Connect with us

Sports

Switzerland rage after Breel Embolo red card decision: ‘It was a disaster’

Published

on

Switzerland midfielder Remo Freuler described the decision to use VAR to send off his team-mate Breel Embolo in its World Cup quarter-final loss against Argentina as a “disaster”, while team captain Grant Xhaka said the video reviews to adjudicate such offences can “kill” a game.

Just five minutes after Switzerland had drawn level with Argentina in the second half of the game in Kansas City, forward Embolo found himself shown a red card after new rules implemented for the World Cup saw him receive a second yellow card for diving — after the Video Assistant Referee had intervened to overturn a yellow card given to opponent Leandro Paredes.

At first glance, it appeared that Argentina midfielder Paredes had tripped Embolo, with Portuguese referee Joao Pinheiro pulling out a yellow card for the Argentinian.

The VAR team, which is headquartered at the International Broadcast Center in Dallas for every match, then intervened. Looking at multiple replays, which appeared to show there had not been any contact and Embolo had thrown himself to the ground, it was recommended that Pinheiro review the incident. As the images played out, it emerged that the referees were studying the replays for “mistaken identity” — i.e. that the wrong player had received a yellow card.

After review, Pinheiro withdrew the booking for Paredes and showed one instead to Embolo. Given the Swiss player had already been booked in the first half (for fouling Paredes, ironically), that meant a red followed.


What do the rules say?

Guidance from FIFA does not limit match officials to interpreting the ‘mistaken identity’ rule to players of the same team. The rules say that “if the referee penalises an offence but has clearly misidentified the player who committed that offence, only the identity of the offender can be reviewed.”

Under regulations brought in for the World Cup, the reviewable decisions and incidents now include mistaken identity when the referee shows a yellow or red card but clearly penalises the wrong player of either team. As such, Pinheiro was correct in reversing his original decision, leaving Embolo in tears and in need of consoling by team-mates.

The irony here is that if the referee had not shown a yellow card to Paredes, the incident could not have been reviewed on the merits of Embolo’s dive alone. It required a card to be shown to Paredes in order to trigger the protocol.


How Switzerland reacted

Switzerland’s midfielder Freuler, speaking to reporters after the game, was not happy at all with the refereeing decision that saw Embolo sent off in the 67th minute.

“It’s just a disaster,” he said. “I don’t know what this referee is doing here. I don’t know, I don’t understand why they call it for a situation like this, because there were many fouls, made also in the first half, maybe he has to also to call them for a yellow card. So I don’t understand. How can a VAR change a game with this situation?

Xhaka also believed the decision cost Switzerland the game, with his team having to abandon its game plan following the red card, playing the rest of normal time and the 30 minutes of extra time with 10 men.

Embolo being consoled by his teammates

Embolo (center) was emotional after his red card (Odd Andersen / AFP via Getty Images)

“We had a good start,” Xhaka said. “We conceded from the corner, but after that, in my opinion, you saw just Switzerland. We had the ball, we didn’t create a lot in the first half.

“They didn’t have anything else in the first half, just a corner goal. The second half was our game. We knew that step by step, we can take more risks.

“We took it, we scored on the pitch, we felt very good. We had more energy, we had more belief as well, and the red card changed everything. I think the red card changed our game plan, what we had from the beginning, which was very positive.

“If you have to lose because of one decision from the referee, it is painful. But it was his decision. It’s difficult to accept now after the game, because the dressing room was very quiet, disappointed, but if you are disappointed after playing against this Argentina team, it shows a big mentality for this team.”

Asked for his view of VAR’s expanded remit for these types of offences, Xhaka said: “The rules are the rules, and we can’t change the rules, but it’s a decision where you kill the game.

“It is my opinion. I don’t know what else he can do, but just don’t kill the game. I think that we were so good in the game inside. I believe that 11 against 11, we will have had them, but it is very difficult to find the right words after the game.”

>

Continue Reading

Sports

How to watch Brewers vs. Pirates: TV channel and streaming options for July 12

Published

on

The Pittsburgh Pirates aim to sweep the Milwaukee Brewers on Sunday at PNC Park, starting at 12:15 p.m. ET. Paul Skenes (7-8, 3.58 ERA) gets the start for the Pirates, who are 49-47 this season and fourth in the NL Central. Robert Gasser (2-3, 4.15 ERA) is starting for the Brewers, who are 59-36 and first in the NL Central.

How to watch Milwaukee Brewers vs. Pittsburgh Pirates

Brewers vs. Pirates odds

  • Favorite Moneyline: Pirates -130
  • Underdog Moneyline: Brewers +105
  • Total: 7.5
  • Total Over Odds: -115
  • Total Under Odds: -105

Injury reports

Pirates

Endy Rodriguez: 10 Day IL (Lower body), Oneil Cruz: 10 Day IL (Hand), Spencer Horwitz: 10 Day IL (Hamstring), Evan Sisk: 15 Day IL (Elbow), Wilber Dotel: 15 Day IL (Lat), Chris Devenski: 60 Day IL (Illness), Konnor Griffin: 60 Day IL (Finger)

Brewers

David Hamilton: 10 Day IL (Hamstring), Brandon Woodruff: 15 Day IL (Shoulder), Coleman Crow: 15 Day IL (Forearm), Carlos Rodriguez: 15 Day IL (Shoulder), Rob Zastryzny: 15 Day IL (Shoulder), Kyle Harrison: 15 Day IL (Forearm), Joel Kuhnel: 15 Day IL (Shoulder), D.L. Hall: 15 Day IL (Pectoral), Brian Fitzpatrick: 60 Day IL (Elbow), Angel Zerpa: 60 Day IL (Forearm), Brandon Lockridge: 60 Day IL (Knee), Quinn Priester: 60 Day IL (Wrist)

Stats to know

  • Bryan Reynolds is hitting for a .282 BA, .397 OBP and .477 SLG with a 22.2% strikeout rate and a 14.8% walk rate. His OPS is .874, which ranks 18th in MLB, and he has scored 67 runs. In 418 plate appearances, he has hit 14 home runs and driven in 58 runs. Reynolds has been crafty on the base paths, recording seven steals on seven attempts.
  • In 398 plate appearances, Brandon Lowe is hitting .246/.317/.490 with a .807 OPS. He has hit 21 long balls (12th in MLB), driven in 64 runs (9th in MLB) and scored 58 times.
  • Brice Turang has hit 13 home runs this season. He has also tallied 58 RBIs and has scored 65 runs. In 412 plate appearances, he has recorded a .266 BA, .359 OBP and .458 SLG with a 12.9% walk rate and a 25% strikeout rate. He has been effective on the base paths, recording 15 steals on 18 attempts.
  • In 342 plate appearances, Jake Bauers has hit 18 long balls, tallied 59 RBIs (19th in MLB) and scored 55 runs. He is batting .267/.371/.510 and has posted a 26% strikeout rate and a 13.5% walk rate. Bauers has recorded six steals on seven attempts.

This watch guide was created using technology provided by Data Skrive.

Betting/odds, ticketing and streaming links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication.

Photo: Jamie Squire, Ishika Samant, Scott Taetsch, Alika Jenner / Getty Images

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition Logo

Connections: Sports Edition

Spot the pattern. Connect the terms

Find the hidden link between sports terms

>

Continue Reading

Sports

McGregor vs Holloway 2: Paddy Pimblett, Michael Bisping and Islam Makhachev react to Conor McGregor’s injury

Published

on

Liverpool’s Paddy Pimblett, who beat Benoit Saint-Denis in just 52 seconds in the co-main event, was being interviewed when he saw McGregor’s fight waved off via a TV backstage.

“Oh my god, McGregor’s done already? He’s finished, the new boy is in town. I can become the face of the organisation now,” Pimblett said.

“You could call that the changing of the guard, I can be the new face of MMA now. I just got a finish in 52 seconds on the biggest card of the year.”

Some speculated that McGregor, who has one fight remaining on his UFC contract, may have carried an injury into the fight, but he posted on X to refute those claims.

“I had no injury/injuries going into the fight,” McGregor said.

“I was throwing kicks, planted and jumping, all throughout camp as well as backstage before the fight. This came out of nowhere.”

McGregor’s bout with Holloway was a rematch 13 years after the Irishman won by decision.

Their first meeting took place at featherweight but they stepped into the octagon as welterweights on Sunday.

UFC welterweight champion Islam Makhachev posted on X: “Conor beat Conor, congrats Max.”

>

Continue Reading

Sports

The Wimbledon final that will never be repeated: Pat Rafter, Goran Ivanišević and the rain

Published

on

THE ALL ENGLAND CLUB, London — In sports as in life, it is rare that something will categorically never happen again.

A Wimbledon men’s final held over to Monday from the tournament’s second Sunday because of rain, and therefore opened up to the public?

That will never happen again.

The construction of roofs on Centre Court and No. 1 Court, the two biggest stadiums at the All England Club in southwest London, means that even the wettest Wimbledon on record will be able to stay on schedule — and that the 2001 men’s singles final between Goran Ivanišević and Pat Rafter will forever have an untouchable place in tennis history.

The strangeness of the occasion, and the wild atmosphere provoked by something Wimbledon had never seen before, was a fitting environment for statistically the most unlikely champion in the tournament’s history. Goran Ivanišević, the Croatian world No. 125 and the only wild card to have won the event, finally lifted the trophy after losing in three previous finals, at a time when he was both wretchedly out of form and managing a shoulder injury.

For the man on the other side of the net, there is only one way to remember such a monumental, confounding occasion.

“Chaos. Total. Bloody. Chaos,” Pat Rafter, who was on the wrong end of Ivanišević’s miracle in the final, said of the 6-3, 3-6, 6-3, 2-6, 9-7 roller coaster during a video interview last year.

Australia’s Rafter was 28 at the time, a year younger than Ivanišević, and had also suffered previous Wimbledon heartbreak. He lost the 2000 final to Pete Sampras, having been up a set and 4-1 in the second-set tiebreak. By then, Rafter had won two U.S. Opens and had very briefly been the world No. 1, but for an Australian in the late 1990s and early 2000s, Wimbledon was seen as the Holy Grail — even more so than the Australian Open.

Temperamentally, Rafter couldn’t have been more different from the volatile Ivanišević. His vibe was very much laid-back Aussie surfer dude — an activity that takes up much of his time now — and he was known for his sportsmanship and ability not to take life or himself too seriously.

Where Rafter was similar to Ivanišević was how popular he was at Wimbledon, and for the 2001 final, he had an army of Australian fans wearing green and gold cheering him on. There were even members of his country’s men’s cricket team in attendance, taking a break from an Ashes series against England.

Ivanišević had plenty of neutrals on side, as well as a host of fans waving Croatian flags.

In a conversation at Wimbledon last year, both men recalled the thrumming atmosphere.

“Probably the best ever in history,” Ivanišević said.

The noise was deafening throughout, with cheers between first and second serves and even during points, as well as soccer-style chants for the players. Because of incessant rain that meant Ivanišević’s semifinal against Tim Henman took three days and wasn’t completed until Sunday, the final was played on Monday with 10,000 tickets available on a first-come, first-served basis to anyone who could pitch up to Wimbledon and get in an overnight queue on the Sunday night.

This reporter was one of the people in that queue, aged 14. My brother, a friend and I packed a tent and got a lift from my dad to the All England Club pretty much as soon as the ticketing information was announced on television.

Even objectively speaking, there will never be a final like Ivanišević against Rafter. A crowd filled almost exclusively with people who were desperate to be there and had camped overnight for the privilege of watching the most unlikely champion in the tournament’s history.

Why do players wear white at Wimbledon?

Ava Wallace and Madison Eades

Ivanišević always wore his heart on his sleeve, and so the Wimbledon supporters knew just how crushed he’d been by his three previous final losses. First, he was beaten in five sets in 1992 by Andre Agassi, who somehow won from the baseline in an era when just about everyone served and volleyed on grass.

Two years later, Ivanišević lost to Sampras in three sets, when he was bageled 6-0 in the third after losing the first two sets on tiebreaks.

Then came the most devastating of the three — losing to Sampras again in 1998, this time in five sets. Ivanišević couldn’t contain his despair during the trophy presentation, and felt like his chance might have gone forever.

It certainly seemed that way in 2001. Ivanišević’s ranking plummeted to outside the world’s top 100 thanks to an ongoing shoulder injury. The All England Club still gave him a wild card into Wimbledon, but Ivanišević lost 6-3, 6-4 to the world No. 194 Cristiano Caratti at Queen’s, the annual pre-Wimbledon tuneup, in what he considers to be one of the worst performances of his career.

He was so down that the following week, he changed his racket. “Usually it takes a couple of months trying, but I said to myself, ‘I cannot play worse. It is impossible, so why not?’ ” Ivanišević told The Times of London last month.

“To be honest, through to this day, if you ask me what happened (at Wimbledon) I cannot explain. It’s not normal.”

Goran Ivanišević on his knees on a grass tennis court in tears.

Goran Ivanišević had lost this three previous Wimbledon finals. (Simon M Bruty / Anychance via Getty Images)

Ivanišević was a 150-1 outsider to win the tournament, but his wickedly effective lefty serve always gave him a chance on grass, especially in the dying embers of the period when the conditions were still quick enough to serve-and-volley every point.

Propelled by that serve and a sense of destiny, he started to work his way through the draw, beating former and future Grand Slam champions Carlos Moyá and Andy Roddick in the second and third round, before taking out home hope and former world No. 4 Greg Rusedski in the fourth round.

“The All England Club shouldn’t have given him a wild card because he killed British hopes,” Rusedski joked in a mixed zone interview at Wimbledon this week.

And however much destiny may have been at work, Ivanišević was leaving nothing to chance. He had brought his own priest, Father Josip, to Wimbledon five years earlier, and was so superstitious that he changed nothing about his routine throughout the 2001 tournament — including watching the BBC preschoolers’ show “Teletubbies” every day.

“When I saw this show, ‘Teletubbies’, I started to laugh so much and I watched for 45 minutes,” Ivanišević said to Rafter last year. “I was like, ‘Wow.’ And I felt good. So I had to watch every day.”

In the video interview, Rafter said of hearing this: “I was just sitting there going, ‘My God, what is wrong with you? You are batshit crazy. You seriously are.

Rafter also found it funny that when he and Ivanišević met, his opponent from more than two decades earlier could remember everything about the tournament, whereas for him, apart from the final, his memories were very hazy. That might partly be explained by his relatively serene path to facing Ivanišević, apart from the semifinals, when Agassi served for the match but Rafter prevailed 8-6 in the fifth.

Despite it being a thriller, that semifinal was soon overshadowed by the three-day epic between Ivanišević and Henman that followed. Like the eventual finalists, Henman had endured more than his fair share of nearly moments at Wimbledon. This was his third semifinal, and with seven-time champion and the winner of he previous four editions Pete Sampras out of the way, it was the best opportunity he’d ever had. Sampras had lost in the fourth round to a 19-year-old called Roger Federer, who in turn was beaten by Henman in the quarters.

Ivanišević’s victory over Henman is almost as famous as the final. After losing the first set, Henman, who had won their four previous meetings, won the second and third. The latter was a 15-minute 6-0 blitz.

Henman looked well on his way to the final, but leading 2-1 on serve in the fourth, the rain began to fall and Ivanišević earned a reprieve. Asked last month on “Served”, Andy Roddick’s podcast, whether he thought he’d have won had it not rained, Henman deadpanned: “I don’t think, I know.”

When play resumed on the Saturday, Ivanišević pinched the tiebreak 7-5, and the match was stopped again with him leading 3-2 on serve in the fifth. Soon after the Sunday resumption, Ivanišević broke for 5-3 and that was all he needed to finally end the match almost 48 hours after it had started. He felt that a higher power was on his side. “God wants me to win,” Ivanišević said after the match. “He sent the rain on Friday.”

Goran Ivanišević reacts as Pat Rafter (back to camera) stretches for a volley on a grass tennis court.

Goran Ivanišević and Pat Rafter found themselves eyeball to eyeball at the net. (David Ashdown / Getty Images)

While Ivanišević slugged it out for three days on Centre Court, Rafter was chilling out, watching cricket and rugby union, in which Australia were up against the British and Irish Lions.

It was unreserved seating on Centre Court, so when the gates opened the fans ran in and picked the best seats available. A friend of this reporter in attendance could run the 100 meters in 11 seconds, so off he went to snag a perfect view, opposite the umpire’s chair.

After all the buildup, Rafter started nervously and was broken in his first service game. “I wasn’t really prepared,” Rafter said. “I mean maybe Goran’s a bit crazier. Well, he certainly is crazier than me. But in terms of him dealing with craziness, he handled it a lot better. But there are moments in sport which you’re part of that are pretty cool.”

After losing the first set, Rafter rebounded to take the second, and he did likewise in the fourth after Ivanišević had won the third. Both men have been fairly down on the quality of the match, but it was more a case that it wasn’t until the fifth set that both played well at the same time.

Going into the fifth set, Rafter had all the momentum and Ivanišević appeared to be in meltdown. When a second serve of his was called out to go down 4-2 in the fourth — this was pre-electronic line calling, and even the famous challenge system — Ivanišević raged at the umpire and kicked the net in frustration. He’d spoken earlier in the tournament of having three personalities: “Good Goran”, “Bad Goran” and “Emergency Goran”, to mediate between the two.

“You had dropped your bundle a little bit,” was how Rafter described that implosion to Ivanišević last year.

“I was hoping that was a really big turning point. Because you were someone that could go off the rails a little bit and that momentum swing was with me.

“But you stuck in there. I mean, you hung tough.”

“I knew, ‘OK, you have to stay calm. This is your last chance. OK, you lose the set, it’s finished. Now you have to focus on the fifth set,’” Ivanišević said.

The final set went with serve all the way up until Ivanišević was serving to stay in the match for a third time, down 7-6. When Rafter got to 0-30, he was two points from the title, with the crowd getting louder and louder, and screaming after and during every point. His memory from the rest of the tournament may be limited, but Rafter remembers this game perfectly.

“Oh mate,” he said in the video interview.

“It’s not the last game I think about, it was the one at 7-6. He had two second serves from 0-30 and he went big lefty kicker out wide on the first one, and I went, ‘Bloody hell.’ And then the second one, he hits the line down the middle on the second serve.

“I was there for both, but they sort of checked on me, he had an easy volley, then I missed a return. I was like, ‘Goran, you’re inches away from being down 15-40 or 0-40.’

“But he took it on. So you have got to take your hat off to him. He showed some serious balls and he went to some really big plays. It was those Sliding Doors moments, I had the wrong grip and things like that and he picked the right way, so good on him.”

Ivanišević held on, and broke in the next game for 8-7, giving him the chance to serve for a Grand Slam title for the first time in his career. What followed was one of the nerviest games ever in a major final.

By the end, Ivanišević was so emotional that he was fighting back tears as he went to serve. He even slipped when serving in the first point of the game, before snatching at a volley that was going out, double-faulting and then hitting a second serve ace.

When finally up championship point, he had tears in his eyes and prayed as he walked back to the baseline and asked to use the same ball he’d just served two aces with.

Then he double-faulted again.

He earned a second one.

He double-faulted again.

“One can only guess at the turmoil raging in the mind of Goran Ivanišević at this moment,” John Barrett said in commentary for the BBC.

Before the third, Ivanišević bent down and said another prayer, only for Rafter to then hoist up an inch-perfect backhand lob.

“I hit maybe one of the best volleys of the whole match and you hit probably the best lob,” Ivanišević told Rafter last year. “And I’m watching the ball and I’m saying, ‘No, no, this is not happening.’”

On the fourth match point, the ever-superstitious Ivanišević had a sudden thought. “I was thinking this is the sign,” he said to Rafter last year. “Fourth final, fourth match point. In that moment, when I saw the ball in the net, it was unreal.”

The pair embraced at the net, with Ivanišević almost collapsing with emotional exhaustion, as players hugged and Rafter ruffled his hair fondly. A weeping Ivanišević clambered into the crowd to embrace his father and the rest of his team.

It was easy to assume that because of how differently they were wired emotionally that the defeat wouldn’t hurt Rafter as much as it would have done Ivanišević. But it was still a crushing loss for him to process.

“To me, Wimbledon’s the greatest event there is. I wanted to be part of that winning circle. So yeah, it meant a lot to me,” he said during the interview, adding that he no longer thought about the final.

“Not now,” he said, before saying with a smile: “It took about 20 years, but not now.”

Goran Ivanišević looks emotional as he stands next to Pat Rafter with a crowd behind them in soft focus. Rafter is smiling.

Goran Ivanišević and Pat Rafter’s 2001 Wimbledon final has gone down in tennis history. (Bongarts / Getty Images)

The defeat was the beginning of the end for Rafter, and after persistent injuries, he didn’t play again after 2001. He formally retired at the start of 2003, and the 2001 final was his last match at Wimbledon. His meet-up with Ivanišević is the only time he’s been back since.

Rafter spent the night as he always did after a Grand Slam final, putting a load of money behind the bar for whoever wanted to join. So there he was with a few hundred people at the Dog and Fox in Wimbledon Village.

“I was dancing and cheering with everyone and singing songs, and all the Aussies and everyone’s s–––faced drunk and laughing. Then you finish up there and you make your way home. I mean, what are you gonna do?”

Ivanišević meanwhile headed back to Croatia for one of the all-time homecomings. Nearly 200,000 people flooded the streets of Split to celebrate his victory.

Injuries meant he didn’t return to Wimbledon until 2004, winning a couple of matches before losing in the third round to 2002 champion Lleyton Hewitt.

He’s since remained involved in tennis, including coaching compatriot Marin Čilić to the U.S. Open title and then Novak Djokovic to 12 Grand Slams. He is currently working with exciting young Frenchman Arthur Fils.

Rafter by contrast has stayed away, save for a role as a vice-captain at the Laver Cup last year, which he began last year and will reprise in September.

It’s tough to get him away from the waves of Broken Head, south of Byron Bay, on the Australian east coast.

“My local beach is a few minutes’ drive away, so I surf there, come back to do a bit of work on the property and then play a bit of padel. Life’s good, mate,” he said.

Still, for both men, nothing will ever top that frenzied day in July a quarter of a century ago.

>

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.