Israeli Hammers, we don’t encourage hatred towards Palestinians, or towards any group of people. Football should bring people together and our message has always been one of peace, respect and support for West Ham.

“We also believe Manor should be treated first and foremost as what he is: a footballer. At the same time, we think it is important to acknowledge the amount of hostility and abuse, including antisemitic abuse, Manor has received online since signing for West Ham, much of it directed at him simply because he is Israeli. We also fully support the statement issued by West Ham United.”

Has Solomon ever said anything about it?

The last time Solomon spoke publicly about the chant was during an interview with The Athletic in January 2025 during his time as a Leeds player.

“I prefer not to comment about it,” he said. “I just want to say I’m grateful for the support of the fans, for everyone, and it doesn’t matter where they’re from and what they believe and what they support.”

Could West Ham or their supporters be punished for this?

That is unclear. The Football Association is aware of the chanting that took place at Burnley’s Turf Moor stadium on Sunday but has yet to say anything publicly on the chant.

West Ham have an anti-discrimination policy that states that they have “a zero-tolerance approach to any form of discrimination.”

What have West Ham said?

On Thursday, West Ham issued a statement which read: “Everyone at the club recognises that each and every supporter is an ambassador for West Ham United at our fixtures. Regardless of their background, every supporter within our diverse fanbase should also be free to enjoy watching their team play football without fear, discrimination or abuse. And we remain committed to ensuring that everyone feels safe, respected and included.

“The club is aware of an offensive and divisive chant, containing an anti-Palestine message, being sung by a section of away supporters during our opening EFL Championship match at Burnley on Sunday afternoon.

“We understand that singing and chanting is a traditional and deeply-embedded part of the matchday experience. We encourage our supporters to sing loud and proud about their football club and the players wearing the claret and blue shirt — but never in a way that creates division or causes offence among fellow fans.”

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Richard Masters on… Chelsea payments, FIFA’s fiasco and the arrival of Jeff Bezos

Published

on

“There’s a lot of new about it,” is Premier League chief executive Richard Masters’ sales pitch for the new season, which starts on Friday evening when Arsenal, the newish champions, host Coventry City, the newish competitors.

With Pep Guardiola on sabbatical again, Manchester City are one of nine teams under new management. Mohamed Salah, one of the league’s icons, has moved to Turkey, but Premier League sides have already spent more than £2billion ($2.7bn) on new talent, with more sure to come.

Aston Villa and Crystal Palace enter the season as champions of European competitions, Palace for the very first time, Villa for the first time in a long time, while Bournemouth can look forward to their first set of European club fixtures.

This will also be the first season played under a fully operational Independent Football Regulator, which partly explains why the league’s 20 clubs will also be following new financial rules and we may even get a new financial settlement between the Premier League and the English Football League.

New, new, new… that was certainly the word of the day when Masters hosted a scribble of football writers at the Premier League’s London HQ this week to answer as many questions as we could squeeze into half an hour of his busy schedule. And as he seemed not to completely hate the experience, we managed to get seven minutes of added time.

Given the fact that opportunities to get the boss of the world’s most popular domestic football competition on the record for this long do not happen very often, we thought we would share pretty much all of it with you, bar a few snips here and there for readability and to avoid repetition.


The forever war: Manchester City v Premier League

However, we are going to start with some very obvious repetition, as Masters has given a version of this answer every year for what seems like most of my adult life.

When asked, without any hope of receiving a fresh response, if there will ever be an outcome to the Premier League’s case against Manchester City, the small matter of those 100-plus charges for a decade of alleged cheating, Masters said: “Yes, there will be an outcome, but I literally can’t say anything about it.

“There’s only one available outcome, which is to allow the process to reach its natural conclusion. I can’t talk about the substance of the case. I can’t talk about the timing of the case. I’ve always been very clear about that. I accept it’s taken longer than anyone expected and obviously people are eager to know what the outcome is, but the process is the process.”

For those of you still counting. It is now eight years since German outlet Der Spiegel published the hacked emails at the centre of the controversy, six years since Manchester City overturned its two-year ban from European competition at the Court of Arbitration for Sport, three and a half years since the Premier League charged the club and two years since an independent panel started a 12-week hearing to assess those charges.

(Michael Regan/Getty Images)

Has something gone wrong? Does this delay suggest something needs to change?

“No,” he said. “We’ve always said the commission needs the time and space to do their work.

“It’s the league’s job, providing the evidence is there, to put serious allegations in front of an independent commission to let it establish the truth. That process shouldn’t be qualified by the amount of time it takes.”

But the commission has been mulling it over since December 2024?

“I just have to accept the fact that people are frustrated and want to know (the result),” he said. “The process is independent. It will take as long as it takes.”

And those frustrated people include the other clubs in the league?

“I talk to clubs all the time and it’s not top of the list,” he said. “There are lots of other things to talk about.”


Chelsea’s hidden payments 

We can imagine, we all nodded, like how they feel about the £10million fine and suspended transfer ban the league gave to Chelsea earlier this year after they admitted making £47million worth of off-the-books payments to agents and third parties between 2011 and 2018?

For some added context, those payments helped Chelsea recruit the likes of Samuel Eto’o, Eden Hazard and David Luiz. Players you would think provide a team with a sporting advantage.

The Premier League, however, like UEFA before and the Football Association after, was in a difficult spot, as it had to balance the undoubted seriousness of the offences — and their impact — against the equally undisputed fact that these organisations only knew about the offences because Chelsea’s new owners discovered them during the due diligence they did when they bought the club from Roman Abramovich in 2022 and promptly fessed up.

“In the end, a sanction agreement was reached and it was the largest fine in Premier League history by quite some distance, and it was also the only sporting sanction, albeit a suspended one, that’s been given outside the PSR cases,” said Masters, when asked a question that suggested the sanction was a tad too generous.

The mention of PSR was a reference, of course, to the points deductions Everton, Leicester City and Nottingham Forest have been hit with for breaching the league’s old financial rules, the prof and sustainability regulations.

“(The Chelsea) sanction had to go to an independent commission and part of their job is to opine on whether the sanction is unduly lenient,” Masters added. “They did not in this case.”

(Steve Bardens/Getty Images)


Other people’s problems, the best kind

Having spent at least until the first hydration break of our allotted time with him on parochial matters, we started to branch out into more global issues.

As you may have gathered, there was a football tournament in North America this summer. Lots of people really liked most of it, but there were a few issues that caused a bit of a flap there and elsewhere.

What impact will all of that have on the Premier League?

“I’m a big fan of the World Cup,” said Masters.

“It’s a great recruiting sergeant for bringing new people into the game. Normally, everyone gets a little lift post a World Cup or Euros, as there are just more people interested in the game or who want to follow players they’ve met along the way.”

Indeed, we nodded, but what about those less savoury moments? The rows about certain teams being favoured by the referees, inconsistencies with new pieces of technology or, dare we say, the world’s most powerful politician calling a football official to have a star player’s ban suspended?

“I do scroll through social media every now and then, (and) I bump into some of the stuff that people are saying out there,” he said.

“But I believe that when our fans turn up — we’re 99 per cent sold out — and they look at what’s on the pitch, it’s everything it should be. Everyone is trying their best. The referees are trying their best. There’s lots of controversy but it is what it says it is.”

Speaking of football officials and lots of controversy, we were all eager to hear his take on the recent travails of FIFA boss Gianni Infantino. A touch of schadenfreude, perhaps?

Gianni Infantino has had a testing few weeks (Carl Recine/Getty Images)

“I don’t think the (short-lived FIFA Forward Enterprise) concept is the only thing that has contributed to the split in the confederations,” he observed sagely.

“It’s an accumulation of things over a period of time — the expansionism, the taking football in a particular direction — that has led to this situation where we have a split FIFA.”

To be fair to Masters, he has been talking about FIFA’s arrogance and overreach for some time.

“This proves what we’ve been talking about for five years: the calendar, competitions, decisions that impact on domestic football competitions,” he continued.

“The Premier League has been the same size since 1994. It begins in August and ends in May. All the new football is either at regional or global level, and the amount of football that players play now… we’re at saturation point.

“Leagues don’t have a meaningful seat at the table at all. We’re not consulted on the big decisions. We think that’s wholly wrong and that’s why we’ve regrettably had to put in a complaint at the European Commission. We’ve all seen what’s happened over the summer, but it feels like more of the same.”

That complaint was lodged in October 2024 by European Leagues, the umbrella group that represents the interests of Europe’s leading domestic leagues, and FIFPro, the global players’ union. They want the Brussels-based body to investigate FIFA for potential breaches of European Union competition law, namely the abuse of a dominant market position.

Surely this summer’s FIFA drama is all the grounds the commission needs to open an investigation?

“The European Commission moves at its own pace,” said Masters, pumping the brakes.

“The European Leagues team is in pretty regular dialogue with the people there and at some point a decision will be made. We’re not going to put pressure on that process today.”

And while we wait for that, whither FIFA?

“What needs to happen is for another candidate to emerge with a new, different offer that can unify the confederations,” said Masters.

“Part of that offer should be to look at governance reform. That’s not to say it should be Europe dictating that reform — that’s not what this should be about. But, given what’s happened, it would be right to look at those governance structures and the role of the president.”


New money, great returns

While we were on the subject of FIFA, one of our number asked if any exciting, new private-equity fund had ever offered him a large cheque for a small slice of the league’s future revenues.

“We’ve never had those discussions with anybody,” he said firmly.

Really?

“Perhaps we don’t give out the right signals,” he said. “Even during Covid, when people had big problems in front of them, we didn’t go near a solution like that. The Premier League model works very well. We have a very strong media rights business, we’re number one in that market, and there’s no need for us to access that sector.”

That does not mean the league is against any of its clubs bringing in new investment, though. On the contrary. Asked how he feels about the prospect of Amazon founder Jeff Bezos being involved with Liverpool, Masters said: “That is proof positive that people still look at the Premier League and think it’s a strong investment.

“It’s also a testament to the job (current owner Fenway Sports Group) has done. Think about the club they bought all those years ago, the position it was in then and the position it’s in now, the progress they’ve made and all the trophies they’ve won.”

Jeff Bezos is part of a consortium that has bought 38 per cent of Liverpool for $2.7bn (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Quantity, not quality? 

And Masters is right — nobody could accuse Premier League clubs, of all sizes, of not investing in new talent. No other league gets close to the Premier League’s net spend these days.

But that does not mean all the best players in the world play in the Premier League. Far from it. In fact, some might say almost none of the world’s best players play in the Premier League. Is that true? If so, is it a concern?

“I don’t think the Premier League has ever been led by stars — it’s the whole league offer, the competition,” said Masters.

“If this season has a title race, a race for European spots, a relegation battle and another few surprises along the way, that’s its inherent beauty. You never quite know what you’re going to get.

“It’s different in other leagues where they only have a couple of teams who can potentially win it, and they have star-studded line-ups. Of course, you’d like as many big names as you possibly can, but the Premier League has just under 50 per cent of the world’s top 100 players, so there is no shortage of quality within the league. And while we have a few big names leaving the stage, new stars will emerge.”

Fair points, all of them, but another of the Premier League’s great strengths was that it might not have been home to all of the world’s best players, but it was where the planet’s top coaches wanted to be. Is that still the case?

“I think you’ve got to give (the new managers) a chance,” he said.

“There are nine new managers and to get into a Premier League technical area you’ve got to be at the top of your profession. It’s a chance for the Premier League to look slightly different this season. One era finishes, another one starts.”


New deal or no deal

The English Football League will be hoping that sense of renewal applies to the topic of how English football shares its wealth. After all, the Premier League used to be known as Division One until the country’s biggest clubs realised that pay-TV channels were going to revolutionise sport and it would be nice if they got to keep more of that money for themselves.

Fair enough, you might think. That’s capitalism. All fine until you remember the Premier League remained connected to the rest of the game, with three teams coming up from the EFL each season and three teams going the other way.

Those broadcast billions do not belong solely to whichever 20 teams are in the top division in any given season. The Premier League has become a global sensation because it sits atop the world’s deepest and most vibrant professional football pyramid. That pyramid deserves a fair share of the credit and annual revenues.

So, how are talks going on between the Premier League and EFL to replace a financial distribution model that has been in place since 2019 and nobody thinks is fit for purpose anymore?

“Two weeks ago, our clubs unanimously approved a new proposal,” said Masters, encouragingly.

“It includes all the financial elements you’d expect: an increase in solidarity funding, a phased reduction in parachute payment and a whole bunch of other things.

“But we’ve agreed not to talk about it in public while we’re still negotiating how to make a deal work.”

Oh. And he meant it.

When asked if he was confident a deal can be done without needing the IFR’s involvement, he added: “We’re very much in favour of an industry-led solution and not having to use what could be a very damaging backstop process to find a resolution.

“I’m very optimistic. We think the proposal is fair to both sides.”


Any other business? 

By this point, we had entered added time and we could hear the whistles from the league’s media team at the back of the room. It was time to fire random questions at him, speed-dating style.

When are we going to scrap the domestic TV blackout on Saturday afternoons?

“It’s not just our decision,” he sidestepped. “It’s us, the EFL and FA, and we’re all backing it for the next three seasons. In about 12 to 18 months, we’ll think about whether we’ll continue that. It’s an all-football decision and it’s quite a big one. But it’s a decision for the future.”

The Premier League keeps taking teams to North America for summer friendlies. Have you given up on China?

“No, we’re looking at it for next summer,” he said. “Our Asian fans are very important to us. We may end up there next summer.”

Like Manchester City, Liverpool, Chelsea and the rest, the United Kingdom has a new gaffer in the dugout. What do you make of him?

“I haven’t spoken to (British Prime Minister and huge Everton fan Andy Burnham) since he’s taken over — he’s obviously a very busy man,” said Masters. “But we know he’s a big football fan, and he’s going to talk about football.

“But the Premier League is politically neutral; we have to get on with all governments and we think we can help. We will produce £33billion (in gross value added) over the next three years, with billions going to the exchequer. We support 110,000 jobs, all over the country, and we’re a fantastic global export, rooted in our communities.

“There’s so much good work that can be done with the whole of English football. We’re talking to the government about how we can help young people, how we can help with regional regeneration. We can be a real asset.”

And how about you, Richard? You have run the Premier League for seven years (which makes Burnham his sixth counterpart in No 10) — are you getting sick of our questions yet?

“It’s eight, actually. I include the interim year (in 2018),” he said, with a smile.

“No, I really enjoy it. It’s a privilege and opportunity to be involved in this incredible league.”

A positive note on which to finish and a good starting point for the new campaign. Good luck, everyone.

>

Continue Reading

Sports

Blue Jackets’ Elvis Merzlikins sidelined indefinitely following shoulder surgery

Published

on

Elvis Merzlikins stands in front of the net during a game against the Carolina Hurricanes in April.

Elvis Merzlikins first mentioned feeling pain in his shoulder last month. Jared C. Tilton / Getty Images

COLUMBUS, Ohio — The Columbus Blue Jackets may be without goaltender Elvis Merzlikins when the 2026-27 season starts.

Merzlikins, who complained to the club last month about discomfort in one of his shoulders, had surgery to fix the problem Monday, according to a team news release. The Blue Jackets said there is no established timetable for Merzlikins’ return.

“Elvis informed us a few weeks ago that he was experiencing some discomfort in his shoulder during his offseason workouts,” Blue Jackets GM Don Waddell said in the statement. “Following an MRI, it was determined that surgery was the best course of action.

“He’ll be evaluated again in a few weeks, at which time we’ll have a clearer idea on when he will be back on the ice.”

The Blue Jackets did not specify which procedure was done on the shoulder. The recovery time can vary dramatically depending on the procedure.

Columbus opens training camp Sept. 16, with the regular-season opener set for Oct. 1 against Buffalo.

Merzlikins lost the starter’s job to Jet Greaves last season, and is entering the 2026-27 season in the final year of a contract that pays him $5.4 million per season. If he’s sidelined, look for Pheonix Copley, who was signed as a free agent in early July, to play in support of Greaves.

Last season, Merzlikins went 14-11-3 with a 3.40 goals-against average and an .883 save percentage.

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition

Spot the pattern. Connect the terms

Find the hidden link between sports terms

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.