Connect with us

Tech

Laplace Intelligence red-teams robots and self-driving cars before they hit the real world

Published

on

If there’s one lesson the OpenAI-Hugging Face incident taught us, it’s that AI agents can be unpredictable. 

“Imagine if something like that happened in the physical world,” Howie Sun, CEO and co-founder of Laplace Intelligence, told TechCrunch. “AI agents are moving from computers into the real world, and we don’t really want physical AI to fail in the real world.”

Ann Arbor-based Laplace is building automated red-teaming — essentially, stress-testing a system by deliberately trying to make it fail — for robotics and physical AI. The company is betting that the only way to make sure physical AI is safe is to have AI test it.

“Our goal is to help companies discover and fix problems before deployment—and, over time, build a shared foundation of evidence that customers, insurers, and regulators can trust,” Sun said.

Laplace is one of 20 startups competing in Startup Battlefield, TechCrunch Disrupt’s three-day pitch competition in downtown San Francisco. It will present on the Startup Battlefield stage Monday afternoon, October 13.

Howie Sun, CEO, Laplace IntelligenceImage Credits:Laplace Intelligence

Sun, alongside his co-founder and chief scientist Henry Liu, founded Laplace a year ago out of the University of Michigan. Sun has spent the last eight years in academia researching how to challenge autonomous driving AI in simulation. In 2023, he and Liu — his then-PhD advisor — published a paper on the subject that made it onto the cover of the top scientific journal Nature. That’s when the calls started coming in from autonomous vehicle companies interested in implementing their ideas. 

“I realized that I wanted to build this and take it from purely academic research into a product that’s useful in the real world,” Sun said. 


Using their academic research as a base, Sun and Liu built Laplace, so named for “Laplace’s demon,” an 1814 thought experiment by French scholar Pierre-Simon Laplace that imagined that if you knew the exact state of everything in the universe, you could predict the future with total precision.

“We are essentially using simulation to predict the real world’s future,” Sun said. 

At the startup’s core is a high-fidelity simulation reconstructed from the real world, paired with an AI agent that constantly probes for weaknesses and failure points. The goal is to ensure that any physical AI — be it a robot, autonomous vehicle, or smart city solution — is safe in simulation before it’s deployed in the real world. 

The simulation environment is a post-trained version of Nvidia’s Cosmos, an AI world simulation platform, that’s grounded in the real world, allowing Laplace to reconstruct anything from an Arizona highway to a Paris pedestrian crossing. Simulations are generated by blending a mesh of different real-world information. A Google Street View image could serve as a reference from which an entire street is generated. But rather than generating something random, the simulator combines real-world map data to recreate an environment that’s true to scale. 

Developers can then use language prompts to change the setting in real time, like adding in afternoon traffic. Sun says Laplace pulls real-time traffic and congestion information from navigation providers like TomTom. 

Within Laplace’s simulations, not only the environment is simulated, but also the behavior of other actors. For example, during a demo, Sun directed the test agent vehicle to swerve into oncoming traffic. The car it would have hit — or driven through, as is common among some  generative world models — moved out of its way to avoid a collision. 

“It’s truly an interactive simulation environment,” Sun said. “Everyone is reacting to everything. …This is more like a world model with interactive participants.”

While the simulated environment is an important part of Laplace’s product, the real unique selling point is the AI agents the startup is developing to automatically design corner cases (tricky, rare scenarios that could trip up an AI system) moving the human further out of the loop. 

“They can design from the news, from police reports on collisions — all kinds of information to actively challenge the autonomous vehicles and other physical AI agents,” Sun said.

Henry Liu, chief scientist Laplace IntelligenceImage Credits:Laplace Intelligence

Today, autonomous vehicle developers mostly train an AI to handle edge cases using recorded footage that they then turn into a simulation, or by relying on humans to come up with new ideas and design them. While many AV companies have done what Laplace is pitching and started embracing AI to create edge cases for training — self-driving truck company Waabi comes to mind — the need for this kind of technology will really become apparent when we start placing generalized robots in the real world. 

“There’s less data on generalized robotics,” Sun said. “No one knows what the edge cases will be in the real world.”

Despite Sun and Liu coming from academia, with no shiny Silicon Valley tech company pedigrees, the two have managed to start generating revenue and even turn a modest profit. Most of the money is coming from autonomous driving use cases, with customers including Japanese trucking manufacturer Isuzu and Texas-based autonomous trucking firm Bot Auto. 

Nvidia is also a customer, says Sun. The two companies, alongside T-Mobile, are working together on a free smart city pilot for the City of San Jose to provide high-level traffic operations. Laplace is also in the early stages of working with partners building humanoid robotics for warehouses.  

Most of Laplace’s customer contracts are project-based today, and the company is working towards turning that into recurring revenue. The startup’s near-term goal — which it hopes will be aided by competing at Disrupt — is to raise funds and scale so it can compete with its rivals. 

Chief among its rivals is Applied Intuition, a buzzy late-stage startup that’s raised $1.2 billion to date at a $15 billion post-money valuation. Isuzu is also one Applied’s customers. 

Sun isn’t too worried. He believes Laplace’s core methodology of using AI to test AI is a “new paradigm that changes the testing of physical AI entirely,” turning it into a “dynamic interactive testing process.”

“That will be the biggest moat,” he said. 

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

>

Continue Reading

Tech

Niobia takes the guesswork out of some of tech’s most expensive mistakes

Published

on

San Francisco-based startup Niobia is betting big on a critical but often overlooked part of battery and chip making: helping engineers understand how and why things go wrong. Its AI software flags production defects and lets engineers ask a chatbot what caused them, aiming to deliver answers in minutes rather than days.

How it works broadly: The company’s customers place AI agents on their production lines to look for defects, then loop in human engineers to work out what might cause a product to fail. The agents run on self-contained GPUs mounted directly on manufacturing equipment, much like a sensor. They can spot pinhole-sized flaws such as scratches. Niobia’s AI also gathers all the data in one place so engineers can ask a chatbot what went wrong and dig deeper into the cause.

Speed is so critical because chips and batteries are some of the world’s most important products, while also increasingly in short supply. As manufacturers continue to develop and improve their technologies, things inevitably go awry during research and development. Engineers then spend days or longer figuring out a fix before they can restart production. Each flaw or mistake can prove costly — sometimes running into the millions of dollars — and set back manufacturing timelines.

Niobia co-founders Gaurav Jha and Harveen Kaur both have PhDs in chemistry and have worked at chipmakers and battery manufacturers, giving them firsthand experience with the challenges within the industry. In a call ahead of TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, where the company is a Battlefield finalist, Jha explained that while what Niobia does is specialized, it serves a multibillion-dollar market that includes some of the biggest battery and semiconductor makers today.

“It’s extremely niche; maybe people will never know about it,” said Jha, speaking of the battery and chip manufacturing market that his company aims to serve. “But it’s like behind the scenes, this is powering everything… we just don’t see it in the regular world.” 

“Every product around you, like glasses or shoes, slippers, wallets, and headphones — these processes touch every single part of it,” added Jha.

Niobia’s agents run on open-source models that the company trains further with battery and chip research and other data. That training is what lets them identify pinhole-sized defects. Jha said that Niobia chose open-source models largely because its customers don’t want their highly sensitive company information going into a public AI cloud where it might be used to train the model.


“None of our customers want their proprietary data to go to the cloud, even if we tell them it’s safe,” said Jha. The startup also outlines how it approaches cybersecurity, given the high-stakes race among adversarial nations to innovate in the battery and chip space. Niobia for instance lets its customers hold their own encryption keys so that the startup cannot decrypt the customers’ data.

Jha said that the company’s priority for now is to focus on three specialties, such as film coating, electroplating (which is coating a surface with metal using an electric current), and fluidized bed reaction (a chemical process where solid particles are suspended in a gas or liquid).

He said that the company also wants its technology to become more autonomous, with the eventual aim of building out a fully self-driving factory for its customers.

If you’re curious to learn more, Niobia will present on stage at TechCrunch Disrupt this afternoon in San Francisco. Join us to catch the company and the 19 startups against which it’s competing as part of our storied Startup Battlefield competition, happening today, Tuesday, through Thursday, October 15.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

>

Continue Reading

Tech

Flox Intelligence is building AI to keep wildlife away from trains, airports, and roads

Published

on

When I was eight, I remember our train to Mumbai ground to a halt with a great noise. When we started moving again, a good eight hours later, someone pointed out a mangled tail, of all things, hanging from a branch close to the tracks.

The train, you see, had apparently hit a wild bison at full speed, and the impact damaged the engine so badly that it had to be towed away for repairs. For a long time, I thought such things only happened in places like rural India, but I learned a few years ago that wildlife and infrastructure do not mix anywhere on the planet.

The FAA estimates that wildlife strikes have cost U.S. civil aviation about $272 million a year on average between 1990 and 2025. In France, the rail operator SNCF says wandering animals affect more than 8,000 trains across the country each year and are among its five leading causes of delays. In Brittany, 120 trains hit animals in 2023 alone, disrupting 660 services and causing more than 15,000 minutes of delays.

Reading about all that damage, to both infrastructure and animals, inspired Sara Nozkova (pictured above on the left) to develop a wildlife deterrent system that works differently from the sirens, lights, fences, falcons and culling traditionally used to keep animals away from roads, train tracks, airports and other infrastructure.

“I was convinced the answer was not a louder deterrent,” she told TechCrunch.

After spending 13 years working in transportation and autonomous vehicles, Nozkova had learned how quickly the systems we build to navigate roads and other controlled environments fail once nature enters the equation.

“We have taught machines to be brilliant, but only inside the environments we engineered for them,” she said. “Cities, factory lines, warehouses. Fixed geometry, known objects. Stepping outside into nature I saw firsthand how the same machines quickly go blind. Because nature is complex and always alive.”


So instead she joined the AI lab at KTH Royal Institute of Technology in Stockholm and started working on a system that could change its deterrent responses based on what an animal nearby is doing, and even which animal it is.

That work turned into Flox Intelligence, which spun out of KTH in 2020 and is one of the finalists at this year’s Startup Battlefield 200 at TechCrunch Disrupt. (The company pitched a panel of VC judges on Tuesday at Disrupt, which is taking place this year at Moscone West in San Francisco through Thursday, October 15.)

Flox makes edge devices that process data on-site rather than in the cloud. Like autonomous vehicles, they use perception systems to sense their surroundings, but theirs are trained on wildlife behavior. A motion sensor wakes the device when it detects movement, triggering a camera that uses on-device models to identify nearby animals. The device then emits a species-appropriate sound to scare them away.

Nozkova says the system learns from experience, too, and varies its responses so animals don’t get habituated to repeated signals.

The company currently sells battery-operated devices that can be mounted on poles, trees and other structures. It also offers a software platform that shows clients where the devices are deployed and what’s happening on the ground. The platform can also generate reports for regulatory compliance and for uses like biodiversity monitoring. The longer-term goal is to make the software portable enough to run on machines that work outside, including trains, cars and drones.

Nozkova says about 150 Flox devices are live in North America, Europe and Australia at sites including airfields and airport perimeters; road and rail corridors (especially fence ends and crossings along wildlife corridors); national parks; agricultural land; urban areas; mining sites; and critical infrastructure such as electrical substations.

The company sells edge units upfront, then charges an annual software and AI subscription after the first year. Flox also has OEM partnerships with companies that pay an annual fee to deploy its software on vehicles, like trains. Train manufacturer Alstom is one such partner.

The company expects to end 2026 with revenue of about $1.5 million, Nozkova said.

Unique as Flox’s product and approach is, the startup is not without competition. Robin Radar’s Scarecrow also uses species-specific distress calls to disperse birds and it records the activity, while iCHASE sells a system that detects birds with computer vision and targets them with a moving laser, adjusting its response as needed.

Nozkova says her moat is the breadth of the system and the data Flox has collected in the field, which she calls “ground truth on what actually makes a moose or a grizzly bear move safely.”

“Physical AI is walking out of the factory and into the messy, alive outdoors,” Nozkova says. “Every machine that operates outside — trains, trucks, drones, tractors, robots — will need to understand nature, and nature intelligence is the next layer of the perception stack. Almost nobody is building it.”

The company has raised about $5 million across pre-seed and seed rounds so far, with the seed round led by Unconventional Ventures and Tilia Impact Ventures. Co-investors across the rounds include GENIUS NY, Norrsken, Satgana and angel investors, Nozkova said.

The company is now opening a $10 million Series A, which would mostly go toward growing from about 150 devices to several thousand deployed units and extending the underlying system beyond its current wildlife use cases.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

>

Continue Reading

Tech

Rivian spinoff Mind Robotics hires former Ford EV chief Doug Field

Published

on

Doug Field has worked on EVs at Ford and Tesla, the not-so-secret car project at Apple, and was employee No. 1 at Segway. Now, the executive is turning his attention to Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe’s latest project: Mind Robotics.

Field has been hired at president of Mind Robotics, an industrial AI and robotics venture that spun out of Rivian last year. The news, shared on stage at Disrupt 2026, is another sign that Mind Robotics is getting ready to scale up its early operations just one year after its founding.

Scaringe will still be involved with Mind Robotics, but the day-to-day aspects of the business, including product, engineering, and operations will be handled by Field.

Mind Robotics, which has already amassed more than $1 billion in backing from Accel, Andreessen Horowitz, Eclipse, Kleiner Perkins and the venture arms of Volkswagen and Salesforce, is building a full stack for industrial manufacturing. The purpose-built robots will run on foundation models with an goal of automating industrial and manufacturing tasks at scale.

Unlike the humanoid-like robots being developed by Tesla and others, Scaringe says Mind Robotics won’t attempt to mimic all the biomechanics of a human. The startup is also using Rivian as “a live, high-volume manufacturing environment for model training and deployment,” with Rivian being Mind Robotics’ first customer.

“It’s incredibly exciting what’s happening in robotics and what we’re capable of doing today, when we think about the progress that’s happened on the hardware, modeling techniques, [and] bringing that together to develop robots that can actually be deployed at scale,” Scaringe said on the Disrupt stage.

Field left Ford in April after five years shaping the automaker’s electric vehicle and technology strategies. His departure was part of a wider reorganization of the automaker’s leadership. Prior to Ford, Field led Apple’s Project Titan, the electric, autonomous car project that was canceled in 2024. He also served as senior vice president of engineering at Tesla, where he oversaw development of the Model 3 and got the sedan through “production hell.”


“Integrating AI and robotics is one of the most important–and difficult–engineering challenges of our time,” Field said in a statement. “Mind has assembled an exceptional team and has a unique advantage: the ability to deploy and learn inside a real, high-volume factory from day one. I’m thrilled to join RJ in building a team, culture, and technology that will redefine what we can make in America.”

Mind Robotics is the second company that Scaringe spun out of Rivian, following Also, a micromobility play that’s starting with high-end e-bikes. Like with Field and Mind Robotics, Scaringe is involved as chairman at Also but has tapped someone to run the day-to-tay: Chris Yu, the former chief product officer of Specialized.

Mind Robotics and Also operate as standalone companies, but Rivian has minority stakes in both. The company reported owning about a third of each startup as of June 30, 2026.

When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. This doesn’t affect our editorial independence.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.